Strategic Reset Fails to Resolve Under Armour's (UAA) Struggles with Profitability
Elevate Your Investing Strategy:
Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence.
While the stock trades at a relative discount following its decline, the path to sustainable growth remains uncertain. I prefer to maintain a Neutral stance on the stock until I see meaningful progress on revenue stabilization and margin improvement (perhaps at its earnings call on August 6th, which will hold some good news in that regard).
Under Armour Struggling to Regain Its Swagger
Since its founding in 1996, the Baltimore-based company has built its reputation as a leading manufacturer of performance athletic apparel on technical fabric innovations, particularly its moisture-wicking HeatGear and ColdGear products, which cater to athletes across various sports and climates.
Last year, founder Kevin Plank returned to the CEO role to spearhead a 'strategic reset' focused on premium brand positioning and operational efficiency improvements. This has included shifting from the previous product-focused approach to a more consumer-centric, category-managed operating model, designed to better serve the needs of athletes.
The company's recent Q4 FY2025 results suggest it has yet to get meaningful traction with its turnaround efforts. Revenue declined 11% year-over-year to $1.2 billion, with weakness evident across major markets, as U.S. sales fell 11%, international revenue dropped 13%, and the Asia-Pacific region declined 27%.
Weak top-line performance and ongoing restructuring expenses have resulted in the company posting a net loss for the year of $201 million, with an earnings per share loss of $0.47.
Evaluating UAA's Valuation and Momentum
The stock currently trades near the midpoint of its 52-week range, $4.78 to $11.89. It reached its all-time high in 2015, trading above $50, then cascaded down over the following years, falling to under $5 earlier this year. However, over the past three months, the stock has experienced a notable rise, climbing 27% during that period.
Despite the recent price run-up, the stock still trades at a relative discount, with a price-to-sales ratio of 0.61x, compared to 1x for the Consumer Discretionary sector, 2.42x for Nike (NKE), and 1.61x for Adidas (ADDYY).
The shares exhibit positive price momentum, trading above most major moving averages (except for the 200-day moving average, though it is closing in on surpassing that level as well). Other technical indicators are neutral-to-bullish.
Is UAA a Good Stock to Buy?
On Wall Street, UAA stock carries a Hold consensus rating based on four Buy, 13 Hold, and three Sell ratings over the past three months. UAA's average stock price target of $6.84 implies approximately 4.5% downside potential over the next twelve months.
Analysts following the company have taken a cautious stance, with many lowering their price targets for the shares. For instance, Goldman Sachs analyst Brooke Roach recently lowered the firm's price target on the shares to $6.50 (from $7) while maintaining a Neutral rating, noting the potential impact of elevated tariff rates.
Similarly, Truist's Joseph Civello lowered the price target on Under Armour shares to $7 while reiterating a Hold rating, citing Q1 FY2026 guidance that came in well below expectations. In a research note, the analyst declared himself 'incrementally cautious' about the company's future outlook, with the impact of potential tariffs yet to be resolved.
Conversely, Simeon Siegel at BMO Capital kept an Outperform rating on the shares while lowering his price target to $9 (from $12). He observed that Q4 results marked ongoing improvement in gross margins on lower revenue, as management works to turn the business around. He maintains that focusing on improving margins can act as a lever to enhance profitability and drive share growth over time.
UAA Stock in Summary
Under Armour is undergoing a turnaround effort aimed at regaining brand momentum and strengthening its market position. The company's strategic reset centers on leveraging its core strength in technical performance wear to deliver premium products and stand out in a highly competitive landscape.
However, continued revenue declines across all major regions suggest deeper structural issues that won't be resolved quickly. Negative profitability further clouds the path to sustainable cash flow, especially as well-capitalized competitors like Nike and Adidas maintain pressure on market share.
While the firm's bold reset has delivered some early signs of progress, reversing persistent revenue losses and restoring profitability remains a formidable challenge. Until Under Armour demonstrates measurable improvement in these key areas, the turnaround is likely to remain stalled. The stock trades at a relative discount, but this valuation appears to reflect market doubts about the company's ability to execute a successful transformation. Analyst price targets indicate limited upside in the near term, given the associated risks.
I maintain a Neutral stance on the stock and will look for signs of margin improvement that could support a more constructive view going forward.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
12 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
California's major home insurers are likely to raise rates soon. Here's why
California home insurance companies could begin requesting rate increases within weeks, after state regulators approved a key step that will undergird new rate filings. Insurance rates have soared in California in recent years, but insurers say they still don't reflect the cost of doing business in the expensive, wildfire-prone state. To prevent insurers from further pulling back coverage or leaving the state, the California Department of Insurance recently enacted a set of reforms, called the Sustainable Insurance Strategy, that will make it easier for insurers to justify rate increases — though the state plans to ensure that the carriers continue to cover, and even expand, in parts of the state considered at risk for wildfires. A key step in the reform process occurred last week, when the Department of Insurance said it would allow insurers to use a catastrophe model to evaluate future risks. Previously, insurers have only been allowed to use backwards-looking information as the basis for rate increase requests — and thus could not take global warming or other predicted future changes into account. Insurers and regulators have long said that a more accurate assessment of future risks is critical for them to remain viable in California. California is an outlier: Other states already allow carriers to forecast risks using catastrophe models. The newly approved model was created by the New Jersey company Verisk. Two other catastrophe models, made by Moody's and Karen Clark, are now under review, according to Deputy Insurance Commissioner Michael Soller. 'I'm expecting (that) within a matter of weeks we could have our first filing from a major carrier,' Soller said in an interview Thursday. Exactly how much rates are likely to rise in the immediate future is unknown, and will undoubtedly vary by insurer. Mercury, a Los Angeles-based insurer that is one of California's largest carriers, said it is currently preparing a rate change request for homeowners insurance using the Verisk model. 'The move is a direct result of the ongoing implementation of (Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara's) Sustainable Insurance Strategy, which the company believes will provide California homeowners with more insurance options and lead to a more resilient insurance marketplace,' the company said. The use of catastrophe models is one of several key changes made by Lara under his Sustainable Insurance Strategy. Another key change is allowing insurers to partially pass on the cost of reinsurance (insurance for insurance companies) to policyholders — something not previously allowed in California, though it is common in other states. As soon as they file for updated rates, insurance companies will be required to tell regulators if they plan to write new policies, and if so, how many new policies. Insurers will also be asked to describe how they'll be seeking new policies to write — for example, if they'll offer full coverage to customers whom they partially cover under a companion policy to California's FAIR plan. (The FAIR Plan is California's insurer of last resort and covers only damage from wildfires, whereas traditional insurers include other risks such as liability and plumbing problems.) There have been virtually no rate increase requests filed after the devastating Los Angeles wildfires in January. In prior years, large rate increase requests tended to flow in after major fires, Soller said. But this time, insurers have been waiting for the catastrophe models to be approved. 'It's why we are doing this,' Soller said, noting that really large rate increases after wildfires are 'not a sustainable path for us.'
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
David Stearns comments on the Mets acquisition of reliever Gregory Soto from Baltimore
New York Mets president of baseball operations David Stearns breaks down the acquisition of Orioles left hander Gregory Soto to help fortify the bullpen and adds that "the door remains open" for more moves to be made as the trade deadline approaches.
Miami Herald
42 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Home Depot denies claims of cooperation with ICE deportations
With the Trump administration pulling off all brakes for a wide-scale deportation campaign, businesses both big and small have felt pressure to take a stance against the targeting of migrants. Avelo Airlines, a Houston-based low-cost airline that serves many secondary markets, spurred a wave of protests across different cities for continuing to use three of its Boeing 737-800s (BA) planes to run deportation flights for U.S. Customs and Immigration Enforcement (ICE). Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Back in May, chief executive Andrew Levy added further fuel to the fire by saying that the contract to "support the Department's deportation efforts" was "controversial [but...] too valuable not to pursue." The latest company to fall under the radar of how it can help or hinder Trump's deportation campaign is home goods chain giant Home Depot (HD) . Parking lots of store locations in several parts of California became the main target for ICE raids this summer. In one standoff at the start of June, federal agents rounded up and took away over 40 day laborers people at a location in the Westlake neighborhood of Los Angeles. Parking lots in front of the store often end up becoming gathering spots for those looking for temporary work. Many laborers come from Latin American countries such as Guatemala, Nicaragua, and Honduras and get offered day jobs from small employers who come to the parking lots to seek them out. "They are trying to earn a living and have a tough decision to make: pop my head out and get deported or don't and can't support my family," George Carrillo, who heads the national Hispanic Construction Council, said to CNBC. Related: Home Depot makes a startling closure amid concerning trend As a result, many rumors around what role Home Depot itself is playing in these round-ups have circulated on social media. To contradict them, representatives have been replying under posts claiming that the retailer has accepted a $250 million Department of Homeland Security (DHS) contract for access to their parking lots to conduct deportations. "Hi, this story is false," Home Depot wrote under one such post. "We don't have contracts with DHS or ICE. We aren't notified that ICE activities are going to happen, and we aren't involved in them." Under another post making a similar claim on July 27, Home Deport similarly stated that these claims "are false" and that it "isn't involved" in any raids. Even so, Home Depot has faced mounting pressure to speak out against the campaigns in the communities they operate in. Some social media users have called for a boycott, while others have been replying under every post on the Home Depot account with questions about what it is doing to close off store grounds to deportations. "Why have you continued to allow ICE raids on your properties?" one commenter with the profile name Laurie wrote under Home Depot's denial of signing an ICE contract. More on travel: United Airlines places big bet on new flights to trendy destinationGovernment issues new travel advisory on popular beach destinationAnother country just issued a new visa requirement for visitors "Like many businesses, we have a longstanding no-solicitation policy, which prohibits anybody from selling goods or services on our property," a Home Depot spokesperson told CNBC. "[...] We instruct associates to report the incident immediately and not to engage in the activity for their safety." Related: Lowe's, Home Depot add return policy that will outrage customers The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
