
Hegseth: US will stand by Indo-Pacific allies against ‘imminent' China threat
US defence secretary Pete Hegseth reassured allies in the Indo-Pacific on Saturday that they will not be left alone to face increasing military and economic pressure from China, while insisting that they also contribute more to their own defence.
He said Washington will bolster its defences overseas to counter what the Pentagon sees as rapidly developing threats by Beijing, particularly in its aggressive stance towards Taiwan.
China has conducted numerous exercises to test what a blockade would look like of the self-governing island, which Beijing claims as its own and the US has pledged to defend.
China's army 'is rehearsing for the real deal', Mr Hegseth said in a keynote speech at a security conference in Singapore.
'We are not going to sugarcoat it — the threat China poses is real. And it could be imminent.'
China has a stated goal of having its military have the capability to take Taiwan by force if necessary by 2027, a deadline that is seen by experts as more of an aspirational goal than a hard war deadline.
But China also has built sophisticated man-made islands in the South China Sea to support new military outposts and developed highly advanced hypersonic and space capabilities, which are driving the US to create its own space-based Golden Dome missile defences.
Speaking at the Shangri-La Dialogue, a global security conference hosted by the International Institute for Security Studies, Mr Hegseth said China is no longer just building up its military forces to take Taiwan, it's 'actively training for it, every day'.
Mr Hegseth repeated a pledge made by previous administrations to bolster US military capabilities in the Indo-Pacific (Anupam Nath/AP)
Mr Hegseth also called out China for its ambitions in Latin America, particularly its efforts to increase its influence over the Panama Canal.
He urged countries in the region to increase defence spending to levels similar to the 5% of their gross domestic product European nations are now pressed to contribute.
'We must all do our part,' Mr Hegseth said.
He also repeated a pledge made by previous administrations to bolster US military capabilities in the Indo-Pacific to provide a more robust deterrent.
While both the Obama and Biden administrations had also committed to pivoting to the Pacific and established new military agreements throughout the region, a full shift has never been realised.
Instead, US military resources from the Indo-Pacific have been regularly pulled to support military needs in the Middle East and Europe, especially since the wars in Ukraine and Gaza.
In the first few months of president Donald Trump's second term, that has also been the case.
In the last few months the Trump administration has taken a Patriot missile defence battalion out of the Indo-Pacific in order to send it to the Middle East, a massive logistical operation that required more than 73 military cargo aircraft flights, and sent Coast Guard ships back to the US to help defend the US-Mexico border.
Mr Hegseth was asked why the US pulled those resources if the Indo-Pacific is the priority theatre for the US.
He did not directly answer but said the shift of resources was necessary to defend against Houthi missile attacks launched from Yemen, and to bolster protections against illegal immigration into the US.
At the same time, he stressed the need for American allies and partners to step up their own defence spending and preparations, saying the US was not interested in going it alone.
'Ultimately a strong, resolute and capable network of allies and partners is our key strategic advantage,' he said.
'China envies what we have together, and it sees what we can collectively bring to bear on defence, but it's up to all of us to ensure that we live up to that potential by investing.'
The Indo-Pacific nations caught in between have tried to balance relations with both the US and China over the years.
Beijing is the primary trading partner for many, but is also feared as a regional bully, in part due to its increasingly aggressive claims on natural resources such as critical fisheries.
Mr Hegseth cautioned that playing both sides, seeking US military support and Chinese economic support, carries risk.
'Economic dependence on China only deepens their malign influence and complicates our defense decision space during times of tension,' Mr Hegseth said.
China usually sends its own defence minister to this conference, but Dong Jun did not attend this year in a snub to the US and the erratic tariff war Mr Trump has ignited with Beijing, something the US delegation said it intended to capitalise on.
'We are here this morning. And somebody else isn't,' Mr Hegseth said.
Mr Hegseth was asked by a member of the Chinese delegation, made up of lower level officers from the National Defence University, how committed it would be to regional alliances. In some, China has a more dominant influence.
Mr Hegseth said the US would be open to engaging with any countries willing to work with it.
'We are not going to look only inside the confines of how previous administrations looked at this region,' he said.
'We're opening our arms to countries across the spectrum — traditional allies, non-traditional allies.'
Mr Hegseth said committing US support for Indo-Pacific nations would not require local governments to align with the West on cultural or climate issues.
It is not clear if the US can or wants to supplant China as the region's primary economic driver. But Mr Hegseth's push follows Mr Trump's visit to the Middle East, which resulted in billions of dollars in new defence agreements.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Examiner
3 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
US commerce secretary Howard Lutnick denies EU now has 'leverage'
US commerce secretary Howard Lutnick yesterday downplayed the impact of legal uncertainty around tariffs on negotiations with the European Union, saying talks were ongoing. Mr Lutnick was asked about a report quoting an unnamed EU official close to negotiations who said the legal uncertainty of the tariffs in the US gave the EU "extra leverage". "You can't listen to silly people making silly comments," Mr Lutnick said. "All of the countries that are negotiating with us understand the power of Donald Trump and his ability to protect the American worker." A US trade court blocked most of Mr Trump's tariffs in a sweeping ruling last week that found the president overstepped his authority by imposing across-the-board duties on imports from US trading partners. A federal appeals court paused that ruling a day later, allowing the tariffs to go into effect while it considered an appeal by the Trump administration. Mr Lutnick said the ruling "maybe cost us a week, but then everybody came right back to the table." Mr Trump in late May threatened 50% tariffs on all European goods by June 1 but days later delayed the effective date to July 9 to allow for time to negotiate. Mr Trump also said on Friday that he would increase tariffs on imported steel and aluminum to 50% from 25%, leading the European Commission on Saturday to say it could consider countermeasures. Speaking on ABC News' 'This Week,' White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett said the US needed to protect its steel industry for national security reasons in light of economic rival China's steel production. "We have to show strength," Hassett said. "We have to have a steel industry that's ready for American defence." Meanwhile US Treasury Secretary Bessent said he believes Mr Trump and Chinese president Xi Jinping will speak soon to iron out trade issues including a dispute over critical minerals. Mr Trump accused China of violating an agreement with the US to mutually roll back tariffs and trade restrictions for critical minerals. "What China is doing is they are holding back products that are essential for the industrial supply chains of India, of Europe. And that is not what a reliable partner does," Bessent said in an interview on Sunday with CBS' "Face the Nation." "I am confident that when President Trump and Party chairman Xi have a call, that this will be ironed out."


Irish Examiner
5 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Ukraine says it destroyed more than 40 military planes in drone attack in Russia
Kyiv has destroyed more than 40 military aircraft in a drone attack deep in Russia, a Ukrainian security official said. The attack on Sunday came as Russia pounded Ukraine with missiles and drones a day before the two sides meet for a new round of direct talks in Istanbul. The official said the attack took more than a year and a half to execute and was personally supervised by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. The operation saw drones transported in containers carried by trucks deep into Russian territory, he said. We are doing everything to protect our independence, our state and our people The drones reportedly hit 41 bombers stationed at several airfields, including the Belaya air base in the Russian region of Irkutsk, more than 2,500 miles from Ukraine. It is the first time that a Ukrainian drone has been seen in the region, local governor Igor Kobzev said, stressing that it did not present a threat to civilians. The attack was disclosed on the same day as Mr Zelensky said Ukraine will send a delegation to Istanbul for a new round of direct peace talks with Russia on Monday. In a statement on Telegram, Mr Zelensky said that defence minister Rustem Umerov will lead the Ukrainian delegation. 'We are doing everything to protect our independence, our state and our people,' Mr Zelensky said. Ukrainian officials had previously called on the Kremlin to provide a promised memorandum setting out its position on ending the war before the meeting takes place. Moscow had said it would share its memorandum during the talks. Russia on Sunday launched the biggest number of drones – 472 – on Ukraine since the full-scale invasion in February 2022, Ukraine's air force said. Russian forces also launched seven missiles alongside the barrage of drones, said Yuriy Ignat, head of communications for the air force. Russian strikes have caused extensive damage in Ukraine (Evgeniy Maloletka/AP) Earlier on Sunday, Ukraine's army said at least 12 Ukrainian service members were killed and more than 60 were injured in a Russian missile strike on an army training unit. The training unit is located to the rear of the 620-mile active front line, where Russian reconnaissance and strike drones are able to target. Ukraine's forces suffer from manpower shortages and take extra precautions to avoid mass gatherings as the skies across the front line are saturated with Russian drones looking for targets. 'If it is established that the actions or inaction of officials led to the death or injury of servicemen, those responsible will be held strictly accountable,' a Ukrainian ground forces statement said. Russia's Ministry of Defence said on Sunday that it had taken control of the village of Oleksiivka in Ukraine's northern region of Sumy. Ukrainian authorities in Sumy ordered mandatory evacuations in 11 more settlements on Saturday as Russian forces make steady gains in the area. Speaking on Saturday, Ukraine's top army chief, Oleksandr Syrskyi, said that Russian forces were focusing their main offensive efforts on Pokrovsk, Toretsk and Lyman in the Donetsk region, as well as the Sumy border area.


RTÉ News
6 hours ago
- RTÉ News
In the age of AI, is doubt becoming a political strategy?
When video footage of French President Emmanuel Macron appearing to have an altercation with his wife Brigitte circulated online last week, the Élysée Palace initially suggested the footage could have been created using AI. The footage was later confirmed to be real. As references to AI become more common in political discourse, what happens when democratic governments begin using it to question the authenticity of real events? Last Sunday the Associated Press (AP) captured footage showing French President Emmanuel Macron stepping off a plane in Vietnam, followed closely by his wife, Brigitte Macron. As the doors open, she appears to push him in the face with both hands. In the video, President Macron looks momentarily startled, before quickly regaining his composure and waving out through the plane's open doorway. With Brigitte Macron mostly hidden by the plane, it's hard to know the full context or what preceded the push — but the clip still spread widely online. As the clip gained traction, journalists covering the president sought answers. According to a French political journalist who spoke to RTÉ, a senior adviser to President Macron initially suggested to reporters asking questions about the push that the video may have been AI-generated. The explanation was offered before any formal verification had taken place and, according to those briefed, was the first line of response to a potentially sensitive story. However, the Élysée Palace later acknowledged that the footage was genuine and described the incident as a private interaction between the couple. But this clarification only came after the AP published the video in its entirety, which ruled out the suggestion that it was generated using AI. The response from the senior adviser also came just weeks after Macron was the target of a viral disinformation campaign, in which he was falsely accused of handling a bag of cocaine during a diplomatic meeting, an incident that some suggest may have influenced their instinct to invoke AI as an explanation. While debate about the Vietnam plane video, and what may have prompted the push from Brigitte, has continued throughout the week, less attention has been paid to the early suggestion that AI might have been involved. That offhand remark, reported widely in the hours after the clip emerged, raises broader questions about how some democracies are beginning to invoke AI in moments of uncertainty, according to some experts. Dr Tetyana Lokot, an associate professor at Dublin City University who researches digital governance and state media strategies, says moments like this can erode trust in democratic institutions. "It's not just the deepfakes themselves that undermines people's trust in the media or in, political officials or leaders but also very often the shorthand is like, 'oh, this is a deepfake.' It becomes harder for people to distinguish between claims of credibility or how to verify something," Dr Lokot said. It also raises a tougher question, according to Dr Lokot. If a democratic government casts doubt on real footage, what happens when an authoritarian regime does the same, and people can't tell the difference? "It almost amplifies this effect of like 'we don't really know who to trust,' which I think is a much bigger problem. It basically undermines trust in the democratic process." Dr Lokot also notes that beyond questions of public trust, AI is increasingly being used not just as a threat to guard against, but as a way for governments to shape narratives and reassert a sense of control during moments of uncertainty. "When you have a situation where you don't feel like you're in control, which you could argue this was one such situation, you can fall back on the myth of AI as a very powerful technology that's very easily appropriated," Dr Lokot said. "The key concern [for governments] is: 'how do we make sure that we're in control?'" she added. Others say that while governments may reach for AI as a way to reassert control, sometimes it's just a sign of how wired we've become to question everything, especially when AI is involved. Claire Wardle, a professor at Cornell University in New York and a leading expert on misinformation, says the Macron case may also reflect a more instinctive response, a symptom of how easily doubt creeps in when AI is part of the conversation. "What I don't know about this... is did they [the Élysée Palace] know and they were trying to cover it up, or did they just go, 'oh, there's no way that she would appear like that, so it must be a deepfake,'" Ms Wardle said. "It's just a horrible reminder to advisers. Never say something is a deepfake until you know it's verified," Ms Wardle added. She adds that in a climate where trust in institutions is already at a low point, even a throwaway remark can deepen public suspicion. "We already know that we're in trouble here and people are not trusting politicians. They believe they're being lied to, which in some countries they increasingly are. This becomes just another way they can do it: by telling us it's a deepfake when it's not." Ms Wardle also says the confusion around the Macron clip taps into a deeper problem that researchers like her have been warning about for years — the risk that AI doesn't just create fake content, but also gives people cover to dismiss real events. "Photography came along and we were like, 'we can hold people accountable.' And then AI technology took that away. It's broken the foundations upon which we stand." And when those foundations crack, whether it's the French president having an altercation with his wife or something more mundane, Ms Wardle says the result can be the same: a sense that nothing can be trusted. "Whether it's frivolous Instagram posts, or it's French politicians, or war crimes. In a very short space of time, the foundation we've relied on to understand reality has disappeared. And that's what's so terrifying."