logo
Shouts for justice at Grenfell anniversary march before tower demolition begins

Shouts for justice at Grenfell anniversary march before tower demolition begins

The Government announced earlier this year that the remains of the building will be brought down.
It is thought the earliest that demolition will start is September and the process is expected to take around two years.
Hundreds walked in silence through west London on Saturday evening before hearing the names of the 72 dead and speeches by campaigners, as the tower overlooked them.
Vice chairman of Grenfell United, Karim Mussilhy, who lost his uncle in the blaze, told the crowd: 'Eight years have passed, eight years since the fire – lit by negligence, greed and institutional failure – tore through our homes, our families and our hearts.
'And still no justice has come. The truth is, there's almost nothing new to say because nothing has changed.
'As we stand here eight years on, the only decision this Government has made is to tear down the tower – our home.'
The crowd shouted 'shame' and Mr Mussilhy continued: 'Not because justice has been delivered, but despite the fact it hasn't – before a single person has been held accountable, to make what happened disappear.
'The tower has stood not just as a reminder of what happened, but of what must change – a symbol and a truth in the face of denial, of dignity in the face of power, of our resistance, of our 72 loved ones who can't fight for their own justice.
'And now they want it gone, out of sight out of mind, a clear skyline and a forgotten scandal.'
The crowd faced the tower and chanted: 'Justice, justice.'
At the close of the speeches people filed in through the gates, which are rarely opened, and paid their respects at the base of the tower.
Attendees held each other and children wrote tributes on electric candles that were left on a podium between the flowers.
What remains of the tower has stood in place in the years since the disaster, with a covering on the building featuring a large green heart accompanied by the words 'forever in our hearts'.
The final Grenfell Tower Inquiry report, published in September, concluded victims, bereaved and survivors were 'badly failed' through incompetence, dishonesty and greed.
The tower block was covered in combustible products because of the 'systematic dishonesty' of firms who made and sold the cladding and insulation, inquiry chairman Sir Martin Moore-Bick said.
News of the Government's demolition decision earlier this year was met with criticism from some bereaved and survivors of the 2017 fire who expressed their upset and shock, saying they felt they had not had their views considered before the decision was taken.
Deputy Prime Minister and Housing Secretary Angela Rayner later said in an interview that she knew the meeting with those most closely affected was going to be 'really difficult' and that there was 'not a consensus' among everyone over what should happen to the tower.
On Saturday, placards read 'this much evidence still no charges' and 'Tories have blood on their hands. Justice for Grenfell'.
Large green papier-mache hearts were held aloft, with words including 'hope', 'integrity', 'enough is enough' and 'justice' written across.
Around a dozen fire fighters stood to attention on each side of the road outside Ladbroke Grove station, facing the passing crowd with their helmets at their feet.
Some members of the Grenfell community walked up to hug them and shake hands.
After an hour of walking in silence the crowd gathered for the speeches outside Notting Hill Methodist Church.
The Government confirmed in February that engineering advice is that the tower 'is significantly damaged' and will get worse with time.
Separately, the Grenfell Tower Memorial Commission has been consulting on plans for a permanent memorial in the area of the tower, with recommendations including a 'sacred space', designed to be a 'peaceful place for remembering and reflecting'.
It is expected a planning application for a memorial could be submitted in late 2026.
According to the Government's latest figures, published last month, there were 5,052 residential buildings in England which are 11 metres or taller identified as having unsafe cladding as of the end of April.
Fewer than half – 2,477 buildings or 49% – had either started or completed remediation works, with just a third – 1,652 buildings or 33% – having had remediation works finished.
Labour unveiled its remediation acceleration plan last year, pledging that, by the end of 2029, all buildings more than 59ft (18 metres) tall with unsafe cladding that are on a Government scheme will have been remediated.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Outrageous! Fury at threat to increase rail fares by 5.5%
Outrageous! Fury at threat to increase rail fares by 5.5%

Daily Mail​

time6 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Outrageous! Fury at threat to increase rail fares by 5.5%

A potential 5.5 per cent rise in England's train fares next year has been described by public transport groups as 'outrageous'. July's Retail Prices Index (RPI) measure of inflation – which is often used to determine increases in the cost of train travel – will be announced on Wednesday. The Government has not confirmed how it will determine the cap in regulated fare rises for 2026, but this year's 4.6 per cent hike was one percentage point above RPI in July 2024. Banking group Investec has forecast this year's July RPI figure will be 4.5 per cent, which means fares could jump by 5.5 per cent. Bruce Williamson of pressure group Railfuture said 'it would be outrageous' if fares rose by that much. He added: 'What would be the justification for jacking up fares above inflation? There isn't any. 'It's ripping off the customer, driving people off the trains and on to our congested road network, which is in no one's interest.' Mr Williamson said that he would support the Government marking its nationalisation of train operators by freezing fares. He continued: 'One would hope that there would be some efficiency savings and economies of scale that you get from having a more integrated railway. 'But I strongly suspect that if there are any savings to be had, they'd be swallowed up by the Treasury and not passed back to passengers, which I think is wrong.' Ben Plowden, chief executive of the lobby group Campaign for Better Transport, said: 'Rising fares are not just burdening passengers, they are putting people off rail travel. 'Our survey found that 71 per cent of people would be more likely to take the train if fares were cheaper.' Mr Plowden added that Great British Railways – an upcoming public sector body that will oversee the UK's train operations – 'must take the opportunity to reform fares and make rail travel more affordable' because 'public support for nationalisation plummets if fares continue to rise'. About 45 per cent of fares on the country's railways are regulated by either the Westminster Parliament or the Scottish and Welsh governments. They include season tickets on most commuter journeys, some off-peak return tickets on long-distance routes and flexible tickets for travel around major cities. The Department for Transport (DfT) said there will be an update on changes to regulated fares later this year. A DfT spokesman said: 'The Transport Secretary [Heidi Alexander] has made clear her number one priority is getting the railways back to a place where people can rely on them. 'No decisions have been made on next year's rail fares but our aim is that prices balance affordability for both passengers and taxpayers.'

Now Salmond's widow takes on his legal battle with ministers over sex probe
Now Salmond's widow takes on his legal battle with ministers over sex probe

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Now Salmond's widow takes on his legal battle with ministers over sex probe

Alex Salmond 's widow is to pick up her late husband's £3million compensation claim that he raised against SNP ministers. Moira Salmond is pursuing the legal action started almost two years ago over a flawed sexual misconduct investigation by the Scottish Government. The case concerns possible wrongdoing by officials while Nicola Sturgeon was First Minister. Reporting the development, the Sunday Mail said the reclusive 88-year-old had been galvanised by attacks on Mr Salmond in Ms Sturgeon's memoirs, Frankly. A family friend said Mrs Salmond was 'upset and angered by the continued attempts to smear Alex in the book' with 'ridiculous and inaccurate' allegations. 'It has only strengthened her resolve to make sure the full truth comes out and Alex's name is cleared,' they told the paper. Now executor of Mr Salmond's estate, his widow has assembled a legal team including a KC and two junior counsel in readiness for a court battle. The friend added: 'Her case against the government is now live, the legal team is in place, the finance in place and this will be going ahead, no question of that. 'Alex may not be here to defend himself but his family are determined to stand up to those who continue to attack him.' Ms Sturgeon's book includes disputed claims Mr Salmond had 'consensual affairs', opposed gay marriage and failed to read the 650-page independence white paper. The MSP also denied there had been any 'conspiracy' to ruin Mr Salmond's reputation – a claim the former Alba Party leader maintained until his death at the age of 69 last October. Ms Sturgeon said her former mentor 'would have rather destroyed the SNP than see it succeed without him'. She also claimed he 'impugned the integrity of the institutions at the heart of Scottish democracy – government, police, Crown Office', adding: 'He was prepared to traumatise, time and again, the women at the centre of it all.' Ms Sturgeon and Mr Salmond fell out spectacularly in 2018 after it emerged her government had investigated misconduct complaints made against him by two female civil servants. Mr Salmond had the probe struck down at the Court of Session within months as unfair, unlawful and 'tainted by apparent bias', and was awarded £512,000 in legal costs. He was later cleared of 13 sexual assault charges at the High Court in Edinburgh in 2020. He launched the Alba Party as a rival to the SNP a year later. The former First Minister, who admitted he could have behaved better towards women on occasions, had always denied any criminality. He sued the Scottish Government in November 2023 alleging there had been misfeasance – a knowing abuse of power to harm others – by various civil servants under Ms Sturgeon and sought damages of around £3million. Promising a 'day of reckoning', he said at the time: 'Not one person has been held accountable. With this court action that evasion of responsibility ends.' In a Court of Session hearing last August, Mr Salmond's lawyer said the police were probing whether one senior civil servant 'gave a false statement under oath' to a Holyrood inquiry that was probing how the sexual harassment claims were handled. The action was frozen when Mr Salmond suffered a fatal heart attack in North Macedonia. But Mrs Salmond's legal team is now reactivating proceedings. A Scottish Tory spokesman said: 'It's hardly surprising Moira Salmond is deeply disappointed that her previous calls for privacy to grieve have been ignored by Nicola Sturgeon.' Ms Sturgeon's spokesman declined to comment. The Scottish Government said: 'It would not be appropriate to comment on live litigation.'

Alex Salmond's family vow to clear his name as ex-FM's widow set to sue Scottish Government
Alex Salmond's family vow to clear his name as ex-FM's widow set to sue Scottish Government

Scottish Sun

time2 hours ago

  • Scottish Sun

Alex Salmond's family vow to clear his name as ex-FM's widow set to sue Scottish Government

Christina Hendry fears the stress of defending himself had hastened his death 'FIGHT FOR TRUTH' Alex Salmond's family vow to clear his name as ex-FM's widow set to sue Scottish Government ALEX Salmond's niece has pledged to clear his name as it emerged his widow is suing the Scottish Government over its botched sexual harassment investigation. Moira Salmond, 88, has appointed lawyers to reactivate the ex-First Minister's case seeking reparations for his family after a judge ruled the probe against him was unlawful, unfair and tainted by bias. 3 Christina fears the stress of defending himself had hastened her uncle's death Credit: Andrew Barr 3 Moira Salmond during the public memorial service for her late husband Credit: PA Advertisement 3 The case is reportedly being bankrolled by wealthy friends of Mr Salmond Credit: Getty Allies claim the investigation, and subsequent criminal charges which were dismissed by a jury, hastened the SNP colossus's death from a heart attack aged 69 last year. His niece Christina Hendry, 30, told The Scottish Sun: 'I will do whatever it takes to continue my uncle's work and continuing to clear his name. 'My hope is that the truth comes to light. And that those who dismissed claims of this conspiracy theory are proven wrong.' Advertisement A source close to the family confirmed the case is in an 'adjustment period' where both sides make written pleadings. A top legal team has been hired, including a senior investigator. The case is reportedly being bankrolled by wealthy friends of Mr Salmond. He went on trial at the High Court in Edinburgh in 2020 and was acquitted of 14 charges of sexually assaulting nine women. Advertisement Christina told The Scottish Sun on Sunday how she fears the stress of defending himself and trying to prove the conspiracy had hastened his death. She also hit out at his successor Nicola Sturgeon for dragging his name 'through the dirt' to boost sales of her memoir. Asked how her aunt was coping with Ms Sturgeon's fresh criticism amid a blaze of publicity to promote her book, Christina said: 'She should not have to be going through this and neither should any of the family. Five of the biggest BOMBSHELL moments from Nicola Sturgeon's new memoir 'I find it very distasteful. In some ways it is quite cruel. 'She is using his name for relevance, to promote her book, to earn money — she could have said these things in the past few years. Advertisement 'She has chosen to wait until he is no longer here to defend himself. It's left to the family to deal with this and there's an element of cowardice to that.' The Scottish Government said: 'It would not be appropriate to comment on live litigation.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store