Reeves' tax raids and tariff woes strain UK manufacturers
British manufacturers continued to struggle in May, despite a surprise minor uptick, as tax hikes and tariffs weighed on firms.
S&P Global's latest PMI survey, which asks around 600 industrial companies about their performance, revealed manufacturers were still battling a tirade of challenges.
The latest figure edged up to 46.4 in May, compared to 45.4 in April – marking the highest level since February. A provisional forecast of 45.1 was initially pencilled in for May.
But the figure – a key metric observing an industry's potential of expansion – still slumped below the basic threshold of 50, anything above which denotes growth.
S&P cited a 'combination of weak global demand, turbulent trading conditions and rising cost burdens' as leading to reduced levels of output, new orders, exports and employment.
Manufacturing firms were forced to battle a duo of rising costs after Chancellor Rachel Reeves employer's national insurance tax hike came into effect at the beginning of April, along with the increases to national minimum wage.
Reeves upped firm's NIC 1.2 per cent to 15 per cent, meanwhile the living wage rose to £12.21 simultaneously.
Manufacturing companies slashed employment at the fastest pace in three months on the back of tightening costs and economic uncertainty. Firms reported higher costs passed along the supply chain following the impact of President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs.
Rob Dobson, director at S&P global market intelligence, said: 'May PMI data indicates that UK manufacturing faces major challenges, including turbulent market conditions, trade uncertainties, low client confidence and rising tax-related wage costs.'
The difficulties were also attributed to a fall in export orders, tied to weaker demand from the US and Europe.
But nearly 50 per cent of manufacturers expected to see output increase over the next 12 months, up from 44 per cent in April.
Dobson said: 'There are some signs of manufacturing turning a corner though. PMI indices tracking output and new orders have moved higher in each of the past two months, suggesting the downturn is easing, and came in better than the earlier flash estimates for May'
But he warned conditions remained turbulent 'both at home and abroad'.
Dobson said this made 'a return to stabilisation or a sink back into deeper contraction likely during the coming months'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
After Hitting All-Time Highs This Year, Is Berkshire Hathaway a Buy Today?
Berkshire Hathaway is run by none other than Warren Buffett, arguably the greatest investor of our time. Berkshire's stock has outperformed the S&P 500 this year and hit all-time highs. Investors seem to like the company's diversity of businesses and its management, and view the stock as a flight to safety. 10 stocks we like better than Berkshire Hathaway › Once the Trump administration began to implement sweeping tariffs against major trading partners of the U.S. in April, investors, sensing a significant disruption in the market, ditched U.S. risk assets and ran for cover. They piled into cash, gold, and assets they believed could provide a port in the storm. One of those happened to be Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK.A)(NYSE: BRK.B), one of the largest conglomerates in the world, run by arguably the world's best investor, Warren Buffett. Berkshire's stock was up nearly 10% (as of June 4), compared to the broader benchmark S&P 500's roughly 2% gain. Berkshire's stock also hit all-time highs earlier this year. Is the stock still a buy today? Aside from Buffett and his strong team of investing lieutenants and managers, one thing investors seem to like about Berkshire is the diversity of businesses under the large conglomerate's umbrella. Berkshire not only operates a massive stock portfolio, but also a large insurance business as the owner of Geico. The company also owns a slate of energy assets, the Burlington North Santa Fe Railroad, and a mortgage business, among others. It might be difficult for some of these sectors to operate alone, but together they provide diversity and have turned Berkshire into a juggernaut that generated over $89.5 billion of earnings in 2024. It also had $47.4 billion of operating earnings, which Buffett believes is a better metric for the company because it strips out volatile unrealized capital gains and losses. Another reason investors view Berkshire as a flight to safety is because of the company's massive cash hoard. Combined, Berkshire's cash, cash equivalents, short-term U.S. Treasury investments, and investments in fixed-maturity securities totaled an incredible $357 billion. Berkshire now reportedly owns about 5% of the short-term Treasury bill market. The massive pile of cash gives Berkshire a huge margin of safety -- and also a war chest, should opportunities arise in the market that Berkshire finds compelling. Now, after a strong run, it's always important to look at a stock's valuation. One way investors like to value Berkshire is on a price-to-tangible book value (TBV) basis, which is a frequent way investors value bank and insurance stocks. As you can see above, Berkshire's stock recently traded slightly under two times TBV. That's down from highs the stock reached earlier this year, but also above the company's five-year average. While Berkshire's stock does look a bit expensive right now, I still think long-term-oriented investors will be served well by owning it. For one, Buffett and his team have built Berkshire to last, meaning it can perform well through the entirety of the economic cycle, including the tougher parts. Berkshire's equities portfolio has exposure to growth stocks like tech and artificial intelligence, but management are also clearly big believers in oil and gas, which they may view as a finite resource. Not only does the company own and operate energy businesses, but Berkshire has major stakes in large domestic oil and gas producers like Occidental Petroleum and Chevron. These stocks should perform well if the price of oil, which trades in the low $60s per barrel, eventually rises. Investors may be concerned over the fact that Buffett, who is 94 years old, is preparing to retire at the end of 2025 after over six decades on the job. No one will ever be able to replace the Oracle of Omaha, but incoming CEO Greg Abel is more than capable. Without the Buffett brand, I think Berkshire may also try to entice investors by returning more capital to shareholders through stock repurchases and perhaps even a dividend, which Berkshire has never paid before. So even with the departure of Buffett, who will stay on as chair of the company's board of directors, it's not all doom and gloom. There is still much more for investors to look forward to. Before you buy stock in Berkshire Hathaway, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Berkshire Hathaway wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $669,517!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $868,615!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 792% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 171% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Bram Berkowitz has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Berkshire Hathaway and Chevron. The Motley Fool recommends Occidental Petroleum. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. After Hitting All-Time Highs This Year, Is Berkshire Hathaway a Buy Today? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Britain to allocate $116 billion to R&D in spending plan
LONDON (Reuters) -British finance minister Rachel Reeves will allocate 86 billion pounds ($116 billion) in this week's spending review to fund research and development, the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) said on Sunday. It said the package, funding everything from new drug treatments and longer-lasting batteries to artificial intelligence breakthroughs, would be worth over 22.5 billion pounds a year by 2029/30, driving new jobs and economic growth. Reeves will divide more than 2 trillion pounds ($2.7 trillion) of public money between her ministerial colleagues on Wednesday, making choices that will define what the year-old Labour government can achieve in the next four years. The DSIT said the announcement on R&D follows Reeves' commitment last week to 15.6 billion pounds of government investment in local transport in city regions in the Northern England, Midlands and the South West. ($1 = 0.7398 pounds)
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Rachel Reeves to announce £86bn for science and technology in spending review
Research into drug treatments and longer-lasting batteries will receive new funding as part of an £86 billion package for science and technology set to be announced in next week's spending review. Regions will be handed up to £500 million with local leaders given powers to decide how investment is targeted in their communities, the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) said. The overall package, which will be announced as Chancellor Rachel Reeves sets out departmental spending plans on June 11, is expected to be worth more than £22.5 billion-a-year by the end of the decade. DSIT said 'every corner of the country' would benefit as local leaders are given a say on how the money is spent on leveraging expertise specific to their communities. In Liverpool, which has a long history in biotech, funding will be used to speed up drug discovery and in South Wales, which has Britain's largest semiconductor cluster, on designing the microchips used to power mobile phones and electric cars. The Chancellor said: 'Britain is the home of science and technology. Through the Plan for Change, we are investing in Britain's renewal to create jobs, protect our security against foreign threats and make working families better off.' Science and Technology Secretary Peter Kyle said: 'Incredible and ambitious research goes on in every corner of our country, from Liverpool to Inverness, Swansea to Belfast, which is why empowering regions to harness local expertise and skills for all of our benefit is at the heart of this new funding – helping to deliver the economic growth at the centre of our Plan for Change.' Local leaders including North East Mayor Kim McGuiness and West Midlands Mayor Richard Parker welcomed the package, but research backers warned more is needed to secure Britain's reputation for Rottingen, chief executive of Wellcome, Britain's biggest non-governmental research funder, said: 'The Government rightly acknowledges that investing in science and technology is a key way to boost the economy. 'But while it's positive under the financial circumstances, a flat real-terms science budget, along with continuing barriers such as high visa costs for talented scientists and the university funding crisis, won't be enough for the UK to make the advances it needs to secure its reputation for science in an increasingly competitive world. 'The UK should be aiming to lead the G7 in research intensity, to bring about economic growth and the advances in health, science and technology that benefit us all. We look forward to seeing the full details at the spending review.' Meanwhile, the Institute of Physics called for a longer-term strategy for science, including a plan for teachers and other members of the skilled workforce needed to deliver advances. Tony McBride, director of policy and public affairs at the institute, said: 'It's good to see the Government recognise the power of science and innovation to transform lives and grow prosperity in every part of the UK. 'But to fully harness the transformational potential of research and innovation – wherever it takes place – we need a decade-long strategic plan for science. This must include a plan for the skilled workforce we need to deliver this vision, starting with teachers and addressing every educational stage, to underpin the industrial strategy. 'We hope that the Chancellor's statement on Wednesday will set out such a vision.' Universities UK said the Government had made a 'smart investment' and academia would put its 'shoulder to the wheel' behind the plans. Vivienne Stern, chief executive of the group representing 142 higher education providers in Britain, said: 'The UK has a real opportunity to sow the seeds of long-term growth, benefiting all parts of the UK – with universities spread right across the country working with industry and public sector bodies to turn discoveries into economic success. 'They stand ready to double down with government, building stronger links with sectors of the economy where we have real room to grow. 'This creates good jobs and attracts investment everywhere from Swansea to Aberdeen, from Barrow to Plymouth.'
