Former municipal president Santosh Kadam held in Tuljapur drug racket case
Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar: The Dharashiv district police on Sunday arrested Tuljapur municipal council's former president Santosh Kadam, the office-bearer of a political party, in connection with the Tuljapur drug trafficking case, which came to light on Feb 14 after the arrest of three people from Tamalwadi village with 45 grams of MD.
Police seized synthetic drugs worth Rs 2.5 lakh on Feb 15, uncovering a network spanning Solapur, Naldurg, Pune and Mumbai. A priest from Tuljabhavani temple was among the main peddlers. The case now involves 38 accused, with 22 arrested and 16 still absconding, including some prominent individuals who have been on the run for two months.
Dharashiv superintendent of police Ritu Khokar told TOI, "Kadam was named as an accused in this case and included in the chargesheet filed earlier in connection with the case.
He, however, remained at large till the arrest was made last night (Sunday night) from Akluj in Solapur district."
Tamalwadi police have arrested political party worker Jeevan Salunke from Solapur in the case. Sub-divisional police officer Nilesh Deshmukh, who is leading the investigation in this case, told TOI, "Kadam was produced before the court on Monday, following which he was remanded to 10-day police custody."
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn
IC Markets
Đăng ký
Undo
The Tuljapur drug network exploits the town's high footfall of Tuljabhavani temple devotees. Easy money lures youth into addiction, with traffickers targeting visitors and selling drugs at Rs 2,000-3,000 per gram in areas like Bomblya Chowk, Hudco and Vetal Nagar. Street-level sellers remain unidentified.
Imposing a self-regulation, Dharashiv district collector Keerthi Kiran Pujara, within a week of police filing a chargesheet in April, asked the pujari association of the historical Tuljapur Bhavani temple not to include names of Pujaris accused in the drug case in the roster for performing pooja or aarti at the temple.
According to the chargesheet, the accused were linked through a complex web of bank transactions and call detail records (CDRs). It contains statements of the accused and details their roles in the racket. The document also reveals how the accused, including prime suspect Sangeeta Gole, came into contact with each other and formed an organised distribution chain. Gole, arrested from Mumbai, is alleged to be the kingpin of the operation.
Her bank accounts reportedly show transactions amounting to Rs 5 crore. Police have also seized a significant quantity of gold from her.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Drug case: Srikanth produced before a Magistrate, remanded to judicial custody till July 7
South Indian film actor Srikanth (46), who has appeared in over 54 films, including several in Telugu and Malayalam, was arrested on Monday by the Greater Chennai Police in connection with a narcotics case, police said. The arrest followed the detention of T. Prasad, a functionary of the AIADMK IT wing, who is suspected of having supplied the banned substance to the actor. During interrogation, police gathered evidence pointing to Actor Srikanth's alleged involvement in the drug network. According to officials, Tamil actor Shrikanth was produced before a Magistrate at the Magistrate's residence. They said the actor has been remanded to judicial custody until July 7, 2025, following his appearance. Shrikanth's advocate, Vignesh Ramanadhan, represented him during the proceedings. Earlier, he was taken to Kilpauk Medical College Hospital for a medical examination as part of the procedure. Following this, Actor Srikanth was produced before Magistrate Dhayalan of the 14th Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Egmore. The hearing took place at the magistrate's residence in the Judicial Officers' Quarters, which is located in the Egmore area of Chennai. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Pätkiikö muisti? Et ole ainut - Tämä supertuote auttaa huomattavasti Lectinect Aivot Saa tarjous Undo Actor Srikanth was brought to the Nungambakkam Police Station on Monday afternoon and interrogated for more than nine hours. During this time, a blood sample was collected and tested, with the results confirming the presence of the narcotic substance in his system. Srikanth made his acting debut in 1999 with K Balachander's TV show Jannal--Marabu Kavithaigal. In 2002, he debuted on the silver screen with the Tamil film Roja Kootam. In April, Malayalam actors Shine Tom Chacko and Sreenath Bhasi were questioned by excise officials in a drug seizure probe. The drugs were discovered in the possession of a woman, who allegedly told the excise authorities that she had consumed drugs alongside both Chacko and Bhasi. Based on her statement, the excise department issued notices to the actors, prompting their appearance for questioning.
Scroll.in
an hour ago
- Scroll.in
Five crucial questions the report indicting Justice Varma does not answer
A three-member committee constituted by the previous Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna to investigate allegations against Justice Yashwant Varma has concluded that there is 'sufficient substance' in the charges. On March 14, half-burnt wads of cash were allegedly recovered at a storeroom in Justice Yashwant Varma's official residence in Delhi when emergency services responded to a fire at his home. No police complaint has been filed thus far in the case, in spite of a petition in the Supreme Court requesting the same. On March 22, the Supreme Court constituted a committee, comprising Chief Justice Sheel Nagu of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chief Justice GS Sandhawalia of the Himachal Pradesh High Court and Justice Anu Sivaraman of the Karnataka High Court, to investigate the incident. The committee in its report, dated May 3, held that Varma's misconduct was 'serious enough to call for initiation of proceedings for removal'. Last week, the report was published by The Leaflet and Bar and Bench. It held that Varma betrayed public trust by allowing 'highly suspicious material in shape of piles of currency notes to be stashed in the store room' of his official bungalow in Delhi when he was a judge at the Delhi High Court. Varma, who was not in Delhi when the fire broke out, has alleged that the entire incident was a conspiracy to frame him. He claims that the storeroom was not part of the main residence and accessible by his staff. He added that on March 14, his family members and staff had not found any cash at the storeroom after the fire was doused. The committee, on the other hand, cited eyewitness testimony and electronic evidence to conclude that not only was half-burnt cash found at the site after the fire, but it was removed by Varma's staff. It also inferred from testimonies and circumstantial evidence that Varma and his family had 'covert or active control' over the storeroom. The committee's recommendation to initiate proceedings for Varma's removal sets the stage for a potential impeachment motion in Parliament, the only constitutional route to remove a High Court judge. However, a close reading of the report reveals that the most fundamental questions about the alleged cash remain unanswered. Play 1 Where did the money come from? This is the central mystery that remains unsolved. The committee's report establishes, through the testimony of at least 10 eyewitnesses from the Delhi Police and Fire Services, that piles of half-burnt Rs 500 currency notes were visible in the storeroom after the fire was brought under control. But after establishing its presence, the report does not identify its source – even though that was one of the three questions the committee had set out to answer. The committee noted that since the cash was found on premises under his 'covert or active control', it was for Varma to account for its source. When Varma offered a 'flat denial and rais[ed] a bald plea of conspiracy', the committee found his explanation wanting. Essentially, the inquiry concluded that since Varma could not prove the money was not his or explain a conspiracy, he must be held accountable for it. The report explained: 'Where presence of burnt cash in the store room is established, it is for Justice Varma to account for the same by either successfully raising a defence of planting of cash in the store room which he failed to do or proving the defence of conspiracy theory by adducing evidence/material that the money/cash did not belong to him but to someone else by disclosing the identity of the real owner of cash. Not having done so, Justice Varma cannot be helped…' 2 Where is the money now? And why was it not counted? The committee noted that despite the discovery of what eyewitnesses called a 'large pile of cash', no official seizure memo was prepared and no panchnama was drawn up at the scene by the police. The committee described the official handling of the scene as 'slipshod'. But it did not hold the police officials accountable for this because its ambit, it said, 'is not to find fault with the action or inaction of the fire personnel or the police personnel'. The committee added that 'quantification of the volume of the currency is of no consequence since it has come from the statements of the witnesses and from the video recordings that there was [a] reasonably large amount of volume of currency in the store room.' Because the cash was never seized or officially counted, its whereabouts are unknown. The committee report relies on 'strong inferential evidence' to conclude that the cash was removed from the scene in the early hours of March 15 by Varma's 'most trusted personnel' – his private secretary Rajinder Singh Karki and his personal staff Hanuman Prashad Sharma and Mohammad Rahil. This conclusion is based on contradictions in their testimonies and their presence at the site from the time of the fire on the night of March 14 onwards. However, this remains an inference. There is no direct evidence – no witness, no video – of anyone physically removing sacks of cash. The evidence at the heart of the case was never secured by the authorities, making its quantity and its fate a matter of speculation. 3 How did the fire start? The report is silent about how the storeroom at Varma's residence caught fire on the night of March 14. The report begins with the series of events that occur once the fire personnel discover half-burnt Rs 500 notes inside the storeroom. But what happened an hour or two before the fire broke out? The report notes Varma's claim that Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya, the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court, had told him about an incident of 'arson' at his residence – meaning a deliberate attempt to set the room on fire. The news of arson shocked Varma, says the committee report, because 'he was under the belief that it was merely a fire caused by short-circuit'. The committee report added that Upadhyaya had been briefed about the fire by the Delhi Commissioner of Police Sanjay Arora over the phone on the afternoon of March 15. Arora also told Upadhyaya that a report on the incident, which included information about the discovery of currency notes, had already been shared with Union Home Minister Amit Shah, the report said. In a separate report that Justice Upadhyaya prepared for the Chief Justice of India on March 21, he said that Arora had told him about 'an incident of fire that broke out' at the storeroom. The paragraphs following this portion were redacted when it was made public by the Supreme Court on March 22. The committee examined the Delhi Police commissioner, but it does not state what exactly he told Upadhyaya about the cause of the fire in his briefing. Upadhyaya was not examined by the committee. Manoj Mehlawat, a station officer with the Delhi Fire Services, told the committee that he was unsure about the short-circuit theory, which was Varma's initial assumption, according to the committee. 'I cannot tell for sure whether the fire occurred by short circuit, though there was no electric heater in the room,' said Mehlawat, quoted in the report. Sumar Kumar, an assistant divisional officer at Delhi Fire Services, said that he did not look into the cause of the fire as his job was to douse it and prevent injuries. 'I was a little bewildered on seeing the incident and my senior officer had informed me that since high ups are involved, you should not further take any action,' Kumar told the committee. In his defence, Varma later told the committee that there was an explosion in the storeroom 'which is not being examined by anyone'. The committee dismissed this by simply noting that Varma 'took no action' on it. Essentially, since Varma did not approach the police alleging arson at his residence, it did not merit a deeper look. So what exactly was the cause of the fire? The report has no answers. 4 What happened to the CCTV footage? Closed-circuit television cameras installed at Varma's residence could have pointed to the cause of the fire, especially footage from one camera that was pointed at the door of the storeroom. But the committee did not rely on it because the camera's data had been lost – a glaring weakness in the probe. This crucial fact is not stated directly in the report. It is mentioned when the report cites Varma's defence, which referred to a Central Forensic Science Laboratory report dated April 27, 2025, and said that the 'hard disc of the said cameras [at his residence] have been found not to be accessible' and that 'it was not his fault that the cameras were not working'. 'He has also questioned the manner in which the CCTV hardware was retrieved,' noted the committee. The report does not say who retrieved the footage. However, the CCTV cameras were seized on the committee's instructions by the Registrar General of the Delhi High Court. The committee did not explain if the footage was lost and why. 'There is nothing on record why the data was lost on account of the fact that the CCTV camera was sealed since the committee had called for the said hardware,' it said. In short, the committee could not study the CCTV footage to probe the case. Varma too questioned whether the camera hardware had been 'properly sealed', because without the footage, 'his defence was lost'. The committee rejected this view because it believed that Varma had 10 days between the fire and the seizure of the cameras to 'preserve, analyse and scrutinise' the footage – something he apparently did not do. 5 Did the committee find anything on Varma's phone? The committee's report confirmed that mobile phones belonging to Varma, his staff and officials at the scene were seized for forensic examination. The report meticulously analysed call data records, noting, for instance, a 230-second call between Varma and Karki at 1.23 am on the night of the fire. This is used to establish that Varma was in close communication with his staff. But the report is silent on the content of any communication. There is no mention of any incriminating message, photo or data recovered from Varma's personal phone that would directly link him to the cash or a cover-up.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Marks of 55 Bangalore University students tampered with after portal security breach
Bengaluru: The marks of 55 students of Bangalore University (BU) were found to be tampered with in the Unified University and College Management System (UUCMS), after the login ID and password of the registrar (evaluation) were breached. The first-semester marks of Bachelor of Computer Applications (BCA) students from two private colleges in the city, as well as those from the Jnanabharati campus of the university, were found to be tampered with. Curiously, many of the students had already passed the exam, and the addition of one or two marks didn't make a difference. However, five students passed after the marks were tampered with. The changes were made in various subjects, including environmental sciences and computer architecture. "Usually, the registrar gets an OTP while changing the password (to log into UUCMS). However, in this case, the hackers were able to change the password and log in without OTP. The changes were made at night. In the morning, when I realised the password was changed, we immediately notified UUCMS. They gave a list of the students whose marks were changed," said registrar (evaluation) Srinivas Chowdappa. BU has formed an internal committee to probe the incident, and also decided to register a complaint with police. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Ductless Air Conditioners Are Selling Like Crazy [See Why] Keep Cool Click Here Undo This is not the first time UUCMS was breached. In 2024, Bengaluru North University (BNU) faced a similar issue with marks getting tampered with. The Kolar district cybercrime and narcotics control police arrested three people in this regard. "We don't know why the marks of students who passed were tampered with. Only one or two marks were added for those students, making no real impact. It could be to confuse us. We'd know only after an inquiry, though. We've made sure the new marks won't be reflected anywhere, the old marks will be retained," he said. UUCMS officials didn't respond to calls. The portal, set up after the implementation of National Education Policy 2021 in the state, manages all functions in a higher educational institution, ranging from admission, fee payment, and declaration of exam results. "With hacking of UUCMS becoming a repeat affair, it's important for the higher education department to take note of it and heighten security measures. Else, where's the credibility of the portal and sanctity of exam?" asked a college assistant professor.
