
Wujuud-i-Zan: Mussamat Tajo's fight for justice
Zoya Sameen's Wujuud-i-Zan talk explored Musammat Tajo's 14-year legal battle against colonial expulsion and injustice
On February 21st, 2025, Habib University hosted a thought-provoking one-day conference titled Wujuud-i-Zan, focusing on women in academia: scholars, artists, and activists. The event fostered a transdisciplinary dialogue on gender performance and perception, bringing together voices from diverse fields to explore the complexities of women's roles in society.
As a Habib University alumna, attending this conference was a bittersweet experience. It was a return to an intellectual space I had cherished as a student, but this time, I was there not to discuss the event in class but to cover it as a professional. The shift in context was both nostalgic and empowering.
One of the panels that particularly captivated me was 'Colonial Modernity and the Gendered Subject', especially the subsection led by Zoya Sameen, a historian specializing in gender, law, and empire in 19th and 20th-century South Asia. Her talk, titled 'This Woman is a Most Undesirable Person': Tajo vs. Frontier Crimes Regulation in the Balochistan Agency', delved into the intricate ways colonial and patriarchal systems policed women, particularly those involved in sex work, and how these systems intersected with legal and social frameworks.
Her presentation began by outlining the colonial state's multifaceted approach to policing women, particularly those engaged in prostitution. She identified four distinct regimes of control that evolved over the 19th and 20th centuries:
1. Criminalization: In the late 19th century, women suspected of being sex workers were criminalized and policed under vague and often discriminatory laws.
2. Expulsion: Following the repeal of the Contagious Diseases Act, women were expelled from military spaces, creating a new set of challenges as they were forced into less surveilled areas.
3. Relocation: In the 20th century, municipal governance played a key role in relocating women to designated red-light districts, effectively segregating them from the rest of society.
4. Deportation: In some cases, women were not just relocated but deported, often under harsh legal frameworks like the Frontier Crimes Regulation (FCR).
While sex work itself was not explicitly criminalized, laws like the Suppression of Immoral Traffic Act targeted the surrounding economic and social structures—brothel-keeping, public solicitation, and property leasing for sex work. This approach created an intricate system of control, reflecting the collaboration between colonial governance and patriarchal nationalism to regulate women's bodies and movements.
At the heart of Sameen's talk was the case of Musammat Tajo, a woman whose life and struggles epitomized the gendered injustices of colonial rule. Tajo, a sex worker in Quetta, was expelled from the city in 1923 under Section 36 of the Frontier Crimes Regulation (FCR). This section granted the Balochistan Agency the power to expel individuals deemed 'dangerous' or likely to cause 'bloodshed'—terms so vague that they could be applied to anyone, particularly women like Tajo.
Tajo's expulsion was justified on the grounds that her presence in Quetta would disrupt peace and lead to violence. This reasoning, however, was deeply gendered. Tajo was blamed for the conflicts between three men—her former husband, Ghulam Rasool; her lover, Ahmed Ali Shah; and another man, Nur Mohammad. Despite the men's involvement in the disputes, it was Tajo who bore the brunt of the legal consequences. Her status as a sex worker made her a convenient scapegoat, and she was expelled from Balochistan without recourse to justice.
Over the next 14 years, Tajo tirelessly petitioned for her return to Quetta. Her brother also appealed on her behalf, arguing that the circumstances of her expulsion no longer applied—her former husband had remarried, and her lover had left the city. Despite these efforts, her petitions were repeatedly rejected.
In 1931, the Agent to the Governor General (AGG) dismissed her appeal with the chilling statement: 'This woman is obviously a most undesirable person and is likely to cause more trouble if allowed to return to Quetta.' Tajo's identity as a sex worker and her perceived 'undesirability' overshadowed any consideration of her rights or humanity.
Tajo's story, however, is not just one of victimization. Her relentless petitions and appeals demonstrate her agency and resilience in the face of systemic oppression. She refused to accept the colonial state's verdict and continued to fight for her right to return home. Her case highlights how women like Tajo engaged with the law, not just as passive subjects but as active participants who read, manipulated, and reshaped legal categories to challenge their oppression.
Tajo's case offers us a window into the realities of colonial legal power, empire, and its impact on women's lives. It shifts the focus from governance as an abstract ideology to its everyday application, revealing how colonial and patriarchal systems intersected to control women's bodies and movements. At the same time, it underscores the ways in which women like Tajo resisted and reshaped these systems, exposing the instability and contradictions of colonial authority.
As I left the conference, I reflected on the enduring relevance of Tajo's story. Her struggles remind us of the importance of centering marginalized voices in our understanding of history and justice. They also challenge us to confront the legacies of colonialism and patriarchy that continue to shape our world today. Tajo's resilience is a testament to the power of resistance and the enduring fight for dignity and equality—a fight that remains as urgent now as it was in her time.
In the end, Wujuud-i-Zan was not just a conference but a celebration of women's voices, past and present, and a call to continue the work of dismantling the systems that seek to silence them. Tajo's story, like so many others, is a reminder that history is not just about the powerful but also about those who, against all odds, refuse to be erased
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Recorder
30-05-2025
- Business Recorder
Rs500m loss inflicted on national exchequer? Senate body raises questions over role of Nespak, NTDC
ISLAMABAD: The Senate Standing Committee on Economic Affairs raised serious questions over the role of National Engineering Services Pakistan (Pvt) Limited (Nespak) and National Transmission and Dispatch Company (NTDC) in awarding the bid to the third lowest, causing Rs500 million loss to the national exchequer. The committee met with Saifullah Abro in the chair here on Thursday for further discussion on the recommendation made after detailed deliberations in the committee's previous meetings concerning the EAD and its related departments (NTDC projects including 765Kv Dasu-Islamabad Transmission Line project (LoT-I-LoT-IV) upto date progress, expenditure and briefing through MD, Nespak on ADB 401B-2022 LoT-II A(ACSR Bunting Conductor) regarding inquiries reports. The committee's chairman remarked that it was a matter of great embarrassment that Nespak, a national institution responsible for technical evaluations, failed to prevent such a decision. It was Nespak's responsibility to ensure proper verification, because Nespak's role is to scrutinise the document, he stated. Senator Abro highlighted that the 'contract is not awarded to the deserving by which the Rs500 million of the country could have saved.' He noted that 'the company to which the project was awarded Newage, Lahore, lacked the relevant experience, while expressing serious concern that this type of negligence cannot be ignored.' Senator Abro stated that the matter will be pursued through the relevant forums like, the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), the Public Accounts Committee (PAC), and the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) to ensure that the public funds are recovered. He also recommended that strict action should also be taken against the involved officers. Referring to legal inconsistencies, he questioned 'if Public Procurement Regulatory Authority (PPRA) laws are not applicable in the case of domestic preference, and how can a letter from the Asian Development Bank (ADB) be considered valid?' He recalled that during the previous meeting, three written letters were presented by the caretaker minister, which further raised serious questions regarding the transparency of the process. When the committee sought further details, it was informed that all relevant data from the Engineering Development Board (EDB) had been destroyed in a fire, and only one verified letter was presented before the committee. Senator Kamal Ali Agha inquired whether an inquiry was conducted following the fire incident. The concerned department stated that no inquiry had been carried out. The chairman committee, recommended that a formal inquiry be conducted into the fire incident and that strict action be taken against those found responsible, including officers from the Power Division. During the committee meeting, a discussion was held regarding where the department conducts testing, which institutions are responsible, and where laboratories are located in Pakistan. The department informed the committee that type testing is conducted internationally and not within Pakistan. It was further stated that the type test for the current year, 2024, was conducted in Hungary. The chairman inquired about who the witness to the test? The department told that the witness was not verified. They also stated that, according to a 2023 policy, having a witness was not a mandatory requirement by the consultant. However, after detailed discussion, it was revealed that no such policy had been formulated. The chairman committee strongly remarked that no valid testing had been conducted and an attempt was made to mislead the committee, which amounted to fraud. The chairman asked whether any recovery of the misused funds had been made, to which the department responded that a letter had been written to NTDC regarding the matter. The chairman committee recommended that all the involved companies be blacklisted, the misappropriated funds be recovered, and that the officers involved be terminated from service. Furthermore, he recommended that the recovered amount should be deducted from the salaries of the responsible officers. The committee also inquired about the report and minutes of the 282nd Board meeting, as well as the letter issued by the NTDC Board. It was noted that while the minutes of the committee meeting were dated 24th December 2024, the Board was required to submit its report within 15 days. However, the BOD has submitted after six months. Meanwhile, the committee remarked that the Board itself is violating its own letter and treating the amount of Rs1.28 billion as insignificant. The chairman recommended that strict action be taken against the Board and that the amount be recovered within two weeks. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025


Express Tribune
16-05-2025
- Express Tribune
Salute to our armed forces
Listen to article The recent military standoff between Pakistan and India has once again reminded the world of the unwavering resolve and strategic strength of our armed forces. In the short-lived but high-stakes conflict, Pakistan not only stood its ground but emerged as a key geopolitical player, demonstrating composure and tactical superiority. Triggered by India's baseless accusations following the Pahalgam attack, New Delhi launched a series of airstrikes on Pakistani soil on the night of May 6-7, leading to tragic civilian casualties. In response, Pakistan exercised its right to self-defence through Operation Bunyan-um-Marsoos, a pivotal part of Marka-i-Haq. This military operation, marked by precision and restraint, pushed back Indian aggression and, more importantly, exposed the ideological fault lines between the two nations on the global stage. Where India sought to control the narrative through its BJP-driven rhetoric, it found itself facing global scrutiny. In contrast, Pakistan's mature response garnered international respect and renewed attention toward the longstanding dispute of Kashmir. The world now understands that peace in the region cannot come at the cost of ignoring Pakistan's concerns. The episode has placed South Asia's fragile security dynamics back on the global agenda — with Pakistan seen as a key stakeholder. For years, India insisted that Kashmir was a bilateral issue. Yet in a significant diplomatic shift, it has now opened the door for third-party mediation. The observance of Youm-i-Tashakur across the country is a moment of pride and gratitude. The 31-gun salute in the capital and the special prayers across mosques reflect a united people standing behind a brave military. Pakistan has not only defended its borders but has made it clear to the world that it remains a responsible yet formidable presence in South Asia.


Business Recorder
13-05-2025
- Business Recorder
UAF observes Youm-i-Tashakur
FAISALABAD: The University of Agriculture Faisalabad observed Youm-i-Tashakur for giving a befitting response to Indian aggression against Pakistan and on the success of Operation Bunyan-un-Marsoos. They paid tribute to valour and gallantry shown by armed forces of the country in foiling the aggression and evil designs of the enemy against the country. Led by UAF Vice Chancellor Prof Dr Zulfiqar Ali, Youm-i-Tashakur rally was taken out from Iqbal Auditorium to University Clock Tower. They expressed their unity and love with the armed forces of the country, who have earned the global recognition and made the nation proud at the international level because of their gallantry and courage. Former Vice Chancellor Prof Dr Iqrar Ahmad Khan also participated. Prof Dr Zulfiqar Ali said that the armed forces are proud of our country who are safeguarding the country with all-out efforts and sacrifices and proven it as one of the best of the armies of the world. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025