
2025 Volkswagen ID Buzz Cargo Review: How Practical Is It Really?
The latest car news, reviews, and features.
The 2025 Volkswagen ID Buzz is an electric vehicle, a bit of a vanity product, and as of this writing, still something of a novelty on American roads. But it is also a van. There's a lot of wind noise. It rides pretty stiff. And it's quite spacious, even for six or seven passengers. We took some time to load all kinds of random junk into one to help you get a sense of what the ID Buzz can comfortably carry.
To learn more about the van's driving dynamics and interface, check out our first drive impressions. Then, we packed six dogs into the thing to get their impressions. Not a dog, but my bud Jerry Perez will have a deeper, week-long test drive review here on The Drive soon, too.
One more thing: We did this test before the stop-sale was put in place after regulators determined the ID Buzz's rear seat to be too wide for two people. So the third row you're seeing in our pictures might not be what you can get at a Volkswagen store. Meanwhile, let's talk cargo. We got a group of bulky objects to load in as examples. Andrew P. Collins
American-spec ID Buzz vans have three rows of seating. Even with all the seats up, the Buzz has room for at least four decent-sized duffle bags. Behind the third row, there's a spring-loaded shelf above soft storage boxes that you can pull out like drawers. They're like the kind of things you'd buy at Target for your kid's college dorm room; not particularly elegant but simple and useful. The ski boots should give you a good sense of how big those boxes are—one pair fits perfectly. Andrew P. Collins
The quickest and easiest way to convert the Buzz from passenger to cargo mode is to simply slap the seatbacks down. This gives you a very deep and reasonably tall void of space without the inconvenience of removing anything. The floor is flat … ish. One large piece to lay down on top of the seatbacks would be great for camping or loading cargo that needs to slide or drag into the van. Unfortunately, it doesn't look like such a part exists yet. But it'd be easy enough to make with thick birch or something.
Removing the rear shelf and third row of seats opens up much more space, most critically affording you a lot more cargo height in the back. It's not difficult to pull those parts, but it's not exactly trivial. The shelf comes out with two big thumb screws—a simple and slightly tedious task. The rear seats are cumbersome and annoying; getting them to fold, and then slide, and then finally un-click is a multi-stage process involving a lot of movement.
Once they're free, the seats are not light so you'll want to lift slowly and carefully, with your legs, not your back. (A key mobility tip because I'm convinced anyone who wants, and can afford, an ID Buzz is at least 50 years old.) There are quite a few motions involved in pulling the back seats out. It's mildly annoying, but pretty easy after a few removals. Andrew P. Collins
In this cargo configuration, you're ready for basically anything. I'd throw a tarp down before picking up anything gross, but even if you don't bother, there's not much to rip or scratch. The ID Buzz's cavernous interior can easily eat a set of wheels, a full-sized office chair, or a huge haul of rectangular boxes. A big bicycle fits, but carrying bikes inside any car is madness—they're too dirty and weirdly shaped. Still, if you refuse to get a bike rack, scroll through the gallery below to see how well a large full-suspension mountain bike fits.
The final phase of a cargo-mode conversion would be to remove the second-row seat bench. It's definitely possible—the bolts holding the seat to the van's body all look pretty easy to access. But it'd still take a breaker bar to bust them loose, and for what it's worth, VW's people told me that these seats are not meant to be removed by customers. Removing and reinstalling the rear shelf is easy, and you can do it by hand. The bolts are quite long, though, so you're stuck spinning them for a while. Andrew P. Collins
I declined to mess with them and most owners will probably feel the same way—this feels like a major missed opportunity. Being able to easily remove the second-row captain's chairs for mega cargo hauls, or to take the midship seats out and leave the third row in place for a limousine-like effect, was one of my family's favorite things to do with the last van we owned: a first-gen Honda Odyssey from 1995.
These measurements will give you a sense of the ID Buzz's usable interior space. On the left I've sketched how tall and deep the cargo bay is with all the seats folded down, and on the right you get an idea of how big the space is behind the second row when the third row's removed. The cargo area is about 57 inches wide at its widest, though the door is 48. My mom says we can hang these on the fridge. Andrew P. Collins
Scroll through this little gallery I made of a few familiar things being stored in the ID Buzz. This might give you a better picture of its real size than simple dimensional measurements.
Here's a front bumper in box.
Let's add some more long cargo.
These skis are almost 190 centimeters
Back shelf out, seats down.
One seat missing.
Full cargo mode.
Enough room to relax.
These boxes are about 2×3′
Tall enough for a vacuum.
This is a standard Home Depot tote.
Anotha' one.
These are 16-inch wheels from a Honda prelude.
Here's a Dometic fridge, a decent-sized 35L one.
A Herman-Miller chair fits no problem.
Bike doesn't fit elegantly, but it does fit. And this is a large one.
And here's how some of these loads look from the side door.
No matter what position the seating is in, the ID Buzz has a few useful small storage slots for personal items. The pockets left of the steering wheel and shelf in front of the front passenger are good for quick toss-aside road trip accessories, and the center console has a neat little pop-out trash-can style bucket at both the front and rear. Here's a closer look at the small storage cubbies and cup holders that you have access to in front of the ID Buzz. Andrew P. Collins
The cup holders that pop out from under the infotainment system are kind of flimsy and awkward to reach. Storage pockets in the doors have USB chargers, which is always nice.
The 2025 Volkswagen ID Buzz is definitely commodious. The combination of a low ride height and high ceiling make it easy to load from the back, and the flexibility in cargo management between the seats and the little rear shelf is decent. If you're thinking: 'Will I be able to carry a lot of camp gear, or sleep in this thing, or bring home lumber with it?' you can, for sure.
The little shelf behind the third row is clever and well-made. By bisecting the rear cargo area, you get a lot more utility out of an area that's generous vertically but not very deep.
I do wish it were easier to take the second row of seats out, that'd make it much easier to utilize the side sliding doors for cargo work.
The latest car news, reviews, and features.
The rear cargo door is enormous. It makes a great awning if you're tailgating or camping. Less optimally, it might make loading the van in a garage challenging. It might also represent some complications for bike racks. The Buzz's roof is so high that it'd be annoying to put bikes onto it, and the back door opens so wide that you'd probably have to re-rack bicycles even mounted low on one of those hitch-style carriers. Empirically speaking, the rear cargo opening is 43 inches high and 48 inches wide.
Finally, where the ID Buzz gave me the most acute frustration loading and unloading things is more a product of its modernness than its dimensions. There's no power button on this stupid thing, so it's always trying to turn itself off as you close doors. The giant rear hatch tried to close on me like a giant clam gobbling up some plankton. I can appreciate that it's trying to think for me, but a simple on/off switch rather than a proximity detector would go a long way to making this thing more grumpy-old-man friendly. It kept fighting me as I tried to move it around my loading area and parking pad. Andrew P. Collins
Bottom line: The ID Buzz feels like a middle ground between a modern minivan and an old-school cargo van. I didn't find the ride quality or driving dynamics to be particularly impressive, but its abundance of headroom and straight, simple walls might give it an edge in hauling over, say, a Sienna or Odyssey.
If you have a small business that involves transit'ing things a relatively short distance (flower shop, catering, mobile dog grooming) one of these could be great if you can grab a pre-imported one that's not tariffed. Nobody raises an eye to a minivan or cargo van running around town, but in New York's Hudson Valley where I road-tested this thing at least, people went nuts for the ID Buzz. It seemed like almost everybody pointed and smiled at it. Then again, even at the lowest model's list price, you could basically buy two Mercedes-Benz Metris vans which are much nicer to drive but not nearly as cute. Andrew P. Collins
Got any good ideas about van hauling or cargo management? Drop the author a line at andrew.collins@thedrive.com Pro car critic since 2012. Andrew's also been an off-road tour guide, repo man, and Baja co-driver, among other things. Lifetime car nerd, amateur tinkerer, very slow casual racer.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Miami Herald
7 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
How U.S. Battery Innovations Could Transform EVs, Homes and the Power Grid
Your smartphone, electric car and home solar array all share a hidden truth: the humble lithium‑ion battery powering them was first commercialized in 1991. Today, three decades later, the U.S. still relies heavily on this vintage chemistry. But a quiet energy revolution is underway that will drive longer EV road trips from Los Angeles to San Francisco, slash home storage costs, and cut reliance on contentious cobalt and nickel supply chains. Nearly every device you own, from your iPhone in Manhattan to your Tesla parked in Palo Alto, uses lithium‑ion cells. This workhorse chemistry delivers high energy density in a compact package, but its road map has begun to bump against real‑world limits: Range ceilings: Most American EVs top out around 300–350 miles per charge, still shy of that California coast‑to‑coast dream. Safety headaches: Flammable liquid electrolytes have prompted high‑profile recalls by major automakers after thermal‑runaway concerns: Over 60% of the world's cobalt and 70% of nickel come from geopolitically sensitive regions that can involve labor and environmental issues. Think of first‑generation lithium‑ion like the Ford Model T: revolutionary in its day, but ready for a homegrown reinvention. Under the bipartisan Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), the Department of Energy aims to drive battery pack costs below $80 per kWh by 2025. Meanwhile, the DOE's Battery500 Consortium brings together Argonne National Lab, Ford, GM and Solid Power to push solid‑state energy density past 500 Wh/kg. States like California (with its Self‑Generation Incentive Program) and New York (via NY Green Bank) are offering rebates on stationary storage, while utilities such as PG&E and NextEra Energy are piloting grid‑scale sodium‑ion and flow batteries. These incentives, paired with swelling U.S. venture investment-over $5 billion in 2023 for battery startups-are rewiring America's cleantech landscape. Below are the five battery families poised to reshape U.S. energy, from EV showrooms in Detroit to solar farms in Texas. 1. Solid‑State Batteries: The 500-Mile EV Game Changer How they work: Replace liquid electrolytes with a solid ceramic or polymer-think of it as an unbreakable ionic highway. Why it matters for Americans: 500‑mile EV range: Ford and BMW collaborations with Solid Power aim to hit this milestone by 2027, letting a single charge carry you from Denver to No more Tesla battery‑fire headlines-solid electrolytes don't fuel thermal DOE tests show over 1,200 full cycles with minimal capacity loss-translating to 10+ years in daily service. Challenges: Scaling to gigafactory volumes remains a multibillion‑dollar hurdle. Expect U.S. pilot production lines by 2025 and limited consumer SUVs by 2030. 2. Lithium‑Sulfur: Lightweight, Low-Cost, and Made in America How they work: Swap pricey metal oxide cathodes for abundant sulfur, slashing pack weight and cost. American edge: Sulfur is a byproduct of U.S. oil refining, costing under $0.05 per kg. Key perks: Up to 500 Wh/kg theoretical energy density-fueling lighter drones for NOAA weather projects and next‑gen eVTOL cost: Potential factory costs as low as $60/kWh. Hurdle: Polysulfide shuttling degrades cycle life-startups like Lyten (HQ: Menlo Park) and Sion Power (Chandler, AZ) are deploying graphene coatings to stabilize cathodes, targeting pilot production by 2027. 3. Sodium‑Ion Batteries: Cheap, Abundant, and Perfect for Home Storage How they work: Replace lithium with sodium in the same "rocking‑chair" format-no exotic supply chains required. U.S. relevance: Sodium is over 10,000 times more abundant than lithium, with vast deposits in Gulf Coast salt flats and across the western U.S. Pros: Cost: Sodium-ion packs could drop below $70/kWh by 2026, undercutting even lithium-ion on reliability: Performs well down to –4 °F, making it a strong candidate for northern grid storage and winter life: Lab data and projections suggest 3,000–5,000 cycles, rivalling or exceeding lithium-ion durability. Use cases: Ideal for stationary home and community storage, as well as micro-mobility like e‑bikes and scooters. Catching up fast: While current sodium-ion energy density remains lower (110–140 Wh/kg), CATL projects next-gen cells reaching 200 Wh/kg by 2027, putting them on par with lithium-ion. Lab results also suggest cycle life of 3,000–5,000 cycles, making sodium-ion viable not just for home storage and scooters, but potentially for urban EVs and commercial fleets. 4. Aluminum‑Ion: Ultra-Fast Charging for Phones and Tools How they work: Anodic aluminum sheets cycle ions through novel cathode structures and ionic liquids. American R&D: Oak Ridge National Lab and Argonne prototypes show full charges in under 10 minutes. Benefits: Fast charging: Down from hours to minutes for smartphones and power Aluminum is the most recycled metal in the U.S.-no toxic extraction. Roadblocks: Lab cells still struggle to maintain 500+ cycles. Commercial rollout likely 2030+, pending DOE's SCALE‑UP funding rounds. 5. Zinc‑Air: Reliable Backup Power for Hurricanes and Grid Outages How they work: Zinc oxidizes at the anode while ambient oxygen reacts at the cathode-like a fuel cell that never runs out of air. Why Texas and Florida care: $50/kWh system costs are within reach for community backup during hurricane-driven blackouts.10‑day storage capability keeps critical services online when solar or wind dips. Limitation: Slow recharge time-best suited for primary backup or flow‑style refueling at centralized hubs. Powerwall vs. sodium‑ion: A Tesla Powerwall 2 lists around $11,500 ($430/kWh installed) today. Early sodium‑ion systems from GridScale Energy (Austin) are targeting $300/kWh installed by 2026-over 30% costs: The average price of a new EV in the U.S. hovers around $55,000. If solid‑state reduces battery pack costs by 15%, automakers could drop sticker prices by $8,000 or boost range by 100 miles without raising pilot: Florida Power & Light's zinc‑air trial aims for 1 MW, 10 MWh systems to handle hurricane season peak loads, at an estimated $200/kWh installed-half the cost of lithium‑ion backups. Why Battery Tech Is Key to America's Energy Security and Affordability Your wallet: U.S. DOE targets and IRA credits could cut your home battery costs in half by 2030. One of the leading reasons for NOT buying an EV in the US is concern over car price which is largely determined by battery security: Fewer imports of cobalt and nickel mean stronger supply chains and less price commute: Imagine your EV reliably hitting 600 miles on a charge-no more range anxiety on I‑95 or Route 66. No single battery chemistry will rule. Instead, expect a U.S. portfolio approach: Luxury EVs: Solid‑state batteries for flagship models from Tesla, Ford and mobility: Sodium‑ion for entry‑level EVs, e‑bikes and scooters in urban cores like New York or Los electronics: Aluminum‑ion and improved lithium‑ion for phones, laptops and power tools that recharge in resilience: Zinc‑air and next‑gen flow batteries giving states their own backup independence. American automakers, utilities and labs are investing tens of billion annually to lead this charge. The real competition isn't just technical-it's about reshoring manufacturing, training a new workforce, and securing U.S. leadership in the energy transition. Q: When can I buy these locally? Sodium‑ion home/storage: Available via regional installers by 2025– EVs: Limited pilot fleets from 2027–2030; mass‑market rollout by packs: Aerospace and specialty drone use in early 2030s. Q: Will lithium‑ion stick around? Absolutely. Existing plants in Nevada and Ohio will keep cranking out improved lithium‑ion for phones, laptops and lower‑range EVs through the 2030s, with incremental gains in lifetime and safety. Q: How about recycling? U.S. firms like Li‑Cycle (Toronto HQ, U.S. plants in Rochester and Gilbert) and Redwood Materials (Nevada) are scaling up facilities to recover over 95% of metals from spent cells, while new chemistries with fewer toxic metals streamline processing. Better batteries are not science fiction; they're being engineered today in American labs, factories and testbeds. Over the next decade, advances in solid‑state, sodium‑ion, lithium‑sulfur, aluminum‑ion and zinc‑air will reshape how we power cars, phones and the grid. The question for U.S. consumers isn't if these breakthroughs will arrive, but which one will change your life. And it might just be Made in America. Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Associated Press
22 minutes ago
- Associated Press
States are rolling out red carpets for data centers. But some lawmakers are pushing back
HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — The explosive growth of the data centers needed to power America's fast-rising demand for artificial intelligence and cloud computing platforms has spurred states to dangle incentives in hopes of landing an economic bonanza, but it's also eliciting pushback from lawmakers and communities. Activity in state legislatures — and competition for data centers — has been brisk in recent months, amid an intensifying buildout of the energy-hungry data centers and a search for new sites that was ignited by the late 2022 debut of OpenAI's ChatGPT. Many states are offering financial incentives worth tens of millions of dollars. In some cases, those incentives are winning approval, but only after a fight or efforts to require data centers to pay for their own electricity or meet energy efficiency standards. Some state lawmakers have contested the incentives in places where a heavy influx of massive data centers has caused friction with neighboring communities. In large part, the fights revolve around the things that tech companies and data center developers seem to most want: large tracts of land, tax breaks and huge volumes of electricity and water. And their needs are exploding in size: from dozens of megawatts to hundreds of megawatts and from dozens of acres up to hundreds of acres for large-scale data centers sometimes called a hyperscaler. While critics say data centers employ relatively few people and pack little long-term job-creation punch, their advocates say they require a huge number of construction jobs to build, spend enormous sums on goods and local vendors and generate strong tax revenues for local governments. In Pennsylvania, lawmakers are writing legislation to fast-track permitting for data centers. The state is viewed as an up-and-coming data center destination, but there is also a sense that Pennsylvania is missing out on billions of dollars in investment that's landing in other states. 'Pennsylvania has companies that are interested, we have a labor force that is capable and we have a lot of water and natural gas,' said state Rep. Eric Nelson. 'That's the winning combination. We just have a bureaucratic process that won't open its doors.' It's been a big year for data centers Kansas approved a new sales tax exemption on goods to build and equip data centers, while Kentucky and Arkansas expanded pre-existing exemptions so that more projects will qualify. Michigan approved one that carries some protections, including requirements to use municipal utility water and clean energy, meet energy-efficiency measures and ensure that it pays for its own electricity. Such tax exemptions are now so widespread — about three dozen states have some version of it — that it is viewed as a must-have for a state to compete. 'It's often a nonstarter if you don't have them, for at least the hyperscalers,' said Andy Cvengros, who helps lead the data center practice at commercial real estate giant JLL. 'It's just such a massive impact on the overall spend of the data center.' Zoning, energy fights often frustrate developers In West Virginia, lawmakers approved a bill to create 'microgrid' districts free from local zoning and electric rate regulations where data centers can procure power from standalone power plants. Gov. Patrick Morrisey, a Republican, called the bill his 'landmark policy proposal' for 2025 to put West Virginia 'in a class of its own to attract new data centers and information technology companies.' Utah and Oklahoma passed laws to make it easier for data center developers to procure their own power supply without going through the grid while Mississippi rolled out tens of millions of dollars in incentives last year to land a pair of Amazon data centers. In South Carolina, Gov. Henry McMaster signed legislation earlier this month that eased regulations to speed up power plant construction to meet demand from data centers, including a massive Facebook facility. The final bill was fought by some lawmakers who say they worried about data centers using disproportionate amounts of water, taking up large tracts of land and forcing regular ratepayers to finance the cost of new power plants. 'I do not like that we're making customers pay for two power plants when they only need one,' Senate Majority Leader Shane Massey told colleagues during floor debate. Still, state Sen. Russell Ott suggested that data centers should be viewed like any other electricity customer because they reflect a society that is 'addicted' to electricity and are 'filling that need and that desire of what we all want. And we're all guilty of it. We're all responsible for it.' Some lawmakers are hesitant In data center hotspots, some lawmakers are pushing back. Lawmakers in Oregon are advancing legislation to order utility regulators to ensure data centers pay the cost of power plants and power lines necessary to serve them. Georgia lawmakers are debating a similar bill. In Virginia, the most heavily developed data center zone in the U.S., Gov. Glenn Youngkin vetoed a bill that would have forced more disclosures from data center developers about their site's noise pollution and water use. In Texas, which endured a deadly winter blackout in 2021, lawmakers are wrestling with how to protect the state's electric grid from fast-growing data center demand. Lawmakers still want to attract data centers, but a bill that would speed up direct hookups between data centers and power plants has provisions that are drawing protests from business groups. Those provisions would give utility regulators new authority to approve those agreements and order big electric users such as data centers to switch to backup generators in a power emergency. Walt Baum, the CEO of Powering Texans, which represents competitive power plant owners, warned lawmakers that those provisions might be making data center developers hesitant to do business in Texas. 'You've seen a lot of new announcements in other states and over the last several months and not as much here in Texas,' Baum told House members during a May 7 committee hearing. 'I think everybody right now is in a waiting pattern and I worry that we could be losing to other states while that waiting pattern is happening.' ___ Follow Marc Levy on X at
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
$110M Wiped Out: Bitcoin Whale Trader Gets Burned As BTC Tags $104,150
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. Pseudonymous crypto trader James Wynn, known for his high-leverage strategies, suffered losses exceeding $110 million after Bitcoin's (CRYPTO: BTC) price slipped below key support levels on Friday. Wynn had taken a bold bet on Bitcoin's upward trajectory, opening a massive $830 million long position on May 21, acquiring over 7,700 BTC at roughly $105,000 per coin. By May 24, he had increased his exposure to 11,588 BTC, pushing his position's value to $1.25 billion at an average cost of $108,243. Don't Miss: Trade crypto futures on Plus500 with up to $200 in bonuses — no wallets, just price speculation and free paper trading to practice different strategies. Grow your IRA or 401(k) with Crypto – unlock the power of alternative investments including a Crypto IRA within your retirement account. However, the market turned sharply following U.S. President Donald Trump's announcement of a 50% tariff on EU exports, pushing Bitcoin below $105,000 and triggering large-scale liquidations of Wynn's leveraged holdings. According to Hypurrscan, Wynn faced a series of painful liquidations: 527 BTC worth $55 million was wiped out at $104,950, followed by another 422 BTC at $104,150, and a final 95.5 BTC at $104,620. In total, 1,044 BTC were liquidated over the week. Wynn expressed frustration over market integrity, posting on X: "I have exposed just how corrupt these markets are. Guess it's better to just buy and hold BTC on spot." Despite the drawdown, Wynn reportedly maintains a remaining long position of 1,591 BTC, worth approximately $167 million, with a high-risk 40x leverage and a liquidation threshold near $104,530. Read Next: New to crypto? Get up to $400 in rewards for successfully completing short educational courses and making your first qualifying trade on Coinbase. A must-have for all crypto enthusiasts: Sign up for the Gemini Credit Card today and earn rewards on Bitcoin Ether, or 60+ other tokens, with every purchase. Image: Shutterstock Send To MSN: Send to MSN This article $110M Wiped Out: Bitcoin Whale Trader Gets Burned As BTC Tags $104,150 originally appeared on Sign in to access your portfolio