
US labor groups sue over ‘ignorant' cuts of programs fighting child labor abroad
The Solidarity Center, Global March Against Child Labour, and the American Institutes for Research (AIR), filed the lawsuit on Tuesday seeking to stop the cuts, enacted by Elon Musk's so-called 'department of government efficiency' (Doge), and arguing the programs were authorized by Congress and that the secretary of labor has no authority to cancel the funds.
Several groups supporting workers and corporations have criticized the Trump administration's decision to abruptly cancel all ongoing grants and contracts for programs with the Bureau of International Labor Affairs (ILAB) at the Department of Labor which works to improve labor conditions outside the US.
In March Doge announced it had canceled about $577m in grants for programs it labeled 'America last'. Doge cited programs including 'worker empowerment in South America', 'improving respect for Worker's rights in agricultural supply chains' in Honduras, Guatemala, and El Salvador and 'assisting foreign migrant workers' in Malaysia.
The AFL-CIO, the largest federation of labor unions in the US, and the American Apparel & Footwear Association (AAFA), whose members include corporations such as Adidas and Ralph Lauren, criticized the cuts and argued the decision 'puts American workers and American businesses last' by enabling the degradation of labor and business standards abroad.
'It's just so frustrating to read the shallow and useless justifications that are being put out on Twitter by the secretary of labor and the Doge crowd,' said Thea Lee, who served as deputy undersecretary for International Labor Affairs at the US Department of Labor from 2021 to 2025. 'The abrupt termination of all of ILAB grants is a destruction of decades of consensus that is bipartisan, that is business and labor agreeing together that these are important things. It's ignorant. It's self-defeating, and it's wasteful and inefficient.'
Lee explained the cuts demonstrate ignorance of how the global economy works, of the long-term sourcing and investment decisions made by corporations, and the negative impacts on American workers, businesses, and consumers in competing and relying on supply chains where forced labor, child labor, and other human rights abuses are ignored.
'This was a completely indiscriminate meat ax that was taken to these projects and workers will suffer, businesses will suffer, and American workers will suffer,' said Lee.
Lee cited programs and research required to enforce trade agreements between the US and other nations, such as the National Child Labor survey, and around enforcing the bipartisan Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act, which was co-sponsored by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, as examples of programs where the work already completed is likely to be wasted due to the cuts.
Shawna Bader-Blau, the executive director of the Solidarity Center, a nonprofit working in over 90 countries to improve worker standards and conditions, said the cuts reduced the organization's budget by 20%, in addition to 30% cuts through USAID cuts.
'It's a devastating, huge impact. The Solidarity Center is very often in countries where they are the only external support for trade union organizing and the advancement of worker rights. If we have to leave, we're not replaced,' said Bader-Blau. 'It's critical to the American economy that American workers not be forced to compete with extremely exploited workers in other countries, up to and including forced and child labor in supply chains.'
She cited programs involved in enforcing labor aspects of the United States Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), signed under Trump's first term, to improve labor conditions in Mexico. The programs directly impact US workers whose jobs have often been outsourced to Mexico by corporations to exploit cheaper labor.
The cuts, noted Bader-Blau, make it more likely that workers will be affected by offshoring and consumers will be purchasing goods where labor abuses are rampant in the supply chain.
The cuts follow cancellations of previous grants, including a program that began in 2022 and was slated to continue until 2026 to provide support for Uzbekistan, the sixth largest producer of cotton in the world, after the country banned forced labor and child labor in its cotton production industry.
The program was created to affirm and support the ban on forced labor and child labor so American corporations that had boycotted cotton from the region could begin sourcing from the country.
The program's cancellation was touted by US Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer last month.
'State-imposed forced labor was used in the cotton harvest for decades,' said Raluca Dumitrescu, coordinator for the Cotton Campaign.
Umida Niyazova, director of the Uzbek Forum for Human Rights, explained Uzbekistan has moved in recent years from producing cotton and exporting the entire crop, to developing a textile industry to process it. Though the nation has eliminated forced labor and child labor in harvesting, issues and abuses are still rampant throughout the industry.
'Since 2021, under enormous pressure, the state has changed the coercive practice of mass mobilization for cotton harvesting, however, the risks of forced labor remain high since structural reforms have not been implemented,' said Niyazova.
Niyazova said the country still needs programs to establish decent labor standards and enforce them, such as the cancelled ILAB program.
'As Uzbek textile products are aimed at the foreign market, this concerns other countries and people of goodwill who would not want to become potential participants in a production chain based on worker exploitation,' she added.
A spokesperson for the US Department of Labor did not provide information on how the funds will be reallocated, and did not comment on criticisms of the cuts.
'The American people resoundingly elected President Trump with a clear mandate to reduce federal government bloat and root out waste. Americans don't want their hard-earned tax dollars bankrolling foreign handouts that put America last,' said Courtney Parella, US Department of Labor spokesperson in an email. 'That's why we're focused on improving oversight and accountability within this program – and across the entire department – while prioritizing investments in the American workforce.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
25 minutes ago
- The Independent
Pfizer CEO says pharmaceutical companies want to work with Trump to make medicine more affordable
Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla announced that major pharmaceutical companies are ready to work with the Trump administration to make medicines more affordable and directly available to consumers. This move comes after Trump demanded that 17 drugmakers expand direct-to-consumer options and lower prices to match those in other industrialized countries, threatening to use 'every tool' if they did not comply. Pfizer and Bristol Myers Squibb have already revealed plans to offer their blood thinner Eliquis at a lower price online, building on Pfizer's existing direct-to-consumer telehealth and prescription services. Other companies, such as Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk, are also exploring direct access for their obesity drugs, aiming to bypass pharmacy benefit managers. Despite potential sector-specific tariffs on pharmaceutical imports, which could escalate to 250 percent, Pfizer expects to meet its financial forecasts, though experts have refuted Trump's claims of significant drug price reductions.


The Independent
25 minutes ago
- The Independent
Stanford University laying off hundreds due to Trump cuts
Stanford University is set to lay off hundreds of employees, citing 'changes in federal policy' under the Trump administration. The elite California private school laid off 363 employees last week, a university spokesperson told The Independent. The move affected roles across departments, including those working in administration, research, alumni relations and campus operations, according to the San Francisco Chronicle. 'The university is providing support resources as well as layoff benefits to eligible employees,' school officials said in a July 31 statement. 'Nonetheless, these are difficult actions that affect valued colleagues and friends who have made important contributions to Stanford.' The layoffs are the result of 'ongoing economic uncertainty' and 'anticipated changes in federal policy — such as reductions in federal research funding and an increase in the excise tax on investment income,' according to a letter from Stanford Vice President for Human Resources Elizabeth Zacharias reviewed by the Chronicle. President Donald Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' — which he signed into law last month — increased Stanford's endowment tax from 1.4 percent to 21 percent, the Chronicle reports. Stanford's $37.6 billion endowment is among the largest in the country. Stanford also lost a significant amount of federal research funding as agencies like the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation are impacted by ongoing funding freezes, the Chronicle reports. Stanford has also been forced to make a $140 million reduction in its general budget for the upcoming year, according to a June statement from the school's president and provost. The school officials cited 'significant budget consequences from federal policy changes.' 'These changes include reductions in federal research support and an increase in the endowment tax,' the statement reads. The Trump administration has taken aim at higher education this year, and some schools have made deals with the administration to ensure federal funding isn't withheld. For instance, Columbia University in New York City agreed to pay the Trump administration a $200 million settlement last month to prevent funding cuts over claims that the elite school failed to combat antisemitism. Columbia University has not admitted wrongdoing and 'does not agree with the government's conclusion that it violated Title VI of the Civil Rights Act,' according to a July 23 statement from the school. 'We are not, however, denying the very serious and painful challenges our institution has faced with antisemitism,' the statement continues. 'For these reasons, we took several important corrective steps in March, many of which are in this agreement, including a new provision for a liaison to the Jewish community, situated in University Life.'


Daily Mail
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Donald Trump accused of being 'like a medieval king' who has turned 'the Oval Office into a reality TV set'
The former UK ambassador to the US has delivered a scathing rebuke of Donald Trump, accusing him of acting like a 'medieval king'. Lord Darroch said the President had turned the 'Oval Office into a reality TV set'. The former diplomat was forced to quit his role in 2019 during Mr Trump's first term after leaked briefings showed him describing the President's government as 'dysfunctional', 'inept' and 'divided'. Speaking to broadcaster Iain Dale at the Edinburgh Festival Fringe, Lord Darroch defended the letter, which he said was a result of then-prime minister David Cameron urging him to be honest and direct. He told the audience that his comments were borne out by Mr Trump's actions as president. The former ambassador said Mr Trump was ultimately an unpredictable leader as he cited the numerous firings of top officials by the President, the various changes to his tariff policies and the recent move to place nuclear submarines near Russia. 'He's sort of like a medieval king - that sort of capricious decision-making - than he is like a modern politician where consistency is seen as important,' he said. 'He doesn't think that's important at all. He thinks that every day is a fresh day. You're basically battling with media. 'You're battling with your opponents. If it suits you today to reverse something you did last week, just do it. 'If you look at tariffs, that's a perfect example of unpredictability of capriciousness.' Lord Darroch suggested that Mr Trump's style stemmed from his time on the US version of The Apprentice. 'Donald Trump was made by reality TV,' he said, describing him as 'the American version of Alan Sugar'. He added: 'He learned a lot about how to present himself from reality TV. 'I think he's now literally turned the Oval Office into a reality TV set.' During his discussion with Mr Dale, the former diplomat praised the Prime Minister's handling of foreign policy, including his relationship with the US President. He told the broadcaster: 'So far, against a lot of predictions, Keir Starmer has proved himself really quite an adept Trump whisperer. 'He's done some clever things, including phoning Trump up after the assassination attempt - that was a clever thing to do, going to see him to sort of kiss the ring before the election.' The peer said the Labour leader had been better on foreign policy than domestic policy, but warned the PM there were 'not many votes in foreign policy'. Asked about defence, Lord Darroch suggested the UK would not be able to cope with a Russian invasion, although he said the chances of that were low. 'The truth is I don't think we are close,' he said. 'I do think it's less distant than it was five years ago. 'I do think the important point really is that we are woefully underprepared.' Lord Darroch has been outspoken in his criticism of Mr Trump since he was forced to quit his stateside role. Mr Trump had criticised him as as a 'stupid guy' and a 'pompous fool'.