A meat allergy caused by ticks may be popping up in new parts of the U.S.
Most cases, scientists believe, are linked to the lone star tick, a species typically found in the Southeastern U.S. and the lower Midwest.
Two case reports published this week, however, suggest that two other species — found elsewhere in the country — may also trigger the allergy.
When ticks bite, they release a steady stream of saliva that contains chemicals that keep their victim's blood flowing as they feed. Sometimes, the saliva contains a sugar molecule called alpha-gal. Alpha-gal syndrome, a reaction to the molecule that occurs in some people, causes a red meat allergy.
'Alpha-gal syndrome is relatively rare, but those who have it can have a full-on anaphylactic shock,' said Douglas Norris, a professor of molecular microbiology and immunology at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
The Center for Disease Control and Prevention estimates nearly half a million people in the U.S. have alpha-gal syndrome.
'We do believe the lone star tick is still responsible for most of the cases of alpha-gal syndrome in the U.S.,' said Dr. Johanna Salzer, a veterinary medical officer and epidemiologist with the CDC's Division of Vector-Borne Diseases. Salzer worked on both of the new case reports, which were published Wednesday in the agency's journal, Emerging Infectious Diseases.
Those reports found cases of alpha-gal syndrome in Washington and Maine in two women who hadn't traveled to areas where the lone star tick typically lives.
Both women reported being bitten by ticks, which suggests that other species — including Ixodes scapularis, also called black-legged or deer ticks — may also be associated with alpha-gal syndrome, though much more rarely. A related tick, Ixodes pacificus, or the western black-legged tick, was also linked to the Washington case.
The CDC's map of suspected cases — which shows high concentrations in Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Mississippi, Missouri, Kansas, Kentucky, Oklahoma and Tennessee as well as Maryland, North Carolina and Virginia — 'would look very different if Ixodes scapularis was widely causing it,' Salzer said.
However, documented cases being associated with other ticks in the U.S. is 'certainly a big deal,' Matthew Aliota, an associate professor in the department of veterinary and biomedical sciences at the University of Minnesota.
Unlike Lyme disease or the Heartland virus, alpha-gal syndrome is not caused by a bacterium or virus. The syndrome is instead an immune reaction to alpha-gal, a sugar found in almost all nonprimate animals, including cows, horses and deer and which can be present in tick saliva.
For some people, being exposed to alpha-gal through a tick bite triggers an immunoglobulin E, or IgE, antibody response in the body. People who mount this response develop an allergy to meat that can take weeks to months to appear. Alpha-gal syndrome was discovered in 2009, and researchers are still working to answer a lot of questions about it — including why some people react to alpha-gal while many do not.
For most people who do develop alpha-gal syndrome, the allergic reaction occurs hours after they eat red meat.
'It's unique because it's a delayed reaction, roughly 2-8 hours, so you can have a hard time knowing the trigger,' Salzer said, noting that with other IgE allergies, such as peanuts or shellfish, the reaction is almost immediate.
Different people can also have different reactions, which can further complicate diagnosis.
In one case, a 61-year-old woman in Washington state went into anaphylactic shock 29 days after she remembers being bitten by a tick on her shoulder: After eating beef tacos, she broke out in hives and her tongue and throat swelled. It happened again after she ate pork.
In the other case, a 45-year-old woman in Maine had stomach pain and general malaise about 2 ½ hours after she ate roasted rabbit. About nine days earlier, she had removed a deer tick from her arm. After that first incident, she'd get sick a few hours after she ate any type of red meat. Beef elicited a bout of vomiting and diarrhea that eventually landed her in her doctor's office.
Both women tested positive for alpha-gal antibodies, and both recalled their bites being itchy and inflamed.
'Not everyone will have this local reaction, but it is pretty common,' Salzer said, referring to the itchy, inflamed bites. 'But there is a subset of people with alpha-gal syndrome who do not recall being bitten by ticks,' she said.
In 2023, the Maine CDC documented 23 cases of confirmed alpha-gal syndrome, but it's unclear how many may have encountered the ticks while traveling. (Lone star ticks are uncommon in Maine and Washington, but they have been found there.)
It's also possible that these other tick species in the U.S. have always been associated with alpha-gal, Norris said, but doctors haven't detected it nearly as often as with lone star ticks. Indeed, ticks in Africa, Australia, Central America and Europe and Central America are also known to trigger alpha-gal syndrome.
One thing is certain: Ticks, and the diseases they are associated with, are thriving.
'Tick populations in general, and particularly with lone star ticks, are exploding all over the United States,' Aliota said. 'Lone star ticks are moving into bigger geographic areas, and that range is continuing to expand with climate change.'
For this reason, it's important to take precautions to avoid tick bites. This includes using bug repellant and wearing long-sleeved shirts, pants and socks when outdoors during tick season, which typically begins in April. If you've been in wooded areas or tall grass, shower off and do a 'tick check' when you get home.
'The most important thing is preventing the tick bite altogether,' Salzer said.
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
CDC issues travel alert as chikungunya outbreak surges in China
[Source] The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued a Level 2 travel alert on Aug. 14 warning of an 'elevated risk' of chikungunya virus exposure in China's Guangdong province. About the virus: The mosquito-borne virus causes high fever, rash and severe joint pain and is transmitted by Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus mosquitoes. First identified in 1952 in southern Tanzania, chikungunya is a regular presence in Asia, Africa and the Americas, but this is the first major outbreak recorded in China. Chinese health officials report over 7,000 confirmed cases since June, with the majority in Foshan city. China's outbreak response: Authorities in China have rolled out large-scale control measures similar to those used during the COVID-19 pandemic. Actions include home inspections, mass fumigation by drones and ground teams, isolation of patients under mosquito nets and the release of mosquito-eating fish and larger predatory mosquitoes. Residents who fail to remove standing water face penalties such as fines or temporary power cuts. Reports of unannounced home visits and blood sampling have fueled debate over privacy and the limits of state authority. Spreading beyond borders: The CDC's advisory also applies to Bolivia, Kenya, Sri Lanka and several Indian Ocean territories, urging travelers to 'practice enhanced precautions' to reduce the risk of infection. Globally, chikungunya has been reported in 16 countries and territories in 2025, with more than 240,000 cases and 90 deaths. In Asia, the virus has spread to countries including India, Sri Lanka and Mauritius, while Taiwan confirmed its first imported case from Foshan in early August. Older adults, newborns infected around the time of birth and people with conditions such as diabetes or heart disease face the highest risk of severe illness. Vaccination and prevention efforts: Two chikungunya vaccines, Ixchiq and Vimkunya, are approved for use in the United States and European Union. The CDC recommends vaccination for travelers heading to outbreak zones and stresses preventive measures such as using insect repellent, wearing long sleeves and pants and staying in screened or air-conditioned areas. There is no specific antiviral treatment for chikungunya, and care focuses on relieving symptoms while the body recovers. This story is part of The Rebel Yellow Newsletter — a bold weekly newsletter from the creators of NextShark, reclaiming our stories and celebrating Asian American voices. Subscribe free to join the movement. If you love what we're building, consider becoming a paid member — your support helps us grow our team, investigate impactful stories, and uplift our community. Trending on NextShark: ! Download the NextShark App: Want to keep up to date on Asian American News? Download the NextShark App today!


The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
Credible scientists can't hold up Kennedy's charade for much longer
How much longer can responsible people work for President Trump's Department of Health and Human Services under the leadership of Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.? That question arises every time Kennedy pulls funding for vaccine research or purges respected scientists at the Centers for Disease Control, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force or the Food and Drug Administration. For a while, it looked like even vaccine critics weren't safe in the Trump administration. During the COVID-19 pandemic, Dr. Vinay Prasad established his reputation as a contrarian, expressing reservations about pediatric vaccination and several common mitigation measures. It was thus no surprise when he was appointed director of the FDA's Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, which covers vaccine policy. Prasad didn't last three months on the job. He resigned abruptly in late July following attacks by right-wing figures such as Laura Loomer, who labeled him a 'progressive leftist saboteur.' A Health and Human Services statement cited Prasad's desire to spend more time with his family. It has been widely reported, however, that Trump himself forced Prasad's departure, despite the objection of FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary. In another abrupt move, only 10 days later, Prasad abruptly returned to the FDA, evidently at Makary's request but otherwise without explanation. While some of Prasad's views remain quite controversial among many highly regarded physicians and scientists, it is certainly reassuring to see Loomer's malign influence diminished at the FDA. Nonetheless, Kennedy is still in charge of the entire department, and it is likely only a matter of time until he resumes appointing resolute anti-vaxxers, if not widely discredited would-be 'scientists,' to key committees. Makary and Prasad, and other well-credentialed scientists, no doubt believe they can overcome Kennedy's destabilization of medical research, while still contributing to public health. Maybe they are right, and the wisest course is to hold on as long as possible, trying to do good. After all, there is no telling who would replace them. On the other hand, it seems inevitable that Kennedy's pronouncements will increasingly become intolerable. Some CDC employees already worry that the recent deadly attack on their building in Atlanta was motivated by 'RFK Jr's lies about vax safety and CDC scientists.' Meanwhile, Trump has announced that political appointees will soon take over scientific research grant approval, displacing actual scientists, i n order to 'advance the President's policy priorities.' At some point in the degradation of science, there must be a line that ethical administrators will not cross. There is no single answer to whether an official should stay or withdraw from a compromising position, but history does provide cautionary tales. In 1854, a Massachusetts judge named Edward Loring reached a sincere but tragic decision. I described the events in my book, ' Fugitive Justice: Runaways, Rescuers, and Slavery on Trial.' Late that spring, a fugitive from slavery named Anthony Burns, was arrested in Boston and brought before Loring, a federal commissioner under the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850, as well as judge of the Massachusetts Probate Court. Burns's arrest sparked mass protests in Boston, where anti-slavery sentiment was strong. Many Bostonians called upon Loring to resign from the federal commissioner's position. As a probate judge, he administered the estates of widows and orphans, which required compassion, and it was intolerable for him to be involved in the heartless business of slave-hunting. Loring took the criticism to heart, responding with a published statement. 'It is said that the statute is so cruel and wicked that it should not be executed by good men,' he wrote. But that would create a paradox. If humane judges were all to resign, 'then into what hands should its administration fall? Will those who call the statute merciless commit it to a merciless judge?' Although he had deep misgivings about the Fugitive Slave Act, Loring believed he had a duty to preside. Otherwise, judging would 'be confined to those who are reckless of that right in others, or ignorant or careless of the means given for its legal defense, or dishonest in their use.' Those who wish this, Loring continued, 'are more cruel and wicked than the statute, for they would strip from the fugitive the best security and every alleviation the statute leaves them.' Despite his protestations, Loring ruled in favor of the slaveholder, holding that it was required under the law. He sent Burns to Virginia in chains, where he was starved and abused. Burns's supporters, meanwhile, demonstrated the true meaning of humanity by raising funds to obtain his freedom. Burns returned to Boston and later studied theology at Oberlin College, no thanks to Loring. It turned out that a 'good judge,' as Loring believed himself, could not honorably enforce a pitiless law in a racist regime. He was dismissed from the Harvard Law School faculty, and the Massachusetts legislature removed him from the Probate Court. Loring is remembered today, if at all, as an enabler of slavery. Perhaps health officials are currently echoing Loring's lament. 'If I resign, someone very bad will take my place.' But sometimes, complicity is complicity.


Bloomberg
2 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Vaccine Panel Conflicts Hit Record Low Before RFK Jr. Headed HHS
Financial conflicts of interest among experts who help guide US vaccination policy were at record lows in 2024, just before Robert F. Kennedy Jr. took the nation's top health spot and vowed to clean out corruption. In 2024, 5% or fewer of the members on two key panels reported conflicts, defined as financial relationships with companies in areas like research funding, stock ownership or consulting contracts, according to the study published Monday in the Journal of the American Medical Association.