logo
Texas votes to outlaw most hemp products, potentially crippling market

Texas votes to outlaw most hemp products, potentially crippling market

Politico22-05-2025
Texas is poised to decimate the state's booming multibillion-dollar hemp industry.
The state House voted to ban almost all hemp products Wednesday, which would deal a crippling blow to an industry that's spawned more than 8,000 licensed shops and employs tens of thousands of workers.
The ban bill previously passed the Senate and appears on a glide path to the desk of Republican Gov. Greg Abbott, but it will almost certainly spark legal fights.
Businesses 'are going to be wiped out,' said Heather Fazio, director of the Texas Cannabis Policy Center, one of the most vocal opponents of the ban bill. 'This is especially unfair because this industry has been allowed to thrive for six years.'
The vote was a stunning reversal for the House after it advanced legislation that sought to regulate — rather than ban — intoxicating hemp products. The state's hemp industry had looked to the chamber as an ally after Republican Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick made it one of his top legislative priorities to crack down on the burgeoning, loosely regulated market for intoxicating products, arguing that it presents a major public health threat.
Patrick vowed that he would not compromise on anything besides an outright ban on THC and other intoxicating compounds, threatening to hold up other legislation from the House.
'I've never been more passionate about anything,' Patrick said in a video he posted to social media this week. 'If we leave Austin this session and we don't ban these products for the next two to three years, we're going to see lives destroyed.'
Ultimately, just one House Republican voted against the proposal to ban almost all hemp products. The bill 'may have serious and harmful unintended consequences such as shuttering thousands of small businesses,' Republican Rep. Brian Harrison said in a statement explaining why he voted against the bill. '[It] exceeds the proper role of government and may ban many products that President Trump legalized in 2018.'
State lawmakers and regulators across the country have been struggling to put guardrails around the rapidly growing market for intoxicating hemp-derived products, which has thrived especially in states with restrictive marijuana laws. The industry exploded in the years after Congress legalized hemp through the 2018 farm bill.
Hemp industry advocates thought they had found allies in the Texas House, which was more concerned with the potential ramifications of killing an industry worth at least $4 billion in the state. During a marathon legislative hearing earlier this month, lawmakers listened to the concerns of small business owners and consumers.
Hemp industry advocates pushed for increased regulations, asking lawmakers not to punish their small businesses due to bad actors who sell highly potent products to minors. Their entreaties seemed to work: After listening to hours of public testimony against banning intoxicating hemp products, the State House Affairs committee overhauled the Senate-passed bill to regulate the hemp industry, proposing public health measures like age restrictions, packaging rules and lab testing requirements.
The House version of the bill would also have banned synthesized cannabinoids and capped THC content in consumable hemp products to 10 mg per serving.
But on Wednesday night, Republican Rep. Tom Oliverson put forth an amendment to replace the House version of the bill with the Senate-passed language. While the House made some minor changes, the substance of the THC ban remains.
The main reason for the seeming about-face is Patrick, who 'held school funding hostage in exchange for votes on passing a ban,' said Cynthia Cabrera, chief strategy officer of Austin-based hemp company Hometown Hero. 'Children were used as leverage to get what he wanted.'
Neither Patrick nor Abbott responded to requests for comment.
The hemp ban bill would also institute new criminal penalties for hemp possession that are even more severe than those for marijuana possession. Possessing non-compliant hemp products is punishable by up to one year in jail under the bill, while the maximum penalty for marijuana possession in the state is six months in jail.
'Sadly, we're going to see many, many thousands of people arrested between now and the next legislative session for possession of a federally legal product,' said Fazio.
Indeed, hemp businesses are already strategizing their next steps, including efforts to persuade Abbott to veto the bill. If that doesn't happen, they are almost certain to sue over the ban.
'[The bill] represents a blunt-force approach that will collapse an entire economic ecosystem,' Thomas Winstanley, executive vice president of hemp e-commerce platform Edibles.com, said in a statement. 'For a state that prides itself on being pro-business, SB3 is antithetical to its values at worst and hypocritical at best.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

California Gov. Gavin Newsom signs redistricting measure in response to new Texas House map
California Gov. Gavin Newsom signs redistricting measure in response to new Texas House map

New York Post

time7 minutes ago

  • New York Post

California Gov. Gavin Newsom signs redistricting measure in response to new Texas House map

California Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom signed off Thursday evening on a redistricting plan aimed at countering Texas Republicans' planned implementation of new congressional maps for the Lone Star State. Newsom enacted the so-called 'Election Rigging Response Act,' setting a Nov. 4 special election asking whether Golden State voters approve of new House districts designed by legislators. The Democrat-controlled state Senate passed the special election measure in a 30-8 vote, shortly after the Dem-held state Assembly approved it in a 57-20 vote. Advertisement If the new map is approved by voters — and if it survives near-certain legal challenges — Democrats could win up to five additional House seats in next year's midterm elections, canceling out the five seats Republicans in Texas are expected to gain as a result of their redistricting push. Newsom announced that California would forge ahead with redistricting at a rally-like press conference in Los Angeles last week. AFP via Getty Images 'The president and the Texas Republicans are rigging the election … it is our duty to fight fire with fire,' state Sen. Jerry McNerney (D-East Bay) said during debate on the measure. Advertisement McNerney argued that 'California voters should have the right to decide if the state should respond to the president's effort to rig the election.' Since the measure seeks to override the Golden State's voter-approved, nonpartisan redistricting commission, a special election is necessary to redraw the existing congressional map. State Democrats maintain that the mid-decade redistricting measure is a one-off, needed to directly respond to Texas Republicans, but some in the legislature expressed fear that California would never return to its original system. President Trump strongly backed Texas' effort to redraw congressional maps in the Lone Star State. REUTERS Advertisement 'With the reported involvement of the [Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee] in this action – that has been developed behind the scenes – one has to be awfully suspicious of significant changes to this process,' argued Republican state Sen. Roger Niello (R-Sacramento County). 'Indeed, the intent or the power to continue on our previous track after 2030 is of great concern to me and I think should be of great concern to everybody who votes in favor of this,' he added. Former President Barack Obama weighed in on California's redistricting earlier this week at a DCCC fundraiser, arguing that Newsom's plan 'was a smart, measured approach' to counter Texas' move.

Karl Rove warns Ukraine defeat could be Trump's Afghanistan withdrawal
Karl Rove warns Ukraine defeat could be Trump's Afghanistan withdrawal

The Hill

time38 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Karl Rove warns Ukraine defeat could be Trump's Afghanistan withdrawal

Republican strategist Karl Rove on Thursday underscored the stakes of the Russia-Ukraine peace talks, saying failure to come to a resolution could be the downfall of President Trump's presidency. In a Wall Street Journal op-ed, Rove outlined the three possible outcomes from Trump's efforts to end the war in Ukraine: a successful peace deal; a failure to reach a deal, resulting in continued conflict; and a Russian victory over Ukraine. Rove compared the third possibility — which Rove said would result from either no agreement or from an agreement that Russia breaks — to the Afghanistan withdrawal in 2021, when President Biden's poll numbers tanked and never recovered. 'In addition to being the worst possible outcome morally and geopolitically, this third possibility is the worst scenario for the president and the GOP,' Rove wrote in the op-ed. 'The disastrous U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan and subsequent Taliban takeover broke President Biden's reputation with voters. He never recovered. Mr. Biden was at 50% approval in Gallup in July 2021; he dropped precipitously after Kabul fell the following month. He bottomed out at 36% in July 2024 before he withdrew from the presidential race,' Rove continued. 'The defeat of Ukraine by Russia would be similarly disastrous for Mr. Trump,' he added. Rove noted that Trump promised to end the war in Ukraine within 24 hours of taking office. Since then, Rove said, Trump has 'put himself at center stage' with his approach to dealmaking and his engagements with foreign leaders. 'The president can't abandon his starring role even if he wants to,' Rove said. 'Public opinion in America and the rest of the civilized world would rightly blame Mr. Putin for the invasion itself—but Mr. Trump for allowing it to succeed.' Rove said that the first outcome—a successful deal—is within reach for the U.S. president, and he touted Trump's steps so far in defense of Ukraine. He also said Trump's pressure on NATO countries to spend more on defense 'is paying off.' Rove urged Trump to become 'as tough on Mr. Putin as he has been on' Zelensky, saying that approach could get the warring countries 'to arrive at a deal that results in a durable peace.' 'Mr. Trump can bring about a reasonably successful conclusion to this catastrophic war by doing what Mr. Putin fears most: rejecting the Russian dictator's flattery and demands and insisting he make a fair, enforceable deal with Mr. Zelensky. Or else,' Rove said. 'Anything less would be a stain on Mr. Trump and on his party, for which they'd rightly pay a high political price,' he continued.

U.S. Rep. Lloyd Doggett of Texas says he'll bow out if redistricting stands
U.S. Rep. Lloyd Doggett of Texas says he'll bow out if redistricting stands

Axios

time38 minutes ago

  • Axios

U.S. Rep. Lloyd Doggett of Texas says he'll bow out if redistricting stands

Longtime Austin Democratic congressman Lloyd Doggett said Thursday that he won't seek reelection if new congressional maps are not overturned by courts. Why it matters: Doggett's move prevents a potentially nasty Democratic primary in the wake of a Republican redistricting effort, allowing U.S. Rep. Greg Casar, D-Austin, a rising progressive, to remain in power. State of play: Casar and Doggett would have battled for a single Austin-based district under the new congressional map that the Texas House approved on Wednesday and which the Senate is expected to pass soon. Gov. Greg Abbott has said he'll sign the legislation. Doggett, who has been repeatedly targeted by Republicans in redistricting during his over 30 years in Congress, currently represents much of Austin and its suburbs. Casar, a former Austin city council member first elected to Congress in 2022, represents parts of southern and eastern Austin in a district that snakes down to San Antonio. Flashback: In a campaign email nearly two weeks ago, Doggett wrote that "seniority is an asset, not a liability." He urged Casar to "not abandon" his reconfigured district, arguing that Casar could "use his organizing skills and populist message to win over the disaffected, particularly disaffected Hispanic voters." What they're saying: Unless the new maps are overturned by courts, "I will not seek reelection," Doggett said in a statement Thursday. "I had hoped that my commitment to reelection under any circumstances would encourage Congressman Casar to not surrender his winnable district to Trump." "While his apparent decision is most unfortunate, I prefer to devote the coming months to fighting Trump tyranny and serving Austin rather than waging a struggle with fellow Democrats." On X, Casar wrote: "Lloyd Doggett is an Austin institution. I've learned so much from him. I'm grateful to him. The fight for democracy continues." The big picture: The new map could give Republicans an additional five seats in Congress. Democrats say the map disenfranchises Black and Latino voters.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store