This Popular Sleep Supplement Has A Surprising Extra Health Benefit, Per A New Study
America just can't seem to get enough of melatonin. The popular "sleep" supplement has an ever-growing fanbase of people (use of the supp quintupled between 1999 and 2018, per NIH research) who use it to fall asleep at night, combat jet lag, and even help calm anxiety before medical procedures. These days, roughly two in 100 people say they take melatonin. But new research suggests that melatonin may do more than just help you conk out when you're too wired.
A study, which was published in the journal Occupational & Environmental Medicine, found that melatonin seems to help actually some people repair DNA damage while sleeping.
As you may know, melatonin is a hormone that your brain creates naturally in response to darkness, per the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH). Melatonin can help with the timing of your circadian rhythms (a.k.a. your internal clock), and can help you fall asleep.
But the DNA repair element is a totally new health perk. Here's what the study found, plus what could be behind this, according to doctors.
Meet the expert: W. Christopher Winter, MD, is a neurologist and sleep medicine physician with Charlottesville Neurology and Sleep Medicine and host of the Sleep Unplugged podcast; Jamie Alan, PhD, is an associate professor of pharmacology and toxicology at Michigan State University; Parveen Bhatti, PhD, is a study co-author and cancer control researcher at BC Cancer Research Institute
For the study, researchers recruited 40 night shift workers and divided them into two groups. One group took a melatonin supplement after work before going to sleep for four weeks. The other group took a placebo pill.
During that time, the researchers took urine samples and measured for something called creatinine-adjusted 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-OH-dG) to look for the body's capacity to perform oxidative DNA damage repair. In case you're not familiar with it, oxidative DNA damage is a change in DNA that can happen due to things like exposure to inflammation, toxins, and poor diet, raising the risk of serious health complications, including cancer. Higher concentrations of this molecule in urine suggest that the body is able to overcome oxidative DNA damage more easily, according to the researchers.
The participants wore activity trackers to better detect how long they slept. The researchers also measured 8-OH-dG levels in the participants' urine after sleeping periods and during the night shifts.
Here's what they found: 8-OH-dG levels were 80 percent higher during the sleeping periods in the melatonin group compared to those who took a placebo, suggesting they experienced better DNA repair during that time.
What does this mean? Well, since working at night disrupts the body's circadian rhythms, it has been linked with a slew of serious health issues, including diabetes, heart disease, and obesity. But the findings suggest that taking melatonin may help counteract the harms that can come with staying up all night and sleeping during the day.
The participants took three milligrams of melatonin before bed over the four-week study period. The researchers wrote in the study that they chose this dose because it was likely enough to influence most participants' sleep-wake cycles.
It's important to point out that the study just found a link between taking melatonin and the production of 8-OH-dG. It didn't actually prove that people who took melatonin had better DNA repair.
Jamie Alan, PhD, an associate professor of pharmacology and toxicology at Michigan State University, also points out that you can have "silent" mutations in your DNA that don't actually have an impact on your health. Plus, Alan says the study was small and specific, and that more research is needed on this topic before we can start extolling the supp's DNA-repairing success.
Still, the findings are definitely interesting.
When you work a night shift, your body suppresses production of melatonin to help you stay awake, the researchers explain. But that makes it harder for your body to repair oxidative DNA damage that naturally occurs in cells. If this is left unchecked, it can raise the risk of developing certain illnesses and diseases.
It's possible that by taking melatonin to sleep, the participants counteracted this, boosting DNA repair in the process, says W. Christopher Winter, MD, a neurologist and sleep medicine physician with Charlottesville Neurology and Sleep Medicine and host of the Sleep Unplugged podcast.
'Our body is constantly monitoring for and attempting to repair cellular damage, even at a DNA level,' he says. 'This is often spoken about in terms of oxidative damage, and certain chemicals facilitate this process. This study is showing evidence that melatonin may aid in this process.'
It's hard to say at this point. The study focused on a very specific population, night shift workers, who are vulnerable to issues with DNA repair.
"These findings are very specific to night shift workers who are sleeping during the day and have lower circulating levels of melatonin," points out study co-author Parveen Bhatti, PhD, a cancer control researcher at BC Cancer Research Institute. "Non-night shift workers tend to sleep at night and usually produce adequate amounts of melatonin."Based on the findings, it's not clear if melatonin would have the same impact if you usually sleep at night and are awake during the day.
Dr. Winter doesn't recommend that most people take a melatonin supplement on a regular basis, since most people produce it naturally. 'Unfortunately, most people use this drug as a sleep aid, which in my opinion is an inappropriate use of the drug,' he says. However, he says there can be a place for using melatonin if you're a night shift worker who has trouble falling asleep or if you are struggling with jet lag.
If you are interested in trying it, here are some doctor-approved supps:$15.00 at amazon.com$7.31 at amazon.com$26.99 at urldefense.com$17.99 at amazon.com
Keep in mind that supplements generally aren't strictly regulated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). As a result, what the label says and what's actually in the bottle can differ. For example, a 2017 study of 30 popular melatonin supplements found that the amount of melatonin in the bottle didn't match what the label said. The researchers also found that 26 percent of the supplements contained serotonin, a hormone that can be harmful to your health.
'The quality—and even whether the supplement even has melatonin in them—can vary dramatically,' Dr. Winter says.
That's why he recommends buying from a reputable source, like a brand name you know and trust. Just be aware that melatonin can make you feel groggy in the morning, per Alan. "Generally, melatonin is only useful to induce sleep and is not useful to maintain sleep," she adds.
You Might Also Like
Jennifer Garner Swears By This Retinol Eye Cream
These New Kicks Will Help You Smash Your Cross-Training Goals
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Atlantic
2 hours ago
- Atlantic
The Two-Word Phrase Unleashing Chaos at the NIH
Since January, President Donald Trump's administration has been clear about its stance on systemic racism and gender identity: Those concepts—championed by a 'woke' mob, backed by Biden cronies—are made-up, irrelevant to the health of Americans, and unworthy of inclusion in research. At the National Institutes of Health, hundreds of research studies on health disparities and transgender health have been abruptly defunded; clinical trials focused on improving women's health have been forced to halt. Online data repositories that contain gender data have been placed under review. And top agency officials who vocally supported minority representation in research have been ousted from their jobs. These attacks have often seemed at odds with the administration's stated goals of fighting censorship in science at the NIH and liberating public health from ideology. But its members behave as though they have no dogma of their own —just a wholehearted devotion to scientific rigor, in the form of what the nation's leaders have repeatedly called 'gold-standard science.' This pretense—that the government can obliterate entire fields of study while standing up for free inquiry—is encapsulated by what's become a favored bit of MAHA rhetoric: All research is allowed, the administration likes to say, so long as it's 'scientifically justifiable.' On Friday, the phrase scientifically justified appeared several times in a statement by the NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya that set the agenda for his agency and ordered a review of all research to make sure that it fits with the agency's priorities. 'I have advocated for academic freedom throughout my career,' he wrote in a letter to his staff that accompanied the statement. 'Scientists must be allowed to pursue their ideas free of censorship or control by others.' But his announcement went on to warn that certain kinds of data, including records of people's race or ethnicity, may not always be worthy of inclusion in research. Only when its consideration of those factors has been 'scientifically justified,' he wrote, would a project qualify for NIH support. That message may seem unimpeachable—in keeping, even, with the priorities of the world's largest public funder of biomedical research: NIH-backed studies should be justified in scientific terms. But the demand that Bhattacharya lays out has no formal criteria attached to it. Scientific justifiability is, to borrow Bhattacharya's description of systemic racism, a 'poorly-measured factor.' It's imprecise at best and, at worst, a subjective appraisal of research that invites political meddling. (Neither the NIH nor the Department of Health and Human Services, which oversees it, responded to my questions about the meaning and usage of this phrase.) Judging scientific merit has always been one of the NIH's most essential tasks. Tens of thousands of scientists serve on panels for the agency each year, scouring applications for funding; only the most rigorous projects are selected to receive portions of the agency's $47 billion budget—most of which goes to research outside the agency itself. All of the thousands of grants the agency has terminated this year under the Trump administration were originally vetted in this way, by subject-matter experts with deep knowledge of the underlying science. Many of the studies have been recast, in letters from the agency, as being 'antithetical to the scientific inquiry,' indifferent to 'biological realities,' or otherwise scientifically unjustified. The same language from Bhattacharya's email appears in other recent NIH documents. Last week, an official at the agency sent me a copy of a draft policy that, if published, would prohibit the collection of all data on people's gender (as opposed to their sex) by any of the agency's researchers and grantees, regardless of their field of study. It allows for an exception only when the consideration of gender is 'scientifically justified.' The gender-data policy was uploaded to an internal portal typically reserved for agency guidance that is about to be published, but has since been removed. (Its existence was first reported by The Chronicle of Higher Education.) When reached for comment, an HHS official told The Atlantic that the policy had been shot down by NIH leadership, but declined to provide any further details on the timing of that shift, or who, exactly, had been involved in the policy's drafting or dismissal. Still, if any version of this policy remains under consideration at the agency, its aims would be in keeping with others that are already in place. One NIH official told me that one of the agency's 27 institutes and centers, the National Institute for General Medical Sciences, has, since April, sent out hundreds of letters to grantees noting, 'If this award involves human subjects research, information regarding study participant 'gender' should not be collected. Rather, 'sex' should be used for data collection and reporting purposes.' Payments to those researchers, the official said, have been made contingent on the scientists agreeing to those terms within two business days. 'Most have accepted,' the official told me, 'because they're desperate.' (The current and former NIH officials who spoke with me for this article did so under the condition of anonymity, to be able to speak freely about how both Trump administrations have affected their work.) Collecting data on study participants' gender has been and remains, in many contexts, scientifically justified—at least, if one takes that to mean supported by the existing literature on the topic, Arrianna Planey, a medical geographer at the University of North Carolina, told me. Evidence shows that sex is not binary, that gender is distinct from it, and that acknowledging the distinction improves health research. In its own right, gender can influence—via a mix of physiological, behavioral, and social factors—a person's vulnerability to conditions and situations as diverse as mental-health issues, sexual violence, cardiovascular disease, infectious diseases, and cancer. The Trump administration has expressed some interest in gender-focused research—but in a way that isn't justified by the existing science in the field. In March, NIH officials received a memo noting that HHS had been directed to fund research into 'regret and detransition following social transition as well as chemical and surgical mutilation of children and adults.' That framing presupposes the conclusions of such studies and ignores the most pressing knowledge gaps in the field: understanding the long-term outcomes of transition on mental and physical health, and how best to tailor interventions to patients. (Bhattacharya's Friday statement echoed this stance, specifically encouraging 'research that aims to identify and treat the harms these therapies and procedures have potentially caused to minors.') According to the draft prohibition on collecting gender data, NIH-employed scientists would be eligible for an exception only when the scientific justification for their work is approved by Matthew Memoli, the agency's principal deputy director. Memoli has played this role before. After Trump put out his executive order seeking to abolish government spending on DEI, Memoli— then the NIH's acting director —told his colleagues that the agency's research into health disparities could continue as long as it was 'scientifically justifiable,' two NIH officials told me. Those officials I spoke with could not recall any instances in which NIH staff successfully lobbied for such studies to continue, and within weeks, the agency was cutting off funding from hundreds of research projects, many of them working to understand how and why different populations experience different health outcomes. (Some of those grants have since been reinstated after a federal judge ruled in June that they had been illegally canceled.) The mixing of politics and scientific justifiability goes back even to Trump's first term. In 2019, apparently in deference to lobbying from anti-abortion groups, the White House pressured the NIH to restrict research using human fetal tissue—prompting the agency to notify researchers that securing new funds for any projects involving the material would be much more difficult. Human fetal tissue could be used in some cases, 'when scientifically justifiable.' But to meet that bar, researchers needed to argue their case in their proposals, then hope their projects passed muster with an ethics advisory board. In the end, that board rejected 13 of the 14 projects it reviewed. 'They assembled a committee of people for whom nothing could be scientifically justified,' a former NIH official, who worked in grants at the time of the policy change, told me. 'I remember saying at the time, 'Why can't they just tell us they want to ban fetal-tissue research? It would be a lot less work.'' The NIH's 2019 restriction on human-fetal-tissue research felt calamitous at the time, one NIH official told me. Six years later, it seems rather benign. Even prior to the change in policy, human fetal tissue was used in only a very small proportion of NIH-funded research. But broad restrictions on gathering gender data, or conducting studies that take race or ethnicity into account, could upend most research that collects information on people—amounting to a kind of health censorship of the sort that Bhattacharya has promised to purge. The insistence that 'scientifically justifiable' research will be allowed to continue feels especially unconvincing in 2025, coming from an administration that has so often and aggressively been at odds with conventional appraisals of scientific merit. Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the head of HHS, has been particularly prone to leaning on controversial, biased, and poorly conducted studies, highlighting only the results that support his notions of the truth, while ignoring or distorting others. During his confirmation hearing, he cited a deeply flawed study from a journal at the margins of the scientific literature as proof that vaccines cause autism (they don't); in June, he called Alzheimer's a kind of diabetes (it's not); this month, he and his team justified cutting half a billion dollars from mRNA-vaccine research by insisting that the shots are more harmful than helpful (they're not), even though many of the studies they cited to back their claims directly contradicted them. Kennedy, it seems, 'can't scientifically justify any of his positions,' Jake Scott, an infectious-disease physician at Stanford, who has analyzed Kennedy's references to studies, told me. Bhattacharya's call for a full review of NIH research and training is predicated on an impossible, and ironic, standard. Scientists are being asked to prove the need for demographic variables that long ago justified their place in research—by an administration that has yet to show it could ever do the same.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
8 Surprising Ways to Strengthen Your Immune System Naturally, According to Doctors
"Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links." We live in a time in which we have a vaccine, medication or other treatment strategy for almost any illness. Still, keeping your immune system (your body's natural defenses against illnesses and invaders) in tip-top shape will help you avoid catching a virus here or an infection there. And the good news is that there are plenty of super simple ways to boost your immune system naturally. Meet the experts: Julia Blank, M.D., family medicine physician in Pacific Palisades, CA; Jessica Cording, M.S., R.D., a dietitian and health coach; Beth Warren, R.D., founder of Nourished by Beth. How the immune system works Your immune system is actually made up of 'multiple layers of defense,' said Julia Blank, M.D., family medicine physician in Pacific Palisades, CA. This includes physical barriers like your skin, cilia (tiny, hair-like structures) that line your airways, and specialized cells that recognize and attack foreign substances like viruses and bacteria, she explained. 'Some of these immune cells are nonspecific and destroy anything that appears foreign. Other cells produce antibodies that recognize and target protein markers (called antigens) on the surface of germs,' Dr. Blank added. Your immune system also has the ability to recognize pathogens you've come into contact with before and mount a quick response. 'This is why we don't usually get sick after being exposed to a germ we've already encountered and fought off in the past,' Dr. Blank said. How to boost your immune system naturally 'Maintaining a healthy immune system requires that you take good care of your body,' Dr. Blank said. Indeed, these simple strategies will help strengthen your immune system, plus boost your overall wellness. 1. Sip alcohol in moderation. 'High alcohol intake has been shown to suppress immune function,' said Jessica Cording, M.S., R.D., a dietitian and health coach. Plus, booze 'can be dehydrating, and hydration is really important for protecting yourself from illness.' When you're dehydrated, your cells aren't able to function at their optimal level—and that can open up the door for you to get sick, Cording explained. If you don't want to cut out booze completely, sip in moderation. That means having up to one drink a day for women and two drinks a day for men, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2. Curb your stress levels. Stress seems harmless enough once you get over whatever it is you're anxious about, but chronic stress can 'compromise or suppress the immune system and make us more vulnerable to infection,' Dr. Blank said. Consistently high levels of stress causes a release of the hormone cortisol, which can lead to inflammation and a weakened immune system, per the Cleveland Clinic. Chronic stress may also interfere with the infection-fighting ability of your white blood cells, per a review in the Annals of Medicine & Surgery, making you more susceptible to contracting illnesses. Daily practices like mindfulness meditation, journaling, or just going for a walk outside can help reduce stress. 3. Enjoy plenty of fruits and vegetables. Putting a rainbow of fruits and vegetables on your plate can do your immune system a solid, said Beth Warren, R.D., founder of Nourished by Beth. 'Fruits and veggies help arm your body with antioxidants it needs to fight oxidative stress, which includes contracting a sickness, in your body,' she explained. Not sure how much you need? The U.S. Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommends that people who eat 2,000 calories a day have two cups of fruit and 2.5 cups of vegetables a day. Some solid options: Leafy greens, bell peppers, citrus fruits, sweet potatoes, and berries. 4. Increase your intake of vitamin D. Vitamin D plays an important role in supporting the immune system by helping your body produce antibodies, which can then fight illness, Cording said. 'Active vitamin D gets sent to different areas of your body, including your bones, intestines, colon, brain, and immune cells, where it binds with the receptors on these cells and ultimately turns them on,' added Warren. The kicker: Most people don't get enough of it, according to the Cleveland Clinic. Your body primarily produces vitamin D from the sun's UV rays (it's called the sunshine vitamin for a reason!), but you can also load up on vitamin D-rich foods to boost your intake, including fatty fish and seafood, mushrooms, eggs (don't skip the yolk), and fortified foods, Cording said. If you suspect your vitamin D intake is low and would like to take a supplement, be sure to talk to your doctor. He or she can do a blood test to determine the appropriate dosage for you. 5. Prioritize sleep time. Spending more time snoozing is key, Dr. Blank confirmed. 'Getting enough sleep helps our bodies recover from everyday stress—both physical and mental—and promotes better functioning of our immune system,' she said. When you don't get enough shut-eye, your body may decrease the production of protective proteins called cytokines, which your immune response needs more of when it's dealing with an infection or inflammation while under stress. So just how much sleep are we talking about? The National Sleep Foundation says adults up to age 64 should snooze between seven and nine hours per night, while adults 65 and up should aim between seven and eight hours. 6. Wash your hands frequently. Washing your hands regularly will help keep viruses and bacteria away from your eyes, nose, and mouth, which can do your immune system a solid, Dr. Blank said. 'This reduces the variety and number of germs we are exposed to and keeps our immune system from getting overwhelmed,' she explained. The CDC specifically recommends washing your hands with soap and water for at least 20 seconds, or the amount of time it takes to hum the 'Happy Birthday' song from beginning to end twice. Hand sanitizer that contains at least 60% alcohol also works in a pinch. 7. Move your body every day. Being physically active can help keep pathogens out of your lungs and airways, according to the National Library of Medicine, which can minimize your odds of getting a cold, the flu, or other illnesses. Exercise can also give antibodies and white blood cells a boost, causing them to circulate more widely throughout your body, where they might detect illnesses better than they would if you didn't get moving. 8. Quit smoking. You already know smoking is bad for your health in so many ways, but it can also wreak havoc and 'cause direct damage' to parts of your immune system, Dr. Blank said. For example, smoking immobilizes cilia, the hair-like structures in your airways that help 'sweep' out bacteria. 'These cilia form the first line of defense against respiratory infections,' Dr. Blank said. When they're immobilized, germs have 'much easier access' to your lungs, she explained. Cue the coughing and sneezing. The good news: According to research in the journal Nature, the detrimental effects of smoking on the immune system vanish immediately once you stop. You Might Also Like Can Apple Cider Vinegar Lead to Weight Loss? Bobbi Brown Shares Her Top Face-Transforming Makeup Tips for Women Over 50
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Remedy's Nutrition Launches Premium Modified Citrus Pectin Supplement to Support Cellular Health and Natural Cleansing
High-Quality (MCP) Supplement Offers Enhanced Bioavailability and Purity for Health-Conscious Consumers KEY LARGO, Fla., Aug. 19, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Remedy's Nutrition, a trusted dietary supplement company since 1972 and a leader in small-batch herbal formulations, announced the launch of its naturally Modified Citrus Pectin (MCP) supplement, a specialized fiber formula designed to support immune and cellular wellness. Revolutionary Citrus Pectin Supplement Technology Regular citrus pectin is an indigestible fiber. According to the NIH, it is fermented by beneficial bacteria in the large intestine, producing short-chain fatty acids that are absorbed into the bloodstream. Modified Citrus Pectin undergoes a scientific process, such as depolymerization and reduction of esterification, that enhances absorption and function. Premium Quality and Manufacturing Standards Unlike conventional MCP production methods, Remedy's proprietary process uses a natural enzymatic modification without heat or water. This preserves the structure of the pectin in its most natural state while increasing its bioavailability. 'Remedy's Nutrition Modified Citrus Pectin has gained considerable attention in the wellness community for its unique properties,' said company representative Gene Lentz. 'Our enzymatically formulated MCP ensures customers receive a supplement with superior absorption and dietary benefits. We believe it is the highest quality MCP available today.' Click Here to Buy MCP on Our Official Website>> >> The modified citrus pectin supplement is: Made from premium citrus sources Non-GMO and gluten-free Free from artificial colors, flavors, and preservatives Suitable for vegans and vegetarians Additional Premium Supplements Offered by Remedy's Nutrition Include: – 20% Aescin, 1,000 mg per serving, traditionally used to support circulatory health. – 1,000 mg per serving, valued in traditional Chinese medicine for kidney support and adaptogenic benefits. (Medicago sativa) – 1,000 mg per capsule, nutrient-rich in vitamins, minerals, and chlorophyll. – 1,000 mg herbal blend formulated to support the body's natural processes. (Boswellia serrata) – 1,000 mg per capsule, traditionally used to support joint health and inflammatory balance. About Remedy's Nutrition Since 1972, Remedy's Nutrition has remained committed to purity, potency, and transparency. The company sources premium global ingredients and manufactures all products in FDA-registered facilities. Its mission is to provide science-backed herbal dietary supplements that support optimal wellness. For more information, visit Click here to buy Remedy's Modified Citrus Pectin (MCP). Disclaimer: These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. A photo accompanying this announcement is available at CONTACT: Media Contact: Remedy's Nutrition Website: Email: manager@ Phone: (305) 396-7028Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
