Nepal's LGBTQ+ community holds first Pride rally since US funding cuts
Hundreds of people took part in the rally through the heart of Kathmandu, playing music and dancing in the Gai Jatra festival, which is celebrated to remember family members who have passed away during the year. But it has long drawn colorful parades by bringing in sexual minorities to join in on the festivities.
Nepal's LGBTQ+ campaign has been hit after U.S. President Donald Trump's administration began dismantling the U.S. Agency for International Development, which was responsible for humanitarian aid.
Most of the help centers for Nepal's LGBTQ+ community have been closed because of a lack of funds. Thousands of people have been left without support.
In the past few years, Nepal's LGBTQ+ community made rapid advancements in securing their rights. The nation became one of the first in Asia to allow same sex-sex marriage. The constitution adopted in 2015 explicitly stated there can be no discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.
The U.S. was among the biggest donors for the LGBTQ+ rights campaign.
Over the years, USAID and others stepped in and partnered with help centers to support initiatives like HIV prevention and care, and safe-sex counselling. The U.S. funds were vital for running the centers and clinics that helped with distributing free condoms, screenings and follow-up treatment for people with HIV. Now the USAID office in Nepal is closed.
'Because of the cut in funding many of the services we have been providing to the community have been hit badly, but we are not discouraged but are hopeful we will get alternative sources and fundings to help us restart those services,' said Simran Sherchan, a LGBTQ+ rights activist in the rally.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
8 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump must demand Putin return stolen kids
In February, President Donald Trump offered a ray of hope to thousands of Ukraine's families. 'I believe I could, yes,' he said, when asked if he could convince President Vladimir Putin to return the more than 19,500 Ukrainian children Russia has abducted during its three-year full-scale invasion. 'It's pretty tough stuff, but I believe I could do that.' On Friday, he'll have his chance. The Aug. 15 Trump-Putin meeting in Alaska offers the perfect moment for the president to raise this issue directly — and to make it unmistakably clear that freeing Ukraine's children must be a prerequisite to any peace deal. NY Post contributor Katya Pavlevych shares this story.
Newsweek
10 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump Reacts to Melania's $1B Defamation Threat Against Hunter Biden
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. In an appearance with Fox Radio's Brian Kilmeade on Wednesday morning, President Donald Trump said that he supports first lady Melania Trump's $1 billion defamation threat against Hunter Biden. In a video interview posted to YouTube earlier this month, Hunter Biden, son of former President Joe Biden, said that Epstein introduced Melania to Donald Trump, a statement her legal team calls "false, defamatory, disparaging, and inflammatory." The letter, dated August 6, demands a full retraction and apology, or Biden will face a $1 billion lawsuit. The president told Kilmeade, "Well, I said go forward. I've done pretty well in these lawsuits lately. Jeffrey Epstein has nothing to do with Melania. But they do that to demean, but it's different stories. I did meet her through another person, but it wasn't Jeffrey Epstein. I told her to go ahead and do it, she was very upset about it." This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.
Newsweek
10 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Trump's BLS Pick Fuels Fears of Rigged CPI, Social Security COLA Cuts
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump's nomination of E.J. Antoni, a Heritage Foundation economist, to lead the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) has triggered concerns over the potential politicization of key economic data—particularly the Consumer Price Index (CPI), which is used to calculate Social Security cost-of-living adjustments (COLA) for seniors. "Seniors should know that the COLA on their Social Security benefits is tied to the CPI," former Treasury official Bruce Bartlett posted on X this week. "If the CPI is artificially reduced, as Trump wants, your benefits will be reduced." Antoni has repeatedly described Social Security as unsustainable and has advocated for its eventual phase-out. In a 2024 radio interview, he called the 90-year-old program a "Ponzi scheme," arguing that current beneficiaries should continue receiving benefits, but future retirees should not rely on it. "Eventually you need to sunset the program," Antoni said last December. He argued that while current beneficiaries would remain protected, younger Americans should transition to private accounts. "The people who are going to retire 10, 20, even 30, or certainly 40 years from now—I'm sorry, but the program is not going to be viable at that time". Donald Trump and economist E.J. Antoni in the Oval Office after Antoni's nomination to lead the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Donald Trump and economist E.J. Antoni in the Oval Office after Antoni's nomination to lead the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The White House Even Small Data Tweaks Could Mean Billions in Cuts In an interview with Fox News Digital earlier this week, Antoni said that, if confirmed, the BLS should consider pausing the monthly jobs report because of flaws in current data collection. His proposal, along with his views on Social Security, has raised concerns about the politicization of the bureau's key statistics particularly after the president fired the previous BLS chief after a soft jobs report earlier this month. Economists consulted by Newsweek warn that underreporting inflation data—even marginally—could quietly erode retirees' purchasing power over time. "If inflation is understated, then beneficiaries will have less ability to afford the goods and services they need," said Todd Belt, professor of political management at George Washington University. Dean Baker, co-founder of the Center for Economic and Policy Research, quantified the long-term impact. "If you reduced the measured rate of inflation by 0.2–0.3 percentage points annually, then someone would be getting about 2.5 percent less in benefits after 10 years, 5 percent after 20 years and 7.5 percent after 30 years," he said. This concern extends beyond benefits. Baker noted that while a move to a lower-measuring index like the alternative known as "chained CPI" would technically require an act of Congress, "it seems the law doesn't really matter anymore." Cartons of eggs are seen for sale in a Kroger grocery store on August 15, 2022 in Houston, Texas. Egg prices steadily climb in the U.S. as inflation continues impacting grocery stores nationwide. Cartons of eggs are seen for sale in a Kroger grocery store on August 15, 2022 in Houston, Texas. Egg prices steadily climb in the U.S. as inflation continues impacting grocery stores nationwide. Brandon Bell/Getty Brian Albrecht, chief economist at the International Center for Law and Economics, added that even small distortions could be difficult to undo. "If inflation were truly 10 percent in a given year but reported as 0 percent, your check the following year would not rise at all," he said. "Even small manipulations of the data can have long-term effects that are very difficult to correct." But manipulating inflation data would not be an easy task. Albrecht pushed back on assumptions that CPI data can be easily gamed. "People dig into those numbers item by item. If you claimed everything in the basket went up 2 percent but reported CPI as 1 percent, it wouldn't add up. That scrutiny makes manipulation harder to hide." "It's just very hard to do," added Andrew Biggs, a former principal deputy commissioner at the Social Security Administration (SSA), about the prospect of manipulating inflation statistics. While the BLS could, in theory, change the methodology or sampling of the CPI-W, a subset of CPI specific to urban areas, Biggs emphasized that "outright rigging is technically demanding, especially for a political appointee working with career employees." Erica Groshen, who served as BLS commissioner under President Obama, added that such changes would require public transparency. "According to OMB Statistical Policy Directive 3, any such major changes need to be announced in advance in the Federal Register," she said. Still, the stakes are high. Groshen noted that even a 0.01 percentage point understatement of the inflation rate would reduce payments to all Social Security beneficiaries—seniors and disabled—by about $1 billion annually. Whether such changes amount to a "stealth benefit cut," she said, "depends on how it was communicated." Trust in CPI Could Erode Public and Market Confidence The CPI-W, a legacy index the measures inflation for "urban wage owners" dating back to 1972, is used only by the Social Security Administration; other agencies, including the Congressional Budget Office and the Federal Reserve, rely on the Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) index, which tends to show lower inflation. "The Social Security Commissioner is required to select a measure of inflation, but not necessarily the CPI-W," Biggs, the former principal deputy commissioner at the SSA, said. A screen shows stock prices on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange, Friday, Aug. 1, 2025, in New York. A screen shows stock prices on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange, Friday, Aug. 1, 2025, in New York. Yuki Iwamura/AP That distinction underscores the political and policy pressure surrounding Antoni's nomination. Critics argue that a shift in the CPI-W's methodology—if perceived as biased—could spark a crisis of credibility. "Reports like the jobs report and CPI aren't just for PR purposes—Wall Street and many markets depend on them," said Anna Tavis, academic director of the Human Capital Management Department at NYU's School of Professional Studies. She also warned that undermining the credibility of official data could drive companies toward costly private analytics. "Those alternatives won't be free." The private sector isn't the only area that could be rattled. Michael Feroli, chief U.S. economist at JPMorgan Chase, told Reuters that suspicions about manipulated CPI figures could distort the $2.1 trillion Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) market, which exists to protect investors from inflation. "There's real money on the line here," he said. The concerns are not just technical—they're about trust. "You have an economy operating in a different reality than the reported numbers," said Belt, the GWU professor. "That creates uncertainty, which is the enemy of good business behavior."
