
This £1 pension trick could save you thousands in emergency tax
During the first three months of 2025, over-55s have been forced to reclaim a staggering £44m in overpaid tax on their pension withdrawals, with more than 15,000 pension savers submitting claims to HMRC worth an average of £2,881.
The emergency tax had been charged on certain flexible pension withdrawals, often landing savers with an unexpected charge that can take months to get back.
In some cases, savers needed to reclaim much more. A Freedom of Information request from Royal London last year found that in the 2022-23 tax year there were 2,300 claims worth more than £10,000.
No one wants to be needlessly out of pocket, but by taking advantage of the so-called '£1 HMRC pension trick', it might be possible to avoid the hassle of a hefty emergency tax bill.
Here, Telegraph Money explains what you need to know about emergency tax on pension withdrawals, and the steps you can take to avoid it.
Why is emergency tax charged on pension withdrawals?
The pension tax process
How the £1 trick works
Plan ahead to avoid emergency tax
Why is emergency tax charged on pension withdrawals?
Following the introduction of the pension freedoms in 2015, it's possible to make flexible withdrawals from your pension once you turn 55 (rising to 57 in 2028).
The first 25pc is paid tax-free, and the remainder is added to your income for the year and taxed at your highest rate.
However, as this withdrawal will come as something of a 'surprise' to HMRC, emergency tax will normally be applied, meaning you will end up paying more tax than you owe.
David Gibb, chartered financial planner at Quilter Cheviot, said: 'When someone makes their first flexible pension withdrawal, HMRC may apply emergency tax, assuming it's a monthly payment rather than a one-off lump sum. This happens because HMRC doesn't yet have an up-to-date tax code for the individual's pension provider, meaning they default to a higher estimated rate due to a quirk in how the PAYE system works.'
Helen Morrissey, pensions and retirement spokesman at Hargreaves Lansdown, explained how emergency tax is calculated: 'When you're taxed on an emergency basis you're treated as though the same amount will be taken on a monthly basis – it doesn't take into account that this payment is a one-off.
'As a result, the income tax payment is calculated using a twelfth of your personal allowance, a twelfth of your basic-rate tax allowance and twelfth of your higher-rate allowance. The remainder will be taxed at additional tax rates, so they are paying tax at much higher rates than they ordinarily would.'
This can be particularly problematic if you are cashing in a whole pension or withdrawing a lump sum. According to calculations from Hargreaves Lansdown, it would land a saver making a £20,000 withdrawal with an emergency tax charge of £7,379. However, assuming the saver paid basic-rate tax, they should only need to pay £1,484.
Ms Morrissey added: 'The excess tax can be reclaimed by filling out a form, but being taxed in this way can take a significant chunk out of the money you were expecting to receive, [which] could cause you financial hardship or mean you have to change your plans.'
The pension tax process
Tom Selby, director of public policy at AJ Bell, described the taxation of pensions as 'outdated'.
'We have only just blown out the candles on the cake celebrating 10 years of pensions freedoms. It is simply unacceptable that, after all this time, the Government has still not managed to adapt the tax system to cope with the fact Britons are able to access their pensions flexibly from age 55, instead persisting with an arcane approach which hits people with an unfair tax bill, often running into thousands of pounds, and requires them to fill in one of three forms if they want to get their money back within 30 days.'
Since April 2025, the Government has made changes to the tax code process to ensure people taking regular income out of their pension get issued with the correct code faster. However, it still won't help those making one-off withdrawals.
How the £1 pension trick works
Clare Moffat, pensions expert at Royal London, says that one way you can avoid an emergency tax a charge is to take a notional amount out of your pension first, to trigger a tax code from HMRC. Then, once this is issued you can withdraw the amount you actually need, which should be taxed at the appropriate rate.
Theoretically, this notional amount could be as little as £1, as there is no legislative minimum pension withdrawal. 'How much you would need to take out would depend on your provider, so you need to check with them first. But even if you can't take £1 out, taking out £100 may still be enough to generate a tax code from HMRC that the provider can apply,' she said.
Many of the main pension providers will accept requests to withdraw £1, but may require you to submit a paper request for such a small amount – therefore, it's best to check what each provider's rules are in advance.
Mr Gibb added: 'While this trick can work well, it's not 100pc foolproof, and some individuals may still need to submit a tax reclaim form (P55, P53 or P50Z) to HMRC if excess tax is deducted. Nevertheless, it can significantly reduce the hassle of reclaiming large amounts later.'
Plan ahead to avoid emergency tax – but always think first
Ms Moffat said it's a big help for savers if they are aware of emergency tax on pension withdrawals. 'A little bit of forward planning means they can save waiting for that tax money. They can go on that holiday or buy that new kitchen.'
However, she also added that it's important to think about making any taxable withdrawal from your pension carefully, especially if you're still relatively young and yet to retire.
Aside from the fact that you're reducing your future retirement income, you could also trigger the money purchase annual allowance (MPAA). This will see the tax-free amount you can pay into your pension – including employer contributions – fall from a maximum of £60,000 a year to just £10,000. 'That might seem like a lot, but people in their 50s are often paying the most into their pensions and may have stopped paying their mortgage,' she said.
As such, if you're thinking about taking any money out of your pension, it's a good idea to talk to an expert. Ms Moffat said: 'Financial advice is the gold standard, but it's not always practical with small pots. Everyone [over 50] can book an appointment with Pension Wise, though. It won't be personalised – it's just guidance – but it can still help.'
Can't I take a tax-free lump sum out of my pension?
It is possible to take 25pc of your pension as a tax-free lump sum. This can be done in one go, or in chunks.
However, you can only take lump sums tax-free when you 'crystallise' your pot by moving funds into income drawdown or buying an annuity. If you make a flexible withdrawal without crystallising your fund, only 25pc of your withdrawal will be paid tax-free.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
20 minutes ago
- The Sun
Primark opening new type of store in Britain for first time and shoppers will be thrilled
PRIMARK is set to open a brand new type of store just in time for summer. The bargain retailer is due to bring a new model of shop to the UK high street in the coming months. A new 11,900 sq ft, two floor shop is set to open in Manchester at the Trafford Palazzo. It will be the first ever dedicated Primark Home store to open in the UK. Primark have said the shop will bring together "the best of Primark's interiors offering under one roof." It will host an expanded range of homeware and lifestyle essentials for Manchester shoppers to browse and buy. The move comes following the firms first ever dedicated Primark Home store was opened in Belfast earlier this year. The new location in Manchester will also include a dedicated travel shop to help customers get holiday-ready. Paul Baldwin, Trading Director for Home at Primark said: 'Our mission is simple: to make it easy for everyone to create a home they love, without breaking the bank. "Customer reaction to our first Primark Home store in Belfast has been really positive, and we can't wait to bring this exciting new concept to Great Britain later this summer. "Homes have become more than just places to live, they're an extension of our personalities, so whether it's soft furnishings, statement tableware, or smart storage solutions you're after, our range has something for every style and budget.' An exact date for the stores opening hasn't been given by the retailer yet but it is expected to come this summer. 'One of each please,' shoppers race to Primark for adorable cosy homewear The new store will stock all manner of high-quality essentials like cotton bedding and towels, soft furnishings, small furniture and quirky ceramics. Trafford Palazzo is already home to one Primark location with the new store adding to the retailers offering on the site. Primark stores usually stock a full range of goods from clothes, to home to holiday essentials. For the first time ever Primark will now stock just homeware in a store. The fashion retailer currently employs over 80,000 people internationally. 2 Primark is known for its budget options and huge range, offering an extensive selection of goods at a low price. The retailer boasts over 460 stores globally with the new Primark Home in Manchester boosting this number further. According to the retailer: " Primark Home combines style, comfort and value to help shoppers make a house a home." Thrilled shoppers took to social media to show their excitement for the new stores launch. One user said: "You've got some great home stuff please make this department bigger and give us trolleys." Another commented: "I need one of everything, and two cushions." A third replied: "We need this store in Kalamazoo Michigan." Why Primark is great for looking expensive on a budget By Clemmie Feildsend, Fabulous Fashion Editor AS someone who's no stranger to grabbing a last-minute outfit from Primark for a night out, it's about time that celebrities started catching on too. For as long as I've been heading out, Primark has been my go-to for those 'I have nothing to wear' moments, rushing in at the last minute to find something perfect. And I'm definitely not alone - on any Friday or Saturday night, you'll find plenty of shoppers doing the same thing, right before closing time. But no matter what, Primark always delivers. Now, Rita Ora is leading the charge, showing that you can snag a designer-worthy look without spending a fortune at high-end stores. While Rita's not rushing in last minute for a red carpet outfit, she's proving you can achieve the same high-impact style for much less. Looking stunning in her tailored suit alongside her mum Vera, Rita fit right in among the other A-listers dripping in Prada, Dior, and Victoria Beckham - if anything, she looked even better than some of the guests at The Fashion Awards. With Myleene Klass and Roxy Horner already jumping on the Primark bandwagon, I'm sure more stars will be following suit soon enough.


Telegraph
35 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The treaty Gibraltar wants, for the future we all need
For over five years, Gibraltar has been at the centre of one of the most complex, technical, and geopolitically sensitive negotiations undertaken by the United Kingdom and the European Union since Brexit. The process has consumed me. It has occupied close to half of my time in elected office, taken over almost every waking hour of the last five years, and, in truth, deprived the people of Gibraltar of their Chief Minister in the way they are used to having him, that is, from fixing housing and parking complaints to defending their sovereignty in the international arena. For much longer than I would have wanted, I have been behind closed doors, in physical or virtual boardrooms, working through the details of a document that will shape the next generation of our people. It has been a relentless, exhausting endeavour. Throughout this time, the UK and Gibraltar teams have worked together seamlessly, 'hand in glove', without a flash of daylight between us. We have worked in close partnership with both Conservative and Labour prime ministers and foreign secretaries; from Dominic Raab, Liz Truss and James Cleverly to David Cameron and now David Lammy. What we have negotiated is not the product of fragmented agendas, but the position of a unified British family determined to find a solution worthy of our people. Without a treaty, Gibraltar could be staring down the barrel of a hard border, marked by endless queues, disrupted supply chains, and a deeply uncertain future for many of our businesses. Our hospitals and elderly care homes would face chronic understaffing, and the surrounding region would suffer the almost certain loss of employment for many of the 15,000 cross-border workers who depend on Gibraltar's economy to support their families. The services we deliver to our people would all come under strain. Our public finances would be pushed to the brink. The self-governing Gibraltar we have built would be diminished, replaced by something poorer, more isolated, more inward-looking, and ultimately less able to thrive as a proud, British European Territory. Instead, we now stand at the threshold of something remarkable, and not just for Gibraltar, but also for the United Kingdom, for Spain, and for Europe and our people. Something bold. Something forward looking and hopeful. Something that finally breaks free of the negative inertia that has defined too much of our recent past. Unlocking potential across borders This is politics at its most elevated. The service-led principle of working for our people's benefit and not the performative personal antagonism that too often infects public life. Real, hard graft that overcomes challenges to deliver progress. This is the kind of result our people demand when they voice distrust and decry the political 'establishment'. Our Spanish and EU counterparts, for their part, have brought to the table a seriousness of purpose that also reflects the gravity of the moment. They, too, have recognised that this treaty is not merely about fluidity of movement, but about unlocking human and economic potential across borders. Make no mistake: the treaty that is now within reach is not one that the Gibraltarians have been forced to accept. Our people voted for us to have a mandate to turn our New Year's Eve agreement of 2020 into a UK/EU agreement/treaty. So we say 'yes' to this agreement, but not because we don't know how to say 'no' when we have to. We did so, emphatically, in 2002, when we triggered a referendum to reject Jack Straw's proposal of joint sovereignty with Spain, and I am just as adamant today that this treaty will not in any way compromise British sovereignty over Gibraltar. That will be set out, black upon white, in the treaty when it is published. It is a legal undertaking given by both sides in clear and unequivocal terms. So to be clear: in this treaty we have not ceded any control of Gibraltar to any authority. Just like today, only Gibraltar will decide who enters Gibraltar – exactly as we agreed in 2020 when Dominic Raab was foreign secretary and Boris Johnson was prime minister. This treaty unleashes the potential to usher in a new era. One in which we move beyond the tired narratives of the past on constant sovereignty disputes, towards a future defined by hope, cooperation and shared prosperity. It will pave the way for better jobs, more investment and lasting stability for Gibraltar and the wider region. It can deliver more harmonious human relations and a better quality of life for all our people. When you read it, I ask that you to look up from the pages of this treaty and see that better reality as it peers back at us from the future. This will be the treaty Gibraltar wants. It will be a treaty the UK and the EU can be proud of. And it will be a treaty that will propel us all to the better future politicians are elected to deliver. When the time comes, back Gibraltar and its proudly British people by backing the Gibraltar treaty.


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Palace co-owner John Textor would sell shares for Europa League chance
Crystal Palace co-owner John Textor is willing to sell his shares in the club in order to ensure the Eagles can enter next season's Europa League, according to reports. The American, whose Eagle Football Group owns 43 per cent of Palace, has imperilled the club's chance of a first-ever European campaign owing to his involvement with Ligue 1 side Lyon, but is ready to offload his stake to his fellow co-owners in order to bring the saga to an end. UEFA does not allow clubs with the same ownership to compete in the same European competitions in a season. As well as his stake in Palace, the 59-year-old has a controlling stake in the French club, also via Eagle Football. However it is also reported that the European governing body does not consider Textor's influence at Selhurst Park to be decisive and is leaning towards allowing the club into the Europa League regardless. The PA news agency understands no formal decision is likely on Palace's fate until the end of June. Textor has previously spoken of his frustration at how little influence his stake entitles him to, over football matters. Victory for Oliver Glasner's side over Manchester City in last month's FA Cup final gave them their first major trophy and with it a first crack at Europe. However, Nottingham Forest have since written to UEFA to challenge Palace's Europa League spot and in the hope of taking their place. Forest's owner Evangelos Marinakis, who also owns Greek side Olympiacos, placed his shares in the club in a blind trust before the governing body's March 1 deadline, anticipating Nuno Espirito Santo's side's European qualification. At present Forest, who finished seventh in last season's Premier League, are set to enter the Conference League but would take Palace's Europa League place, should they be deemed ineligible.