Canadians ghost US as cross border friendship collapses amid political tensions and Trump's tariffs
Canada witnesses a sharp decline in travel to the United States. Political tensions and economic factors contribute to this trend. Return trips by car and air travel see significant drops. Meanwhile, domestic tourism in Canada experiences a boost. Resorts and tour companies report record bookings. Many Canadians opt to stay home amid ongoing tensions.
TIL Creatives
Canadians ditch US trips as politics tariffs and weak loonie fuel boycott
Canadians are hitting pause on trips to the United States, and it's not just a blip. For the seventh straight month, travel south of the border has dropped sharply, a shift fueled by political and economic tensions.New figures from Statistics Canada show that in July 2025, return trips by car to the US fell 36.9 percent compared to the same month last year. Air travel was also down, with Canadians returning from the US on commercial flights dropping 25.8 percent.
President Donald Trump's aggressive trade stance toward Canada, including tariffs and his suggestion that the US should 'annex' its northern neighbor, has sparked anger and a growing boycott movement. The strain is also economic.The gap between the Canadian and US economies is widening. The Canadian dollar's weakness against the US greenback, combined with sky-high housing costs and wages that lag behind inflation, has made American vacations far less affordable.The strain is also economic. Isabelle Salle, a behavioral macroeconomics professor at the University of Ottawa, says the gap between the Canadian and US economies is widening. The Canadian dollar's weakness against the US greenback, combined with sky-high housing costs and wages that lag behind inflation, has made American vacations far less affordable.
'People have directly lost in terms of purchasing power,' Salle explained. 'The uncertainty of the trade war and fears about future job losses are keeping people from spending money on leisure now, just in case.'The boycott works both ways, though less dramatically. The number of Americans visiting Canada in July by land fell 7.4 percent, but air arrivals from the US inched up by 0.7 percent to roughly 714,700 travelers.Domestic tourism operators in Canada are seeing an upside. Resorts in Banff, boutique hotels in Halifax, and tour companies in the Yukon are reporting record bookings. Some promotions, like the 'Canada Strong' pass, have boosted local travel by as much as 75 percent compared to last summer.Many Canadians are choosing to stay home as an act of defiance, and there's no sign that will change anytime soon.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
19 minutes ago
- Indian Express
India does not have the economic leverage vis a vis the US that China does
Between December 2022 and July 2025, China accounted for about 47 per cent of all crude oil and 44 per cent of the coal exported by Russia, as against India's corresponding purchase shares of 38 per cent and 20 per cent. Despite that, US President Donald Trump has slapped India with a 25 per cent 'penalty' for buying Russian energy. This rate, to be effective from August 27, would take the total tariff on Indian goods imported into the US to 50 per cent. China has not only escaped such punishment, but has actually seen a lowering of the duty on its goods from 145 to 30 per cent since May 12. On Monday, Trump extended his trade truce with China for a further 90-day period till November 10. At the same time, his Treasury Secretary, Scott Bessent, has threatened additional 'secondary tariffs' on India if the outcome of Trump's Friday meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin isn't favourable. This blatantly divergent treatment, further eroding the credibility of the current Western sanctions regime, has significantly to do with relative economic leverage — China is seen to possess much more of it. The most visible demonstration of that was when, in early April, it imposed export restrictions on rare earth elements and magnets that are indispensable, whether for auto, aerospace, defence, semiconductor, renewable energy or consumer electronics manufacturing. China could use its virtual global monopoly over the mining and processing of these critical minerals to bring Trump to the negotiating table. Rare earths apart, China also played the trump card of being a massive buyer of US agricultural produce — from soyabean, cotton and coarse grains to beef, pork and poultry meat — sharply reducing the imports of these to signal its capacity for retaliation in any unilateral trade war. On the face of it, India does not have that sort of economic leverage. Barring, say, pharmaceutical products, much of what it exports to the US — readymade garments, gems and jewellery, frozen shrimps, basmati rice or even steel and aluminium — aren't items for which there are no alternative suppliers. Nor are Indian imports of California almonds comparable to the humongous quantities of Midwest US soyabean and corn that China was, until recently, sourcing to feed its swine and poultry birds. Given how much it stands to lose in any prolonged trade war — the worst-affected industries are also the most employment-intensive — the best approach for India to adopt is strategic patience. What the Indian foreign policy establishment and its trade negotiators should emphasise is the country's importance to global economic and regional stability, which aligns with the US's own long-term interests.
Mint
19 minutes ago
- Mint
Jackie Bezos, Who Funded Her Son Jeff's Startup, Dies at 78
(Bloomberg) -- Jackie Bezos, a fierce protector of her son Jeff before he founded Inc. and a deep-pocketed advocate for early childhood education, has died. She was 78. Bezos died at her home in Miami on Thursday, according to the Bezos Family Foundation's website. In a tribute on social media, Jeff Bezos wrote that his mother passed away 'surrounded by so many of us who loved her,' saying her death followed 'a long fight with Lewy body dementia.' With her husband, Miguel, Bezos was the first to invest in Amazon. Their two checks, totaling $245,573 in 1995, backed the startup that Jeff Bezos warned would probably fail. It didn't, of course, and the investment – along with subsequent purchases of Amazon shares – netted them a fortune estimated to be as large as $30 billion in 2018. Starting in 2000 — decades before their son or his company launched their own philanthropic endeavors — the couple funded educational programs through the Bezos Family Foundation. For years, it was the highest-profile charity giving away a slice of the fortunes created by the e-commerce giant. 'At the core of the foundation's work is Jackie's belief that rigorous, inspired learning — in the classroom and in children's hundreds of daily interactions with adults — will allow students from birth to high school to put their education into action,' the organization says on its website. It says her 'vision' is behind two in-house programs — Vroom, which disseminates parenting tips via an app and other methods, and the Bezos Scholars Program, which chooses 17 young Americans and Africans to be trained in a leadership development program each year. The foundation has backed hundreds of other organizations, primarily focused on kids and young adults. It made its biggest single gift in August 2024 — $185.7 million to the Aspen Institute to underwrite a new center focused on young people. Jacklyn Marie Gise was born in Virginia on Dec. 29, 1946. She grew up in New Mexico, where her father, Lawrence Preston Gise, was a senior official at the US Atomic Energy Commission, the agency that then oversaw US nuclear laboratories. During her sophomore year in high school in Albuquerque, she became pregnant by Theodore Jorgensen, a senior. They married in 1963 and their son, Jeffrey Preston Jorgensen, was born the following January. Jacklyn, known as Jackie, moved back in with her parents and filed for divorce from Jorgensen when their son was 17 months old. Jorgensen, a unicycle polo player who would later run a bicycle shop, acknowledged that he wasn't a particularly good father or husband. 'It was really all my fault,' he told Bloomberg Businessweek editor Brad Stone for his book, The Everything Store. (2013). 'I don't blame Jackie at all.' Jorgensen died in 2015. Newly single, Jackie completed high school on conditions imposed by administrators: that she not speak to classmates, loiter on campus or attend graduation. She later enrolled in community college, seeking out professors who would permit her to bring a toddler to class. It was around this time, while working in the Bank of New Mexico's bookkeeping department, that she met Miguel Bezos, known as Mike, a Cuban-born college student who was a night teller at the bank. He had arrived in the US at age 16, a refugee among the thousands of other children sent to live in the US after Fidel Castro's revolution. According to Stone's book, Jackie turned him down several times before finally agreeing to go on a date, to see The Sound of Music. The two married in April 1968 and moved to Texas, where Mike took a job as a petroleum engineer with what became Exxon Corp. They had two children: Christina, in 1969, and Mark, in 1970. Jeff, who had no relationship with his biological father, was adopted by Miguel and took the Bezos surname. Jackie 'ran a household steeped in board games, science projects and storytelling,' Mark Leibovich wrote in The New Imperialists (2002), his book profiling Jeff Bezos and other business titans of the 21st century. Jackie was a 'foremost protector and all-purpose support system' for Jeff, Leibovich wrote. In one example, Jackie got Jeff — a curious child who at age 3 took apart the walls of his crib so he could sleep in a bed — into a pilot program for gifted students at a Houston elementary school. She did the same when the family later moved to Pensacola, Florida. 'You don't just go away,' she told Leibovich. 'You don't go gently. You just keep trying to convince people.' She indulged Jeff's passions, regularly ferrying him to Radio Shack so he could tinker with homemade electronics. Mike Bezos climbed the ladder at Exxon, moving the family to Miami, where Jeff graduated from high school. Mike's later work sent him and Jackie to Norway and Colombia. During a stint in New Jersey, Jackie, then 40 years old, earned a degree from the College of Saint Elizabeth (now Saint Elizabeth University) in Morris Township. After Jeff gave up his New York hedge fund job to found Amazon near Seattle, his parents put much of their nest egg into the company — a decision they would later say was a bet on their son rather than the prospects of an internet bookseller. When Amazon became a Wall Street darling after its 1997 initial public offering, Jackie visited newsstands to find stories about her son, then left the magazine open to that page, Leibovich wrote. In 2000, Jackie and Mike, who by then had retired from Exxon, moved to the Seattle area to be closer to Jeff's growing family. In Seattle, Jackie Bezos wrote occasional opinion pieces in the local newspaper, advocating for early childhood education. She and Mike donated in support of an ultimately successful voter initiative that established state charter schools in Washington and against a proposal to implement an income tax in the state. Voters rejected the tax. The couple were frequent donors to Seattle's Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, including a $710 million gift in 2022 made outside of the foundation. They kept homes in Colorado and Texas and in recent years spent much of their time living in Miami. More stories like this are available on
Mint
19 minutes ago
- Mint
The case for interest-rate cuts is weak. But Trump is still likely to get them.
President Donald Trump's unstoppable force of will is likely to triumph over Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell's immovable object of caution when it comes to lower interest rates. But the case for cuts is growing harder to make, even as market bets for it harden like cement, and the end result might not deliver what the president truly wants. From the broadest helicopter view, the world's biggest economy isn't in need of extra support. Stocks hit their 17th record high of the year on Wednesday, extending an extraordinary rally that has lifted the S&P 500 nearly 30% from its early April trough. Risk assets such as Bitcoin and Ethereum are trading at or near all-time peaks, retail investors are bullish, new tech listings are soaring on new initial public offerings, and small-cap stock gains are outpacing the S&P 500 since the early April trough. House prices are pegged near the highest levels in history. The job market is cooling, at least according to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics proper to the firing of the person in charge of collecting it, but the headline unemployment rate is hovering at 4.2%, an historically low level that by no means suggests deep distress in the labor market. Atlanta Federal Reserve President Raphael Bostic, in fact, told an event in Alabama Wednesday that full employment gives the central bank the 'luxury" of waiting on inflation data to determine their next move on rates. And that is trending higher. Core consumer prices, which strip away volatile components such as food and energy, rose at an annual pace of 3.1% last month, according to the BLS's July inflation report. Economists expect the pass-through of tariffs, which were reset at higher rates earlier this month, to accelerate through the autumn and beyond, and lift consumer prices higher as a result. 'We calculate that the average effective tariff rate on U.S. imports has climbed to 19% this month, from 15% at the end of June," said Samuel Tombs, chief U.S. economist at Pantheon Macroeconomics. 'Those additional costs will hit consumers in the fall and winter." It's no better on the factory side, either. Producer prices surged by 0.9% last month, BLS data showed Thursday, and were pegged at an annual rate of 3.3%. Put simply, the case for lowering interest rates, which investors usually associate with stresses in the domestic economy or slowing inflation pressures, is tissue-paper thin. And yet it's likely to happen at least three times this year, according to forecasts published Thursday by Goldman Sachs, with more cuts expected in 2026, as well. The hard conclusion that can be drawn from this paradox is that president Trump's effort to pressure the Federal Reserve has been a success. And Powell now finds himself in an even less enviable position. If he doesn't lead the case for rate cuts, even though the logic for maintaining the current level of policy restriction is sound, it will be seen as an overtly political act. If he does lower rates, he'll be seen as having bent to the will of the president. Markets, meanwhile, aren't providing him with much cover at this point. Short-term Treasury bond yields, the most-sensitive to interest-rate changes, are trading at the lowest levels in nearly three years in anticipation of a September reduction. 'Believe it or not, there is an unwritten feedback mechanism between the markets and the Fed," said Mark Malek, chief investment officer at Sibert Financial. 'There are times when the market displays its willingness to accept rate hikes, and there are other times when the market says 'cut rates, or else,'" he added. 'It's likely to have to relent to the markets for cuts this time." But the president's desire for lower longer-term bond yields, which he sees as helping reduce the cost of government borrowing, may not emerge as cleanly as he imagines. Last September, when the Fed cut rates by 50 basis points despite inflation pressures that hadn't been fully tamed, 10-year Treasury note yields rose nearly 90 basis points over the next three months. Barring an unforeseen surge in hiring, or a massive change in inflation readings, the Fed's going to cut rates in September. The president, the Treasury, and the markets have effectively ensured they'll get what they want. But is it what they really need? Write to Martin Baccardax at
