What a leftwing leader needs to do to earn credibility
The leadership team of any new political movement must convince voters of two things. One: 'I trust these people to run the country.' Two: 'They have got my back.'
Economic credibility requires exploding the austerity myth. Speaking as someone who ran an arm of government – successfully – I found that when you make the case, people, including businesspeople, think it's common sense. That keeping kids in poverty is economically illiterate. That investing in health and education makes us all wealthier in the end, and happier too. That public ownership will lower utility bills and improve services. That the climate crisis is real, and we must invest in a resilient future or see our economy crippled.
Having someone's back means saying that we won't throw you under the bus for an easy headline. We will put your right to a secure home above your landlord's right to make a quick buck. We will put your kid's mental health above the right of global corporations to avoid regulations. We will fight your corner when you're victimised for being disabled, or black, or LGBTQ+.
There is a truth to why governments can't afford to invest. Money flows to very, very rich people. They make 8% to 12% a year from parking money in big tech, utilities, property, finance and care homes, while the rest of us do the work and actually generate the wealth. That money needs to be taxed to pay for the safe, sustainable, prosperous society that everyone needs.Jamie DriscollFormer North of Tyne mayor
Owen Jones is right to some extent – a populist left with a charismatic front person is badly needed. However, his suggestion of Mick Lynch as such a leader is laughable. A new populist left alternative needs to think radically and organise broadly, connecting with and building alliances between social actors who are philosophically and/or theoretically critical of Labourism and the labour movement, especially the macho, workerist tendency that Lynch and others represent. Jean-Luc Mélenchon's La France Insoumise is a good example of a project with some populist potential that is failing to break out of such a straitjacket. We should learn from this.Tony SamphierBeckenham, London
I agree with Owen Jones that Mick Lynch would be the ideal candidate to take on Labour from the left and stave off the sinister threat of Reform. However, I would suggest that, in the absence of Mr Lynch wanting to take up this mantle, the Independent Alliance should form into a political party and merge with the Greens and those seven Labour MPs recently suspended from the party for voting against the retention of the appalling two-child cap.
Such a new party would not only be 15 MPs strong – three times the size of Reform's parliamentary presence – but would represent those predominantly middle-class former Labour voters who have turned to the Greens in disgust at Starmerism, and the traditional white working-class demographic in the 'red wall' seats and other similar constituencies.
Only such a unified party of the left can hope to stave off Reform and provide the 'broad church' that Labour likes to tell us it is but so woefully is not, as the party's lurch to the right under Keir Starmer leaves us in no doubt as to where its priorities now lie.Michael WaltonBath
Do you have a photograph you'd like to share with Guardian readers? If so, please click here to upload it. A selection will be published in our Readers' best photographs galleries and in the print edition on Saturdays.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
I am a Robodebt whistleblower. I know what it's like to be punished for speaking out and why protection is urgent
I blew the whistle on Robodebt. I experienced first-hand the absence of support for whistleblowers. That is why I am firm in my belief that we need whistleblower reform, now, including the establishment of a Whistleblower Protection Authority. For most of my career, I have worked for Services Australia. I was on the frontline of the implementation of what became known as Robodebt. As I explained in my testimony to the Robodebt royal commission, involvement in Robodebt was a deeply traumatic experience. I tried, from the very beginning, when I was part of an initial Robodebt pilot, to blow the whistle on the scheme. I immediately saw Robodebt for what the royal commission eventually concluded it to be: unlawful and deeply unethical. I thought it should be stopped, to never proceed beyond the pilot. But when I, and others, raised concerns, we were met with a clear, stark message: resign, transfer or comply. The message was as blunt as that: shut up or leave. Our concerns were ignored. Instead, we received threatening communications. Performance targets, threats of underperformance notices and code of conduct breaches were used to suppress dissent. Daily emails reminded us that if we spoke to anyone outside our team about our work, we could face termination. There was no safe, independent mechanism for staff to report concerns without fear of reprisal. If such a body had existed, I believe many more staff would have spoken out, and Robodebt may have been stopped before it began. Think about what that might have prevented – the trauma avoided, the beautiful lives not lost as a result, the billions in taxpayer dollars not wasted. If whistleblowers were protected and empowered, not punished, maybe we could have avoided Robodebt altogether. At its core, Robodebt was a breakdown of integrity. A logical response in such situations is to go outside that system and report – somewhere, some way, somehow. While the integrity of all government systems rely on public confidence, there are a range of reasons the integrity of those systems can be compromised. Whistleblowing is a vital safety valve when those systems fail. No doubt you will hear much today about the importance of whistleblowing, and how we can improve support and protection for whistleblowing. But I want to speak to the personal cost of speaking out. I lost my career. My mental health suffered. I struggled with alcohol dependency. I became unable to properly parent, or care for my elderly parent. I endured suicidal ideation. A decade since I first blew the whistle on Robodebt, and over two years since I gave evidence to the royal commission, I am still suffering. I was so traumatised by my experience that I am on workers' compensation, barely subsisting on a fraction of my former salary. Ultimately my family, my career and my colleagues have paid the high price for speaking up. Meanwhile, those most responsible for Robodebt have faced no real consequences. The royal commission vindicated those who raised concerns, yet still we suffer. Society benefits when whistleblowers speak up – ultimately, Robodebt was stopped. But we are left on the scrap heap, paying a high price for our sacrifice – a sacrifice made in the public interest. I am not the only one. In recent years there have been Australians prosecuted for blowing the whistle, a whistleblower imprisoned for speaking up. There are dozens more who have had their careers ended, or sidelined, for doing the right thing, not to mention those – including many colleagues during Robodebt – who simply walked away in disgust. For this reason alone there should be some sort of mechanism to support whistleblowers who speak up in the public interest. To have a body which can offer a modicum of protection to those who would bring 'right' to a place where it can be considered, should be at the core of efforts to restore credibility in Australian public institutions. That is why we need a Whistleblower Protection Authority. That is why I came here today, to call on the Albanese government and attorney general Michelle Rowland to act. Whistleblower protections must ensure that those who speak out for what is right are not punished for doing so. Integrity in our public systems depend on it. Jeannie-Marie Blake is a public servant. This is an extract of evidence she gave to the Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee in Canberra on Wednesday, as part of the Committee's inquiry into a whistleblower protection authority In Australia, the crisis support service Lifeline is 13 11 14. In the US, the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline is 1-800-273-8255. In the UK, Samaritans can be contacted on 116 123. Other international suicide helplines can be found at
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Treasury considers inheritance tax reforms to fill £50bn spending gap in budget
Rachel Reeves is looking to raise more money by tightening the rules around inheritance tax in the autumn budget, it's been reported. Amid growing pressure regarding the state of the UK's finances ahead of the autumn budget, the chancellor is looking to address a blackhole left by Labour U-turns, higher borrowing and sluggish economic growth. Economists have warned Ms Reeves that she must raise taxes or tear up her flagship borrowing rules to fill the shortfall in public finances. According to a report in The Guardian, the Treasury is now looking at options on inheritance tax like changing rules to restrict the gifting of money and assets Under current rules, unlimited amounts of money and assets can be gifted to relatives and friends which avoids inheritance tax, provided that it is gifted at least seven years before the benefactor dies. Money given less than three years before is taxed at the full inheritance tax rate of 40 per cent, while gifts given between seven and three years has a 'taper relief' tax, which is between eight and 32 per cent. The Guardian reports that the Treasury is considering a lifetime cap to limit the amount of money an individual can donate outside of inheritance tax, as well as reviewing rules around the taper rate. 'With so much wealth stored in assets like houses that have shot up in value, we have to find ways to better tap into the inheritances of those who can afford to contribute more,' a source told the newspaper. 'It's hard to make sure these taxes don't end up with loopholes that undermine their purpose. But we are trying to work out what revenue might be raised and how to ensure it's a fair approach.' However, it has been reported that no substantive talks at a senior level have occurred about inheritance tax, and no decisions have been made. Reeves has already ruled out increases to income tax, national insurance and VAT, while inheritance tax brought in a record £6.7bn in 2022-2023. However, recent analysis that showed wealthy investors are leaving the UK because of measures such as the abolition of non-dom status has caused nervousness. A Treasury spokesperson said: 'As set out in the plan for change, the best way to strengthen public finances is by growing the economy – which is our focus. Changes to tax and spend policy are not the only ways of doing this, as seen with our planning reforms, which are expected to grow the economy by £6.8bn and cut borrowing by £3.4bn. 'We are committed to keeping taxes for working people as low as possible, which is why at last autumn's budget we protected working people's payslips and kept our promise not to raise the basic, higher or additional rates of income tax, employee national insurance or VAT.'
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
More than HALF of women say they do not feel safe in their local area - as Labour minister admits there are not enough police on the streets
More than half of women are now concerned for their personal safety in their local area, new polling for Reform UK has revealed. Some 60 per cent of women fear for their safety when out shopping or going for a walk and 51 per cent are worried about being harassed or sexually assaulted. Reform leader Nigel Farage described it as the 'next big issue in British politics' and said Labour and the Tories have 'prioritised the interests of illegal migrants over the safety of women and girls'. It comes as the party launched a new drive to tackle violence and sex assaults against women and girls as Reform's only female MP blamed migrants with 'medieval views' for a decline in public safety. Meanwhile a Labour minister admitted that 'there aren't enough police officers on our streets' while Kemi Badenoch said women have stopped jogging in the park because of 'men lurking in bushes'. Polling shared exclusively with the Daily Mail shows that 60 per cent of women are concerned about their safety in public - with a quarter saying they are 'very concerned'. Even amongst men, some 38 per cent say they are now concerned for their safety in public and 12 per cent are very concerned. Over half of women are worried about the risk of sexual assault or harassment and this is felt more amongst younger people, with 63 per cent of 25-34 year olds concerned about the risk, the poll by Survation found. Damian Lyons Lowe, chief executive of the pollster, said the findings shows a 'stark gender divide in perceptions of safety'. He added: 'These perceptions feed into a wider public mood that favours tougher sentencing, with strong majority support for life sentences without parole for the most serious crimes.' The representative poll of 2,131 UK adults found that Britons resoundingly support minimum sentences of 10 years or life imprisonment for physical, violent, and sexual crimes. A large majority are in favour of convicted criminals never having the chance to be released early while 72 per cent back life sentences without parole for serious crimes such as murder or terrorism. And by far the most popular punishment for repeat offenders of minor crimes such as shoplifting is longer prison sentences of a year or more, with 42 per cent backing this compared to 15 per cent who were in favour of electronic tagging. When it comes to which party the public trusts to reduce crime in the UK, Reform has a nine-point lead over Labour with 35 per cent backing the party to best tackle crime. However a significant proportion - some 27 per cent - chose neither when asked which party they trusted most to bring crime levels down in Britain. It comes as former home secretary Baroness Jacqui Smith said she 'shares the concerns' of Reform about women feeling safe in this country and admitted that 'there aren't enough police officers on our streets'. The Labour women and equalities minister told Times Radio: 'I think what it says about the state of the country is that the last government undermined our neighbourhood policing so that it's not surprising that people in communities aren't feeling the confidence that we would want them to feel.' But on Reform's criticism Baroness Smith said that the party had voted against legislation to keep women safe, adding: 'They're very good at pointing at problems, slightly less good at actually getting behind the solutions.' It came as Kemi Badenoch said that women have 'stopped jogging in the park because there are men lurking in bushes'. Referring to her visit to Epping on Monday, the Conservative leader told reporters: 'Mothers told me that they're worried about their daughters going to school. They're getting harassed. They stopped jogging in the park because there are men lurking in bushes. 'Communities shouldn't have to be paying for this. And what I saw in Epping really, really upset me. I can see why many of those people are protesting.'
