
School suspensions and exclusions in England reach record high
There were 10,885 permanent exclusions in 2023/24, compared with 9,376 the year before – a rise of 16%, according to the Department for Education (DfE) data.
The rise comes amid warnings of challenging behaviour in classrooms following the Covid-19 pandemic.
Suspensions – which are when a pupil is excluded from a school for a set period of time – in primary schools rose by nearly a quarter in a year.
Figures released on Thursday show that suspensions for pupils in state primary schools rose by 24%, from 84,264 in 2022/23 to 104,803 in 2023/24.
Meanwhile, suspensions for secondary school pupils rose by 21% in a year, from 685,930 to 829,896.
Persistent disruptive behaviour was the most common reason for sanctions, accounting for 51% of all reasons given for suspension and 39% for exclusion.
Suspensions and exclusions peaked in the 2023/24 autumn term, where there were 346,279 suspensions and 4,168 permanent exclusions in a single term.
The number of suspensions and exclusions in England is the highest since at least 2006/07, when the latest DfE data begins.
Pupils on free school meals and those with special educational needs and disabilities (Send) continue to see high levels of suspensions and permanent exclusions, the DfE said.
Education minister Stephen Morgan said: 'Every moment in the classroom counts – but with almost one million suspensions in the 2023 academic year, the evidence is clear that this Government's inheritance was classrooms in chaos, with swathes of the next generation cut off from the opportunity to get on in life.
'Through our plan for change, we've wasted no time in tackling the root causes of poor behaviour, including by providing access to mental health support in every school, making sure every child gets the fuel they need to learn through free breakfast clubs and expanding free school meals, and launching our new attendance and behaviour hubs which will directly support the 500 schools that need the most help.
'We're also continuing to listen to parents as we reform the Send system, while already putting in place better and earlier support for speech and language needs, ADHD and autism and £740 million to encourage councils to create more specialist places in mainstream schools.'
Beth Prescott, education lead at the Centre for Social Justice (CSJ) think tank, said: 'There is a crisis of bad behaviour disrupting classrooms.'
She added: 'Government and schools have an important role to play, but our research shows that parents also need to up their game and take responsibility for their children's behaviour in class.
'There has been a fundamental breakdown in the school-parent social contract.'
Carol Homden, chief executive of Coram charity, said: 'Year on year the numbers of children excluded from school on a temporary and on a permanent basis continue to rise, but this year's significant rise must be a wake-up call.'
She added: 'This epidemic of exclusion must also be faced head on by the Government while addressing the current crisis in special educational needs and disability provision, in order to make our children's right to a suitable education a reality.'
Paul Whiteman, general secretary at school leaders' union NAHT, said: 'Schools have a duty to provide a safe environment for all pupils and only use suspensions and exclusions when other options to ensure this have been exhausted.
'The reasons for disruptive behaviour often lie beyond the school gates and have their roots in wider challenges, including everything from poverty to access to support with special educational needs and mental ill-health.
'Schools work tirelessly to support pupils, but they alone cannot address the causes and symptoms of poor behaviour.
'They need back-up in the shape of additional investment in vital services like social care, children's mental health, behaviour support teams, and special educational needs provision, which have been reduced or failed to keep up with demand over the last decade.'
Sophie Schmal, director of Chance UK charity, said: 'The latest figures released today reveal a shocking picture, particularly for some of our youngest and most vulnerable children.
'When you have children as young as five and six years old being permanently excluded from school, then clearly something is going very wrong.
'Every day, we see children and families being let down by a system that is failing to support them early enough.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
4 hours ago
- The Independent
Government names technical colleges to train 40,000 construction workers
The Government has named the locations for technical colleges which will train 40,000 construction workers, as part of the Government's plan to build 1.5 million new homes during this Parliament. The 10 sites across England comes as part of the Department for Education's planned £100 million investment in training workers. It is hoped that they will help tens of thousands of builders, bricklayers, electricians, carpenters, and plumbers, many of whom are already in the industry, to get improved skills as ministers by 2029. The plans are in addition to a separate target, announced in March, to train 60,000 construction workers. The Department for Education said the initiative was part of reducing its reliance on foreign labour. A further 100,000 construction workers will be recruited by the Construction Skills Mission Board each year by the end of the Parliament. The construction technical excellence colleges will be based in Derby College Group in the East Midlands, West Suffolk College in the east of England, New City College in Greater London, City of Sunderland College in north-east England, Wigan and Leigh College in north-west England, North Kent College in south-east England, Exeter College in south-west England, Bedford College which the Government said will be cross-regional, Dudley College of Technology in the West Midlands and Leeds College of Building – which will cover Yorkshire and the Humber. Some are long-standing colleges, but will receive extra funding and support from the Government. Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson said: 'We need skilled workers to deliver the homes, schools and hospitals that communities across the country are crying out for, and today's announcement underlines our commitment to the next generation of homegrown talent. 'Construction Technical Excellence Colleges will enable us to invest in people and give them the skills they need to break down barriers to opportunity.' A recent Government survey found that the percentage of construction firms funding or offering training to their workers has fallen from 57% in 2011 to 49% in 2024. David Hughes, chief executive of the Association of Colleges, said: 'Today's announcement is very positive news for people wanting good jobs, for the construction employers looking for skilled people and for the government's ambitions to build 1.5 million new homes. 'It represents significant investment and trust in the 10 successful colleges, and the college sector, recognising their crucial role in boosting the country's construction sector by opening up high quality learning opportunities all over the country.' Tim Balcon, chief executive of the Construction Industry Training Board, said: 'It's wonderful to see the progress being made towards establishing these technical excellence colleges for construction. 'They represent a transformative opportunity for people to complete local vocational training, helping to drive regional growth and nurture the next generation of skilled construction workers in local communities.' Shadow education minister Saqib Bhatti said: 'We welcome any investment into skills and training for British people, but this pledge rings hollow in the face of Labour's broken promises. 'What young people need are good and secure jobs, but thanks to Labour's jobs tax, jobs are being cut a record rates and unemployment is on the rise. Combined with Labour's cuts to Level 7 apprenticeships, this government is clearly not on the side our next generation. 'Only the Conservatives are on the side of Britain's makers – those who work hard, do the right thing and want to get on, and only we can be trusted to deliver the low tax, pro-growth economy that supports jobs for the future.'


The Sun
4 hours ago
- The Sun
Parents have just days left to save up to £7,500 on childcare – check if you're eligible
PARENTS have just days left to save as much as £7,500 on childcare following a major government change. The Department for Education (DfE) is rolling out more free childcare for working families - but the deadline to apply is fast approaching. 1 From September, parents will be able to access up to 30 hours for children aged nine months up to four years old. However, you must get your application in by August 31 if you want to receive the funding by the start of the 2025/26 academic year. You can apply for funding from September if your child turns nine months old between April 1 and August 31. Stephen Morgan, early education minister, said: "This landmark expansion of funded childcare will help parents save money, work in the jobs they love, and give more children the best start through high-quality early education." The rollout of extra free hours of childcare to working parents from next month is the final phase in a three-part expanion. Phase one began in April 2024 and saw eligible working parents of two-year-olds able to apply for 15 hours of free childcare. Phase two saw 15 hours free childcare extended to eligible working parents of children aged nine months to three years old in September 2024. The expansion was announced by the previous Conservative government during its 2023 Spring Statement. Previously, parents could only claim 15 free hours for three and four-year-olds in England. The Government has said parents using the full 30 hours from next month will save around £7,500 a year. Freebies for parents worth £2,900 Holly Yildiz, a mother of two, will be accessing 30 hours of funded childcare from September. She said: "Formal childcare has been brilliant for my children - it's amazing to see how much they've grown, not just with learning but in confidence and friendships too. "I really feel like they're being set up for school and life in the best way. "The financial support has been a huge help - both children will get 30 funded hours from September, which takes a big weight off our shoulders." It comes after fresh research by the DfE found just 45% of parents earning under £20,000 a year are aware of the expanded free childcare hours offering. That's compared to 81% of those on annual salaries of over £65,000. It's worth bearing in mind, you are only eligible for free hours of childcare if you are classed as a "working" parent. You meet this criteria if you individually earn more than £9,518, but less than £100,000 a year. If you're in a couple, you must both earn at least £9,518 and neither one of you can earn more than £100,000 adjusted net income. Your adjusted net income is your total taxable income, including your salary, rental income and money from freelance work. The full eligibility criteria for free childcare hours can be found on the Childcare Choices website - How to apply Families in England can apply for free hours childcare via the website. You have to first set up a childcare account and if your application is approved you are sent an 11-digit code that proves you're eligible to get free childcare. You give this code to your childcare provider. To keep getting free childcare hours you have to confirm your details are correct every three months via your childcare account. You'll need some personal information to hand when you first apply - this includes your National Insurance (NI) number and Unique Taxpayer Reference (UTR) number if you're self-employed. You will also need the UK birth certificate reference number (if you have one) of any children you're applying for and the date you start or are due to start work. The Government's website says the application takes around 20 minutes to complete. Find out more via Who's eligible for free childcare hours? YOU could get up to 30 hours of free childcare per week through the Free Childcare for Working Parents scheme if you meet these conditions: Child's age: Your child must be between 9 months and 4 years old and live in England. From September 2025: All children aged 9 months to 2 years will qualify for 30 free hours per week. Income: Each parent must earn at least £166 per week (equal to working 16 hours at minimum wage) and no more than £100,000 per year. If you're not eligible for the 30-hour scheme, you can still get 15 free hours per week for all 3 and 4-year-olds, starting from the term after their third birthday until they begin school. This is available to everyone, regardless of income or benefits. Your 2-year-old can also get free childcare if you live in England and meet any of these conditions: You receive benefits like Income Support, income-based Jobseeker's Allowance (JSA), income-related Employment and Support Allowance (ESA), or Universal Credit (with a household income of £15,400 or less after tax, not including benefit payments). You get the guaranteed element of Pension Credit. Your child is also eligible if they: Are in the care of a local authority. Have an education, health, and care (EHC) plan. Receive Disability Living Allowance. Have been adopted or are under a special guardianship or child arrangements order. Taking up the 15 free hours for 2-year-olds won't affect your benefits


The Herald Scotland
9 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Nicola Sturgeon memoir: Why I cried for Boris Johnson
However, it is the former issue that brought Ms Sturgeon and Mr Johnson together. The former first minister famously referred to Mr Johnson as a "clown" in an expletive-filled message exchange with her chief of staff Liz Lloyd. That row emerged at the UK Covid Inquiry, with Ms Sturgeon describing Downing Street's announcement of a second Covid-19 lockdown in England as "excruciating". Ms Sturgeon's memoir Frankly was supposed to be released on Thursday, August 14. However it went on sale early in Waterstones on Monday. Read more: In the book, the former first minister wrote: "I find it hard, even today, to look back on Covid without a torrent of emotion. It was the hardest period of my career, possibly my life." She added: "I am still haunted by the impact of the decisions I took and those I didn't take. "I still agonise over what I might have done differently. I think part of me always will." Ms Sturgeon reflects on April 2020, when Boris Johnson was moved to an intensive care unit after contracting the virus, with his symptoms "worsening". The Glasgow Southside MSP wrote of her political rival: "It was a moment in which the existential peril of the pandemic truly hit people. "Whatever the science said, if it could fell even a Prime Minister, no one was safe. "I remember feeling profoundly shaken by it and also fearing the worst. "As I got dressed for work early on Tuesday morning, I wondered if I should wear black. It was horrible. "When I sent Boris good wishes from my lunchtime briefing, I felt myself welling up." Read more: Ms Sturgeon also elaborated on communicative difficulties she had with the former prime minister at the height of the pandemic. In May 2021, the UK Government dropped its 'Stay Home, Protect the NHS, Save Lives' advice that had been used by devolved administrations since the beginning of the crisis. This decision was made "without any consultation whatsoever" with governments in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. By the summer of that year, she said "Johnson wasn't engaging" with devolved administrations. She added: "Whenever he did grace us with his presence, I would be taken aback all over again by how unserious he was. "The fact this was a virus that had come close to taking his own life made his attitude all them more inexplicable." Ms Sturgeon also reflected on how she tried to take the "heat" from Dr Catherine Calderwood, Scotland's former chief medical officer who was forced to resign two weeks after a UK-wide national lockdown was imposed on March 23. She had broken lockdown rules by making two trips to her second home in Fife with her family. Ms Sturgeon said that with "hindsight" she should have told the medic to resign "immediately". She wrote: "Not only would it have avoided hours of mounting public anger, but it would have also have been kinder to her." However, she said: "In an hour-long press conference on Sunday, 5 April, I tried to take as much of the heat as I could." It was after this press conference that Ms Sturgeon received a call from her then deputy first minister John Swinney to ask if "resisting" Dr Calderwood's resignation was the "right thing to do". Ms Sturgeon said she became increasingly uneasy with the decision, writing: "I knew in my gut that I was in the wrong place. I also knew that if I stayed in that place, it wasn't just Catherine's credibility that would be shot. My own would be fatally undermined too."