The French Open is picking humans over technology. Novak Djokovic thinks that's a bad call
PARIS (AP) — For Novak Djokovic, this is a relatively easy call: He, like many players, thinks the French Open is making a mistake by eschewing the electronic line-calling used at most big tennis tournaments and instead remaining old school by letting line judges decide whether serves or other shots land in or out.
Plenty of sports, from soccer and baseball to the NFL, are replacing, or at least helping, officials with some form of high-tech replays or other technology. Tennis, too, is following that trend, except at Roland-Garros, where competition continues through June 8.
Even the longest-running and most tradition-bound of the majors, Wimbledon, is — gasp! — abandoning line judges and moving to an automatic system this year. The WTA and ATP added machine-generated rulings this season for tour events on red clay, the surface at the French Open. But Grand Slam hosts can do what they want, and the French tennis federation is keeping the human element.
The French Open is pushing back against modern technology
Djokovic, the 24-time major champion scheduled to play his first-round match in Paris on Tuesday, understands why folks might prefer the way to keep things the way they were for more than a century in his sport. He gets why there could be an inclination to shy away from too much change in a world now drowning in cell phones and streaming and social media.
'You don't want to give everything away to the technology, right? But if I have to choose between the two, I'm more of a proponent of technology. It's just more accurate, saves time, and ... (means) less people on the court' said Djokovic, 38, who was disqualified from the 2020 U.S. Open for inadvertently hitting an official with a ball hit out of frustration between games.
That edition of the tournament in New York only placed line judges on its two largest courts, while others used an electronic setup, a nod to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Australian Open got rid of all line judges in 2021, a first at a tennis major; the U.S. Open did the same later that year.
The French Open remains a holdout, and that's not likely to change anytime soon.
Don't expect electronic line-calling at Roland Garros in the near future
'Unless the players are unanimous and come to us and say, 'We won't play if there isn't a machine' ... then I think we've got a great future ahead of us to maintain this style of refereeing,' French federation president Gilles Moretton said, while boasting of the quality of his country's officials.
Players don't sound that adamant, although they tend to echo the opinion of 2023 U.S. Open champion Coco Gauff, who is 21: 'I mean, I don't know if it's like the 'Gen Z' in me, but I think if we have the technology, we should use it.'
Still, there is some charm to be found in the choreography of players insisting a call was wrong and chair umpires climbing down for a closer look at a ball mark on the clay. Watch a day of TV coverage from Paris and odds are good that dance will take place — probably more than once.
'That's what makes clay special, in a way — that you can always review the shots. ... Obviously, you can't deny that electronic line-calling is the future, and everything is moving towards AI and artificial intelligence,' said Stefanos Tsitsipas, the runner-up to Djokovic at Roland-Garros four years ago. "But me, personally, I wouldn't mind playing on clay with maybe the judgment of a human instead of a robot.'
Some tennis players resort to taking photos of ball marks
No matter the form of officiating, there invariably are times when athletes — perhaps eyesight or faith strained by heat-of-the-moment tension and an eagerness to be correct — just won't agree with a call.
That, in turn, can lead to extended arguments and sometimes a scene seen recently: A player grabs a cell phone from the sideline to snap a photo of a mark in a bid to prove, and win, a point.
Aryna Sabalenka, a three-time Slam champ and No. 1 women's player, and Alexander Zverev, a three-time major finalist, did just that, although they weren't the first. Back at the 2013 French Open, Sergiy Stakhovsky put down his racket and took a picture of where a ball had landed during a loss to Richard Gasquet; Stakhovsky said then he'd done it before.
'Linespeople mess up sometimes,' said 2023 Australian Open semifinalist Tommy Paul. 'Automatic line-calling is going to mess up probably less.'
___
AP Sports Writer Andrew Dampf in Rome contributed.
___
Howard Fendrich has been the AP's tennis writer since 2002. Find his stories here: https://apnews.com/author/howard-fendrich. More AP tennis: https://apnews.com/hub/tennis
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Are you not entertained? Thrilling club finales show tribal rugby at its best
The final week of every domestic season is always an indicator of rugby's underlying health. Are supporters crawling over their grandmothers in their haste to buy a finals ticket? Is the entertainment value of the product trending upwards year on year? And are there collective signs of rising positivity among players, tournament organisers and fans alike? These are especially relevant questions right now amid all the exciting/delusional (take your pick) chatter about a possible breakaway global franchise league. And before we contemplate this year's answers let's hope those looking to flog the concept of a Formula One-style circus featuring the world's top players were watching last Friday night's game in Bath. Advertisement Related: Rugby's breakaway R360 league labelled 'delusional' by leading TV sport executive Because it could be that club rugby, too often dismissed in certain circles as tired old hat, has never enjoyed a more vibrant, upbeat few weeks out on the field. The first half between Bath and Bristol Bears was as thrillingly watchable and intense as the Premiership has ever been. The pace and ambition, the handling and defensive desire … all of it was spectacular with the atmosphere similarly super-charged. Driving home – and leaving aside the losing side's' natural disappointment – it was hard not to think 'what more could anyone want'? A brilliant spectacle, a riot of passion and colour, an outstanding advert for the sport. Along with the French Open tennis men's final it refreshed parts not all sports are able to reach. And then the following day, albeit in a contrasting way, there was more to relish. Rugby is not solely about fleet-footed wingers pulling rabbits from a hat but Adam Radwan's airborne second try was absolutely out of the top drawer. These were club fixtures masquerading as something else, as the Tigers' head coach Michael Cheika duly confirmed on Monday. 'As competitions get towards the end of the season the big games look like Test matches. The physicality, the speed … if you look at the data they start to look similar. Test matches are a unique entity but this competition prepares players equally as well as any other. There's no doubt about that.' Advertisement Which is interesting, coming from someone who has coached all over the world. Above all, though, the outcome seriously mattered. The best sport is not about artifice or glossy marketing: it is wincingly authentic and, ideally, tribal. Bath have not won a domestic league title for 29 years and now stand 80 minutes away from breaking that drought. You could absolutely feel that pent-up desire at the Rec on Friday evening. No wonder this Saturday's Twickenham final sold out weeks ago. All this on the back of Northampton's remarkable Champions Cup semi-final win over Leinster in Dublin last month, another occasion that ranked up there with the greatest away wins the competition has ever witnessed. The final in Cardiff between the Saints and Bordeaux-Bègles was another exhilarating cracker. Ambassador, you really are spoiling us. The situation in the United Rugby Championship, admittedly, is more complex, with only a strictly limited period available in which to sell the final between Leinster and the Bulls in Croke Park. The organisers will be happy if the attendance creeps up to the 50,000 mark; being able to pre-sell tickets to a final at a venue confirmed well in advance would clearly help. But overall this season the URC expects to announce another overall attendance record and in the Premiership average attendances are up 10% this year with a million new fans attracted to games. While none of this can airbrush away all the sport's wider issues around financial instability and player welfare concerns, it should not be entirely dismissed either. If rugby is appealing to newbies and simultaneously delighting its existing followers, it must be doing something right. Advertisement So the first couple of questions posed in the opening paragraph can pretty much be ticked off. The third step to heaven now involves sustaining that momentum into this weekend and learning lessons from last year. Then, as now, Bath were involved in the Premiership final and were looking good in the first-half against Northampton until Beno Obano was sent off for a marginally high tackle on Juarno Augustus. In that split second the mood of the whole occasion completely changed. A year on, the game is still trying to balance on the same precarious high wire, caught between a well-intentioned desire to make the game safer and wanting to protect its physical appeal. History may well conclude that these twin aims have long since been incompatible, with the science suggesting repeated small blows to the brain over a long period can ultimately be worse than one or two clear-cut knock outs. Perhaps the biggest passion killer on high-profile days, accordingly, is the sight of referees staring endlessly at big screens, trying to make definitive calls based on selective slowed-down replays or the opinions of a bossy television match official in a booth somewhere. Even then the truth is frequently elusive. In the recent Challenge Cup final, Sam Underhill was shown just a yellow card for his head-on-head tackle on Davit Niniashvili; subsequently the England flanker was banned for four weeks and misses this weekend's Twickenham finale. Go figure. Such maddening inconsistency continues to do rugby a disservice at precisely the moment the players are ramping things up. Imagine an oval-ball world where the skill, speed, commitment and collective enjoyment on display in Bath last Friday was the consistent takeaway. Hopefully this weekend will be similarly uplifting and restore a little more faith in the battered old game. Opt, instead, for the empty-headed, soulless R360 proposal and rugby union will reap what it sows. One to watch Leicester's return to Twickenham for the Premiership final offers a fitting stage for Ben Youngs and Dan Cole to bid farewell on their last appearances for the Tigers before their top-level retirement. With Michael Cheika, Handré Pollard and the popular Puma hooker Julián Montoya, among others, also about to depart the club, there will no shortage of emotional energy for the Tigers to feed off. Should they win on Saturday there will certainly be requests for a repeat performance from Montoya's father, who marked his first visit to Welford Road with an impromptu celebratory dance in the stands after last Saturday's semi-final. An Argentinian version of Tiger Feet – the Tiger Tango? – may be called for if Bath are unexpectedly beaten. French test Talking about brilliant viewing, did you see the sensational try that helped to propel Montauban back into the Top 14, at Grenoble's expense, for the first time in 15 years? If you live in the UK there is now more chance you will have done so: the play-off games in the French Pro D2 have been available for free on the FR-UK Rugby channel on YouTube, the rights having been secured by the podcaster and broadcaster Tim Cocker with the former England flanker Joe Worsley – now coaching at Brive – as a co-commentator. It is a smart move, with the French second tier increasingly supplying both excellent rugby and intriguing storylines. Can Grenoble now win the Top 14/Pro D2 Access match against Perpignan – who beat Toulouse in their final game of the regular season – this Saturday and join Montauban in the top flight? What a compelling prospect it is – and, hopefully, one which will remind England's rugby authorities about the value of end-of-season promotion/relegation jeopardy. Memory lane In September 1998, Australia faced Fiji in Sydney in, of all things, a RWC qualification match. The Wallabies, captained by John Eales who went on to lift the trophy again the following year, ran out 66-20 victors at Parramatta Stadium, in the only Test played between the two sides between 1985 and 2007. Lock-forward Eales kicked nine conversions and a penalty for 21 of Australia's points. Still want more? Is the R360 breakaway league the cure to rugby union's ills, wonders Andy Bull. And check out our weekly email of editors' picks, The Recap. Sign up here to receive it every Sunday morning.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
What Carlos Alcaraz and Jannik Sinner's French Open final said about five-set tennis
Case closed. The end of the argument. Best-of-five-set-tennis haters in shambles. Whether tennis should eliminate its longest format is an ongoing discussion, but for its advocates, Sunday's instant classic French Open final between Jannik Sinner and Carlos Alcaraz was the ultimate endorsement. Advertisement Five and a half hours of undulating tension and elite-level competition, given deeper meaning by how its length raised the significance of the match's decisive moments. The format allowed the match to take on an epic quality, elevating Sinner and Alcaraz's rivalry, previously incipient to the wider world outside of tennis, into something transcendental. The Wimbledon finals between Björn Borg and John McEnroe in 1980, and then Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal in 2008, had the same effect. The highs of matches like Sunday's is a compelling, possibly inarguable, case for the upsides of the format outweighing the downsides, but for dedicated tennis followers, the downsides are harder to ignore. But for regular watchers of the sport, there most certainly are downsides. Five-set matches like the Sinner-Alcaraz classic are rare. While their computer-game fast, extremely physical and incredibly powerful tennis is awe-inspiring, it's more often the case that even matches between two of the world's best players have sags and dips. Alcaraz and Sinner met in last year's French Open semifinal in another five-set match. That one was scratchy and strange. They rarely played well at the same time, and with both of them having physical issues toward the end, there was a lot of energy conservation at the end of sets. A more typical five-set Grand Slam match would be something like Tommy Paul vs. Karen Khachanov, from this year's fourth round. Two well-matched players — the No. 12 seed and the No. 24 seed — swapping sets for four hours, seven minutes. On Sunday, no one wanted Sinner vs. Alcaraz to end. More often, five-set matches ebb unsatisfyingly before eventually reaching the end. Advertisement Tennis was not designed to take anywhere near this long. It was conceived of as a sport where even five-set matches would take a maximum two hours. The first Wimbledon final that went to five sets, in 1887 between Herbert Lawford and Ernest Renshaw, lasted 120 minutes. More than 50 years later, the 1949 final between Ted Schroeder and Jaroslav Drobný lasted 100 minutes. That's only 15 minutes longer than just the second set of the 2023 final between Alcaraz and Novak Djokovic. A glance at five-set Wimbledon finals from the first half of the 20th century shows matches between 95 and 135 minutes. Match lengths have steadily increased since, and the rate of rise has steepened since the turn of this century. As of June 2023, they had become 25 percent longer on average since 1999. Three-hour matches, previously the marker of something epic, had become close to the average. This is due to a complex combination of surface and equipment changes, advances in fitness and changes in dominant gamestyles, but the net result is more long matches, more often. The increased length and physicality has a knock-on effect through tournaments. Players that come through a five-setter at a Grand Slam may be wiped out for their next match, or by the start of the second week, if they've had a few long ones. At the Australian Open in January, a number of fourth-round matches included either blowouts or mid-match retirements from players who had burned themselves out physically in the first week. Jack Draper withdrew at the end of the second set against Alcaraz having played five-setters in all three of his previous matches. With Grand Slams drawn such that high-seeded players like Draper are drawn to face weaker opponents early on, there are some who like this karmic aspect of the best-of-five format: mess around against an overmatched opponent and pay for it down the line. But density and depth of quality on the ATP Tour has grown in line with match lengths to the point that sometimes, players just get dragged into a war of attrition that leaves one player losing and the other scoring a pyrrhic victory. Advertisement The longer format also drastically reduces the number of viable champions. Very few players can consistently withstand the demands of best-of-five tennis against the best in the world; upsets are less likely because the better player has more time to work things out. All of which raises questions about who the formats are there to serve. For fans, the tension is between how much intrigue is generated by the best matches and how dull the worst can be. Matches like Sinner vs. Alcaraz catapult tennis into the wider sporting consciousness; when a less interesting match is tied at one-set all after two hours, its conclusion can feel so far away that changing channel is an entirely reasonable response. Then there's the question of the players, who generally like best of five because it's seen as the ultimate test and one that will typically lead to the best player winning. It's a lot harder to sneak a best-of-five win than a best-of-three one. One would be for the Grand Slams to have a hybrid system: best of three for the first three or four rounds; best of five for the last three or four rounds. The biggest matches could go long, but without so much accumulated fatigue from earlier in the tournament, and the early-round grinds would be eliminated. The switch from shorter to longer matches mid-tournament could be problematic for the players physically, but they already make have to make that adjustment for majors, with all other tour events played to three sets. Advertisement This hybrid format could also be used in the women's events, creating equality and taking away situations like at the French Open, where men are given the prime scheduling slots because, according to tournament organizers, they are longer and therefore offer fans better value for money. WTA players are generally not enthused by the idea of playing five sets, however. There is precedent — between 1984 and 1998, the final of the year-ending WTA Finals was best of five. All of this remains theoretical, because the slams have never shown any inclination to tweak the best-of-five format. They post record attendances and revenues, and longer matches generally means people in the grounds for longer with more scope to spend more of their money. And while the Sinner vs. Alcaraz final is proof of the majesty of tennis' most gladiatorial format, it's important to remember that matches of that level are the exception rather than the norm. This article originally appeared in The Athletic. Sports Business, Tennis, Women's Tennis 2025 The Athletic Media Company
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Major French Open Announcement Follows Coco Gauff and Carlos Alcaraz's Wins
Major French Open Announcement Follows Coco Gauff and Carlos Alcaraz's Wins originally appeared on Athlon Sports. The 2025 French Open was a historic one, and the numbers back it up. American tennis sensation Coco Gauff and Spanish star Carlos Alcaraz won the titles at Roland-Garros over the weekend. Advertisement Gauff beat Aryna Sabalenka in the women's singles final on Saturday, though she needed all three sets to defeat the World No. 1, 6-7(5), 6-2, 6-4. Meanwhile, Alcaraz took down Jannik Sinner in a thrilling Sunday finale that went to five sets (4-6, 6-7, 6-4, 7-6, 7-6) and lasted five hours and 29 minutes — making it the longest French Open final ever. Following their wins, the French Open announced on Monday that the 2025 iteration of the Grand Slam tournament made history. Apparently, a total of 685,000 people came to watch the competition in Paris, setting a new attendance record at Roland-Garros. "Record numbers on and off the court," the French Open Instagram account posted. "Roland-Garros 2025 sets new attendance highs to headline our Stat of the Day by @infosys." Sure enough, fans were ecstatic about the news, with many heaping praise on the tournament, as well as on Coco Gauff and Carlos Alcaraz for their performances throughout. Advertisement "What a tournament these two brought omg I'm obsessed," a commenter wrote, referring to the singles champions. Another one said, "COCOLITOS EFFECT." "Yes, this sport deserves such numbers. Next year we will set a new record. Tennis is the best sport," a fan added. Another viewer shared, "One of the best tournaments ever. Congrats to @cocogauff and @carlitosalcarazz." "What a tournament you delivered this year! The best tournament and the best @rolandgarros ever. An absolute perfection from the beginning to the end," a supporter remarked. Carlos Alcaraz, Jannik Sinner, Coco Gauff and Aryna Sabalenka Mullane-Imagn Images Throughout the tournament, several fans raised concerns about the empty seats at Stade Roland Garros. Clearly, though, attendance is not an issue for the organizers given the latest turnout. Advertisement Related: Coco Gauff Makes Request After French Open This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 9, 2025, where it first appeared.
