&w=3840&q=100)
Equity returns are in a phase of normalisation: Tata MF's Rahul Singh
Singh says that first-time investors should avoid chasing performance, focus on asset allocation, and stick to core diversified equity categories
Premium
Puneet Wadhwa New Delhi
Listen to This Article
It has been a nervy start to the new financial year for the markets. Rahul Singh, chief investment officer (CIO) for equities at Tata Mutual Fund (MF), tells Puneet Wadhwa in an email interview that first-time investors should avoid chasing performance, focus on asset allocation, and stick to core diversified equity categories. Edited excerpts:
How can investors Trump-proof their portfolios?
Equities have performed well since the pandemic, supported by improving macros and earnings recovery. However, with the spectre of a global slowdown and a rising risk-on US dollar, the situation has become more complex. In this scenario, investors should adopt
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
30 minutes ago
- Mint
Donald Trump is pushing cash for all American babies. What are ‘Trump Accounts'? Explained
US President Donald Trump wants to make a significant but limited investment in newborn babies through his 'Big Beautiful Bill'. On Monday, the president touted a provision in his tax cut bill that proposes opening investment accounts for all American babies born during Trump's current term as President. These accounts have been dubbed "Trump Accounts", and families of all income levels could receive them. The 'Trump Accounts' pilot program is included in the 'One Big Beautiful Bill'. Simply put, these are new tax-exempt investment accounts to benefit all American children. An earlier version of the bill called them MAGA Accounts, referring to the president's Make America Great Again campaign slogan. During a roundtable on Monday, Trump said, "For every US citizen born after December 31, 2024, before January 1, 2029, the federal government will make a one-time contribution of $1,000 into a tax-deferred account that will track the overall stock accounts will be private property controlled by the child's guardians. This provision means that every US citizen born between the start of 2025 and the end of 2028 would receive $1,000 initially from the federal government in a tax-deferred account. The accounts would, over the course of a child's first 18 years, be linked to a mutual fund or index fund tied to the performance of the stock market. The initiative further allows parents to contribute additionally — up to $5,000 tax-free each year to "Trump Accounts". The money would only be accessible to the child upon reaching adult status at 18. At age 18, children could withdraw the money to put toward a down payment for a home, education or to start a small business. If the money is used for other purposes, it'll be taxed at a higher rate. The full balance would be available at age 30, USA Today reported. With about 3.6 million babies born in the US each year, the cost could exceed $3 billion annually, the Washington Post reported. Republicans have yet not released any cost estimates for the program. Amid criticism from several people, including former aide Elon Musk, Trump is trying hard to get his 'Big, Beautiful' tax and spending bill approved by the Senate. On Monday, Trump worked the phones and took to social media to try to sway Republican holdouts on his multi-trillion-dollar tax bill. Trump further promoted the program as a pro-family, pro-child initiative at a time when his administration and congressional Republicans are facing criticism over cuts that the tax, spending and immigration bill would make to programs like Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. It's feared that the tax and spending cut package will add more than $3 trillion to the US national debt over the next decade. The House of Representatives approved the bill by one vote last month. It now faces opposition from both moderates and ultra-conservatives in the Senate. Many in favour of this provision say that it doesn't distinguish between the rich and the poor. The Trump program is similar to 'baby bond' programs run in California, Connecticut and Washington, D.C, according to the Washington Post. The report says that while those local programs were created to reduce the wealth gap by supporting children in need or lower-income families, Trump accounts will be made available to Americans regardless of their socioeconomic status. Moreover, USA Today reported that the program serves as a counter to Democratic arguments that the bill helps the nation's wealthiest Americans. Meanwhile, a statement from the White House said, "The One Big Beautiful Bill will change the lives of middle-class families across America" — 'together with historic tax cuts, an increased child tax credit, higher wages, and monumental economic growth.' President Trump said on Monday that the mega bill would 'make it possible for countless American children to have a strong start at life at no cost to the American taxpayer.' Meanwhile, Dell CEO Michael Dell said, "With these accounts, children will be much more likely to graduate from college, to start a business, to buy a home, and achieve lifelong financial stability.' Amid the buzz over "Trump Accounts", Donald Trump gathered corporate leaders at the White House Monday to highlight a provision in his tax bill that would deposit $1,000 into an investment account for babies born in the next few years. Dell Technologies, Salesforce, Uber and Goldman Sachs were among the companies the White House said would be participating. 'They'll really be getting a big jump on life, especially if we get a little bit lucky with some of the numbers and the economy," the US President said.
Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
Musk-Trump spat entangles MAGA prince JD Vance
Musk-Trump spat: The fallout between Donald Trump and Elon Musk has ignited a MAGA civil war, with JD Vance caught in the crossfire. Musk's call for Trump's impeachment and suggestion of Vance as a replacement has reportedly fueled Trump's paranoia. Vance now walks a tightrope, balancing loyalty to Trump with his Silicon Valley connections, as Trump demands unwavering allegiance. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Vance, the MAGA prince in Trump's cross hairs Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Vance does a tightrope walk Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads In a presidency already defined by internal volatility and external shockwaves, the recent falling out between President Donald Trump and tech mogul Elon Musk marks a significant rupture in the power structure. But the MAGA civil war , which flared up with an open spat between Trump and Musk on social media is still smouldering even though Musk has deleted the controversial posts he aimed at Trump. Vice-President JD Vance has emerged as a target in the Trump-Musk Michael Wolff, who has written several books on Trump, has said on the Daily Beast Podcast that Trump is getting paranoid after Musk turned Vance into an existential threat to his power. During their explosive spat last week, Musk called for Trump's impeachment and urged that Vance take his place. Wolff, the best-selling Trump biographer, suggests that Musk's demand struck fear into Trump and made him even more suspicious of is a fascinating political figure. Once a critic of Trump, he pivoted hard during his Senate run, aligning himself fully with the MAGA movement and earning Trump's coveted endorsement. His 'Hillbilly Elegy' background gives him working-class appeal, while his Silicon Valley experience (as a venture capitalist funded by Peter Thiel, a tech billionaire) makes him a rare bridge between conservative populism and tech-world Musk, Vance may represent the ideal vessel: loyal to Trumpism's nationalist message but not bound to Trump's personal baggage. This may explain why he would reportedly float Vance's name as a successor, or alternative, to says that Trump has always been ambivalent about Vance, an 'unlikely Republican' whose 'hardcore support is in the tech bro community". Trump chose Vance as his running mate, Wolff said, in part because Musk made his backing of Trump, worth hundreds of millions of dollars, conditional on that in Trump's world, loyalty is everything. The president would view any attempt to discuss succession as an act of betrayal. If Vance is perceived, rightly or wrongly, as fit to replace Trump, he risks being sidelined from Trump's inner circle. According to Wolff, Trump now wants to put Vance through a 'loyalty test' — a familiar ritual for those within the MAGA president's high-profile fallout with Musk -- a 'central pillar' of the tech world's incursion into right-wing politics -- leaves him vulnerable and will push him to scrutinize his Vice President ever more closely, Wolff said. 'He will set up what we will see as a set of tests that Vance is going to have to endure and pass,' Wolff told host Joanna Coles. '(Vance has) got to profess his absolute loyalty to Trump, or he will just be marginalized within the administration.'In a statement to the Daily Beast, White House Communications Director Steven Chung slammed Wolff as 'a blithering idiot who has been widely discredited due to his blatant lies and fabrications".'He is an imbecile of the highest order and his Trump Derangement Syndrome-addled brain has caused him to lead a miserable existence devoid of reality,' he continued. 'Nothing he says is the truth and he resorts to outlandish falsehoods in order to stay relevant since Father Time has passed him by 20 years ago.'For Vance, it's a tightrope walk. If he alienates Trump, he will be sidelined from everything important in Trump's inner circle. If he distances himself from Musk, he could lose his future prospects and a significant stream of Silicon Valley-aligned a podcast appearance with comedian Theo Von posted on Saturday, Vance said, 'First of all I'm the Vice President to President Trump; my loyalties are always going to be with the President. Elon is an incredible entrepreneur. I think DOGE was really good. The effort to root out waste, fraud, and abuse in our country was really good.''I hope that eventually Elon kind of comes back into the fold. Maybe that's not possible now because he's gone so nuclear. I hope it is,' Vance tried to downplay Musk's blistering attacks as an "emotional guy" who got frustrated. "Look, it happens to everybody," Vance said during the podcast. "I've flown off the handle way worse than Elon Musk did in the last 24 hours."Vance told Von that as Musk for days was calling on social media for Congress to kill Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill," the president was "getting a little frustrated, feeling like some of the criticisms were unfair coming from Elon, but I think has been very restrained because the president doesn't think that he needs to be in a blood feud with Elon Musk." "I actually think if Elon chilled out a little bit, everything would be fine," he the interview, Von showed Vance Musk's claim that Trump's administration hasn't released all the records related to sex abuser Jeffrey Epstein because Trump is mentioned in them. Vance responded to that, saying, "Absolutely not. Donald Trump didn't do anything wrong with Jeffrey Epstein." "This stuff is just not helpful," Vance said in response to another post shared by Musk calling for Trump to be impeached and replaced with Vance. "It's totally insane. The president is doing a good job."If Wolff's claims are accurate, the implications go beyond tabloid drama. Trump can increasingly feel lonely and cornered as he alienates his close aides. What's worse for him, he can also end up losing support of certain sections of his MAGA base as the emergence of Musk and Vance means there are now other popular conservative leaders too.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
White House Wi-Fi blunder? Trump allegedly ignored cybersecurity warnings while installing Musk's Starlink
It appears that the Trump administration permitted the installation of a Starlink terminal at the White House despite the cybersecurity recommendations of its own IT teams. Apparently, Elon Musk's Starlink Wi-Fi has been deemed a grave error by cybersecurity experts. What were the security concerns? According to reports, this action was spearheaded by Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which appears to have violated significant security regulations. This raises questions regarding sensitive data security. According to The Washington Post, a Wi-Fi network known as "Starlink Guest" showed up on White House phones and only requested a password, no username or additional authentication was required. White House guests' phones continued to connect to this Wi-Fi network this week. When DOGE officials set up a Starlink terminal on the roof of the adjacent Eisenhower Executive Office Building, those in charge of White House communications systems were not notified beforehand, as per the report. Live Events In the worst situation, improperly configured Wi-Fi networks can allow users from outside the company to log in, posing a significant cybersecurity risk to businesses. According to the Post's anonymous sources, White House personnel in charge of the systems were unable to keep an eye on the Starlink connection in order to stop sensitive data from leaking or unauthorized access, as per a report by PC Mag. How did the White House respond? Whether the Starlink rooftop terminal is still in place or what will happen to the technology after Elon Musk leaves the Trump administration were not disclosed by the sources. Secret Service spokesman Anthony Guglielmi stated that they were aware of DOGE's intentions to improve internet access on the campus and did not consider this matter a security incident or security breach. More government agencies seek to safeguard themselves against the possible dangers of over-relying on SpaceX's technology lately. FAQs Was the Starlink Wi-Fi network at the White House properly secured? According to reports, the "Starlink Guest" network only required a password and no username or second form of authentication, which is a major cybersecurity concern for the White House. Did the White House's IT teams approve the Starlink installation? White House communications systems teams were not informed ahead of time and were unable to monitor the Starlink connection, despite concerns about potential data leakage or unauthorized access. Economic Times WhatsApp channel )
