Alberta panel formed to fight federal overreach questioned over proposed cuts to newcomers
Two members of Alberta's new $2-million panel fighting federal overreach say they aren't responsible for the messaging and ideas on the panel's website, including a suggestion to end social supports for some newcomers.
"I can't comment on what the province has put up in the website," Adam Legge, president of the Business Council of Alberta, said in an interview Wednesday.
Legge and University of Calgary economist Trevor Tombe are two of 15 people introduced by Premier Danielle Smith this week for the Alberta Next panel.
The panel, led by Smith, is set to tour the province this summer to hear concerns from citizens surrounding ways to stop unwarranted meddling in Alberta's affairs from Prime Minister Mark Carney's government. The panel is to recommend a series of questions to be put to a referendum next year.
Legge, who stood beside Smith the day before at a press conference announcing the panel, said he agreed with messaging on the panel's website that blames housing costs and unemployment on "disastrous" immigration rates.
In the interview, he said immigration levels, especially for temporary foreign workers and international students, are out of control.
"The numbers have gotten so high that Canada simply cannot keep up from a social service standpoint, housing standpoint, access to doctors and physicians standpoint," he said.
But he declined to comment on the panel polling Albertans on cutting social services like health care and education to immigrants not sanctioned by Alberta.
Tombe, in an interview, also said the panel's website ideas originate with the government.
"I can't speak to the government's marketing decisions," Tombe said. "Politicians of all parties, of all governments, are in the business of persuading."
Asked if he agreed that cutting service access was a solution, Tombe said he didn't agree with the immigration problems as they were illustrated on the panel's website.
He said it's not clear if the government is more concerned about population pressures, international students, or housing shortages but said in each instance reality is more complicated than what is laid out by the government.
"If we can clearly define what the actual concern is, then we can get into a more productive policy conversation about how to address it," he said.
'Disastrous' and done
The panel's website says immigration over the past decade has been "disastrous" and done "without any sort of proper vetting."
"Housing prices have skyrocketed. Unemployment keeps increasing as immigration outpaces job growth. And sadly, many of the divisions and disputes that plague other countries have begun making their way into ours," the website reads.
To counteract this, the website says Alberta could issue its own immigration permits and cut off those who don't have them from accessing provincially-funded services.
Smith has spoken about the panel for months, characterizing it as part of a two-track process, to listen to Albertans' concerns while also negotiating with Ottawa on ways to reduce federal rules and policies Smith says are undermining energy development and Alberta's overall prosperity.
Smith's government has also loosened referendum rules, making it easier for citizens to gather signatures for public votes on hot topics including separating from Canada.
The immigration proposal and messaging on other ideas for consideration drew criticism from provincial and federal counterparts.
In Calgary, Federal Industry Minister Melanie Joly, asked by reporters about the panel, said she was "not necessarily" keeping up with it, but added, "I'm personally a very important proponent of national unity."
Alberta Independent Senator Paula Simons posted on social media that Smith's government was embarking on a "vile hate campaign" when it comes to its proposed immigration measures.
"This bitter xenophobia is as un-Albertan as it's possible to be."
WATCH | Alberta's strained relationship with Ottawa: Can it be mended?
Will premier's Alberta Next panel reset the province's relationship with Canada? | Power & Politics
2 days ago
Duration 2:57
As Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announces the members of the Alberta Next panel who will tour the province with her to gather Albertans' views on their relationship with Ottawa, the CBC's Jason Markusoff tells Power & Politics the consultations may result in simultaneous referendum questions on issues like removing the province from the Canada Pension Plan and moving forward on a sovereign Alberta.
Opposition Alberta NDP Leader Naheed Nenshi said the panel's ideas are "worrisome" and "full of extremist language that has no place in our province."
Smith's press secretary, Sam Blackett, responded to emailed questions on the immigration issue by sending quotes from the panel's website.
He also said that a potential Alberta-approved immigration permit would be granted to those who move to the province under the Alberta Advantage Immigration Program, which fast-tracks the permanent residency process for workers in sought after sectors like health care, technology and law enforcement.
Blackett said permanent residents also wouldn't be blocked from accessing services.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
36 minutes ago
- CTV News
North Bay mayor says he won't resign over expenses controversy
North Bay Mayor Peter Chirico held a last-minute news conference Thursday afternoon to call for an investigation into his expenses by the city's integrity commissioner. (File) North Bay Mayor Peter Chirico held a last-minute news conference Thursday afternoon to call for an investigation into his expenses by the city's integrity commissioner. Chirico said he has no intention of resigning and said he has done nothing wrong, according to city spokesperson Gord Young. The mayor has been under fire in recent weeks after the city's standard financial oversight processes flagged his use of a corporate credit card for a number of personal expenses. Charges from 2023-2024 According to reports, about $16,000 in personal expenses were charged to his corporate card. In a statement to CTV News on June 13, Chirico said that in 2023 and 2024, a number of expenses charged to his corporate credit card were flagged and reviewed and that all expenses were submitted through 'appropriate channels.' Chirico said expenses that were deemed personal, including some that fell into a 'grey area,' were fully repaid. On Thursday, he called for a full investigation into the matter by North Bay's integrity commissioner Guy Giorno to clear the air. Chirico declined requests for an interview Thursday from CTV News Northern Ontario, but said he would be available to talk next week.
CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
Nova Scotia Progressive Conservatives received highest donations last year
Nova Scotia's governing Progressive Conservatives outpaced their rivals in fundraising last year, though the NDP had more individual donors. Elections Nova Scotia says the Tories raised $1,157,677, the Opposition NDP collected $839,465, and the Liberal Party received $633,163. The annual report lists the name and community of each person who contributed $200 or more, and the amount donated to each political party, riding association and registered candidate. Donors are limited to giving a maximum of $5,000 to an individual party, its riding associations and candidates — but can donate to multiple parties. The Tories had the highest average donation at about $1,105 per donor, while the average for the Liberals was $826, and for the NDP, it was $689 per donor. However, the New Democrats had the highest number of individual donors who gave them $200 or more, with 1,218 people listed in that category, ahead of 1,048 for the Progressive Conservatives and 766 for the Liberals.
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
CSIS flags extremist Khalistani activists as national security threat
Canada's spy agency is warning that a small but militant group of Sikhs are using the country as a base for promoting, fundraising and planning violence in India in support of an independent homeland in Punjab, a caution some see as a sign of shifting policies toward New Delhi. In its annual report to Parliament in June, the Canadian Security Intelligence Service said these homegrown extremists represent only a small group among Sikhs who are otherwise pursuing non-violent advocacy for a state they call Khalistan. The spy agency says the presence of Sikh extremists in Canada 'continues to pose a national security threat to Canada and Canadian interests,' without pointing to any specific examples. It's the first time CSIS has highlighted Khalistani extremists in its annual report since 2018. Canada is attempting to rebuild relations with India, which suffered a major rupture in September, 2023, when then-prime-minister Justin Trudeau accused New Delhi of a role in the killing of Canadian Hardeep Singh Nijjar, a prominent advocate for Khalistan. India has denied the allegation. A year after Hardeep Singh Nijjar's death, mysteries remain about how he really lived The rift escalated further last fall when Canada dismissed top Indian diplomats over allegations that government agents had been linked to a targeted campaign against Canadian citizens. India expelled Canadian diplomats in response. The CSIS report says India remains one of the country's most persistent foreign interference threats. It adds that India's 'real and perceived' concerns about Khalistani extremism is driving New Delhi's foreign interference activities in Canada. Balpreet Singh, legal counsel for the World Sikh Organization of Canada, which advocates on behalf of this country's nearly one million Sikhs, says his group has reached out to CSIS over concerns about the language in the report. He says despite alarms raised by India, there's no evidence Khalistani extremists pose a threat to Canada, and the report acknowledges there were no attacks in Canada related to Sikh extremism in 2024. 'Are there actors that engage in some sort of extremist activity in Canada? CSIS would indicate that there is a 'small number.' I haven't seen them. I don't know anything about them,' Mr. Singh said. 'The problem is India tries very hard to malign anything related to Khalistan as, by default, terrorism.' Opinion: Canada is letting the memory of the deadliest terrorist attack in our history slip away Andrew Kirsch, a security consultant and former intelligence officer with CSIS, said the spy agency is signalling that the threat from Khalistan extremists is real and should be taken seriously. 'If they're highlighting it, it means it's become a priority item, that the threat is serious and they want to raise awareness about it. Clearly, this stuff is going on, and they want the public to know about it,' he said. These annual reports are important because they offer insight into how the spy agency is spending time and resources, he said. He is skeptical of the suggestion CSIS could be influenced by Indian disinformation. These kinds of threat assessments are based on a wide range of sources, as well as electronic surveillance, such as intercepts and wiretaps, all of which goes through a heavy vetting process internally, he said. 'Unfortunately, we can't tell people what information that threat is based on. But our intelligence service is trained to wade through disinformation. I have a high degree of confidence in their analysis,' Mr. Kirsch said. The CSIS report says politically motivated violent extremism has been an element of the Khalistani movement in Canada since the 1980s. Sikh activists, however, argue India has used these perceived threats to target peaceful advocacy for Khalistan. 'The problem is India sees any activism for Khalistan as extremist, and it has targeted that,' Mr. Singh said. Mr. Nijjar, designated a terrorist by India, was gunned down in the parking lot of a gurdwara in Surrey, B.C., in June, 2023. Four Indian nationals are facing charges in connection with the killing. Mr. Trudeau said Canada had credible allegations the murder was carried out by agents of India. New Delhi has refused to acknowledge any role in foreign interference or transnational oppression of Sikhs in Canada. Mr. Singh says the CSIS report may signal a shift in policy from Ottawa. He suggested it may be designed to appease New Delhi as Canada seeks to repair relations – something Gurpreet Sahota, editor-in-chief at Channel Punjabi in Surrey, called a 'betrayal.' Multiple Sikh organizations protested Prime Minister Mark Carney's decision to invite Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi to the G7 summit in Alberta earlier this month. Campbell Clark: Carney should know it's way too soon to invite Modi to Canada 'We believe that India pressures Canada to do these sort of things … Did it happen here? I hope not,' Mr. Singh said. CSIS spokesperson Magali Hébert told The Globe and Mail that the spy agency has used the term 'Canada-based Khalistani extremism' for some time, and pointed out the Public Inquiry into Foreign Interference referenced its findings on Sikh extremism in its final report earlier this year. Ms. Hébert, who added that the 'vast majority' of Khalistan supporters are peaceful, did not directly address a question about whether its reports are politically influenced. The Indian High Commission did not respond to a request for comment. But in social-media posts, it said the bombing of Air India Flight 182, 40 years ago this month by Canada-based Khalistani terrorists, is a reminder the world must show 'zero tolerance' toward extremism.
