Sarwar dodges question on potential welfare reform revolt
Around 120 Labour MPs – including a reported 12 from Scotland – have put their names to an amendment which would block the welfare reform Bill.
But on Wednesday, Mr Sarwar refused to say if he supported the reforms or the rebellion against them.
When asked if he supports the Scottish MPs seeking to block the Bill at a live taping of the Holyrood Sources podcast in Edinburgh, the Scottish Labour leader said: 'My position has been quite consistent on the welfare reforms, which is I support the principle of reform.
'We have to look at the structural challenges that exist in our welfare system, even with the changes currently being proposed.'
Mr Sarwar said there were 'many positives' in the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill, but added that there were 'still conversations to be had' about potential changes.
Pushed again on whether he supports the rebellion, Mr Sarwar said: 'Conversations are ongoing, as you would expect.
'People are legitimately voicing their concerns, having those conversations.'
Pressed again on his view on the potential revolt, Mr Sarwar added: 'We have to support the principle of reform.
'What those reforms look like has to be balanced and has to be fair.'
Mr Sarwar stressed that he believed the best way out of poverty was through work, but said those who cannot work should be supported.
The most controversial part of the plans will see the eligibility of the personal independence payment (Pip) in England and Wales be reduced in a bid to save £5 billion.
Earlier on Wednesday, Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner suggested that ministers were considering potential concessions to Labour MPs to stave off a rebellion.
'Those discussions are ongoing around making sure that the welfare reforms that we're bringing in support people into work who need that, and we're putting a huge amount of investment into doing that, but also protecting the most vulnerable,' she said in an interview with ITV's Peston programme.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
25 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Here comes Sir U-turn… Starmer braces to make concessions as MORE Labour MPs join massive benefits revolt ahead of crunch vote with demands for 'regime change'
Keir Starmer is poised to make humiliating concessions on benefits reforms today after failing to quell a massive Labour revolt. Ministers have been hinting at a climbdown as they face a disastrous defeat in a crunch Commons vote on the flagship legislation. Despite frantic direct pleas from the PM and Chancellor Rachel Reeves, more MPs have added their names to a fatal amendment overnight. Around 130 have now publicly declared they will oppose the Second Reading of the Bill, easily enough to overturn even Labour's massive majority. There is speculation that Sir Keir could offer to widen eligibility for Personal Independence Payment (Pip) or weaken curbs on Universal Credit - blowing a hole in hopes the proposals will save the government £5billion. He has dismissed what has been described as the nuclear option of delaying or abandoning the package altogether. Ms Reeves has been among the strongest backers of the reforms, as she desperately struggles to balance the books without resorting to more tax hikes. Even with the changes the benefits bill was still due to keep spiralling, just at a slightly slower rate. In a grim sign for the premier, bitter infighting has been surfacing with MPs and aides swiping at No10 chief of staff Morgan McSweeney. Some have been demanding 'regime change' complaining that Downing Street is dominated by 'over-excitable boys'. A No10 source said: 'The broken welfare system is failing the most vulnerable and holding too many people back. 'It's fair and responsible to fix it. There is broad consensus across the party on this.' The source insisted the reforms were 'underpinned by… Labour values'. They said: 'Delivering fundamental change is not easy, and we all want to get it right, so of course we're talking to colleagues about the Bill and the changes it will bring, we want to start delivering this together on Tuesday.' Lord Blunkett last night suggested the PM had failed to focus on the peril the Government is in because he has spent so much time abroad. And he warned that Sir Keir will be forced to hold a formal confidence vote if he loses. No government Bill has failed to pass second reading - typically a verdict on the broad principles of plans rather than details - since 1986. The Labour grandee told LBC: 'If they lost it, they'd have to go for a vote of confidence, I think. 'But the embarrassment of that one year in leaves you with two problems. One is you've been humiliated, and the second is you've still got the problem. The welfare issue has not gone away. So, solving the problem, not taking the hit, is the sensible solution.' Urging a delay in the vote, he added: 'Keir Starmer, for very understandable reasons, has been diverted on to the international agenda. I think he now needs to come back from Holland and be absolutely focused on this.' Facing questions at the Nato summit yesterday, Sir Keir bridled at suggestions he had failed to read the mood of Labour MPs. He risked inflaming the mood by shrugging off the insurrection as 'noises off', insisting benefits reform must happen and the vote will go ahead on Tuesday. Angela Rayner delivered the same message as she stood in at PMQs. But by the evening the tone had changed, with ministers stressing they are listening to complaints from MPs. Sir Keir is finally due to take his feet in the Commons today, giving a statement expected to cover the G7 in Canada, Nato summit and Middle East crisis. It has been over two weeks since he spoke in the chamber. Touring broadcast studios this morning, trade minister Douglas Alexander admitted that the government was thinking about how to 'implement' the intention of curbing benefits. He told Sky News: 'Everyone agrees welfare needs reform and that the system was broken. Everyone recognises you're trying to take people off benefit and into work, because that's better for them and also better for our fiscal position. 'And everyone recognises that we need to protect the most vulnerable. 'Where there is honestly some disagreement at the moment, is on the issue of 'how do you give implementation to those principles?'' Toby Perkins is among the new MPs to add their names to the fatal amendment He suggested that normally the second reading of a bill, its first Commons test, was a vote on the principle behind a piece of legislation rather than the way it will be implemented. 'The effect of what's happened with this reasoned amendment being tabled is that that's brought forward the discussion of how to give implementation to those principles,' he said. 'So given the high level of agreement on the principles, the discussions over the coming days will really be about the implementation of those principles.'
BBC News
40 minutes ago
- BBC News
No 10 in talks with Labour MPs over changing welfare policies as it faces growing rebellion
Update: Date: 07:52 BST Title: Labour rebel: New welfare criteria 'totally arbitrary way' of allocating support Content: Labour MP Toby Perkins tells the BBC he finds the proposed welfare changes "very difficult to support". 'I don't disagree that we need reform, but just because we need reform doesn't mean that any reform is the right one," he tells BBC Radio 4's Today programme. The bill would change how people are assessed for personal independence payment (Pip) and universal credit (UC). Perkins says the new criteria are a "totally arbitrary way" of delivering them. He describes the proposed reforms as cruel, and hopes the government will "get to the right place" before the vote on Tuesday. Perkins urges the government to "take a pause", saying: "Let's try and make sure we don't end up having damaging changes in amongst what ultimately, primarily, are some very positive changes." Update: Date: 07:46 BST Title: Why is the government trying to cut welfare spending? Content: By Ben Chu It is concerned about the rise in the number of people claiming working-age benefits in recent years and the implications of this trend for the public finances. Last Autumn, the government projected that the numbers of working-age claimants of Pip in England, Scotland and Wales would rise from 2.7 million in 2023-24 to 4.3 million in 2029-30, external, an increase of 1.6 million. At that time, the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), the government's official forecaster, projected, external that the overall cost of the working-age benefit system would rise from £48.5bn in 2024 to £75.7bn by 2030. That would have represented an increase from 1.7% of the size of the UK economy to 2.2%, roughly the size of current spending on defence. Ministers argue that this rising bill needs to be brought under control and that changes to the welfare system are part of that effort. It is worth noting though that - even after factoring in the planned cuts - the OBR still projected, , externalthis bill to continue to rise in cash terms to £72.3bn by 2030. And the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) still projected, , externalthe total number of working-age Pip recipients to rise by 1.2 million between 2023-24 and 2029-30 - after the cuts. In this sense, the main effect of the Pip cuts would be to reduce the increase in claimants that would otherwise have occurred. Update: Date: 07:43 BST Title: Trade minster speaking to BBC Content: Trade minister Douglas Alexander is speaking now to BBC Breakfast - we'll bring you the key lines as he's asked about the welfare bill. Update: Date: 07:39 BST Title: Labour 'pretty united' on welfare reform – what Starmer has said Content: Just yesterday, Keir Starmer stood firm when asked about his proposed welfare changes. Speaking to the media, Starmer said the Labour party was "pretty united" on reforming the welfare system and dismissed criticism as "noises off". Earlier, his deputy Angela Rayner told the House of Commons that a vote on the government's welfare bill will go ahead as planned on Tuesday. In his conference with reporters, Starmer admitted that making changes to welfare was "tough going" but said, "the important thing is to focus on the change that we want to bring about". He argued that the current welfare system "doesn't work as it stands for people who desperately need help to get into work or for people who need protection". "We were elected in to change that which is broken, and that's what we will do, and that's why we will press ahead with reforms," he added. Update: Date: 07:30 BST Title: A Labour-led rebellion – what's the welfare changes row about? Content: The row over Keir Starmer's proposed welfare changes began when more than 130 MPs, including 120 from Labour, signed an amendment to reject plans to cut disability and sickness-related benefit payments. The government says the changes will save £5bn a year by 2030. Cabinet ministers have reportedly been calling Labour MPs to ask them to take their names off the amendment. So far, only one Labour MP, Samantha Niblett, has removed her name. MPs who signed the amendment include both new MPs from the 2024 intake and those who were in Parliament before Labour's election win. The rebels say they oppose the plans because of the number of people expected to be pushed into relative poverty, a lack of consultation, and what they say is an inadequate impact assessment on the jobs market. Update: Date: 07:25 BST Title: Welfare system broken but we want to get changes right, says No 10 source Content: Henry ZeffmanChief political correspondent More for you on this story now. A No 10 source tells the BBC: "Delivering fundamental change is not easy, and we all want to get it right, so of course we're talking to colleagues about the bill and the changes it will bring. "We want to start delivering this together on Tuesday." The source adds: "The broken welfare system is failing the most vulnerable and holding too many people back. "It's fair and responsible to fix it. There is broad consensus across the party on this." Update: Date: 07:20 BST Title: No 10 considering possible changes to welfare policies Content: Henry ZeffmanChief political correspondent Downing Street has confirmed it is in talks with Labour MPs about possible changes to the government's welfare policies. In a notable softening of tone, No 10 said that they "want" to hold a vote on Tuesday - as is currently planned - and admitted that getting the policy right was "not easy". This is a developing story, we'll have more for you on this shortly.
Western Telegraph
an hour ago
- Western Telegraph
Starmer seeking to quell revolt over welfare reform plan
Downing Street insiders said talks were taking place with Labour MPs about the legislation after 126 of them publicly backed a move to block the legislation. The first vote on the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill is due to take place on Tuesday and a concerted effort has been launched by ministers to win round potential rebels. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer faces the most serious revolt of his premiership (Ben Stansall/PA) A No 10 source said: 'The broken welfare system is failing the most vulnerable and holding too many people back. 'It's fair and responsible to fix it. There is broad consensus across the party on this.' The source insisted the reforms were 'underpinned by… Labour values'. They said: 'Delivering fundamental change is not easy, and we all want to get it right, so of course we're talking to colleagues about the Bill and the changes it will bring, we want to start delivering this together on Tuesday.' Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner said talks between backbenchers and the Government were 'ongoing' as six more Labour MPs added their names to the rebel amendment that would halt the legislation in its tracks. The reasoned amendment argues that disabled people have not been properly consulted and further scrutiny of the changes is needed. Angela Rayner sought to reassure backbenchers on Wednesday (Andrew Milligan/PA) The new signatories include the Commons Environmental Audit Select Committee chairman Toby Perkins, Stoke-on-Trent Central MP Gareth Snell, Newcastle upon Tyne MP Mary Glindon and Tamworth MP Sarah Edwards. North Ayrshire and Arran MP Irene Campbell and Colchester MP Pam Cox, both of whom won their seats in the party's 2024 landslide election victory, have also added their names. The new names take the total number of Labour backbenchers supporting the amendment, tabled by Treasury Select Committee chairwoman Dame Meg Hillier, to 126. The plans restrict eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip), the main disability payment in England, and limit the sickness-related element of universal credit. The Government hopes the changes will get more people back into work and save up to £5 billion a year. Existing claimants will be given a 13-week phase-out period of financial support, a move seen as a bid to head off opposition by aiming to soften the impact of the changes. But the fact so many Labour MPs are prepared to put their names to the 'reasoned amendment' calling for a change of course shows how entrenched the opposition remains. To leave it until a few days before the vote, it's not a very good way of running the country Labour backbencher One backbencher preparing to vote against the Bill told the PA news agency: 'A lot of people have been saying they're upset about this for months. 'To leave it until a few days before the vote, it's not a very good way of running the country. 'It's not very grown-up.' They said that minor concessions would not be enough, warning: 'I don't think you can tinker with this. They need to go back to the drawing board.' The Daily Telegraph reported that potential concessions being considered include a commitment to speed up payment of support to help people back into work and offering assurances that reviews of policies in this area will be published. Meanwhile, The Times reported some MPs opposed to the plans had blamed Sir Keir's chief of staff Morgan McSweeney and suggested the time had come for 'regime change' in Downing Street. Other senior Labour figures outside Parliament, including Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham and London Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan, have publicly expressed their opposition to the plans. Meanwhile, the Tories seem unlikely to lend the Government their support, with leader Kemi Badenoch setting out conditions for doing so, including a commitment to rule out tax rises in the autumn budget and further cut to the benefits bill.
