logo
Hopes for Fed rate cuts keep US Treasury yield views low ahead of supply deluge

Hopes for Fed rate cuts keep US Treasury yield views low ahead of supply deluge

Reutersa day ago

BENGALURU, June 11 (Reuters) - U.S. Treasury yields are set to decline further according to bond strategists who are clinging to expectations the Federal Reserve resumes cutting interest rates after pausing for more than half a year even as dealers are set to underwrite a deluge of new supply.
A slight majority now expect another sell-off in longer-dated bonds, the maturities most at risk, by the end of this month.
Concerns that President Donald Trump's tax-cut and spending bill will add trillions of dollars to an already-staggering $36.2 trillion debt pile by 2034, along with tariff brinkmanship already have many holders of U.S. assets scrambling for the exit.
The rising "term premium" – what investors demand as compensation for holding longer-dated debt – leaves the market more vulnerable, particularly among foreign investors, ahead of upcoming Treasury bond auctions.
"The amount of debt we need to issue keeps rising and there doesn't appear to be anyone in Washington on either side that really has a plan to bring down deficits and address our fiscal situation," said Collin Martin, fixed income strategist, Schwab Center for Financial Research.
"That'll weigh on the long end of the curve where we need to see yields rise a bit to attract that marginal buyer."
Global sovereign bond yields have mostly risen in tandem over the past two months. A rapid sell-off in benchmark U.S. 10-year Treasuries in April pushed the yield up around 60 basis points.
That yield, which rises when prices fall, has since steadied, oscillating around 4.50%.
Median forecasts from nearly 50 bond strategists in a June 6-11 Reuters survey, most from dealers and sell-side firms, predicted the 10-year yield would decline a modest 13 bps to 4.35% in three months and to 4.29% in six from its current 4.48%.
Despite predicting a decline, more than half upgraded their forecasts from a May survey with many flagging the risk of yields moving higher.
"The 10-year will probably trade range-bound for a while between 4-4.50% and maybe even rise a little bit further, particularly given deficit concerns. The yield curve should continue to steepen as short-term yields drift gradually lower as the Fed cuts rates one or two more times by year-end," Schwab's Martin added.
The more interest rate-sensitive 2-year yield was forecast to decline a slightly steeper 17 bps to 3.85% in three months and to 3.73% by end-November, the survey showed.
Most economists polled by Reuters predict two or fewer rate cuts this year while rate futures are currently pricing two.
An ongoing auction for three-year Treasury notes has been met with somewhat tepid demand though markets will be paying closer attention to sales of longer-dated 10- and 30-year bonds this week.
"Given recent market behavior and the pressure we've seen on yields, it seems the long end of the yield curve is most susceptible to a supply-demand imbalance leading to higher rates," said Mark Heppenstall, chief investment officer at Penn Mutual Asset Management.
"There has been some disruption at the long end of the curve and the 30-year Treasury bond supply is the biggest question mark for the week in light of all the supply that is hitting. But that isn't to say threes and 10s are going to be necessarily easy either."
A Reuters survey of foreign exchange strategists conducted last week showed a near-90% majority expecting a decline in demand for dollar-denominated assets this year with Europe widely slated to be the biggest beneficiary.
"On the bond side European investors who are looking at the U.S. market would normally hedge currency risk, but that's become very expensive. So on a hedged basis, Treasuries are just not very attractive to European investors anymore," said Chris Iggo, CIO of AXA IM Core, AXA Investment Managers.
"There's been a lot of talk about defence spending and infrastructure but you know 'Show me the money!' - we haven't really seen the opportunity set increased massively just yet."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

ADM sets off 'frenzy' in US soybean market ahead of new biofuel blend rule
ADM sets off 'frenzy' in US soybean market ahead of new biofuel blend rule

Reuters

time16 minutes ago

  • Reuters

ADM sets off 'frenzy' in US soybean market ahead of new biofuel blend rule

CHICAGO, June 12 (Reuters) - Archer-Daniels-Midland (ADM.N), opens new tab, a major U.S. soybean crusher and biofuel producer, slashed its bids to buy the oilseed this week ahead of an expected Trump administration announcement on biofuel blending requirements, a primary driver of demand for soybean oil. Processors such as Chicago-based ADM have been waiting for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's decision on blending requirements for months as they grapple with slumping crush margins and abundant soybean stocks. Reuters reported on Thursday that the EPA is expected to propose blending requirements below industry recommendations on Friday, leading to lower-than-expected demand for soyoil to be used in biofuels. ADM said in an emailed statement to Reuters on Thursday that it does not have insight around the pending blending announcement beyond publicly available information and that it independently sets its basis bids, which is the difference between futures and a local cash price to take possession of the grain immediately. The company on Wednesday rolled its cash basis bid at its flagship Decatur, Illinois, facility to 20 cents below the Chicago Board of Trade November soybean futures price from 22 cents over July futures . The roll to November futures, which closed at a 15-cent discount to July on Thursday, lowered the local cash price by about 60 cents a bushel, representing an unusually sharp 6.5% drop in the price offered to farmers. ADM also rolled basis bids at its other crushing facilities, and some rival processors, including Cargill, followed ADM on Thursday. Other processors kept their basis bids against the July futures contract, but lowered basis values by up to 15 cents. "ADM Decatur put the bean market in a frenzy," agriculture trading company John Stewart and Associates said in a note. Falling basis values reflect expectations for a large autumn harvest and weak demand that has eroded processing margins for companies that crush beans into soymeal livestock feed and soyoil used for cooking and producing biofuels. Crush margins have struggled as a recent jump in U.S. processing capacity has swelled available supplies of meal and oil and pressured prices for the soy products. Tariff worries and unclear U.S. biofuels policies have stoked further unease among crushers and biofuel makers, and some biodiesel producers have scaled back or idled plants. ADM said in April it would permanently close a South Carolina soybean processing plant to cut costs. "Cash crush margins stink, and there is a bunch of downtime scheduled for July," said Charlie Sernatinger, executive vice president for Marex Capital Markets. Diana Klemme, vice president of Grain Service Corp in Atlanta, which serves agricultural hedgers in the futures markets, sent an alert to customers after seeing ADM's bid adjustments. She said that she had never seen a move to new-crop basis levels in June in more than 50 years in the grain business. "I said check your markets carefully because ADM just dropped all their bids 40-75 cents a bushel and went to new-crop values," Klemme said. The November futures contract represents the autumn harvest price, or the new crop. Farmers have been reluctant to sell crops to processors because they want higher prices, while processors avoided raising bids to protect their thin margins.

It might be tempting to put 401(k) contributions on hold, but sticking with it is a better strategy
It might be tempting to put 401(k) contributions on hold, but sticking with it is a better strategy

The Independent

time23 minutes ago

  • The Independent

It might be tempting to put 401(k) contributions on hold, but sticking with it is a better strategy

Amid this year's market turmoil, I've heard investors wonder if they should hit pause on 401(k) contributions until things settle down. Though this approach sounds tempting, it's better to stick with your investment strategy instead of waiting for conditions to improve. Running the numbers To test how a 'wait and see' approach would have fared compared with continuing to invest, I looked at four different market downturns of the 21st century. In each case, I looked at results under two different scenarios: an investor who started saving $500 per month and continued to do so throughout downturns, and another investor who stopped saving until the market started to improve. I assumed all contributions were invested in stocks. (In the first four cases below, I assumed that contributions were only paused during the bear market in question and then resumed for all the periods that followed.) Case 1: March 2000–October 2002 Stocks suffered cumulative losses of about 33% from early 2000 through October 2002. But an investor who started investing $500 per month in March 2000 and kept doing that even throughout the turmoil would have about $700,000 as of March 31, 2025. The 'wait and see' investor, on the other hand, would have about $573,000. Case 2: October 2007–February 2009 The market downturn in 2008 was the second-worst calendar year for equity investors in recent market history. An investor who started investing $500 per month in October 2007 and continued making monthly investments would have about $360,000 as of March 31, 2025. An investor who paused contributions until March 2009 would have about $307,000 as of the same date. Case 3: February and March 2020 The covid-19-driven market downturn led broad stock market indexes to shed about 34% of their value from Feb. 19, 2020. But after this sharp downturn, the rebound was even more impressive, with stocks posting gains of 28.7% during 2021. As a result, the 'keep buying' investor would have still ended slightly ahead by March 2025, even after suffering through market downturns in 2022 and early 2025. Case 4: January 2022–October 2022 The 2022 market reversal was a sharp reaction to 2021's unexpected spike in inflation, followed by a series of aggressive interest-rate hikes. As a result, the Morningstar US Market Index lost about 19% from January through October of that year. But thanks to the market's dramatic rebound, the 'keep buying' investor would have ended about $7,000 ahead by March 2025. Case 5: January 2000–March 2025 The differences are even more dramatic over a longer period. For this analysis, I assumed that an investor started contributions of $500 per month in January 2000, paused during each of the four above downturns, and then resumed contributions after the market had bottomed out. But even in this seemingly ideal scenario, consistent contributions won out. The consistent 401(k) contributor ended up nearly $200,000 ahead of the stop-and-start investor. The reason? Consistent contributions meant there were more dollars around to benefit when the market rebounded, while hitting pause on contributions meant the opposite. And the impact compounds over time. The 'wait and see' investor would have skipped out on 61 months' worth of contributions for a total of $30,500 but ended with a balance about $184,000 lower than the 'keep buying' approach. Why retirement savers shouldn't give up These examples make a strong case for sticking with the plan, even during a bear market. But this analysis probably overstates the results for 'wait and see' investors because it assumes that investors somehow knew when the market would start recovering. Not only is it tough to get the timing right for a market recovery, but keeping money on the sidelines means betting against the odds. Statistically speaking, the market goes up more than it goes down. Watching a 401(k) lose money isn't fun to live through, but things eventually turn around.

Trump: I'm surprised Elon ever endorsed me
Trump: I'm surprised Elon ever endorsed me

Telegraph

time35 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Trump: I'm surprised Elon ever endorsed me

Donald Trump said he was 'amazed' that Elon Musk ever endorsed him because of his long-held commitment to demolishing the 'electric vehicle mandate'. The world's most powerful men entered a war of words trading insults from their respective social media platforms in an explosive row over Mr Trump's flagship spending bill. Mr Musk, who has since apologised for his insults, called for the president to be impeached and accused the president of being in the Epstein files. 'We're going to abolish the EV mandate, and Elon still endorsed me. Because, honestly, he never, ever spoke to me about that,' Mr Trump said as he signed a measure blocking California's first-in-the-nation rule banning the sale of new gas-powered cars by 2035. 'And I used to say, 'I'm amazed that he's endorsing me, because that can't be good for him.' 'I once asked him about it. 'You never talked to me about that'. He said, 'Well, as long as it's happening to everybody, I'll be able to compete'. It's a very interesting answer.' 'Now we know why Elon doesn't like me so much,' Mr Trump joked. 'Which he does, actually, he does. And he never had a problem.' The bill signed by Mr Trump which Congress approved last month, aims to quash the country's most aggressive attempt to phase out gas-powered cars. It will also kill rules that phase out the sale of medium and heavy-duty diesel vehicles and cut tailpipe emissions from trucks. It is the latest in an ongoing battle between the Trump administration and Gavin Newsom, California's Governor, over everything from tariffs to the rights of LGBTQ+ youth and funding for electric vehicle chargers. The president and Mr Newsom have clashed over Mr Trump's move to deploy troops to Los Angeles in response to immigration protests. California, which has some of the nation's worst air pollution, has been able to seek waivers for decades from the Environmental Protection Agency, allowing it to adopt stricter emissions standards than the federal government. In his first term, Trump revoked California's ability to enforce its standards, but Joe Biden reinstated it in 2022. Mr Trump has not yet sought to revoke it again. 'He [Musk] said; 'as long as I'm on the same plan as everybody else, we're going to do good. We make a better product',' Mr Trump added. 'I said, 'That's very cool. That's very good'. That was my answer. After that, he got a little bit strange, but I don't know why.' Mr Musk apologised to Mr Trump after a phone call with JD Vance, the US vice-president, following their explosive fallout. The details of the truce between the two men emerged after Mr Musk said publicly on Wednesday that he 'regretted' writing inflammatory posts about the president on social media. In a podcast episode released the day after the feud erupted, Mr Vance said: 'I hope that eventually Elon comes back into the fold. Maybe that's not possible now because he's gone so nuclear – but I hope it is.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store