Lockerbie-Syracuse scholarship scheme set to restart
Two Lockerbie Academy students were selected to study at Syracuse University in New York state every year between 1989 and 2024 but no intake will happen in 2025/26.
Thirty-five Syracuse students were among 270 victims of the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 in December 1988.
The university has announced that the scholarship is now due to restart in autumn 2026 but it is unclear who will fund the programme.
Previously, the Lockerbie students selected to spend a year at the US university were chosen by the Lockerbie Syracuse Trust (LST).
The scheme was funded by both the university and the trust - with a contribution also understood to come from Dumfries and Galloway Council.
There will been no intake for 2025/26 but Syracuse University has now relaunched the scheme, describing it as a "reimagined partnership".
Students will be chosen by a panel of representatives from the university and the academy using "elevated selection criteria based on rigorous academic standards".
The university said it would select students who demonstrate "academic excellence and a deep understanding" of the Pan Am Flight 103 tragedy.
A press statement makes no mention of the LST and does not state how the scheme will be funded.
Lockerbie: The town scarred by Pan Am flight 103
Lockerbie: Remembering the victims of Flight 103
Carolyne Wilson, who chairs the LST, said the funding situation had not been confirmed with them.
"Previously, Syracuse University have funded part of it, and the trust has picked up the other part which equates to about £40,000 a year," she said.
She said the LST would be happy for that arrangement to continue but it had not been approached to do so.
"I think there would definitely need to be discussions between all parties because obviously we would love to strengthen and maintain our partnership with both Lockerbie Academy and Syracuse University to provide the best opportunities possible for the students of Lockerbie and the surrounding area," she added.
Anna Newbould, one of the Lockerbie Academy scholars for 2024/25, said it was important to keep the link.
"I think everyone would agree that it's incredibly important for this scholarship to continue, not just as an experience for the upcoming students but especially for the families of the victims who were sadly lost," she said.
"Without the scholarship, the connection with Lockerbie, I believe, would only fade over time and ultimately it could be forgotten which is not something anyone wants.
"Now more than ever, as the disaster is drifting further from the current generation, 36 years on, it's important to keep educating future generations and to keep the victims' memories alive."
Brian Asher, head teacher at Lockerbie Academy, welcomed the move to re-establish the scholarship.
He said: "Syracuse University has, since the terrible events of 21 December 1988, held a special place in the heart of Lockerbie.
"We reforge our bond in honour of all those who were lost that night.
"I am excited to work with our Syracuse University colleagues on behalf of the academy as we build on our shared past, towards a shared future."
Syracuse University said the scheme would run until at least 2028.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
JD Vance lands in Scotland for next leg of UK holiday
US Vice-President JD Vance has arrived in Scotland during his visit to the UK. Vance is on a private family holiday, and will stay in a plush country estate in the outskirts of Kilmarnock in Ayrshire. The vice-president arrived on Air Force Two at Prestwick Airport and was expected to be driven a short distance to Hulford in a motorcade. His arrival comes just weeks after President Donald Trump was in Scotland, where he played golf on his courses at Turnberry and in Aberdeenshire. Vance will stay at Carnell Estates, a privately owned estate which has a 14th century tower and 10-bedroom mansion situated on over 2,000 acres of land. The estate is about a 40-minute drive away from Trump's Turnberry golf club. Police Scotland previously confirmed they had plans in place for "a significant policing operation." Officers were seen at the estate ahead of Vance's arrival on Wednesday and some road closures were in place. A number of protests are expected to take place during the visit, including one outside Carnell Estate. On Tuesday, Vance met US troops stationed at the Royal Air Force Base in Fairford, Gloucestershire, where he received a briefing on the base's capabilities. While not on official White House business, he met David Lammy for talks about Gaza and other international affairs at the foreign secretary's official residence, Chevening House, in Kent on Friday. Lammy has since referred himself to a watchdog after photos emerged of the pair fishing without the correct license. Vance also met Conservative MP's Robert Jenrick and Chris Philp and Reform UK leader Nigel Farage. Earlier this year the vice-president criticised Scotland over buffer zones which prevent demonstrations or vigils taking place close to abortion clinics. He used the new law as an example of Europe not protecting free speech enough and used a speech in Munich to claim "even private prayer within their own homes may amount to breaking the law". Gillian Mackay, the MSP behind the legislation, said at the time the comments were inaccurate. She said: "This is shocking and shameless misinformation from VP Vance, who is either very badly informed about what my Act has done or he is knowingly misrepresenting it." However, Vance has also described himself as a "Scots-Irish hillbilly at heart" in the past, with his ancestors having moved to the Appalachian region in the US more than three centuries ago. A Scottish government spokesperson said: "The Scottish government continues to work collaboratively with partners, including the UK government and Police Scotland, to manage the impact of a potential visit by the US Vice President to Scotland." JD Vance meets Jenrick and Philp in Cotswolds Police Scotland preparing for potential JD Vance visit Lammy admits fishing without licence on Vance trip
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Trump's mental decline is on vivid display as he rages about Epstein, windmills
It was nice of Donald Trump to travel to Scotland and show our European allies firsthand that the United States is led by a self-absorbed and deeply weird man in obvious mental decline. Over the span of a weekend, the U.S. president's addled brain raced about like a dull-witted Labrador attempting to outsmart squirrels. He went on lengthy diatribes about windmills. He ranted about the ungratefulness of starving children. He forayed into nonsensical conspiracy theories regarding the Jeffrey Epstein scandal consuming his administration, while laughably saying upon arriving in Scotland on July 25: 'I'm not focused on conspiracy theories.' Trump's head, based on his overseas babbling, is 90% conspiracy theories and 10% brain cells. Coverage of Trump's Scotland trip doesn't show the extent of his rambling The trip was largely a taxpayer-funded chance for the grifter in chief to promote his Scottish golf properties, which in the realm of 'things Trump can do that no other president would ever get away with' barely registers as a blip. It was also a chance for him to talk 'deals' with the European Union and the United Kingdom, with a 'deal' being something resulting in trade tariffs that will negatively impact American consumers. Or as Trump likes to call it, 'Winning.' Opinion: MAGA is realizing Trump lies. How can they trust anything he says on Epstein? News coverage tends to trim Trump's voluminous prattling into digestible sound bites that sound vaguely sane. But if we care about a president's lack of mental acuity – and I've been told by many that we do – it's worth sticking your head in the high-pressure stream of nonsense that shoots out every time Trump opens his face hole. Trump shows he's laser-focused on the scourge of windmills On July 25, Trump deplaned in Scotland and immediately showed reporters he was armed with weapons-grade non sequiturs. 'This immigration is killing Europe,' he said, racistly. 'And the other thing, stop the windmills killing the beauty of your countries.' Two days later, he sat with European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen, who looked like she would love to be elsewhere, and uncorked this: 'And the other thing I say to Europe, we will not allow a windmill to be built in the United States, they're killing us. They're killing the beauty of our scenery, our valleys, our beautiful plains. And I'm not talking about airplanes, I'm talking about beautiful plains, beautiful areas of the United States, and you look up and you see windmills all over the place, it's a horrible thing. It's the most expensive form of energy; it's no good. They're made in China, almost all of them. When they start to rust and rot in eight years, you can't really turn them off, you can't bury them, they won't let you. But the propellers, the props, because they're a certain type of fiber that doesn't go well with the land, that's what they say. The environmentalists say you can't bury them because the fiber doesn't go well with the land; in other words, if you bury it, it will harm our soil. The whole thing is a con job.' OK. That was a thing nobody asked for. It's also filled with lies – wind isn't the most expensive form of energy, and windmills last far longer than eight years. But who would expect honesty from someone rambling like that? Again with the windmills? Heck, just let the old man cook. And Trump wasn't done with windmills. On July 28, during his meeting with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, the president said: 'It destroys the beauty of your fields, your plains, and your waterways, and look out there – there's no windmills. But if you look in another direction, you see windmills.' Are the windmills in the room with us right now, Mr. President? Propose prosecuting Beyoncé? Check! Babble incoherently? Check! Trump did take a break from talking crazy over the weekend to post something crazy on social media, writing July 26 that pop star Beyoncé should be prosecuted for a nonexistent $11 million payment from Kamala Harris' presidential campaign. So that happened. And it's not ideal. On July 27, alongside von der Leyen, Trump was asked how he feels about the images of starving children in Gaza, to which he said: 'That whole place is a mess. The Gaza Strip, you know, was given many years ago, said that they could have peace. That didn't work out too well. When Israel gave that up, whoever was the prime minister at the time, who I know, who it was, but it was not exactly a very clever thing to do. Because that was given so that they finally have peace, but it's actually made the situation worse. But we'll see what happens. I think Iran is acting up. We have a lot of people acting, we have Venezuela acting up in a different way. They continue to send people that we rebuff to our border. They continue to send drugs into our country, Venezuela. They've been very nasty.' Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store. So when shown images of starving children in Gaza, Trump feels the place is a mess because an Israeli prime minister whose name he DEFINITELY knows but isn't going to say gave up the Gaza Strip so there could be peace but that made things worse and Iran is acting up and, hey, let me tell you about Venezuela, which is about 7,000 miles away from Gaza. Opinion: Trump is unpopular, polls show, and he's building an America most Americans hate Republicans would have impeached Biden if he talked like Trump Had Joe Biden said something like that when he was president, Republicans would have either impeached him or ordered him locked in a room at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center. It got worse when Trump was asked if Israel should be doing more to allow food into Gaza to help the aforementioned starving children. The president's few remaining brain cells decided to focus on how ungrateful all those starving people are: 'We gave $60 million two weeks ago, and nobody even acknowledged it, for food. It's terrible, you know, you really at least want to have somebody say thank you. No other country gave anything; we gave $60 million two weeks ago for food for Gaza. Nobody acknowledged it, nobody talks about it. And it makes you feel a little bad when you do that, and you have other countries not giving anything, none of the European countries, by the way, nobody gave but us, and nobody said, 'Gee, thank you very much,' and it would be nice to have at least a thank you.' During his meeting with Starmer, Trump apparently forgot he had been talking about the Gaza Strip the day before and said: 'We do have to take care of the humanitarian needs on what they used to call the Gaza Strip. You don't hear that line too much anymore. You don't hear the Gaza Strip. But it is the Gaza Strip. Amazing.' Yes. Amazing. Epstein, Epstein, Epstein. Trump can't stop talking about the scandal. Trump's mental dullness led him to keep talking about the Epstein scandal he wants everyone to stop talking about, effectively telling the world the Epstein stuff is 'not a big thing,' but probably involves former Democratic President Bill Clinton and a former president of Harvard University and 'hedge fund guys' and was probably made up by Democrats who probably put fake stuff in the Epstein files but then, I guess, didn't use any damning information against Trump before the election. He also gave a third explanation for why he stopped being friends with Epstein and said of the convicted sex offender's notorious island: 'I never had the privilege of going to his island.' The privilege? Spoken like a man whose mind has turned to mush. So nice of Trump to share his cognitive decline with the world. Follow USA TODAY columnist Rex Huppke on Bluesky at @ and on Facebook at You can read diverse opinions from our USA TODAY columnists and other writers on the Opinion front page, on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and in our Opinion newsletter. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Scotland trip shows Trump's mental decline in real time | Opinion
Time Magazine
3 days ago
- Time Magazine
Trump Has Deployed Troops At Home Like No Other President
President Donald Trump announced on Monday that he would take control of the police force in Washington, D.C. and deploy 800 National Guard troops to quell crime and remove homeless encampments in the city. Flanked by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Attorney General Pam Bondi, Trump said he was deploying troops to 'help reestablish law, order and public safety' in the nation's capital, which he claimed had been 'overtaken by violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals." It comes just months after federal officials announced that violent crime in the city hit a 30-year low. The move is the latest in a string of military deployments on home soil by Trump that experts say represents a marked departure from his predecessors. It comes just two months after Trump deployed California's National Guard to quell protests in Los Angeles over his immigration policies, after the protests had largely died down. William Banks, professor of law at Syracuse University and an expert on the role of the military in domestic affairs, says Trump's move is likely intended as a 'symbolic' show of power, especially after a former DOGE staffer's assault in the city caught his attention. 'Symbolism has always been very important to Trump,' Banks tells TIME. 'Trump wants to clean the city up. He wants to make it look like the White House lawn.' Banks adds that the United States has always been 'unique' in its allocation of law enforcement to civilians and its general refusal to use the military on its own citizens. 'The [British] soldiers in the colonies ransacked people's homes, arrested people without cause, beat people up, stole their papers, [and] violated their privacy, so by the time of revolution and then the Constitution, we didn't have a good feeling about the presence of soldiers on our streets,' Banks says. 'We want our members of our community, our neighbors, people that we know and recognize, in civilian uniform.' Banks acknowledges that the Constitution recognizes there may be 'exceptional circumstances' where a military presence is required domestically, but that Presidents prior to Trump did so more sparingly. He points to what he calls 'rights-promoting deployments' of the National Guard, including by Lyndon B. Johnson to desegregate schools in Alabama and Mississippi. Though Trump focused on D.C., he also hinted that the capital city is just the beginning, mentioning New York City, Baltimore, and Oakland—cities in which he has much less jurisdiction. 'This will go further,' Trump said. 'We are starting strongly with D.C.' Here is where Trump has chosen to deploy federal troops during his two terms. Along the border During Trump's first term, he deployed the National Guard to the U.S.-Mexico border in a bid to cut down on illegal immigration. Trump's first term, much like his second, was defined by his aggressive immigration tactics. At the time, Trump's proclamation justified his deployment of troops by pointing to a surge of apprehensions at the border, while critics said that overall border crossings were at historic lows. This deployment of the National Guard at the border continued during his second term. In May of this year, thousands of National Guard troops were deployed to the Southern Border, escalating his crackdown on immigration. 'National Defense Areas' were established in New Mexico and Texas. Importantly, federal troops have been deployed at the border during previous Administrations, specifically to aid Border Patrol. Trump's expansion of military zones along the U.S. border, though, has empowered the military to further act as a law enforcement body, detaining and searching those who they consider as trespassing in these defense areas. Typically, the President would need Congressional approval for defense areas and the creation of essentially a 170-mile military installation, but the President's Day One declaration of a national emergency on the southern border in an Executive Order allowed him to sidestep this formalization. Black Lives Matter protests, 2020 In May 2020, protests broke out across the country in response to the murder of George Floyd by a police officer. The protests marked one of the largest protest movements in U.S. history, with estimates of as many as 26 million people participating in the call for racial justice. Tens of thousands of National Guard troops in over half of U.S. states were activated by state governors to deal with the Black Lives Matter protests, but Trump also used his own powers to deal with the unrest. In August 2020, Trump deployed federal forces to Kenosha, Wisconsin, to quell protests in the aftermath of the shooting of Jacob Blake by a police officer. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) also sent hundreds of federal officers to Portland, Oregon, to handle protests, with some reports, including one from the ACLU, claiming that these federal agents grabbed protestors off the streets in unmarked vehicles. Tactical teams of the Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) were also sent to Seattle, Washington, though push back by former Washington Gov. Jay Inslee and former Mayor Jenny Durkan eventually led to their withdrawal. In D.C., though, Trump, acting as Commander-in-Chief, deployed National Guard members from several states, despite public criticism from D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser. Trump's National Guard in D.C. also notoriously utilized tear-gas and rubber bullets against these Black Lives Matter protestors to disperse the demonstration and make room for a photo-op at St. John's Episcopal Church, which had been vandalized the night before during protests with a fire in the basement. Eventually, Trump threatened to utilize the Insurrection Act to deploy military forces to suppress the protests, calling the protestors 'terrorists.' Here, though, the Pentagon publicly broke from Trump, as Defense Secretary Mark Esper said he would prefer to not use active duty military on protests analyzed to have been mostly peaceful. Banks notes that Trump, as Commander-in-Chief of D.C., has more authority here than in the states, but adds 'one of the ironies is that in one of the few instances where there really was a violent disturbance inside the district—January 6, [2021]—[Trump] did nothing.' He continued, stating that if Trump had deployed the National Guard during the Jan. 6 insurrection, 'they could have stopped the Capitol rioting in 30 minutes.' Los Angeles, June 2025 President Trump deployed the California National Guard and the Marines in June this year, ostensibly to quell protests in Los Angeles against Trump's aggressive immigration policies and the intense escalation of deportations in the interior by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents. Trump's deployment of the National Guard came with a Presidential Memorandum that invoked Title 10, Section 12406 of the U.S. Code, which allows for the federal deployment of National Guard forces in limited circumstances, including if 'there is a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States.' When deployed, though, the National Guard was tasked with protecting ICE agents and federal property, and they were not authorized to perform any law enforcement activities. Trump was criticized for the move, with California Gov. Gavin Newsom calling the deployment 'purposefully inflammatory' and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) Southern California describing it as 'akin to a declaration of war on all Californians.' Currently, only 300 of the 5,000 troops deployed remain in Los Angeles, as a trial begins over the legality of Trump's deployment in the first place. A California federal judge is to rule whether Trump's use of the troops violates the Posse Comitatus Act, which limits the use of the military in domestic law enforcement.
