‘One Nation, One Election' was recommendedway back in 1999, say civil society members
Lucknow: 'One Nation, One Election' will not only save the country's money but also save the huge manpower used in performing duties during every election.
This was highlighted at 'Ek Rashtra Ek Chunav Kyun?' conference at CMS auditorium on Monday.
The event was attended by former Speaker of the UP Assembly
Hriday Narayan Dixit
, Justice Rangnath Pandey, and Acharya Maithleshnandansharan.
Dixit said, "The idea is rooted in our Constitution and cultural ethos. We are not a union of states like the US—we are one nation, as reflected in the Preamble: 'We the people of India.'
Simultaneous elections
will strengthen unity, reduce costs, and ensure smoother governance."
"The recent Ram Nath Kovind committee report, over 18,000 pages long, deserves serious study—not knee-jerk rejection," he said while insisting that this reform was recommended in 1999.
"Let's rise above party lines and engage in meaningful dialogue. Our aim must be to strengthen democracy, not cling to outdated political conveniences," he said.
Justice Rangnath Pandey, said, "Our Constitution evolves with the country's needs, and the proposed 129th amendment reflects the majority's support for this reform. Holding simultaneous Lok Sabha and state assembly elections will save economic resources and reduce the continuous political campaigning that drains our nation.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
No dark spots, 10 years younger! Just take this from Guardian
URUHIME MOMOKO
Learn More
Undo
The Constitution already provides mechanisms for necessary amendments, and there are no legal barriers to this change.
It is our duty to support this idea, and I urge the govt to take swift action to realise the dream of 'One Nation, One Election'."
Maithleshnandan said, "India appears divided by region, language, and belief, making national unity seem fragmented. True unity isn't just about flags or anthems—it requires shared cultural and political consciousness.
Sadly, foreign voices often hold more sway than our own leaders."
"One Nation, One Election is not just about efficiency; it's about aligning our democratic structure to foster accountability, reduce fragmentation, and reinforce India's identity as one cohesive and culturally united nation," he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
23 minutes ago
- Business Standard
No official Bharat Mata image, cannot be allowed in events: Kerala govt
The Left government in Kerala on Friday made it clear that it was not in agreement with the use of the Bharat Mata portrait at the Environment Day event at the Raj Bhavan here as the picture was not authorised as the official version by the Constitution or the Indian government. Kerala Agriculture Minister P Prasad, who boycotted the event at the Raj Bhavan a day ago over the use of the portrait, said that those in constitutional offices cannot convert government programmes into political events. A similar view was also expressed by state General Education Minister V Sivankutty who said that the Raj Bhavan and the Governor were above politics and said that Arlekar should withdraw from the stand taken by him. The government's stand came a day after Governor Rajendra Vishwanath Arlekar asserted that there would be no compromise on Bharat Mata. Prasad, while talking to a TV channel, said that no Bharat Mata portrait has ever been acknowledged as the official or authorised version by the Constitution or any of the governments in power since independence. He further said that the portrait about to be used at the event was not carrying the Indian flag, but that of a political organisation, and therefore, it could not be honoured during a government event. The minister said that the particular political organisation and the Governor were free to pay homage to the portrait at private events, but it cannot be done in state government programmes. "We all have a political view, but those in constitutional positions have restrictions on how they express it," he added. He said that the government view was that such a stand ought not to have been taken by a constitutional establishment and expressed hope that it will be corrected by the concerned persons. "It actually should not be repeated in our country. We cannot accept it in Kerala," he added. The minister also questioned why the Governor was "rigid" on the issue, when none of the earlier Governors in the state and not even the Presidents of the country have carried out such a practice in the past. For the World Environment Day event, the Raj Bhavan came out with a minute-to-minute programme, but it initially did not have anything about paying floral tributes to the portrait of Bharat Mata, he said. On eve of the programme, a new schedule was sent to us and it included the paying of floral tribute to Bharat Mata portrait. "So, I enquired with the Raj Bhavan about the floral tributes and asked them to send me a picture of the portrait. The portrait was the one used by the RSS and was not recognised or authorised as an official version, I informed the Raj Bhavan that we cannot offer floral tributes to it," he said. The minister said that the Raj Bhavan in response said they cannot remove the portrait. On being told that the opposition was criticising the lack of response on the issue by Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan, Prasad said that the Congress-led UDF was trying to gain political mileage out of it especially in view of the upcoming bypoll in Nilambur assembly constituency. After knowing Raj Bhavan's stand, the state government relocated the event to the Secretariat's Durbar Hall and the Raj Bhavan went ahead with its programme. Later, in a statement issued by the Raj Bhavan, the Governor said, "Whatever be the pressure, from whichever quarters, there will be no compromise whatsoever on Bharat Mata." In his speech at the Raj Bhavan programme, the Governor said two ministers--state Education Minister and Agriculture Minister--had agreed to attend the function but they did not turn up for the event. While Sangh outfit Bharatiya Vichara Kendram strongly backed the Governor, the ruling CPI(M) and the Congress criticised the Raj Bhavan on the matter.
Time of India
25 minutes ago
- Time of India
How dangerous is Russia's advance on Ukraine's Sumy region?
AI- Generated Image Russian troops are advancing their operations in the northern Ukrainian region of Sumy. Ukraine's regional military administration has confirmed that four settlements on the border have come under Russian control. Prior to this, the Ukrainian army had almost completely withdrawn from the parts of the Russian region of Kursk it had been occupying since August last year. Russia then intensified its shelling of Ukrainian border areas, with Ukrainian authorities ordering the evacuation of 11 villages as a result. In late May, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy confirmed that Russia was preparing an offensive in the Sumy region. He said that Moscow had concentrated its "largest, strongest forces" on the Kursk front, and that troops continued to amass near the border. He added that over 50,000 troops were already at the Sumy front, but that Russia did not have the capacity to establish any sort of "buffer zone" 10 kilometres (6.2 miles) into Ukrainian territory. Not the first time Putin announces a 'buffer zone' Mykhailo Samus, a military expert and director of the New Geopolitics Research Network, believes that the fears triggered by Russian President Vladimir Putin's recent statements on establishing a "buffer zone" in Ukraine are "exaggerated." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Memperdagangkan CFD Emas dengan salah satu spread terendah? IC Markets Mendaftar Undo He told DW it was not the first time that Russia had announced such intentions. "There are no buffer zones there, and there won't be any. There are repeated Russian attempts to attack Ukrainian territory," Samus said. "One year ago, they tried to attack the entire Kharkiv region. They penetrated six or seven kilometres deep into the area around the town of Vovchansk. A year later, we can see that [the troops' advance] stopped there." Ukraine and Russia trying to capture advantageous positions The expert pointed out that Ukraine's forces army had also made advances into the Russian regions of Belgorod and Kursk. "Both the Ukrainian and Russian armed forces are trying to capture the most advantageous positions in the border area, from which they can carry out shelling and maintain operational control," he explained. This was especially important for "the conduct of subsequent operations, that is, to occupy high ground, take advantage of geographical features, and prepare as effectively as possible for further developments. " According to his estimation, Russia does not currently have enough troops near the border to advance deep into unoccupied Ukrainian territory. He added that the occupation of parts of the region around Sumy did not yet give Moscow a tactical advantage. "[Russian forces] will try to move towards favourable heights," he said. "The Ukrainian army knows this, and will take action against them." Is Russia trying to capture Yunakivka ? According to Ruslan Mykula, the co-founder of the independent Ukrainian intelligence service DeepState UA, the current Russian territorial gains around Sumy are not yet a "great success" considering the superiority of their troops in terms of numbers. At the same time, he told DW, there is still a risk of further advances by Russian troops farther into the Sumy region, even if the Ukrainian defence forces "have already learned to fight against a superior enemy. " In his opinion, the Russians' main target is the strategically important village of Yunakivka. He said that this would clear the way into a large adjacent forest area. "If they advance into the forest, it will cause a lot of problems. Whoever has the larger infantry has a significant advantage here." He added that the occupation of Yunakivka would create new hazards for the civilian population, as Russia would then be able to launch First Person View (FPV) drone attacks on Sumy's city centre from there. "We could experience a situation such as in Kherson, Nikopol or Kostyantynivka, where the Russians have used such drones to hit buses and civilian trucks. That is why we must not allow the enemy to reach Yunakivka," Mykula warned.
Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
Morgan Stanley opens xAI books with Musk in Trump crosshairs
Even before Elon Musk and President Donald Trump 's public falling out, selling debt for the tech mogul's companies has always been tricky for Morgan Stanley . But xAI Corp. was supposed to be different. Beyond the frenzy around artificial intelligence in markets of late, internal numbers, which the bank revealed to a select group of investors Thursday, show a company that anticipates generating more than $13 billion of annual earnings by 2029, according to a person with knowledge of the figures. Yet the Musk-Trump feud, which has exploded into public view and degenerated into an ugly tit-for-tat for all to see, will now almost certainly make the bankers' task more complicated. Trump, as he's proven with Harvard and Columbia Universities, is willing to use unconventional tactics to punish those who challenge him, and all companies in Musk's empire, including xAI, could wind up in the crosshairs. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Una abuela sigue cayéndose de su silla de ruedas - Su hijo pone cámaras y ve la verdad Plays Star Undo It wasn't immediately clear how the debt sale effort had been affected by the clash. The price of a loan for social-media-platform X, another of Musk's companies that is attached to xAI in a broader enterprise, was down roughly 1.25 points on Thursday, as their arguments became more ferocious online. By late Thursday, Musk signaled he would move to cool tensions with Trump, while White House aides ahd scheduled a call between the two to avoid further escalation, Politico reported. Live Events A representative for Morgan Stanley declined to comment, while xAI didn't respond to a request for comment made after normal business hours. Discover the stories of your interest Blockchain 5 Stories Cyber-safety 7 Stories Fintech 9 Stories E-comm 9 Stories ML 8 Stories Edtech 6 Stories In meetings Thursday, investors who were willing to write checks of at least $50 million were allowed to view limited statistics about xAI, including revenue, earnings, cash flow and projections, said multiple people with knowledge of the situation, who asked not to be identified because they were not authorized to speak publicly. The figures showed xAI losing money and burning cash, which is typical for a startup in the AI industry. The company had $52 million in gross revenue during the first quarter and lost $341 million before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, according to material shared with investors. The company projects that figure — known as Ebitda in Wall Street parlance — will be $2.7 billion in 2027 and $13.1 billion in 2029, one of the people said. xAI anticipates $1 billion in gross revenue by the end of this year, which it predicts will grow to $14 billion by 2029, the person added. Its cash flow from operations was negative $220 million after spending $2.6 billion on capital expenditures, that person added. The company plans to spend $18 billion on investments in data centers going forward. The figures were not audited nor were they subject to the same accounting standards publicly traded companies follow, the people said.
