Electric car RUCs coming for Australia
Federal Treasurer Jim Chalmers has met with the transport and infrastructure industries to propose the RUC plan, and organise a timeline for its implementation.
Once up and running, all electric cars will pay a tax based on distance travelled, or at least that is the plan.
Currently, the government adds a 52c fuel excise at the pump, with the sum aimed at maintaining and improving roads.
However, BEVs are exempt on account of not needing fossil fuels.
So a road-user charge would mean owners of non-ICE vehicles will also contribute to ongoing road maintenance.
The fine details of the tax have yet to be ironed out. It is unclear whether rural EV owners will pay less than urban dwellers.
Victorian Treasurer Tim Pallas said: 'You've got to be conscious of the fact that there are areas that will be disadvantaged by a purist model of road use…so you have to make allowances for that,' according to a report in the Australian.
Whatever happens, the new tax looks to be a while away. Chalmers is suggesting it won't happen until 2028.
Victoria tried to introduce a RUC system for EVs and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) in mid-2021. However, only the Federal Government has the power to impose such a charge so it was scrapped.
The NSW Government wants to implement a similar system from July 1, 2027 but again it would not be enforceable unless adopted nationwide.
Whether Australia follows New Zealand in implementing a road-user charge system that includes all light vehicles is unclear. No country or state has yet introduced a scheme where all powertrain types pay RUCs.
More information on the Australian plan will be announced soon.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
an hour ago
- Otago Daily Times
Shadows over netball's place in the sun
Netball has long had a special place for New Zealanders. It has been the number one women's team sport in both interest and participation. Its stars, outside of Olympic Games heroes, often represented the pinnacle of sporting achievement for female sport. Netball legends, including Dunedin's former New Zealand representative and revered coach Lois Muir, have long been admired and celebrated. Showdowns against Australia were eagerly anticipated. A broad cross-section of sporting fans recognised the team and its players. Viewership during the heyday of World Championship and Commonwealth Games finals was immense. Yet, much has and is changing, at least at the elite level. The domestic netball competition once commanded high fees for broadcast rights. These were sold to Sky, both a blessing and a curse. The money enabled the players to be paid salaries and boosted professionalism but, because the games were on a subscription service, much of the population was excluded. Children had fewer opportunities to see potential heroes in action. Netball faded a little from the limelight. Netball's appeal to broadcasters has waned, and in recent months it has struggled to secure a broadcast partner. While TVNZ 1 will now show games live and on demand, reports suggest Netball New Zealand had to pay for the privilege. This year, the domestic competition was shortened to reduce costs. Its format for next season remains uncertain. Meanwhile, top players are heading overseas in search of better financial rewards. Superstar Grace Nweke left for Australia this year, initially sacrificing her eligibility to represent New Zealand. Unable to offer competitive salaries, Netball NZ has backtracked, allowing certain players, including Nweke, to depart while retaining Silver Fern eligibility. The criteria for this dispensation remain undisclosed. Several players are heading overseas, including Southern Steel co-captain Kate Heffernan. Who can blame them, when top players might earn $120,000 in Australia compared to just $60,000 in New Zealand? Even that figure is uncertain, with pay cuts expected next year, and many players earning significantly less. Next year, the televised league will also lack the draw of its 10 or so most recognised netballers, weakening its appeal. On the other hand, the presence of many of them in the Australian league could offer a new platform for New Zealand fans to follow the sport Netball might go the way of basketball, football and rugby league, with one or two New Zealand teams competing in Australia. That would be a long way from the days when the two countries shared a competition with the same number of teams. Premier netball is shifting from professional to semi-professional, and perhaps even amateur. Unlike rugby or cricket, it lacks a male counterpart to help underpin professional structures. Unlike football, it lacks international clout and the revenue generated by World Cups. And unlike basketball, it is not a global sport offering pathways such as US college scholarships. Viewers now have compelling alternatives in women's rugby, rugby league, football, and cricket, most of which carry greater overall clout. These sports are also drawing athletic talent that once gravitated toward netball. As a result, netball's standards are likely to decline, and New Zealand may struggle to consistently reclaim a top-two global ranking. Netball also faces intensified competition for commercial interest and sponsorship. The good news is the enduring strength at the community level. It continues to benefit from dedicated volunteers and, particularly in the South, capable development officers. Southland, of course, remains the standout region for netball support. Netball New Zealand's registered player numbers rose from about 120,000 in 2024 to about 145,000 last year. However, there may have been a decline in secondary school participation. Basketball and volleyball have grown in popularity. Indoor team sports have growing costs and organisational advantages over those based on fields. Volleyball demonstrates that a high profile is not necessary to thrive. Netball's deep roots in New Zealand society will serve it well in the challenging times ahead.
Techday NZ
4 hours ago
- Techday NZ
BeyondTrust cloud security completes IRAP PROTECTED review by CyberCX
BeyondTrust has announced that four of its security solutions have completed an Information Security Registered Assessors Program (IRAP) assessment at the PROTECTED classification level through a review conducted by CyberCX. The IRAP assessment, required by Australian government departments before adopting external security platforms, was conducted in line with Phase 1A of the Australian Cyber Security Centre's (ACSC) Cloud Assessment and Authorisation Framework. The assessment covered compliance against the controls set out in the March 2025 version of the Australian Information Security Manual (ISM). Four BeyondTrust solutions were included in the assessment: Endpoint Privilege Management, Password Safe, Privileged Remote Access, and Remote Support. The assessment process involved a documentation review and technical configuration checks by CyberCX to ensure operational effectiveness at the PROTECTED classification level. This enables government agencies and public sector organisations to make risk-informed decisions about cloud adoption and the use of BeyondTrust's offerings. The IRAP program is designed to provide assurance that vendor solutions meet strict cybersecurity control requirements for government information that needs protection at higher sensitivity levels. It allows departments to evaluate both the security posture and the compliance of external solutions prior to deployment in their environments. The assessment period began in March 2025 and was completed in July 2025. CyberCX conducted a technical and procedural evaluation to confirm BeyondTrust's alignment with IRAP and Australian ISM requirements. This verification included an examination of how the company's solutions address the cloud controls matrix, which is instrumental for agencies to assess their own risk when using Software as a Service (SaaS) products and platforms for sensitive information. Roshi Balendran, Regional Sales Director at BeyondTrust, said the successful assessment enhances BeyondTrust's capacity to serve the public sector and commercial enterprises handling data at the PROTECTED level. "We are delighted to have successfully completed the IRAP assessment, which now allows BeyondTrust to expand our ability to work with both public sector organisations and commercial businesses that require information to be stored, processed, and communicated at the 'Protected' classification level," said Roshi Balendran. "The IRAP assessment reflects our commitment to our Australian government customers in providing them with industry-leading identity security solutions that help to secure their Paths to Privilege." Balendran also noted the effect on the company's partners in Australia, specifically referencing potential benefits to the broader market and public sector cyber defences. "In addition, our Australian channel partners also now have more market opportunities to strengthen the cyber defences of Australian government agencies with a suite of BeyondTrust identity security solutions, which facilitate faster and more informed decision-making processes," Balendran added. BeyondTrust stated that details of the IRAP assessment are available for customers to review as part of their own due diligence when considering the company's solutions for adoption. The IRAP assessment and the associated compliance reporting are aimed at helping public sector organisations adopt cloud-based security solutions with confidence that they have undergone rigorous third-party evaluation, confirming alignment with the Australian Government's standards for the protection of sensitive information. Follow us on: Share on:
1News
12 hours ago
- 1News
US tax adviser conned small town locals of $160m in ponzi scheme
For decades in a stretch of upstate New York, Miles "Burt" Marshall was the man you went to see if you had some money to invest but wanted to keep it local. Working from an office in the charming village of Hamilton, down the road from Colgate University, Marshall prepared taxes and sold insurance. He also took money for what was sometimes called the '8% Fund,' which guaranteed that much in annual interest no matter what happened with the financial markets. His clients spread the word to family and friends. Have a retirement nest egg? Let Burt handle it. He'll invest it in local rental properties and your money will grow faster than in a bank. Marshall was friendly and folksy. He gave away gift bags with maple syrup, pickles and local honey in jars labelled with cute sayings like, 'Don't be a sap. For proper insurance coverage call Miles B. Marshall." ADVERTISEMENT The morning's headlines in 90 seconds, including our first ever espionage trial, the end of an era for Cook Strait crossings, and a surprising survival story. (Source: 1News) 'He would tell you about all the other people that invest. Churches invest. Fire companies invest. Doctors invest,' said one client, Christine Corrigan. 'So you'd think, 'Well, they're smart people. They wouldn't be doing this if it wasn't okay to do ... Why are you going to be the suspicious one?' Then it all came crashing down. Marshall owed almost 1000 people and organisations about US$95 million (NZ$160 million) in principal and interest when he filed for bankruptcy protection two years ago, according to the trustee's filings. This summer, the 73-year-old businessman was indicted on charges that his investment business was a Ponzi scheme. He could face prison time if convicted. Marshall's lawyers declined to comment. ADVERTISEMENT Total losses by Marshall's investors fall short of the multibillion-dollar Ponzi scheme masterminded by Bernie Madoff. But they loom large in the small, college town of about 6400 people and its largely rural surrounding area. Many investors were Colgate professors, labourers, office workers or retirees. Some lost their life savings of tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars. Corrigan and her husband, who own a restaurant 48 kilometres east, were owed about US$1.5 million (NZ$2.5 million). Now they're wondering how someone who seemed so reliable, who held annual parties for his clients and even called them on their birthdays could betray their trust. 'You look at life differently after this happens. It's like, 'Who do you trust?'' said Dennis Sullivan, who was owed about $40,000. 'It's sad because of what he's done to the area.' A reliable local businessman Marshall and his wife lived in a brick Victorian, blocks from his office. ADVERTISEMENT Aside from insurance and tax preparation, he rented more than 100 properties and ran a self-storage business and a print shop. His parents had run an insurance and realty business in the area and the Marshall name was respected locally. Though he quit college, he was a federally enrolled tax professional. To many in the area, he seemed knowledgeable about money and kept a neat office. 'He had French doors and a beautiful carpet and a big desk and he just looked like he was prosperous and reliable," Corrigan said. Marshall began taking money from people to buy and maintain rental properties in the 1980s. People got back promissory notes — slips of paper with the dollar amount written in. Withdrawals could be made with 30 days' notice. People could choose to receive regular interest payments. Participants saw the transactions as investments. Marshall has called them loans. For many years, Marshall made good on his promises to pay interest and process withdrawals. More people took part as word spread. ADVERTISEMENT Sullivan recalls how his parents gave Marshall money, then he did, then his fiancee, then his fiancee's daughter, then his son, and even his snowmobile club. 'Everybody gets snowballed into it,' Sullivan said. A number of investors lived in other states, but had connections to the area. The promise of 8% returns was unremarkable in the '80s, a time of higher interest rates. But it stood out later as rates dropped. Marshall told a bankruptcy proceeding that he assumed appreciation on his real estate would more than cover the debts. 'That's obviously false now," he said, according to filings, "but that's what I always thought.' Reckoning with more than US$90 million in debt ADVERTISEMENT The money stopped flowing by 2023. Marshall filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection that April, declaring more than US$90 million in liabilities and US$21.5 million in assets, most of it in real estate. He explained in a filing that he had been hospitalised for a 'serious heart condition' that required two surgeries, costing him US$600,000. As news of his illness spread, there was a run on note holders asking for their money back. The bankruptcy trustee, Fred Stevens, blamed Marshall's insolvency on incompetent business practices and borrowing from people at above-market rates. The trustee contended that by 2011, Marshall was using new investment money to pay off previous investors, the hallmark of a Ponzi scheme. Prosecutors claim Marshall falsely represented the profitability of his real estate business and had his staff generate "transaction summaries' with bogus information about account balances and earned interest. Money was funnelled into his other businesses, and he spent hundreds of thousands of investors' dollars on personal expenses, including airline travel, meals out, groceries and yoga studios, according to prosecutors. ADVERTISEMENT Marshall's clients feel betrayed. 'We left it there so that it would accumulate. Well, it accumulated in his pocket,' Barbara Baltusnik said of her investment. The ripple effects of multimillion-dollar losses Marshall pleaded not guilty in June to charges of grand larceny and securities fraud. He's accused of stealing more than US$50 million. Marshall's home and properties were sold as part of bankruptcy proceedings, which continue. People who gave Marshall their money stand to recoup around 5.4 cents on the dollar from the asset sales. Potential claims against financial institutions are being pursued, according to the trustee. Baltusnik said she and her husband were owed hundreds of thousands of dollars and now she wonders how she will pay doctors' bills. Sullivan's mother moved in with him after losing her investment. ADVERTISEMENT In Epworth, Georgia, retiree Carolyn Call will never see money she hoped would help augment her Social Security payments. She found out about Marshall though an uncle who lived in upstate New York. 'I'm just able to pay my bills and keep going," she said. "Nothing extravagant. No trips. Can't do anything hardly for the grandkids.'
