Britain to allocate $116 billion to R&D in spending plan
LONDON (Reuters) -British finance minister Rachel Reeves will allocate 86 billion pounds ($116 billion) in this week's spending review to fund research and development, the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) said on Sunday.
It said the package, funding everything from new drug treatments and longer-lasting batteries to artificial intelligence breakthroughs, would be worth over 22.5 billion pounds a year by 2029/30, driving new jobs and economic growth.
Reeves will divide more than 2 trillion pounds ($2.7 trillion) of public money between her ministerial colleagues on Wednesday, making choices that will define what the year-old Labour government can achieve in the next four years.
The DSIT said the announcement on R&D follows Reeves' commitment last week to 15.6 billion pounds of government investment in local transport in city regions in the Northern England, Midlands and the South West.
($1 = 0.7398 pounds)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Road junction could be replaced with 'pocket park'
A road junction could be closed and replaced with a "pocket park" as part of new plans to re-design a Sussex village's shopping area. Adur District Council has released plans for changes to Lancing in North Road, North Farm Road and Penstone Park aimed and making the area more pedestrian friendly. The changes would be funded through money from a partnership with West Sussex County Council, with work potentially beginning at the start of 2026 if approved. Councillor Becky Allinson, cabinet member for regeneration, said the plans aim to "revitalise the village" and make it greener and more accessible. The new park in the North Farm Road junction would include trees, planting and seating to "encourage people to spend time" outdoors. Also included in the plans are a new planting and seating area at the end of Penstone Park, with the entrance made one way and the road narrowed. West Sussex County Councillor Garry Wall, cabinet member for economy, said the scheme could be funded buy pooling money from business rates to "support delivery of a viable scheme". A consultation on the plans, which are available on the district council's website, will run until 27 July. Follow BBC Sussex on Facebook, on X, and on Instagram. Send your story ideas to southeasttoday@ or WhatsApp us on 08081 002250. Parking charges introduced for motorcycles Council recognised for cycling and walking plans Adur District Council
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sizewell C boss 'optimistic' it will get go-ahead
The head of a multi-billion pounds project to build a new nuclear power station says she is "very optimistic" a final go-ahead will be given to the scheme this week. Julia Pyke, the joint managing director of Sizewell C in Suffolk, told BBC Politics East she is hoping for an announcement when the Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves unveils her Spending Review on Wednesday. She said construction of the new power station was expected to create 10,000 jobs and fund a new post-16 college in the nearby town of Leiston, along with other infrastructure projects in the area. But there was fierce opposition on Saturday at a demonstration calling on the government to reject the scheme. Ms Pyke, who has been working on the project for 10 years, told Politics East that she would "really like to see the go-ahead for Sizewell C". "Obviously we are very optimistic, because it's a great thing for this country and a great thing for this region." She added that the nuclear plant was needed by the nation because "we want energy security. We want to wean ourselves off gas". The project is expected to be jointly owned by the British government and the French state-owned energy giant EDF, and would be funded by taxpayers and private investors. She said the taxpayer contribution would be funded by adding around £1 a month to energy bills, but she argued that once operational, the new power station would save consumers between £1bn and £1.5bn a year. "It will have been cheaper to have built it than not to have built it," she said. But there is opposition to the scheme. On Saturday, about 300 protesters braved the bad weather to demonstrate on the beach near Sizewell B. Organisers said the rally was "to grieve for our beloved Suffolk and urge ministers to think again about splashing the cash on this slow, expensive folly". Alison Downes, director of Stop Sizewell C, said pre-construction work had already changed the area dramatically. "Anybody visiting Suffolk for the first time in a year or so is going to be enormously shocked," she said. "Local people say to me all the time just how devastated they feel at seeing old oak trees, seeing long swathes of hedgerows and vegetation, being chopped down. "The local economy has been seriously impacted. Tourists are staying away." She also questioned how many of the jobs being created at the site would go to locals. Julia Pyke told Politics East she would never deny that it was inconvenient to have a big construction project on your doorstep - but said Sizewell C would do everything it could to minimise disruption. She said the project hoped to mitigate against increased traffic by having 60% of materials brought to the site by rail or sea. Asked about claims that early construction work was already putting off tourists from visiting the area, she said: "The power station site is in Leiston, it's not in Aldeburgh and it's not in Southwold. "It's quite a contained area. Our experience of having built Hinkley Point C (nuclear power station in Somerset) is that actually tourism increases." She said Sizewell C was contributing to a tourism fund and there was a legal commitment to a third of the workforce coming from the local area. Sizewell was highlighted by the government as being suitable for a future nuclear power station in 2010. There have been two power stations at Sizewell already - Sizewell A, which opened in the 1960s and shut in 2006, and Sizewell B, which opened in the 1990s and is still in operation. The Labour government and previous Conservative administrations have committed £6.4bn to Sizewell to help with start up costs. Labour, like the Conservatives, believes more nuclear power will help Britain become energy self-sufficient. There are still questions over where the private finance for Sizewell C will come from, but ministers and EDF insist there are plenty of potential investors and they are close to finalising an agreement. BBC Politics East will be broadcast on Sunday 8 June at 10:00 GMT on BBC One in the East of England, and will be available after broadcast on BBC iPlayer. Follow Suffolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X. Latest legal challenge against Sizewell C launched Sizewell C announces plan to build post-16 college 'Nothing prepared us for Sizewell C devastation' What are the arguments for and against Sizewell C?
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What will the Spending Review mean for NI public services?
Next week the Chancellor Rachel Reeves will reveal the outcome of her Spending Review. It will allocate money to day-to-day public services for the next three years. It will also set infrastructure budgets for the next four years. The review will directly impact on what Stormont Ministers have to spend on public services in Northern Ireland. Last year Reeves set what is known as the "spending envelope" – the amount by which total government spending will change in a given period. Day-to-day spending is planned to grow by an average of 1.2% above the rate of inflation each year for the next three years. Infrastructure spending is planned to grow by 1.3% above inflation a year over the next four years. These are much lower growth rates than this year and last year, reflecting the new government's "emergency" injection of cash into the health service and public sector pay deals. On Wednesday the Chancellor will break it down further, making allocations to each central government department. The precise allocation of this money matters for Stormont's spending plans. More than 90% of what Stormont ministers have to spend comes from the Treasury through what is known as "the block grant." The increase in the block grant is worked out using a calculation known as the Barnett formula, which is based on the annual changes in UK central government departmental budgets. It gives Stormont an equivalent spending increase for the size of the NI population, adjusted for the extent to which each service is devolved. Some services, like health, are almost entirely devolved but defence is not devolved. If the government decides it is going to spend more on defence at the expense of other services that will have an impact on the amount of extra money in the Stormont pot. In simple terms: If the UK Department of Health sees its budget increase by £100m, then Northern Ireland would get approximately £3m extra. If the Ministry of Defence budget increases by £100m Stormont does not get anything extra. When devolution was restored in 2024 the government agreed a financial package which included an automatic top-up of any money awarded by the Barnett formula. The government was persuaded that the level of need in Northern Ireland means it requires spending of £124 per head for every £100 per head spent in England. As Northern Ireland was funded below that level, the government said that in future every £1 that comes through the Barnett formula will now come with an extra 24p. That will apply until the overall level of funding need is reached. The independent Fiscal Council has estimated that will be worth £815m over five years. The government said the size of the top up could be reviewed if "independent and credible sources" provide evidence. To that end the Executive commissioned a study from the economist Prof Gerry Holtham, an expert in the devolution of public finances. The BBC understands that his work has come back with a range of possible funding need. The central estimates are £123 per head, for every £100 spent in England, if agricultural spending is excluded and £128 per head if agriculture forms part of the calculation. If the Treasury is persuaded to accept the higher end of the range it will be worth tens of millions of pounds extra over the next five years. The devolution financial package also brought a large dollop of one-off UK government funding, largely to pay for public sector pay deals. However that creates a cliff-edge drop in Stormont funding of about £500m in 2026/27 when that short term money runs out. The government committed to review "concerns about 2026-27 funding" at the Spending Review. The Fiscal Council has suggested options to tackle the cliff edge could include more one-off funding or setting a new, higher baseline for Stormont's budget. However, it is also possible that the normal operation of Spending Review will allocate enough money to largely remove the cliff edge. The Chancellor will be allocating trillions of pounds in the Spending Review but it is a tiny fraction of that which may have most political impact in Northern Ireland. There is a growing expectation that the UK government will come up with additional money for the construction of a new GAA stadium at Casement Park in Belfast. That project has been bogged down in labyrinthine planning and funding issues. The GAA official leading the project has told the BBC he is cautiously optimistic that the Spending Review will include a new financial contribution for the redevelopment project. Spending Review: When is it and what might Rachel Reeves announce? Reeves admits some will lose out in spending review
