Council tax warning as record £8.3billion owed by millions of households – how to get help and avoid bailiffs
We reveal all the help you can get with your council tax below
TAXING TIMES Council tax warning as record £8.3billion owed by millions of households – how to get help and avoid bailiffs
HOUSEHOLDS have been issued a warning over a record £8.3billion in unpaid council tax.
The latest Government data reveals millions across England, Scotland and Wales have fallen behind payments for the essential bill.
New analysis from charity Debt Justice shows more than £6.2billion was owed by households in England at the end of March this year.
Meanwhile, Scottish households owed £1.5billion and those in Wales £160million.
The charity's analysis reveals council tax arrears across Britain has increased by 79% in the last five years, from £4.63billion in March 2020 to £8.2billion this March.
Wales has seen the biggest hike, with a rise of 170% since 2020, nearly tripling from £59million.
Arrears in England and Scotland have increased by 85% and 51% respectively over the last five years.
Meanwhile, other recent research by Debt Justice found 4.4million people have fallen behind on their council tax, up from 3.2million a year ago.
Council tax bills are expected to increase at their fastest rate in 20 years following Rachel Reeves' spending review.
The average Band D council tax set by local authorities in England for this financial year is £2,280 - a 5% rise would see this go up to £2,394.
Toby Murray, policy and campaigns manager at Debt Justice, said: "The vast majority of people aren't avoiding council tax, they simply can't afford it.
How to Qualify for Free or Discounted Council Tax!
"People in council tax arrears are overwhelmingly on low incomes, and many are living in poverty.
"Rather than help, councils are sending in the bailiffs - punishing people for struggling with their bills.
"Councils should end the use of bailiffs for council tax debt collection and instead introduce urgent reforms, including a duty of care to protect people most at risk."
It comes as the Government plans a huge shake-up to the way council tax is collected following calls from campaign groups.
Ministers are proposing households pay council tax bills over 12 months instead of 10 to help them manage their finances better as part of a consultation.
The Government is also mooting changing the way council tax arrears are recovered.
Under the plans, councils will have to wait longer before demanding a bill is paid in full and the costs charged to households through liability orders will be capped.
A liability order is a demand for payment of council tax issued by a Magistrates' Court.
Any changes included in the consultation are being discussed until September 12 and would come into effect this autumn.
What happens if you don't pay council tax and what can you do?
The repercussions for not paying council tax can be severe, hence why the Government is consulting on changing the rules.
Your council will send you a reminder notice giving you seven days to pay if you miss a payment.
If you don't pay within seven days, you'll have to pay the whole year's council tax.
You'll then be sent a second reminder notice if you miss another council tax payment.
You'll only get a maximum of two reminder notices in a financial year - this runs from April 1 to March 31 of the next year.
Your council will ultimately send you a final notice saying you must pay the whole year's council tax if you miss a payment for the third time.
If you don't pay this within seven days, you may end up being summoned to court.
Your council can even send bailiffs to seize your property if there's no other way to recover your debt.
The bailiffs' costs can be added to the total amount you owe the council.
If you are struggling to get the funds together to pay off council tax arrears, you can pause any debt for 60 days under the Debt Respite Scheme, also known as Breathing Space.
During this time, you receive professional advice to help you establish a long-term plan to clear any debt.
You are also offered protection from bailiffs. You can find out more about who's eligible and how to apply.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Rhyl Journal
22 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
British woman stranded in Israel remains in dark about evacuation flights
The first RAF flight set off from Ben Gurion Airport in Tel Aviv on Monday afternoon carrying 63 British passengers, who landed in Cyprus and were then flown back to Birmingham Airport, where they arrived in the early hours of Tuesday. In the days since, more Britons have made the journey home as part of the Government's evacuation strategy. It comes as Israeli airspace reopened on Monday after being closed for 10 days following the start of the conflict between Israel and Iran on June 13. British-Israeli Mali Smith, 66, said she has not heard from the Foreign Office since registering for the repatriation flights on Wednesday June 18, leading her to book a flight home to London for 600 US dollars (£439) as she 'can't bear the stress anymore'. Mrs Smith, a solicitor born in Tel Aviv but who now lives in Hampstead Garden Suburb, London, with her husband, had arrived in Israel on June 11 to see her mother and friends. The mother-of-two has twice booked flights to Luton Airport, one with Wizz Air and one with Israir, which were both cancelled. She said: 'After my flights were cancelled, the Foreign Office sent many of us an email saying that they were planning on sending an RAF plane to rescue us and take us back to the UK. 'But it's been days now and I'm still waiting for a response – even though we had to pay them £350 for the pleasure. 'They have been in touch with some Brits but many of us are still waiting and I don't understand why they are sending such a small aeroplane with only 63 seats, while there are thousands who have applied for the flights. 'I sent them emails and I called them, but they couldn't give me an answer – I have been in touch with my MP and she has tried hard to help some of us here, but we've had no success. 'It's nerve-wracking and it's really hard to sit around and wait for them to do something. 'Now the war has a ceasefire, so I don't know what's going to happen – they might cancel it all even before they have rescued us.' Mrs Smith says that the lack of information about the flights has left those who remain in the country feeling stranded waiting for more support. She said she had also been told that British nationals have had phone calls from the Foreign Office as late as 3am in the morning, asking them to be at the airfield just six hours later at 9am, only for their flight to be delayed until 1pm. Mrs Smith said: 'The organisation of the evacuation has not been good enough. 'I'm in Tel Aviv, right next to the Iron Dome, and the noise is really loud and scary, and it means you can't sleep properly. 'The community has been great, they've been so supportive and there's a lot of warmth from everyone. 'But the UK Government has been so slow to respond and I'm just disappointed that it's taken them that long and that the communication is that bad. 'I don't know whether to book another flight and forget about the evacuation flight, and whether I can claim the money back. 'The situation has improved here with the ceasefire which seems like it's holding, but the Foreign Office needs to be so much better.' The FCDO has been contacted for comment.
Rhyl Journal
22 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Welfare concessions being discussed with Labour rebels, Rayner suggests
Angela Rayner insisted the Government was not expecting backbenchers to go against traditional party values amid a looming revolt over the welfare Bill set for a Commons vote next week. Some 120 Labour MPs have put their names to a bid to block the legislation in its tracks, arguing that disabled people have not been properly consulted about the plans and further scrutiny is required before making any changes. Asked what concessions could be offered to convince rebels to back the Bill, Ms Rayner said 'discussions are ongoing'. 'I'm not going to get into that on your show tonight,' she said in an interview on ITV's Peston programme. 'Those discussions are ongoing around making sure that the welfare reforms that we're bringing in support people into work who need that, and we're putting a huge amount of investment into doing that, but also protecting the most vulnerable.' She acknowledged that 'a lot of people are very scared about these changes' but added: 'I haven't changed my Labour values and we're not expecting our benches to do anything that isn't in check with them. 'What we want to do is support people, and that is the crucial bit around these reforms of what Labour are trying to achieve, and we're discussing that with our MPs.' Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall, who has already taken steps to soften the impact of the welfare Bill, has been locked in talks with backbenchers as she seeks to win over those opposed to the measures. The Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill faces its first Commons test on Tuesday. The plans restrict eligibility for personal independence payment (Pip), the main disability payment in England, and limit the sickness-related element of universal credit, with the aim of getting more people back into work and saving up to £5 billion a year. Existing claimants will be given a 13-week phase-out period of financial support, a move seen as a bid to head off opposition. But the fact so many Labour MPs are prepared to put their names to the 'reasoned amendment' calling for a change of course shows how entrenched the opposition remains. Earlier on Wednesday, Sir Keir Starmer defended his leadership against accusations he had misjudged the mood in his party, insisting he is 'comfortable with reading the room'. At a press conference at the Nato summit in the Hague, he said: 'Is it tough going? Are there plenty of people and noises off? Yes, of course, there always are, there always have been, there always will be. 'But the important thing is to focus on the change that we want to bring about.' Ms Rayner earlier told MPs in the Commons the vote will take place as planned despite the rebellion, saying: 'We will go ahead on Tuesday.' Social security minister Sir Stephen Timms said he was 'looking forward to the debate' next week. He told the Commons Work and Pensions Committee the changes need to be made urgently to cut the spiralling welfare bill. Committee chairwoman Debbie Abrahams, who is one of the Labour MPs to have signed the amendment to block the legislation, asked why the provisions within the Bill had not been consulted on. Sir Stephen said: 'Essentially because of the urgency of the changes needing to be made.' He said the cost of Pip had gone up from £12 billion before the pandemic to £22 billion last year 'and that is not a sustainable trajectory'. Setting out the impact of the reforms, he told the Committee 370,000 people getting Pip under the current system would not be receiving it by the end of the decade. Other senior Labour figures outside Parliament, including Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham and London Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan, have also publicly expressed their opposition to the plans. Meanwhile, the Tories seem unlikely to lend the Government their support, with leader Kemi Badenoch setting out conditions for doing so including a commitment to rule out tax rises in the autumn budget and further cut the benefits bill.
North Wales Chronicle
31 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Planning reforms could break housebuilders' ‘failed' dominance
Lord Best, who is vice president of the Town and Country Planning Association, hit out at the 'oligopoly' in the sector said the major firms for building homes had failed in their task of building enough. He told peers that small building firms were responsible for 10% of new homes since 2000, down from a previous figure of 40%. A Government report from 2024 found the 11 biggest housebuilders, including Barratt Homes, Taylor Wimpey and Persimmon made up 40% of all new homes built in 2021-22. The crossbench peer said: 'A key question hanging over the ambition to build 1.5 million more and better homes is, who will the nation entrust to get this job done? 'For many years, the answer for most house building has been 'we will let the volume housebuilders acquire the sites, come up with the plans, design and build the homes, and make their profits, while we try to require them to allocate a modest proportion of their output for affordable housing'. 'My lords, this reliance on the large housebuilders has not produced the quantity or quality of homes we need.' Lord Best's comments come a year after a report by the Competition and Markets Authority criticised the speculative model employed by many of the largest housebuilders. He added: 'It's led to so-called 'fleece-hold' sales to homebuyers, to uniform, soulless design, and with little attempt to provide the green spaces and community facilities that are the making of any place. 'And the housebuilders have worked at a rate that suits themselves, a build-out rate that ensures no reduction in house prices.' He said he believed the proposed development corporations, which form part of the Planning and Infrastructure Bill which was getting its second reading in the House of Lords on Wednesday, would make the Government less reliant on large firms which could see more homes built. '(It) enables the use of this development corporation model for any major development, introducing an alternative to the failed business model of the oligopoly of volume housebuilders,' he said. 'Here is the breakthrough that the Bill could achieve.' The Bill includes measures to help the Government achieve its central manifesto commitment of building 1.5 million homes by 2029. It restores mandatory housing targets, legislates for a generation of new towns, and will reform planning to make it harder to reject developments. The debate heard that there are 1,000,000 planning permission applications for homes that have gone unbuilt in England, with 250,000 in London. ONS figures showed fewer than 185,000 homes were completed in 2024. Housing minister Lord Khan of Burnley had hit out at his predecessor's 'mismatched territory of ill-fitting, short-termist reforms, tinkered around the edges rather than resolving our problems'. The Labour peer said the Bill could 'turn this around'. He said: 'Home building has fallen from already insufficient levels. There are simply not enough homes … this would be the lowest year for net-additional dwellings in England since 2015-16.' However, his opposite number, shadow housing minister Baroness Scott of Bybrook said: 'In 2019 the Conservative Party committed to delivering one million additional homes over the Parliament. In 2024, before the general election, we delivered on that commitment. 'The Labour Party has now committed to deliver 1.5 million homes over this Parliament, and it is essential that they deliver on that manifesto commitment.' Conservative former housing minister in John Major's governments, Lord Young of Cookham warned about a lack of planning officers in councils which could hamstring the Government's housebuilding hopes. Lord Young recalled a discussion with a senior economist from his time as a Treasury minister. He said: 'I suggested a new policy that had been tried in New Zealand. He said it may work in practice, but it doesn't work in theory. 'Now, the risk of this Bill is exactly the opposite. It may work in theory, but it won't work in practice unless planning departments are resourced.' Party colleague Lord Patten, who as John Patten served as education secretary in the 1990s, declared a shareholding in housebuilder Persimmon. He said: 'The record sadly shows that no Conservative or Labour government since 1945 have ever met their stated aspirations or hopes or pledges to build this, or that particular number of homes in any one year or in any one decade.' Tory peer Lord Lilley, who held ministerial positions under Mr Major and Margaret Thatcher said reforms to speed up the planning process were much-needed, as he decried sums spent on planning processes. He said: 'Virtually every housing project in my old constituency, and in indeed parts of the country, has faced objections locally. 'We've created in effect, a 'vetocracy', objectors can impose such costs and delays on project developers that they can effectively veto those projects going ahead. 'We must find ways of reducing the power of that plutocracy and I welcome steps in this Bill to do that.'
