logo
Trump and Putin will meet this weekend in Alaska — here's what we know

Trump and Putin will meet this weekend in Alaska — here's what we know

The White House has released new details of the upcoming Alaskan summit between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin.
The lead-up to the talks has seen Russia make gains on the battleground in Ukraine, while Volodymyr Zelenskyy has ruled out any deal that involves giving up land.
Here's what we know.
The summit will be held on Friday, Alaska time, at Elmendorf Air Force Base in Anchorage. Anchorage is Alaska's largest city, although its population is less than 300,000.
At time of writing, the exact meeting time had not yet been revealed.
The location is seen as being geographically significant as Alaska was part of the Russian Empire until 1867, when the United States purchased it for $US7.2 million, which is about $254 million in today's Australian dollars.
Alaska is also the closest US state to Russia. The two superpowers are separated by the Bering Strait, a narrow sea crossing which is just 82 kilometres wide at its narrowest point.
The White House says the talks will be one-on-one between Trump and Putin, meaning there is no room at the table for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.
"Only one party that's involved in this war is going to be present," said White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt.
Putin said last week he wasn't against meeting Zelenskyy, but said "certain conditions need to be created" for that to happen, and that they were "still a long way off".
The White House appears to be trying to dampen down expectations of a quick ceasefire deal, stating the Anchorage talks will be "a listening exercise for the president''.
"This is for the president to go and to get, again, a more firm and better understanding of how we can hopefully bring this war to an end," Leavitt told reporters.
Russia has previously demanded that Kyiv hand over the Donetsk, Kherson, Luhansk and Zaporizhzhia regions, which were illegally annexed by Moscow in 2022 at the start of the three-and-a-half-year war.
Last weekend Zelenskyy said: "Ukrainians will not give their land to the occupier."
However Trump has said "there'll be some land swapping going on … for the good of Ukraine. Good stuff, not bad stuff. Also, some bad stuff for both".
This will be Putin's first trip to the US since 2015, when he travelled to New York to speak at the UN General Assembly.
Putin and Trump met multiple times during Trump's first presidency, while the Russian leader also met with then-US president Joe Biden in 2021.
Although the International Criminal Court issued a warrant for Putin's arrest over alleged war crimes in Ukraine in 2023, the US is not a member of the court and is under no obligation to arrest him.
In 2019, during his first presidency, Trump travelled to the Korean Peninsula to meet North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, becoming the first US leader to step into the communist-controlled North Korea.
Russian troops have been gaining ground in Ukraine's east, with Ukraine throwing extra troops into heavy fighting around the coal-mining town of Dobropillia in the Donetsk region.
Kremlin officials have demanded Ukraine cede "strategically vital" territory in Donetsk as part of a ceasefire agreement, according to Washington-based think-tank the Institute for the Study of War (ISW).
Surrendering the rest of Donetsk, according to ISW, would force Ukraine to abandon its "fortress belt" of multiple major cities and settlements running along a 50-kilometre stretch of highway.
"Ukraine has spent the last 11 years pouring time, money, and effort into reinforcing the fortress belt and establishing significant defence … infrastructure in and around these cities," the ISW said.
"Russian forces are currently still attempting to envelop the fortress belt from the south-west and are engaged in an effort to seize it that would likely take several years to complete."
Russia has also launched Russian summer camps and programs designed to send Ukrainian children across the border as part of a "Russification" campaign.
Details of exactly when the talks will take place have not been released.
Alaska's time zone is 18 hours behind eastern Australia, meaning talks on Friday US time would be happening on Saturday morning AEST.
ABC/wires
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's new numbers guru is not qualified to do the job
Trump's new numbers guru is not qualified to do the job

Sydney Morning Herald

timean hour ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Trump's new numbers guru is not qualified to do the job

The internet has been quick to dig into the professional history of EJ Antoni, President Donald Trump's pick to lead the US Bureau of Labour Statistics. It doesn't take long. Now the chief economist for the Heritage Foundation, he got his doctorate just five years ago and has no publications or citations of note. He has no experience with large public surveys, no research about survey methodology, and no history of managing large organisations such as the 2000 people who work at the bureau. Unusually for an economist, he appears not to have a strong grasp of how recessions work. Ultimately, however, Antoni himself is uninteresting. He's just another unqualified Trump nominee. His nomination is worth paying attention to, however, because it illustrates the twin perils facing the economy: the coming slowdown, and a party that refuses to acknowledge it. If anyone needed further proof of that slowdown, it came in the jobs numbers that got the last bureau commissioner fired. The US economy added an average of just 35,000 jobs over the last three months. This came on the heels of a GDP report that showed both household spending and business investment growing at half the pace of last year. Meanwhile, prices are still rising above the target rate of 2 per cent. This is a historically dangerous combination, brought on by tariffs. There is no nightmare for the modern economy quite like slow growth and rising prices – the dreaded stagflation. And the US is closer to stagflation now than it has been in 40 years. But that's only half the problem – the less scary half, in fact. After all, it's not uncommon for economies to slow down or even go through recessions. When they do, a machinery of co-ordinated policy is put into gear to provide relief to suffering citizens. The goal is to prevent an acceleration of the downturn. Congress has expanded unemployment benefits during every recession since 1957. As the financial crisis was approaching, it passed the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008 and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. During the pandemic, there were the Cares Act of 2020 and the American Rescue Plan of 2021. Separate from this immediate relief, Congress also tries to address root causes. So, after the savings and loan crisis of the 1980s, there was the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989, while the Troubled Asset Relief Program of 2008 was aimed at the causes of the Great Recession. The vaccine efforts for Operation Warp Speed were included in the Cares Act.

Trump's new numbers guru is not qualified to do the job
Trump's new numbers guru is not qualified to do the job

The Age

timean hour ago

  • The Age

Trump's new numbers guru is not qualified to do the job

The internet has been quick to dig into the professional history of EJ Antoni, President Donald Trump's pick to lead the US Bureau of Labour Statistics. It doesn't take long. Now the chief economist for the Heritage Foundation, he got his doctorate just five years ago and has no publications or citations of note. He has no experience with large public surveys, no research about survey methodology, and no history of managing large organisations such as the 2000 people who work at the bureau. Unusually for an economist, he appears not to have a strong grasp of how recessions work. Ultimately, however, Antoni himself is uninteresting. He's just another unqualified Trump nominee. His nomination is worth paying attention to, however, because it illustrates the twin perils facing the economy: the coming slowdown, and a party that refuses to acknowledge it. If anyone needed further proof of that slowdown, it came in the jobs numbers that got the last bureau commissioner fired. The US economy added an average of just 35,000 jobs over the last three months. This came on the heels of a GDP report that showed both household spending and business investment growing at half the pace of last year. Meanwhile, prices are still rising above the target rate of 2 per cent. This is a historically dangerous combination, brought on by tariffs. There is no nightmare for the modern economy quite like slow growth and rising prices – the dreaded stagflation. And the US is closer to stagflation now than it has been in 40 years. But that's only half the problem – the less scary half, in fact. After all, it's not uncommon for economies to slow down or even go through recessions. When they do, a machinery of co-ordinated policy is put into gear to provide relief to suffering citizens. The goal is to prevent an acceleration of the downturn. Congress has expanded unemployment benefits during every recession since 1957. As the financial crisis was approaching, it passed the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008 and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. During the pandemic, there were the Cares Act of 2020 and the American Rescue Plan of 2021. Separate from this immediate relief, Congress also tries to address root causes. So, after the savings and loan crisis of the 1980s, there was the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989, while the Troubled Asset Relief Program of 2008 was aimed at the causes of the Great Recession. The vaccine efforts for Operation Warp Speed were included in the Cares Act.

Trump orders space regulations eased in win for Musk
Trump orders space regulations eased in win for Musk

News.com.au

timean hour ago

  • News.com.au

Trump orders space regulations eased in win for Musk

US President Donald Trump signed an executive order Wednesday easing regulations for the private space industry, including eliminating some environmental reviews, in a move likely to please his erstwhile advisor Elon Musk. The executive order, which said it aimed to "substantially" increase the number of space launches in the United States, was described by an environmental group as "reckless." Since returning to the White House in January, Trump has talked up several space missions including sending humans to the Moon and Mars. The Moon and Mars missions are planned to get a ride on the massive Starship rocket of Musk's private firm SpaceX. However, Starship has had a series of setbacks, with its latest routine test ending in a fiery explosion in June. SpaceX dominates the global launch market, with its various-sized rockets blasting off more than 130 times last year -- and that number looks set to rise after Trump's executive order. "It is the policy of the United States to enhance American greatness in space by enabling a competitive launch marketplace and substantially increasing commercial space launch cadence" by 2030, the order read. The change could well benefit Musk, who has long advocated for deregulation of the space industry. The world's richest man was previously a close advisor to Trump before the pair had a dramatic, public falling out in July. The executive order also called on Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy -- who was at the signing and is currently NASA's administrator -- "to eliminate or expedite the Department of Transportation's environmental reviews" for launches. SpaceX has been repeatedly criticized over the environmental impact at the sites where Starship, the largest and most powerful rocket in history, blasts off. The US-based nonprofit Center for Biological Diversity said Trump's new executive order "paves the way for the massive destruction of protected plants and animals." "This reckless order puts people and wildlife at risk from private companies launching giant rockets that often explode and wreak devastation on surrounding areas," the center's Jared Margolis said in a statement. Musk's dreams of colonizing Mars rely on the success of Starship, and SpaceX has been betting that its "fail fast, learn fast" ethos will eventually pay off. The Federal Aviation Administration approved an increase in annual Starship rocket launches from five to 25 in early May, stating that the increased frequency would not adversely affect the environment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store