
Where is Lt Col Purohit after fighting Malegaon blast taint for 17 years?
The Malegaon blast was projected as a case of "Hindu terror" and "saffron terror" by UPA-era politicians and officials.Describing his harrowing experience, Purohit said, "I am a victim of mentally ill people."The Maharashtra ATS had claimed that the RDX used for the blast in Malegaon was procured from Kashmir by Lt Col Purohit and stored at his residence, thus making him one of the central figures of the investigation.The NIA court on July 31 acquitted Lt Col Purohit of all charges.PUROHIT LOST RANKS, REMAINED A LIEUTENANT COLONELPurohit's journey in the military started in 1994 when he was commissioned into the Maratha Light Infantry after passing out of the Officers Training Academy (OTA) in Chennai. He served in counter-terrorism operations in Jammu & Kashmir from 2002 to 2005, according to a report in The Indian Express.Later, he was posted to the Military Intelligence wing in Nashik, a source told India Today Digital.Lt Col Purohit's arrest in the Malegaon blast case marked the first time a serving Army officer was implicated in a terrorism-related case in India.Even during his nine-year incarceration, Purohit was "always in service"."He was always in service. But since he was in jail, he couldn't serve," said Smita Mishra, author of 'Lt Colonel Purohit: The Man Betrayed?', in a conversation with India Today Digital."I am not clear about the Indian Army's technicalities, but I know that he was never relieved of his service," she added.Mishra clarified that Purohit's intelligence operations were "with complete sanction of his seniors", who were "completely kept in the loop" about his intelligence-gathering activities."The Army is totally with him," Mishra affirmed, without revealing details of his current role, stating, "It might compromise his and his family's security."advertisementNotably, in 2017, Brigadier Raj Kumar (retired), a nodal officer of the Army enquiry into the Malegaon blast case, said that the Army enquiry did not find any evidence that Purohit had supplied RDX for the blast. However, Purohit couldn't explain the possession of two illegal weapons at his residence."Obviously, he lost promotions. Otherwise, he wouldn't be a Lieutenant Colonel now," said Mishra, describing Purohit as "one of the brightest officers of his generation" and "one of the finest intelligence officers we have in the country".LT COL PUROHIT: FROM STUDYING ARABIC TO BEING TORTUREDWhile studying Arabic at the Army Education Centre in Pachmarhi, Madhya Pradesh, during a break from his Nashik posting, Lt Col Purohit was picked up with what he says was a forged movement order.He was told he was being taken to Delhi, but was instead taken to Mumbai and kept in illegal detention for a few days before his formal arrest in November 2008, according to Mishra.The hardships after his arrest were both physical and mental.An Army officer who was taking lectures and training sessions for juniors was suddenly reduced to a terrorist.advertisement"A man in uniform was being tortured by men in uniform," said Mishra, referring to the harsh treatment that Lt Col Purohit faced at the hands of Maharashtra ATS personnel."The physical torture that he faced, left him with physical injuries as well as scars in his mind," Mishra told India Today Digital.A WIFE'S RELENTLESS FIGHT FOR HER HUSBAND'S ACQUITTALThe case took a toll on Purohit's personal life. Married with two sons, his family faced intense social stigma."From a well-known patriotic family of Pune, his family suddenly became the family of a terrorist," Mishra said.But his wife fought relentlessly for his acquittal, working closely with the legal team to the point where "she almost became a lawyer in the process", Mishra said."She worked on the cases... Because there were not too many people coming forward at that time, the political situation was such, he became a pariah suddenly."The couple's children, particularly the younger son who was "just a toddler" during Purohit's arrest, grew up in the absence of their father, and facing ostracism."They were stigmatised in their schools and in society as children of a terrorist," Mishra said. The elder son later contributed to the legal efforts as he grew older.advertisementPUROHIT'S INTELLIGENCE WORK ON JIHADI NETWORKS, MAOISTSMishra asserted that Purohit's implication in the Malegaon blasts was a "political conspiracy" to derail his intelligence work."He had penetrated very deep into this jihadi network, the SIMI, the Indian Mujahideen, and all their offshoots," including their "nexus with the Maoists" and "some relations of this terror network with some powers in the establishment then", she added.The source, who spoke anonymously, said Purohit was targeted "because he knew too much".They tried to "get him out of the way" and "make him the face of Hindu terror", a narrative she claims was orchestrated "at the highest level of the political leadership of that time".Mishra clarified that Purohit's intelligence operations were "with complete sanction of his seniors", who were "completely kept in the loop".He did not operate as part of a group with other accused, such as Pragya Thakur, whom he came to know only when the case was [filed]. "He just knew them," Mishra said, emphasising that he was not part of any organised team or gang.Now acquitted, Purohit continues to serve in military intelligence, with the Army's full support.advertisementDespite the physical and psychological scars, Purohit's dedication to the nation remains steadfast, as he continues his service under the weight of a hard-fought acquittal, said the source.- Ends

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Hindu
11 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Malegaon blast case: Forced to name Yogi Adityanath, says witness; court scraps his statement to ATS
A witness in his testimony to the special court in the 2008 Malegaon blast case had alleged that he was tortured and forced by the officers of the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) to name Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath in the case. Special Judge A.K. Lahoti, who on Thursday (July 31, 2025) acquitted all seven accused in the case, said he could not rely on the witness's statement to the ATS, as he submitted to the court that it was given involuntarily. 2008 Malegaon blast: Who were the accused? A brief timeline of the case In its more than 1,000-page judgment, made available on Friday (August 1, 2025), the court said the ATS had questioned prosecution witness Milind Joshirao in October 2008 about the functioning of the right-wing group Abhinav Bharat. He was asked about a meeting at the Raigad fort, where the accused had allegedly taken an oath to create a separate Hindu Rashtra. Joshirao, during his testimony to the court, claimed that the ATS had treated him like an accused. 'They (ATS officers) were telling him to take the names of Yogi Adityanath, Asimanand Indresh Kumar, Devdhar, Pragya and Kakaji in his statement,' the court said. 'The ATS officers assured him that if he took their names, they would let him go free,' it added. Controversy breaks out in Maharashtra after ex-policeman claims he was asked to pick up Mohan Bhagwat over 2008 Malegaon blast case The court noted that the witness had refused to do so and hence, the then Deputy Commissioner of Police Shrirao and Assistant Commissioner of Police Param Bir Singh had shown the fear of torture to him and extended threats. 'It further held that the witness had never stated the things mentioned in the statement and it was written by the ATS officers,' it said. 'Considering his testimony, it clearly indicates that the statement was involuntary,' the court said. 'The statement raises doubts regarding its admissibility and authenticity as it was involuntary,' the court said. Malegaon blast acquittals destroyed Congress 'conspiracy' to manufacture false narrative of Hindu terror: BJP 'When a statement is given involuntarily without actual knowledge of the facts mentioned in the same, nothing survives in it,' the court held, terming it as unreliable. Former BJP MP Pragya Singh Thakur and Lt. Col. Prasad Purohit were among the seven to be acquitted by the court, which noted that the prosecution had failed to adduce cogent and reliable evidence to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt. Six people were killed and 101 were injured after a blast at Malegaon in Nashik district in September 2008.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
11 minutes ago
- First Post
Iran's President arrives in Pakistan for a 2-day visit amid tensions in West Asia
Iran's President Dr Masoud Pezeshkian arrived in Pakistan to kick-start his two-day visit to the nation. Pezeshkian will be holding talks with Pakistani president, PM and the Army Chief read more Iran's President Dr Masoud Pezeshkian arrived in Pakistan on Saturday for a two-day visit to the neighbouring nation. According to Pakistani news outlet The Express Tribune, the visit came at the invitation of Pakistan's Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif. As per the report, Pezeshkian arrived in the country accompanied by a high-level delegation including the Foreign Minister of Iran, Seyyed Abbas Araghchi, senior ministers, and other high-ranking officials. According to the statment released by Pakistan's Foreign Office, during his stay, Pezeshkian will meet with his Pakistani counterpart, President Asif Ali Zardari. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The Iranian team would also hold delegation-level talks with Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif. This marks Dr Pezeshkian's first official visit to Pakistan as the President of Iran. What makes the visit crucial is the fact that it is taking place after the 12-day Iran-Israel war, along with the regional developments that followed. According to The Express Tribune, the Iranian president is scheduled to visit the Mausoleum of Poet Dr Muhammad Allama Iqbal in Lahore. After that, he would then travel to Islamabad, where he would have a series of meetings with Pakistan's civil and military leaders, including the President, Prime Minister and the Army Chief. The discussions between both sides are expected to focus on strengthening bilateral relations, which span political, economic, religious, and cultural dimensions. The Israel-Hamas war will also be one of the topics of discussion. During the Indian-Pakistan 4-day military escalation, Iran offered to be a mediator between the two nuclear-powered nations. In light of this, Iran's Foreign Minister travelled to both New Delhi and Islamabad to prevent the situation from further escalation. However, a ceasefire between India and Pakistan was reached bilaterally after four days of fighting. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD


Hans India
11 minutes ago
- Hans India
Originators of saffron terrorism jibe Cong, disgraced: Sadhvi Pragya after acquittal in Malegaon blast case
In her first reaction following the acquittal of all seven accused in the 2008 Malegaon Blast case in which 6 people were killed and over a 100 injured, BJP MP Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur, one of the accused, stated that Congress, along with all other non-believers who were the originators of the 'saffron terrorism' tag, have been disgraced. Taking to social media platform X, she wrote: "The Congress, along with all other non-believers, who are the originators of 'saffron terrorism' and 'Hindu terrorism', have been disgraced.. The victory of saffron, Hindutva, and Sanatan has led to the triumph of all Sanatanis and patriots, heartfelt congratulations.... Jai Hindu Rashtra, Jai Shri Ram..." Nearly 17 years after a deadly blast rocked Malegaon in Maharashtra, a special NIA court in Mumbai on Thursday acquitted all seven accused, citing lack of evidence. The verdict marks the closure of a high-profile case that had long been a flashpoint in debates over so-called "saffron terror." The powerful explosion occurred on the night of September 29, 2008, near Bhikku Chowk in Malegaon, a communally-sensitive town approximately 200 kilometres from Mumbai. The blast, which took place during the holy month of Ramzan, killed 6 people and injured more than a 100 others. The court, presided over by Special Judge A.K. Lahoti, stated in its ruling that while the prosecution was able to establish that the bomb blast had occurred, it failed to prove that the explosive device was fitted on the motorcycle allegedly owned by Sadhvi Pragya. The judge specifically noted that the engine number was illegible, and the chassis number had been wiped off, weakening the prosecution's case substantially. The seven accused, including Sadhvi Pragya, were charged under various provisions of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) and the Indian Penal Code (IPC), including charges of criminal conspiracy, murder, attempt to murder, promoting enmity between groups, and voluntarily causing hurt. The case was originally investigated by the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS), before being handed over to the National Investigation Agency (NIA) in 2011. Over the years, the investigation and prosecution became mired in controversy, with allegations of political interference and changing narratives. Sadhvi Pragya was arrested in 2008 and later granted bail in 2017. She has consistently maintained her innocence, claiming that she was falsely implicated due to political motives.