Trump plays deft hand with Iran-Israel ceasefire but doubts remain
With his surprise announcement of a ceasefire between Israel and Iran, US President Donald Trump has turned his flair for social media into diplomatic deftness, despite continued uncertainty in the Middle East.
Israel, Iran and Trump himself all declared victory after 12 days of conflict that culminated Saturday in the United States bombing Iran's key nuclear sites.
After facing criticism -- even within his base -- for breaking his campaign promises against military intervention abroad, Trump was able to show a quick way out, and to portray himself, despite the bombing, as a peacemaker.
"I don't think the Israeli government was able to sustain a long-term war, but I think the main factor here was President Trump. He did not want to see a new war in the region break out under his watch," said Will Todman, a senior fellow at the Middle East program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
"That is what changed the calculation for Israel and for Iran as well."
Trump startled even close aides and allies by announcing the ceasefire on social media late Monday -- the middle of the night in the Middle East -- just after Iran fired missiles at a US base in Qatar, in what appeared to be a choreographed response as the rockets were easily shot down.
Trump chose not to retaliate against Iran and on Tuesday, returned to his electronic bully pulpit to urge Israel to abort new attacks on Iran.
Iran needed an off-ramp as it suffered its worst assault since the 1980-88 war with Iraq. Trump also appeared to offer incentives to sanctions-bound Iran by suggesting an easing of US pressure on China to stop buying Iranian oil.
Israel's military, while proving itself to be the region's strongest, has been stretched by campaigns in Gaza, Syria and Lebanon, and with Iranian strikes this month, the Israeli population endured the most prolonged, deadly air attacks seen in decades.
After Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu hailed Trump's intervention, the president's warning Tuesday likely also showed him the limits to US support, Todman said.
- What was achieved? -
Trump hailed his intervention as a monumental success, although critics have long warned that an attack could make Iran rush, more clandestinely, to a nuclear bomb.
While Trump claimed Iran's nuclear program was "obliterated," a classified report found that the US bombing did not destroy the core parts of the three nuclear sites, according to CNN and The New York Times.
Brian Katulis, a senior fellow at the Middle East Institute, said it's too early to know if the ceasefire would hold, either.
He said that Gulf Arab powers, led by well-connected Qatar, did the hard work of quiet diplomacy as they sought a return to calm in their region.
"Trump vocally used his troll power to try to restrain the actions of Israel and Iran, but that matters less compared with the role that these countries continuously play," Katulis said of Gulf Arab states.
Katulis, who worked on the Middle East for former president Bill Clinton, said the Trump administration's tactical military operations, combined with "a heavy dose of strategic communications" confused Americans and global actors alike "about what it is we're actually trying to get done."
- Showing heft at home -
One area where Trump's diplomacy had clear -- if short-term -- benefits was at home.
A prolonged US military campaign "had the potential to really fracture President Trump's own base of support," said Jonathan Panikoff, a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council.
But now, "my guess is the majority of his MAGA and other Republican base will stay relatively unified, even if they were unthrilled in some quarters," he said.
While traditional hawks of Trump's Republican Party largely cheered the Iran strikes, they were widely but not universally denounced by rival Democrats.
Annelle Sheline, who resigned from the State Department to protest policies under former president Joe Biden and is now at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, said it was critical for Trump to enforce the ceasefire.
She noted Israel has bombed Lebanon and Gaza during truces, saying Netanyahu believed he enjoyed "America's unconditional support."
"Trump demonstrated that he can rein in Israel when he chooses to do so. Now he must do the same to insist on a ceasefire in Gaza," she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
27 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Sharri Markson on Donald Trump's ‘explosive' outburst at Israel
Sky News host Sharri Markson claims United States President Donald Trump's outburst against Israel is unacceptable. 'He could have picked up the phone to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu last night and urged him not to resume the military campaign against Iran … he could have had a rational conversation,' Ms Markson said. 'But instead, he criticised one of his closest allies in front of the world.'
West Australian
an hour ago
- West Australian
Iran-Israel ceasefire: Albanese says Trump's ‘f…' bomb spray reflects Australia's de-escalation desire
Anthony Albanese says Donald Trump's 'f…' bomb — cursed in frustration over a breached Israel-Iran ceasefire — was 'consistent' with Australia's desire for de-escalation in the region. The US President launched the strongly-worded tirade at the Middle East nations, which included 'they don't know what the f… they're doing', while speaking with media outside the White House. The Prime Minister labelled it 'abrupt' but that the US President's fiery spray ultimately reflected the Albanese government's views on a ceasefire. 'We want to see de-escalation and that is consistent with the very clear comments of President Trump,' the PM told reporters in Tasmania on Wednesday. 'I think that President Trump made some pretty clear statements. I don't think it needs any further reflection. 'I think that he stated his views pretty abruptly, and I think they were very clear. 'We want to see peace in the region. We want to see a ceasefire.' Mr Trump had declared the truce — casting it as an end to what he dubbed a '12-day war' — after Tehran launched retaliatory strikes on a US base following American bombing of Iran's nuclear infrastructure. However, Israel has claimed a missile had been fired by the Islamic Republic, which Iran denied. 'I'm not happy with Israel for going out there. It was one rocket,' the US president had said. 'These guys got to calm down. I'm not happy with Iran either.' During appearances on Wednesday, Treasurer Jim Chalmers also noted the president lambasting both nations for violating a truce. 'The stakes are very high in the Middle East. The consequences of this ceasefire falling over are pretty grave. And I think the President's blunt language reflects that,' he told ABC News Breakfast. 'I think it reflects the gravity, the enormity of the situation in the Middle East, and just how important it is that both sides stick to this ceasefire, which has been negotiated.' Speaking on the sidelines of the NATO summit on Wednesday AEST, Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles said there was no planned meeting with Mr Trump who was a fellow attendee. 'There's a lot of people at the NATO summit. There's a lot of people in the rooms that we'll all be in. And in gatherings such as this, the meetings that you have end up being pretty fluid,' Mr Marles told the ABC. Mr Albanese's planned meeting with Mr Trump on the sidelines of the G7 summit was scrapped after the US President had to return to America amid escalating conflict in the Middle East. When asked whether Australia would always back the United States' use of force, Mr Marles said: 'What we've done in this instance and what we do in every instance is to speak in accordance with what is Australia's national interest.' 'It's not in Australia's national interest to see Iran acquire a nuclear weapon.'
West Australian
an hour ago
- West Australian
Ellen Ramsay: Israel-Iran ceasefire deal appears to have held but experts warn peace is fragile
One hiccup aside, the fragile ceasefire deal brokered by Donald Trump appears to have held and the latest escalation of a decades-long conflict is over, but it's almost inevitable the enduring conflict will flare again. Israel, the US and Iran have all claimed to have emerged from the 12-day war as winners. Tel Aviv and Washington say they had done what they set out to achieve: decimating Iran's nuclear facilities. Mr Trump says they have been 'obliterated', while Israel says they have removed the 'immediate' threat of nuclear weapon development. Tehran said they were victorious because Israel had 'failed in achieving its sinister goals: the destruction of facilities, the dismantling of nuclear expertise, and the incitement of social unrest'. The question now is what's next. Competing claims about the status of Iran's nuclear facilities, and how close Tehran was to building a weapon before this war began in the first place, add degrees of complexity. Israel's pre-emptive strikes on Iran almost two weeks ago were based on claims Tehran could have been just months away from producing a nuclear bomb. No such intelligence has been made public and the claims disputed. According to a leaked intelligence report, cited by a number of US news outlets, America's strikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities had not 'completely obliterated' the sites as the President had claimed, and only set the program back a few months. Mr Trump attacked the publications, and asserted again the Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan facilities were 'completely destroyed' by the US at the weekend which were bombed by the US at the weekend. He declared Iran will 'never rebuild their nuclear facilities', because the facilities had been 'demolished'. Middle East expert at Deakin University, Professor Shahram Akbarzadeh, said unless Israel and the US bombed Iran in a 'perpetual war', then the facilities could be repaired. 'One thing we know for certain is that Iran has the knowledge to develop a nuclear bomb if it chose to,' he told The Nightly. If the United States is to prevent that from happening without further involving itself in foreign wars, then diplomacy remains its best hope. Special envoy Steve Witkoff said the US and Iran were already in early discussions, both directly and through intermediaries, about resuming diplomatic nuclear talks. 'The conversations are promising. We're hopeful. Now it's time to sit down with the Iranians and get to a comprehensive peace deal,' he told Fox News. European leaders have also expressed hope that the matter can be resolved without violence. But the decision by the US to enter the war could cast long shadows. 'Hardliners are now hardening their position and will be even more resolute that there should be no negotiations with the United States because they're untrustworthy and unreliable,' Dr Akbarzadeh said. 'There is every incentive for Iran now to develop their own nuclear bomb. They see that as their only deterrent to protect the regime, and without it they'll keep getting bombarded.' Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, in a phone call with the leader of the UAE, said Iran was 'ready to resolve issues at the negotiating table and within international frameworks', again claiming Iran 'has not and will not seek a nuclear weapon'. The world will be watching closely to see what comes of Iran's co-operation with the International Atomic Energy Agency. Before the ceasefire was agreed to, there were reports on Monday that Iran's parliament had approved a move to suspend Tehran's cooperation with the nuclear watchdog. As the missiles stopped, the IAEA called for Iran to resume cooperation with the watchdog, describing it as 'key to a successful diplomatic agreement to finally resolve the dispute over Iran's nuclear activities.' Beyond the persistent nuclear conundrum, a more hardline Iran will also strengthen resolve from Israel that Tehran's regime must be toppled. After leaving the door ajar midway through the war, Mr Trump ultimately decided that fulfilling Israeli Prime MInister Benjamin Netanyahu's long-held aim of enforcing regime change in Iran would be too costly and leave a horrible legacy. But that doesn't mean the aspiration has disappeared. 'I don't want it. I'd like to see everything calm down as quickly as possible. Regime change takes chaos and ideally, we don't want to see so much chaos, so we'll see how it does,' he said. Nevertheless the goal persists in Israel, especially among far-right political corners. That's unlikely to have disappeared just because it's not feasible at the moment. Dr Akbarzadeh said that could mean the conflict witnessed this month 'will be repeated ... perhaps in two to three years time'. In the meantime, he said it will be Iranian people who suffer. 'It will mean a less tolerant regime for domestic dissent. Any opposition is going to be silenced, and that will be very hard for Iranian people. It will make it so much harder to criticise the government,' Dr Akbarzadeh said.
