
All the president's friends, from Natalie Harp and Daniel Penny to Andrew Tate
There are three tried-and-tested strategies for getting into Donald Trump's inner circle. No 1: be young, blond and so obsessed with the president that even the Secret Service think it's kinda weird. That strategy certainly seems to have worked out well for Natalie Harp, a former far-right cable host who is now an official aide to Trump.
Harp is what the New York Times diplomatically termed 'devoted'. During the campaign, she became known as the 'human printer' because she followed Trump around with a portable printer – even sometimes running after him on the golf course – to hand him hard copies of flattering coverage. The 34-year-old also reportedly offered to go to prison for Trump, and told the billionaire he is her 'guardian and protector in this life'. According to excerpts from Michael Wolff's new book on Trump, the 'Natalie situation' became so intense that Secret Service agents deemed her 'a potential danger to herself as well as to the president'. But all's well that ends well: now she's helping to run the country!
Strategy No 2: kill an unhoused man. Last year, a Manhattan jury found Daniel Penny, a 26-year-old former Marine, who is white, not guilty in the chokehold death of Jordan Neely, an unhoused Black man. Penny has become a celebrity in rightwing circles, and was recently hired by venture capital giant Andreessen Horowitz (whose founders are big Trump fans) as a deal partner in its American Dynamism practice. Penny has also recently been spotted schmoozing with Trump at Mar-a-Lago. No doubt it's not long before he gets a job in the Department of Defense.
Strategy No 3: be a self-professed 'misogynist influencer' accused by authorities of sexually exploiting women. There's nothing that will win Trump's sympathy faster than a misogynist in a spot of legal bother: sexual predators of a feather flock together. In a move pretty much anyone could have seen coming, the Trump administration has decided to lend a helping hand to manosphere influencers Andrew and Tristan Tate, who are dual US and UK nationals. Earlier this week, the Financial Times reported that the Trump administration had asked Romanian authorities to lift travel restrictions on the brothers, who were arrested in 2022 and indicted in mid-2023 on charges of human trafficking, rape and forming a criminal gang to sexually exploit women – charges they deny.
Andrew Tate is also facing a separate civil action from four British women who have alleged rape and coercive control between 2013 and 2016. As you can imagine, those women are deeply concerned that the Trump administration seems to be interfering in the case and have asked them to leave authorities alone to 'do their jobs'. The lawyer for the victims also noted that Trump was 'interfering in due process' not just in Romania, but in the UK, where the Tates are pending extradition.
Why is the Trump administration, which has a lot on its plate, seemingly going out of its way to help the Tates? As Matt Shea wrote in an explainer for the Guardian, the 'alliance … has been in the making for a long time. Paul Ingrassia, one of the lawyers Andrew Tate hired to fight his human-trafficking case, was recently sworn in as the White House liaison for the Department of Justice. Tate has also been friends with Donald Trump Jr since 2016, and Alina Habba, who holds the high-ranking political adviser role of counselor to the president, has said she is a 'big fan' of Andrew Tate. He has a lot of friends in high places.
There might also be a bit of quid pro quo at play as well. Tristan Tate boasted on X in November that the brothers had helped Trump win the US election, claiming 'millions of young men in Europe and the USA have a healthy rightwing approach to politics that they would NOT have if Andrew Tate had never appeared on their phone screens'. That's broadly true: the Tate brothers have helped radicalize a generation. And they continue to be useful propagandists for Trump. As Shea notes: 'The Trump administration and Tate are both promoting a conspiracy theory that USAid and the mainstream media have worked together to fabricate charges against Tate. By supporting him, the Trump administration is forging a new axis of disinformation to go after the press and the very idea of justice and due process.'
While the Tates are useful to Trump, the Trump administration might literally be the brothers' get-out-of-jail-free-card. After Trump won the 2024 election, Andrew Tate tweeted that his case would be dismissed. 'Watch this space ;-),' he said.
Oh, believe me, I've been watching this space, and it's getting more and more dystopian every day. Meddling with the Tates's case is just the start. Trump has made it very clear that he doesn't think the law applies to him or any of his friends, tweeting: 'He who saves his Country does not violate any Law.' He has also likened himself to a 'king'. This isn't bombast: Trump has told us time and time again he thinks he is above the law and can do whatever he likes. We must take him at his word.
On average, 130,390 women get contraceptive care each day under US-funded programs, according to the Guttmacher Institute, a non-profit that studies sexual and reproductive health. 'If 11.7 million women and girls are denied access to contraceptive care in 2025, 4.2 million will experience unintended pregnancies, and 8,340 will die from complications during pregnancy and childbirth,' the institute calculates.
The rate of sepsis, a life-threatening condition, went up more than 50% for women hospitalized when they lost their pregnancies in the second trimester, an investigation by ProPublica found.
This joyful video of women dancing to Chappell Roan at a lesbian bar in Brooklyn has gone viral.
According to the Hill, the bill summary states that, if passed, Missouri would create a registry of every expecting mother in the state 'who is at risk for seeking an abortion'. The party of small government strikes again!
And she has put her money where her mouth is, teaming up with a woman director either as a producer or as an actor 19 times over the last eight years.
A number of prominent British feminist writers have recently described Trump, a legally adjudicated sexual predator, as a 'feminist hero' because of his anti-trans policies. How did we get here? The Guardian's Julie Carrie Wong brings this question to Sophie Lewis, whose new book, Enemy Feminisms, 'seeks to understand how and why some forms of feminism have diverged so fundamentally from others as to become, well, enemies'.
Michelle O'Neill, Northern Ireland's first minister, said she could not ignore 'the suffering of the Palestinian people and the recent comments of the US President around the mass expulsion of the Palestinian people from Gaza'. Alas, plenty of other people seem able to ignore Palestinian suffering. The likes of the BBC have downplayed Trump's mass expulsion plans by describing them as 'a highly controversial redevelopment proposal'. Crimes against humanity seem to have become horrifically normalized.
If the news has got you stress-eating, you're not alone. A sneaky, and very hungry, opossum broke into a house in Nebraska and ate almost an entire Costco chocolate cake, then collapsed on the couch. She (the opossum doesn't seem to have a name) is now being looked after by an animal shelter. 'I think the opossum story is really relatable, like, who doesn't want to eat a whole chocolate cake?' the Nebraska wildlife rehab executive director Laura Stastny said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
14 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Trump to send 9,000 migrants to terrorist detention center
Donald Trump is set to send thousands more illegal migrants to the infamous terrorist detention center at Guantanamo Bay starting this week in an acceleration of his mass deportation plan. In February, Trump deployed members of the Armed Forces to expand the capacity of a detention facility at the Cuba base. This week, at least 9,000 people are being identified for a potential transfer to the prison as early as Wednesday, Politico reported. Currently, around 500 migrants have been held at the jail known as 'Gitmo' for short stints in the past few months. These holds would also be temporary, as it would be a pit stop on the way to being deported to the country they came from. However, it would reportedly send a message to foreign countries that America is closed to migrants who aren't willing to go through the legal process. A document obtained by the outlet said that several hundred Europeans - including over a hundred Russians and Romanians - that has the State Department worried. 'The message is to shock and horrify people, to upset people, but we're allies,' an anonymous State Department official familiar with the plans said. The White House also faces legal challenges to the policy. The United States Navy announced that its combat ship USS St. Louis was moored at the Guantanamo Bay naval station and that the crew was supporting the expansion in February. Photographs showed members of the armed forces setting up army green tents and pounding large stakes into the ground to hold them up. The first phase of the expansion is expected to increase the center's capacity to 2,000, according to the Navy, with plans to expand it to fit 30,000 migrants. The detention facility is widely known as the location for detained terrorism suspects in recent years, but the Trump administration has decided to expand it's use for detaining migrants scheduled for deportation. Trump announced plans for his administration to detain as many as 30,000 high priority migrants with criminal records at the military base at Guantanamo Bay. Legal experts stress that detainees at Guantanamo Bay will still have legal rights afforded to them by the Constitution, as the Supreme Court defended terror suspects right to habeas corpus and a lawyer. 'The government's view at that time was that Guantanamo was sort of outside the parameters of the U.S. Constitution, and whoever was there had no rights, whatever. And the Supreme Court rejected that,' Eugene Fidell, Yale Law School military law expert noted. 'We don't want them coming back, so we're sending them to Guantanamo,' he said at the White House. Trump's border czar Tom Homan (pictured) told reporters the administration would expand the capacity of the facility as the military has planned to erect temporary tents. 'We're just going to expand upon that existing migrant center,' Homan said.

Rhyl Journal
17 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Chagossians want sovereignty deal to go ahead, says Mauritius legal adviser
Philippe Sands KC, who has represented Mauritius in its legal battle with the UK since 2010, told a House of Lords committee he wanted to 'knock on the head this idea that all of the Chagossians were not involved' in negotiations over the deal. His comments came a day after a panel of UN experts urged Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer to abandon the agreement reached with Mauritius last month and negotiate a new one. The panel, appointed by the UN Human Rights Council, said it was 'gravely concerned about the lack of meaningful participation of Chagossians in the processes that have led to the agreement'. The experts also criticised the continuing bar on Chagossians returning to Diego Garcia, the largest of the islands, because of the ongoing presence of a joint UK-US military base. On Wednesday, Mr Sands told the Lords International Relations and Defence Committee: 'To be clear, it is not the case that Chagossians had no role in the negotiations. 'I can tell you that Chagossians in Mauritius and Seychelles were deeply involved in consulting with successive prime ministers of Mauritius and they attended the hearings at the International Court of Justice.' He added: 'I want to really knock on the head this idea that all of the Chagossians were not involved in the various processes. That is simply not true. 'It is true, however, that the Chagossian community is divided and I respect that division.' Earlier, he had told the committee that, while some UK-based Chagossians wanted the islands to remain British territory, 'most in Mauritius and Seychelles have made very clear…that they wish this deal to go ahead'. The Chagossians were expelled from the islands between 1965 and 1973 to make way for the Diego Garcia base and have not been allowed to Mr Sands told peers the 'quid pro quo' for the military base remaining on Diego Garcia was Chagossians would be allowed to settle on the outer islands of the archipelago. The deal follows a 2019 advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice saying the islands should be handed over to Mauritius. As well as establishing a £40 million fund for Chagossians, the UK has agreed to pay Mauritius at least £120 million a year for 99 years in order to lease back the Diego Garcia base – a total cost of at least £13 billion in cash terms. The deal also includes provisions preventing development on the rest of the archipelago without the UK's consent, which the Government has said will prevent countries such as China setting up their own facilities. The agreement has also been backed by the United States, the UN secretary general and the African Union, but heavily criticised by the Conservative Party as a 'surrender'. Mr Sands disagreed with that on Wednesday, saying the deal 'will enhance Britain's position in the world'. He said: 'I can tell you from personal experience, direct comments from countries, ambassadors, prime ministers, presidents around the world, this is seen as Britain back on the world (stage), acting honourably and decently, protecting its interests and safeguarding…the rule of law.'


South Wales Guardian
19 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Chagossians want sovereignty deal to go ahead, says Mauritius legal adviser
Philippe Sands KC, who has represented Mauritius in its legal battle with the UK since 2010, told a House of Lords committee he wanted to 'knock on the head this idea that all of the Chagossians were not involved' in negotiations over the deal. His comments came a day after a panel of UN experts urged Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer to abandon the agreement reached with Mauritius last month and negotiate a new one. The panel, appointed by the UN Human Rights Council, said it was 'gravely concerned about the lack of meaningful participation of Chagossians in the processes that have led to the agreement'. The experts also criticised the continuing bar on Chagossians returning to Diego Garcia, the largest of the islands, because of the ongoing presence of a joint UK-US military base. On Wednesday, Mr Sands told the Lords International Relations and Defence Committee: 'To be clear, it is not the case that Chagossians had no role in the negotiations. 'I can tell you that Chagossians in Mauritius and Seychelles were deeply involved in consulting with successive prime ministers of Mauritius and they attended the hearings at the International Court of Justice.' He added: 'I want to really knock on the head this idea that all of the Chagossians were not involved in the various processes. That is simply not true. 'It is true, however, that the Chagossian community is divided and I respect that division.' Earlier, he had told the committee that, while some UK-based Chagossians wanted the islands to remain British territory, 'most in Mauritius and Seychelles have made very clear…that they wish this deal to go ahead'. The Chagossians were expelled from the islands between 1965 and 1973 to make way for the Diego Garcia base and have not been allowed to Mr Sands told peers the 'quid pro quo' for the military base remaining on Diego Garcia was Chagossians would be allowed to settle on the outer islands of the archipelago. The deal follows a 2019 advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice saying the islands should be handed over to Mauritius. As well as establishing a £40 million fund for Chagossians, the UK has agreed to pay Mauritius at least £120 million a year for 99 years in order to lease back the Diego Garcia base – a total cost of at least £13 billion in cash terms. The deal also includes provisions preventing development on the rest of the archipelago without the UK's consent, which the Government has said will prevent countries such as China setting up their own facilities. The agreement has also been backed by the United States, the UN secretary general and the African Union, but heavily criticised by the Conservative Party as a 'surrender'. Mr Sands disagreed with that on Wednesday, saying the deal 'will enhance Britain's position in the world'. He said: 'I can tell you from personal experience, direct comments from countries, ambassadors, prime ministers, presidents around the world, this is seen as Britain back on the world (stage), acting honourably and decently, protecting its interests and safeguarding…the rule of law.'