The Irish Independent's View: Democracy demands political parties ensure presidential choices
Candidates and the media flocked to Iowa for the 1972 caucus, spending plenty of money, so the state kept its first-in-the-nation status.
There is no similar moment in our own presidential election. Names tend to float about in the years running up to a presidential election. Some rule themselves out, others are happy to be talked about. Come the summer of a presidential election year, the field starts to take shape. The runners and riders become clear in the autumn ahead of a November polling date.
The first of the big caucuses kicks off today when Fine Gael's candidate nomination process opens. Prospective candidates have until next Tuesday to be nominated by securing the signature of 20 TDs, senators and MEPs in the parliamentary party, 25 party councillors and five members of the party's ruling body.
At the moment, former European commissioner Mairead McGuinness is the frontrunner to become the Fine Gael candidate, but she has yet to break cover and officially declare her interest. Ireland South MEP Seán Kelly, a former GAA president, is also showing an interest but hasn't confirmed one way or another.
All will become clear in the next eight days. If there is a contest, the party will spend the rest of the summer playing out that process.
So far, Fine Gael is the only party to confirm it will be contesting the presidency – an office it has never held. The list of significant figures to rule themselves out of contention includes Heather Humphreys, Frances Fitzgerald, Barry Andrews, Michael McDowell and Frances Black. Fianna Fáil and Sinn Féin have yet to signal their intentions, but are expected to run their own candidates.
The Labour Party, the Social Democrats and the Green Party have talked about putting up a unified left-wing candidate, but have thus far failed to identify anyone who fits the bill. Independent TD Catherine Connolly has yet to declare her intentions. The new Independent senator Aubrey McCarthy says he is available to run if a political party wants him.
The bruising nature of previous presidential elections has unquestionably put off seasoned politicians from entering the fray. Political novices have found, to their cost, the presidential election is not the ideal contest for dipping their toe into waters of elected office.
Nonetheless, there is an obligation on the parties, big and small, to ensure the electorate are presented with choices in this election. It is unusual to have parties say they are not going to engage in politics. The lack of enthusiasm for this election is not acceptable. There is a responsibility on their part to put forward candidates and participate in the democratic process.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Journal
an hour ago
- The Journal
Dublin city councillors set to increase property tax for first time
DUBLIN CITY COUNCILLORS are set to vote next week to stop applying a 15% discount on property tax for the first time in more than 10 years. The change, for 2026, comes at the same time that the government is also applying increases to property tax to reflect the significant rise in house prices, although tax bands have been tweaked to moderate the impact. It's understood councillors' decision will cost less than €65 per year for homeowners whose houses are worth up to €525,000, with exact costs on a sliding scale based on the value of the property. For a €450,000 house, for example, the annual charge will be €428 in total. For the owners of the capital's most expensive houses, councillors' decision will cost more, with homes worth between €1m and €2m likely to pay €150-460 more than they would have with the discount. A house worth €1.2m must pay €1,094 in property tax in total each year from 2026 onwards. Property tax was introduced in 2013 at the behest of the Troika , with a view to broadening the tax base and funding local authorities without taxing employment. Dublin City Council management has long argued that the vast majority of Dublin homeowners would not be hit with substantial additional charges if councillors agreed to reduce the discount applied, while the city would benefit. The council's ruling group, comprising Fine Gael, Fianna Fáil, Labour and the Green Party, agreed after last year's local elections to apply the baseline rate with no discount this year for the first time. The decision, which will be taken at a meeting on 18 July, is expected to bring in more than €15m in extra funding for the city. It's understood councillors are considering targeting the additional revenue at improving the council's housing stock, as well as improvements to footpaths, although no final decisions have been taken yet. Advertisement Labour and the Green Party, which pushed for the discount to be scrapped, argue that property tax is progressive and will provide crucial funding for improving the city. Councillors Feljin Jose of the Green Party and Darragh Moriarty of Labour characterised property tax as the closest thing Ireland has to a wealth tax, given most of the country's wealth is held in property. 'A lot of our [council] housing stock is very bad, and we need to maintain and repair and urgently increase the energy efficiency of those buildings,' said Jose of the Green Party. Darragh Moriarty of Labour said: 'In the vast majority of instances, these are very modest property taxes, by European comparisons. The 15% will be modest as well.' He noted that the decision would mean an extra €60m could be invested in improving the city over the lifetime of the council. Councillor Deirdre Heney of Fianna Fáil said she hoped additional funding would be allocated to footpath repairs and tree maintenance, issues that are raised with her frequently by residents, as well as to building more playgrounds. Property tax for 2026 is owed on 1 November. The government changed property tax bands earlier this year to moderate the increase in the amount of tax payable as a result of increasing house prices. A possible left-leaning ruling coalition on Dublin City council last year including Sinn Féin fell apart over the question of property tax . Sinn Féin wanted to continue to apply the 15% property tax discount. Separately, the government said last week that this year it will allow Dublin city, which takes in by far the most property tax of any council, to keep an additional €19m of the revenue it raises this year. The government wants this extra funding spent on implementing the recommendations of its Dublin city taskforce. Each year, a proportion of council tax from larger local authorities is redistributed to those with a lower property tax base. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Fianna Fáil MEPs still to pick a side ahead of no-confidence motion in European Commission president
Fianna Fáil MEPs have come under pressure for suggesting they might support a motion of no-confidence in European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen . The no-confidence vote was tabled by a far-right Romanian MEP and 74 others, predominantly from right-wing populist and nationalist parties. On Thursday, Members of the European Parliament will vote on the proposed motion of no-confidence in Ms von der Leyen, the head of the EU 's executive arm that proposes laws. The effort is widely expected to fall far short of the required two-thirds majority needed to censure the commission. If the motion was successful, it would likely force Ms von der Leyen and her team of EU commissioners, including former Fianna Fáil minister Michael McGrath , to resign. READ MORE Fianna Fáil's four MEPs, Barry Andrews, Billy Kelleher, Cynthia Ní Mhurchú and Barry Cowen, have yet to declare what way they will vote. Fianna Fáil have been weighing up the possibility of supporting the motion or abstaining in the vote. The no-confidence vote centres on the 'Pfizergate' controversy, where the commission faced criticism for refusing to release text messages exchanged between Ms von der Leyen and the chief executive of Pfizer, during negotiations to secure supplies of Covid-19 vaccines at the height of the pandemic. Copies of the texts had been sought in access-to-information requests made by the New York Times, which later took the commission to court for blocking the release of the texts. Speaking in the European Parliament on Monday, Ms von der Leyen said the motion was supported by extreme political movements, 'from anti-vaxxers to Putin apologists'. Defending her role at the top of the EU executive during the pandemic, Ms von der Leyen said it was 'no secret' that she was in contact with senior figures in companies producing Covid-19 vaccines. 'Every single contract negotiated was examined in detail in the capitals before being signed by each of the 27 member states. There were no secrets, no hidden clauses,' she told a sitting of MEPs in Strasbourg. 'The implication that these contacts were somehow inappropriate or against the European interest is, by any measure, simply wrong.' The motion was an attempt to spin 'debunked conspiracies' and try to rewrite the history of how Europe 'successfully overcame a global pandemic together', she said. The EU executive needed to be in a strong position during ongoing tariff negotiations with the United States, the German politician said. Sinn Féin's two MEPs, Lynn Boylan and Kathleen Funchion, said they would vote against Ms von der Leyen, due to the failure of the EU to hold Israel to account for its conduct during its invasion of Gaza, among other things. Fine Gael's four MEPs will oppose the motion, which they said had been 'tabled by far-right members of the European Parliament in a bid to destabilise the EU for political gain'. Iratxe García, a senior Spanish MEP who leads the centre-left Socialist and Democrats (S&D), the second largest grouping in the parliament, said its members would not support the motion, as it refused to work with the far right. The motion has divided some right-wing populists, with hard right Italian prime minister Giorgia Meloni's party opposing the effort to bring down the commission leadership. Nicola Procaccini, an MEP from Ms Meloni's Brothers of Italy party, said the move was a mistake. 'This motion is doomed to fail and we know it, without even getting close to the level of votes needed,' he said. The proposal was one 'big political show' from the far-right to undermine democracy, according to Bas Eickhout, the co-leader of the European Greens.
Irish Daily Star
3 hours ago
- Irish Daily Star
Elon Musk says 'Trump used me so much' as feud continues to escalate
Elon Musk hit back at accusations that he was not popular while working in the White House as he claimed 'Trump used me so much' due to his positive polling as the pair's feud intensifies Elon Musk has accused Donald Trump of "using" him for political gain as their intense feud reignites. The pair's public fallout reached a boiling point last month as Musk described Trump's "big, beautiful" bill as "pork-filled" and a "disgusting abomination", pledging to start a third party if it passed. On Saturday, just a day after Trump signed the spending package into law, Musk made good on that promise as he vowed to create the "America Party." 'When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy,' Musk wrote on X. 'Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom.' READ MORE: Melania seen 'trying to leave' Trump's rambling balcony speech as viewers spot fidgeting In response, Trump's treasury secretary Scott Bessent, said on Sunday that Musk should focus on running his countries as he accused the Tesla CEO of being unpopular. Bessent, who Musk regularly clashed with during his time in the White House, told CNN's State of the Union: "The principals of DOGE were very popular, I think if you looked at the polling, Elon was not." Musk fired back at Bessent on X, calling him a "political science major who can't even do math." The Space X founder then claimed that his popularity is what drew Trump to him. "The polling for me was very positive a year ago, which is why Trump used me so much," he wrote. Shortly after Musk announced his new political venture, the president took to Truth Social to issue a scathing critique of his former "first buddy", calling him a "train wreck" and accusing him of going "off the rails." "I am saddened to watch Elon Musk go completely 'off the rails,' essentially becoming a TRAIN WRECK over the past five weeks," Trump declared. "He even wants to start a Third Political Party, despite the fact that they have never succeeded in the United States - The System seems not designed for them." "The one thing Third Parties are good for is the creation of Complete and Total DISRUPTION and CHAOS, and we have enough of that with the Radical Left Democrats, who have lost their confidence and their minds," Trump continued. "Republicans, on the other hand, are a smooth running 'machine,' that just passed the biggest Bill of its kind in the History of our Country. "It is a Great Bill, but, unfortunately for Elon, it eliminates the ridiculous Electric Vehicle (EV) Mandate, which would have forced everyone to buy an Electric Car in a short period of time," Trump added. "I have been strongly opposed to that from the very beginning."
