China says wind and solar energy capacity exceeds thermal for first time
While around 60 per cent of China's energy comes from coal, the country is also a renewable energy powerhouse. PHOTO: REUTERS
China says wind and solar energy capacity exceeds thermal for first time
BEIJING - China's wind and solar energy capacity has surpassed that of mostly coal-powered thermal for the first time, the national energy body said on April 25.
China, the world's largest emitter of greenhouse gases that drive climate change, has pledged to peak carbon emissions by 2030 and achieve carbon neutrality by 2060.
While around 60 per cent of China's energy comes from coal, the country is also a renewable energy powerhouse, building almost twice as much wind and solar capacity as every other country combined, according to research published in 2024.
'In the first quarter of 2025, China's newly installed wind and photovoltaic power capacity totalled 74.33 million kilowatts, bringing the cumulative installed capacity to 1.482 billion kW,' the national energy body said.
That surpassed the installed capacity of thermal power (1.451 billion kW) for the first time.
President Xi Jinping said on April 23 that 'no matter how the international situation changes', the country's efforts to combat climate change 'will not slow down'.
Mr Xi also said China would announce its 2035 greenhouse gas reduction commitments, known as Nationally Determined Contributions, before COP30 in November and that it would cover all greenhouse gases, not just carbon dioxide.
President Donald Trump meanwhile has pulled the US, the world's second-largest polluter, out of the Paris climate accord while pledging a vast expansion in fossil fuel exploitation.
'Structural change'
China's new milestone comes as the country experiences explosive growth in renewable energy.
In 2024, China added a record 357 gigawatts of wind and solar, 10 times the US's additions.
It met a 2030 target to install 1,200 GW of solar and wind capacity almost six years early.
April 25's announcement said that wind and solar additions in the first quarter had 'far exceeded' China's total increase in electricity consumption.
'This trend is very likely to continue in the following months and quarters in 2025,' Greenpeace East Asia's Global Policy adviser Yao Zhe told AFP.
That suggests China's power sector is undergoing 'structural change and the sector's carbon emissions are one small step away from peaking'.
However, coal continues to play a key role in China's energy mix.
'The intermittency of variable renewables like wind and solar... means it's generally inappropriate to compare them to firm, dispatchable power sources like coal,' according to Mr David Fishman, senior manager at the Lantau Group.
'There is indeed some combination of wind plus solar plus storage that equals one coal plant, but the determination is different everywhere in the world.'
And China's energy consumption continues to grow – by 4.3 per cent in 2024.
Covering that growth with renewable power is a 'tough proposition for a developing country with a huge heavy industrial segment and a residential population that frankly doesn't even use that much electricity on a per capita basis', Mr Fishman said.
Despite the renewable energy boom, China also began construction on 94.5 GW of coal power projects in 2024, 93 per cent of the global total, according to a February report from the Finland-based Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air and Global Energy Monitor in the US.
China's coal production has risen steadily in recent years, from 3.9 billion tonnes in 2020 to 4.8 billion tonnes in 2024.
That is despite Mr Xi pledging to 'strictly control' coal power before 'phasing it down' between 2026 and 2030. AFP
Find out more about climate change and how it could affect you on the ST microsite here.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Straits Times
21 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Intense Russian drone attack on Kharkiv kills 2, injures 38, Ukraine says
KHARKIV - A nine-minute-long Russian drone attack on Ukraine's second largest city of Kharkiv killed at least two people and injured 38, including five children, regional officials said on Wednesday. The intense strikes with 17 drones sparked fires in 15 units of a five-storey apartment building and caused other damage in the city close to the Russian border, Kharkiv Mayor Ihor Terekhov said. "There are direct hits on multi-storey buildings, private homes, playgrounds, enterprises and public transport," Terekhov said on the Telegram messaging app. "Apartments are burning, roofs are destroyed, cars are burnt, windows are broken." A Reuters witness saw emergency rescuers helping to carry people out of damaged buildings, administering care and firefighters battling blazes in the dark. Nine of the injured, including a 2-year-old girl and a 15-year-old boy, have been hospitalised, Oleh Sinehubov, the governor of the broader Kharkiv region, said on Telegram. He added that the strikes hit also a city trolley bus depot and several residential buildings. There was no immediate comment from Russia. Kharkiv, in Ukraine's northeast, withstood Russian full-scale advance in the early days of the war and has since been a frequent target of air assaults. The attack followed Russia's two biggest assaults of the war on Ukraine this week, a part of intensified bombardments that Moscow said were retaliatory measures for Kyiv's recent attacks in Russia. Both sides deny targeting civilians in the war that Russia launched on its smaller neighbour in February 2022. But thousands of civilians have died in the conflict, the vast majority of them Ukrainian. "We are holding on. We are helping each other. And we will definitely survive," Terekhov said. "Kharkiv is Ukraine. And it cannot be broken." REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Straits Times
21 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Trump tariffs may remain in effect while appeals proceed, US appeals court decides
The appeals court has yet to rule on whether the tariffs are permissible under an emergency economic powers act that Mr Trump cited. PHOTO: REUTERS WASHINGTON - A federal appeals court allowed President Donald Trump's most sweeping tariffs to remain in effect on June 10 while it reviews a lower court decision blocking them on grounds that Mr Trump had exceeded his authority by imposing them. The decision by the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, DC means Mr Trump may continue to enforce, for now, his 'Liberation Day' tariffs on imports from most US trading partners, as well as a separate set of tariffs levied on Canada, China and Mexico. The appeals court has yet to rule on whether the tariffs are permissible under an emergency economic powers act that Mr Trump cited to justify them, but it allowed the tariffs to remain in place while the appeals play out. The tariffs, used by Mr Trump as negotiating leverage with US trading partners, and their on-again, off-again nature have shocked markets and whipsawed companies of all sizes as they seek to manage supply chains, production, staffing and prices. The ruling has no impact on other tariffs levied under more traditional legal authority, such as tariffs on steel and aluminium imports. A three-judge panel of the US Court of International Trade ruled on May 28 that the US Constitution gave Congress, not the president, the power to levy taxes and tariffs, and that the president had exceeded his authority by invoking the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), a law intended to address 'unusual and extraordinary' threats during national emergencies. The Trump administration quickly appealed the ruling, and the Federal Circuit in Washington put the lower court decision on hold the next day while it considered whether to impose a longer-term pause. The ruling came in a pair of lawsuits, one filed by the nonpartisan Liberty Justice Centre on behalf of five small US businesses that import goods from countries targeted by the duties and the other by 12 US states. Mr Trump has claimed broad authority to set tariffs under IEEPA. The 1977 law has historically been used to impose sanctions on enemies of the US or freeze their assets. Mr Trump is the first US president to use it to impose tariffs. Mr Trump has said that the tariffs imposed in February on Canada, China and Mexico were to fight illegal fentanyl trafficking at US borders, denied by the three countries, and that the across-the-board tariffs on all US trading partners imposed in April were a response to the US trade deficit. The states and small businesses had argued the tariffs were not a legal or appropriate way to address those matters, and the small businesses argued that the decades-long US practice of buying more goods than it exports does not qualify as an emergency that would trigger IEEPA. At least five other court cases have challenged the tariffs justified under the emergency economic powers act, including other small businesses and the state of California. One of those cases, in federal court in Washington, DC, also resulted in an initial ruling against the tariffs, and no court has yet backed the unlimited emergency tariff authority Mr Trump has claimed. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Straits Times
25 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Trump tariffs may remain in effect while appeals proceed, U.S. Appeals court decides
FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump holds a chart next to U.S. Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick as Trump delivers remarks on tariffs in the Rose Garden at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., April 2, 2025. REUTERS/Carlos Barria/File Photo A federal appeals court allowed President Donald Trump's most sweeping tariffs to remain in effect on Tuesday while it reviews a lower court decision blocking them on grounds that Trump had exceeded his authority by imposing them. The decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C. means Trump may continue to enforce, for now, his "Liberation Day" tariffs on imports from most U.S. trading partners, as well as a separate set of tariffs levied on Canada, China and Mexico. The appeals court has yet to rule on whether the tariffs are permissible under an emergency economic powers act that Trump cited to justify them, but it allowed the tariffs to remain in place while the appeals play out. The tariffs, used by Trump as negotiating leverage with U.S. trading partners, and their on-again, off-again nature have shocked markets and whipsawed companies of all sizes as they seek to manage supply chains, production, staffing and prices. The ruling has no impact on other tariffs levied under more traditional legal authority, such as tariffs on steel and aluminum imports. A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of International Trade ruled on May 28 that the U.S. Constitution gave Congress, not the president, the power to levy taxes and tariffs, and that the president had exceeded his authority by invoking the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, a law intended to address "unusual and extraordinary" threats during national emergencies. The Trump administration quickly appealed the ruling, and the Federal Circuit in Washington put the lower court decision on hold the next day while it considered whether to impose a longer-term pause. The ruling came in a pair of lawsuits, one filed by the nonpartisan Liberty Justice Center on behalf of five small U.S. businesses that import goods from countries targeted by the duties and the other by 12 U.S. states. Trump has claimed broad authority to set tariffs under IEEPA. The 1977 law has historically been used to impose sanctions on enemies of the U.S. or freeze their assets. Trump is the first U.S. president to use it to impose tariffs. Trump has said that the tariffs imposed in February on Canada, China and Mexico were to fight illegal fentanyl trafficking at U.S. borders, denied by the three countries, and that the across-the-board tariffs on all U.S. trading partners imposed in April were a response to the U.S. trade deficit. The states and small businesses had argued the tariffs were not a legal or appropriate way to address those matters, and the small businesses argued that the decades-long U.S. practice of buying more goods than it exports does not qualify as an emergency that would trigger IEEPA. At least five other court cases have challenged the tariffs justified under the emergency economic powers act, including other small businesses and the state of California. One of those cases, in federal court in Washington, D.C., also resulted in an initial ruling against the tariffs, and no court has yet backed the unlimited emergency tariff authority Trump has claimed. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.