
What's in the one-in-one-out migrant deal between the UK and France?
French President Emmanuel Macron arrived in London on Tuesday for a three-day visit, marking the first state visit by a European leader since Britain's exit from the European Union.
Here is all we know about the 'one-in-one-out' migrant deal being discussed during a bilateral summit between Macron and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer in London.
What's in the deal Macron and Starmer are discussing?
The deal is aimed at deterring migrants from making dangerous trips across the English Channel from France to the UK in small boats. This year so far, more than 20,000 people have undertaken this journey.
At the start of the summit with Macron on Thursday, Starmer said the two must 'apply our collective strength and leadership' to the challenges of undocumented migration.
'We all agree that the situation in the Channel cannot go on as it is so we're bringing new tactics into play and a new intent to tackle illegal migration and break the business model of the criminal gangs.'
Many migrants without visas or permits departing France by sea attempt to cross to the UK in small, inflatable boats. They frequently pay large sums of money to gangs who arrange the boats in northern France. Journeys can be incredibly dangerous and people have died making the crossing.
Under a new agreement, France would agree to take back asylum seekers who have crossed over to the UK and who cannot prove a family connection to the UK. For each migrant France takes back, the UK would grant asylum to one migrant from France who can prove a family connection to the UK.
During the initial stages of the agreement, details of which were reported by French newspaper Le Monde, the UK would initially send about 50 migrants to France per week. Le Monde also reported that the UK would only be able to return 2,600 migrants in a single year.
The UK press quoted a government source on Thursday that plans would be scaled up if the initial scheme is successful.
Who is to blame for the influx of people by boat to the UK?
Both France and the UK have laid the blame on each other.
One of France's main criticisms of the UK is that it attracts migrants without visas because UK laws are too lenient or not adequately enforced. In his speech to Parliament during his state visit on Tuesday, Macron said that one-third of all migrants arriving in France intend to move on to the UK.
During negotiations with the UK 18 months ago when he was interior minister, Gerald Darmanin, France's current justice minister, said: 'Britain must do something to make itself less attractive and change the rules of their labour market because you can work without papers in the UK,' he said.
The UK disputes this, saying people are drawn to it because of family or diaspora ties, as well as many being able to speak English. Instead, some politicians in the UK have blamed France for not policing its northern shores enough. However, Starmer is also expected to unveil new plans to crack down harder on illegal work in the UK.
France, in turn, says it is making huge efforts to deter migrant departures from northern beaches and to take action against people-smuggling gangs.
Why is this agreement being discussed now?
The deal is being discussed because of the rising number of unauthorised migrants arriving from France to the UK, Peter Walsh, a senior researcher at the Migration Observatory at Oxford University, told Al Jazeera.
Just one year since Starmer's Labour party won a landslide election, the prime minister's popularity has tanked in the UK – in large part because of the failure to stop undocumented migration – while support for the far-right, anti-migration Reform UK party has soared.
In particular, Reform's manifesto pledges to clamp down on migrants coming to the UK in small boats. It states: 'Illegal migrants who come to the UK will be detained and deported. And if needed, migrants in small boats will be picked up and taken back to France.'
The Conservative Party, which was in power before Starmer won last year's general election, pledged to impose a binding cap for legal migration and to deport asylum seekers who arrive by irregular means to Rwanda for processing and potential resettlement. Labour scrapped this plan as soon as it came to power.
As of July 7, immigration and asylum stand as the most significant issue in the UK, at 51 percent, according to polling by YouGov.
According to commentary in UK media, Starmer's meeting with Macron also holds symbolic significance, as it allows the British PM to show that he has been able to maintain a good relationship with his main European partners since he negotiated a 'reset' trade deal with the EU in May.
How many people cross the English Channel in small boats each year?
This year, 21,117 people crossed the English Channel from France to the UK in small boats as of July 6, according to UK government data. This was a 56 percent increase in the number of people crossing in small boats during the same period in 2024.
In the whole of 2024, nearly 37,000 people crossed the English Channel in small boats, bringing the weekly average to about 700 arrivals.
In the past year, 73 people have died trying to cross the English Channel, the highest number recorded in one year so far, according to data by the International Organization for Migration (IOM), an intergovernmental organisation within the United Nations.
Small boat arrivals made up one-third of all asylum applications in 2024, according to an analysis by the Migration Observatory based on statistics from the UK Home Office.
Why do so many people make this risky crossing?
Walsh told Al Jazeera that people take the risk to cross the Channel for a wide range of reasons. 'One is the presence of family members, friends, and members of their community already in the UK,' he said.
He explained that because the UK is no longer part of the EU following Brexit, it does not have access to the bloc's asylum fingerprint database any more. Therefore, British authorities cannot know if people who arrive in small boats have already claimed asylum in an EU country.
'If it did, the UK would be able to dismiss the claims,' he said. 'The UK is also no longer a part of the Dublin system that would allow for such asylum claimants to be returned to the EU. Migrants understand this, so view reaching the UK as giving them another chance at securing residence in the UK.'
The Dublin regulation – the framework for the EU's rules on asylum seekers – establishes the criteria that determine which EU member state is responsible for examining asylum applications submitted by someone who is originally from a third country.
Between 2018 and 2024, 68 percent of asylum applications from migrants who arrived in small boats were granted in the UK. This was higher than the grant rate for asylum applications generally, which was 57 percent for the same duration. This may be another reason people are attracted to the UK, experts say.
What steps have France and the UK taken to stop boats crossing the English Channel?
In March 2023, the UK, under former Conservative PM Rishi Sunak, signed a three-year deal with France, under which the UK agreed to pay France 480 million pounds ($650m) to tighten its border patrols and surveillance.
Under this deal, France agreed to deploy 500 officers and provide a new detention centre in France, which would be operational by the end of 2026. France also agreed to increase funding for stricter enforcement, without specifying the amount of money.
Separately, in June this year, France agreed to come up with a plan to intercept small boats heading to the UK, for the first time, expanding its navy with six patrol boats that will rescue migrants but also intercept them from heading to the UK.
Paris has agreed to do this for boats which are within 300 metres (1,000ft) from the French shore, and has asked the UK for extra funding to fund the police and equipment to enforce these interceptions, according to UK media.
French police have recently taken to damaging the small boats, slashing their rubber frames with knives. The French Interior Ministry told The Associated Press that the police had not been ordered to do this, however.
What are the criticisms of the new deal under discussion?
Since an average of 700 migrants enter the UK by small boat each week, if the UK government sends an average of 50 people back to France per week, that would amount to just one in 14 being returned.
Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp of the opposition Conservative Party told The Times newspaper: 'This deal will mean that 94 percent of illegal migrants crossing the Channel will get to stay. That is pathetic and will not deter anyone. By contrast, the Rwanda deterrent would have seen 100 percent of illegal migrants removed and that would have worked to deter people crossing the Channel. Keir Starmer's failure continues.'
The plan could potentially face a legal challenge under the UN Refugee Convention, which mandates asylum seekers' rights to request protection.
French officials are also critical of the deal, cautious it could result in France becoming a 'return hub' for migrants that the UK refuses to accept. 'We are putting ourselves into the hands of the British without minimal reciprocal elements,' an unnamed French official involved in the talks told Le Monde.
The policy could also provide ammunition against Macron for his right-wing political critics, who may question why he has agreed to take back migrants wanting to live in Britain.
The UK is not subject to the EU's Dublin regulations, while France is. This makes the status of migrants returning from Britain to France unclear, causing concern among other European nations, who are upset with France for bilaterally negotiating the deal without consulting the EU.
'Why should other Europeans be obliged to take these returns under EU, Dublin rules when they result from French obligation under a bilateral deal with the UK, a non-EU member, that France negotiated without asking us?' The Times quoted an unnamed EU diplomat as saying on Thursday.
A deal is also opposed by the southern European countries of Cyprus, Greece, Italy, Malta and Spain, who have been receiving unauthorised migrants at an increasing rate, the Financial Times reported. These countries are concerned that if migrants are sent back to France from the UK, they may try to enter southern Europe from France instead.
As the 2000s came to a close, the immigrant population multiplied by more than fivefold in Spain, Italy and Greece, according to a 2016 research article written by scholars from the University of Liege in Belgium.
Reform UK leader Nigel Farage said on Wednesday during Prime Minister's Questions in Parliament that the UK must refuse to accept 'undocumented males' coming in small boats as part of a deal with France. Farage said Starmer should not bow to an 'increasingly arrogant, anti-Brexit French president'. Starmer responded, saying Farage's approach is to 'break everything and claim that's how you fix things'.
Weighing the viability of an agreement between Paris and London, Walsh said: 'A returns deal may have an impact if it affects enough people. We don't know how many people could plausibly be returned to France under this deal, but there's a risk that if an insufficiently low share of individuals are returned, then people wishing to reach the UK by small boat may see the risk of return as another risk worth taking – alongside the much greater risk of getting in a small boat.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al Jazeera
38 minutes ago
- Al Jazeera
France's decision to recognise Palestine ups pressure on UK's Starmer
France's decision to recognise Palestine ups pressure on UK's Starmer NewsFeed UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, under pressure to recognise a Palestinian state, said he would do so only as part of a wider peace deal. His Labour-led government is facing growing calls to recognise a Palestinian state after France said it will and a cross-party group of parliamentarians urged Starmer to act before it is too late. Video Duration 00 minutes 35 seconds 00:35 Video Duration 01 minutes 47 seconds 01:47 Video Duration 01 minutes 31 seconds 01:31 Video Duration 01 minutes 40 seconds 01:40 Video Duration 02 minutes 57 seconds 02:57 Video Duration 03 minutes 36 seconds 03:36 Video Duration 03 minutes 40 seconds 03:40


Al Jazeera
3 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
UK's Starmer faces mounting pressure to recognise Palestinian state
More than 200 lawmakers in the United Kingdom have called on the British government to recognise a Palestinian state, as pressure mounts on Prime Minister Keir Starmer to take concrete action amid Israel's war on Gaza. Some 221 MPs from across the political spectrum signed an open letter on Friday calling on Starmer's Labour government to recognise a Palestinian state in advance of a United Nations conference on Palestine next week. 'We are expectant that the outcome of the conference will be the UK Government outlining when and how it will act on its long-standing commitment on a two-state solution; as well as how it will work with international partners to make this a reality,' the letter reads. 'Whilst we appreciate the UK does not have it in its power to bring about a free and independent Palestine, UK recognition would have a significant impact due to our historic connections and our membership on the UN Security Council, so we urge you to take this step.' Parliamentarians from nine political parties were among the signatories, Labour MP Sarah Champion said, including Labour, the Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, SNP, and the Greens. The letter comes as public anger is growing in the UK and around the world over Israel's continued bombardment and blockade of the Gaza Strip, which has spurred a deadly starvation crisis. 221 MPs, from 9 parties, have sent a joint letter to the Prime Minister & Foreign Secretary urging them to recognise Palestine as a state now — Sarah Champion (@SarahChampionMP) July 25, 2025 It also comes a day after French President Emmanuel Macron announced that France would recognise the State of Palestine at the UN in September. 'Consistent with its historic commitment to a just and lasting peace in the Middle East, I have decided that France will recognise the State of Palestine,' Macron said in a social media post on Thursday. 'I will make this solemn announcement before the United Nations General Assembly this coming September. The urgent priority today is to end the war in Gaza and to bring relief to the civilian population.' Macron's announcement drew the ire of Israeli leaders, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who said the move 'rewards terror'. But Netanyahu has faced widespread condemnation for Israel's continuing assault on Gaza, which has killed more than 59,000 Palestinians since it began in October 2023. Israel's blockade of the enclave has caused a deepening humanitarian crisis, with the United Nations and top human rights groups reporting that many Palestinian children are now suffering from severe malnutrition and at risk of death. In a statement on Friday, Starmer said 'the appalling scenes in Gaza are unrelenting'. 'The continued captivity of hostages, the starvation and denial of humanitarian aid to the Palestinian people, the increasing violence from extremist settler groups, and Israel's disproportionate military escalation in Gaza are all indefensible,' he said. But Starmer stopped short of announcing plans to recognise a Palestinian state, instead saying he was working 'on a pathway to peace in the region'. 'That pathway will set out the concrete steps needed to turn the ceasefire so desperately needed, into a lasting peace,' he said. 'Recognition of a Palestinian state has to be one of those steps. I am unequivocal about that. But it must be part of a wider plan which ultimately results in a two-state solution and lasting security for Palestinians and Israelis.' Reporting from a protest outside Starmer's residence in London on Friday afternoon, Al Jazeera's Milena Veselinovic said demonstrators expressed 'outrage' at the British government's stance amid the dire situation in Gaza. 'Many of them feel powerless, so one of the only things they can do is gather here, make as much noise as they can, and hope that it will be noticed by the people in power,' she said. 'They want Keir Starmer to do more with the power that he has, and with the influence that he has, to put an end to this.' In addition to recognising a Palestinian state, the British government has faced growing calls to sanction Israel and impose an arms embargo against the country. Veselinovic said Starmer is in 'a difficult diplomatic situation' as he prepares to meet United States President Donald Trump, who was travelling to Scotland on Friday. She explained that Macron's announcement added pressure on the UK, which is a close ally of both France and the US, to also recognise a Palestinian state, but noted that Trump has criticised the French president's move. 'It does seem like a gulf is emerging here over what the European stance is overall, which is much more aligned with what UN aid agencies are saying is going on on the ground in Gaza, and the American position, which seems to nearly 100 percent back whatever is the Israeli government's version of events is,' she said. 'And in the middle of that is Keir Starmer, who wants to maintain good relations with both sides.'


Al Jazeera
4 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Iran holds ‘frank' nuclear talks with European powers amid sanctions threat
Iranian diplomats say they held 'frank' nuclear talks with their counterparts from Germany, the United Kingdom and France, as Tehran faces warnings that the three European nations could trigger 'snapback' United Nations sanctions against the country. The meeting in the Turkish capital, Istanbul, on Friday was the first since Israel's mid-June attack on Iran, which led to an intensive 12-day conflict that saw the United States launch strikes against key Iranian nuclear sites. Israel's offensive also derailed US-Iran nuclear talks that began in April. Since then, the European powers, known as the E3, have threatened to trigger a so-called 'snapback mechanism' under a moribund 2015 nuclear deal that would reinstate UN sanctions on Iran by the end of August. Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi, who attended Friday's talks alongside senior Iranian diplomat Majid Takht-Ravanchi, said after the meeting that the parties held a 'serious, frank and detailed' discussion about sanctions relief and the nuclear issue. 'While seriously criticising their stances regarding the recent war of aggression against our people, we explained our principled positions, including on the so-called snapback mechanism,' Gharibabadi said. 'It was agreed that consultations on this matter will continue.' The European countries, along with China and Russia, are the remaining parties to the 2015 deal, from which the US unilaterally withdrew in 2018. Under the pact, known formally as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), Iran had agreed to curb its nuclear programme in exchange for global sanctions relief. Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei said in an earlier interview with state news agency IRNA that Tehran considers talk of extending the UN resolution governing the deal – Security Council Resolution 2231 – to be doubly 'meaningless and baseless'. The resolution enshrines the major powers' prerogative to restore UN sanctions. The option to trigger the snapback expires in October, and Tehran has warned of consequences should the E3 opt to activate it. Separately, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) head Rafael Grossi said on Friday that Iran has indicated it will be ready to restart technical-level discussions on its nuclear programme with the UN nuclear watchdog. Grossi said in Singapore that Iran must be transparent about its facilities and activities. He told reporters that the IAEA had proposed that Iran start discussions on 'the modalities as to how to restart or begin [inspections] again'. 'So this is what we are planning to do, perhaps starting on technical details and, later on, moving on to high-level consultations. So this will not include inspections yet.' In late June, after the Israeli and US attacks on the country, Iran took an unequivocal stance against the IAEA, with Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi summarily dismissing Grossi's request to visit nuclear facilities that were bombed during the conflict. 'Grossi's insistence on visiting the bombed sites under the pretext of safeguards is meaningless and possibly even malign in intent,' Araghchi said at the time. Uranium enrichment Iranian diplomats have previously warned that Tehran could withdraw from the global nuclear non-proliferation treaty if UN sanctions are reimposed. Restoring the sanctions would deepen Iran's international isolation and place further pressure on its already strained economy. Before the June conflict, Washington and Tehran were divided over uranium enrichment, which Iran has described as a 'non-negotiable' right for civilian purposes but the US calls a 'red line'. The IAEA says Iran is enriching uranium to 60 percent purity – far above the 3.67 percent cap under the 2015 deal, but well below the 90 percent needed for weapons-grade levels. Tehran has said it is open to discussing the rate and level of enrichment, but not the right to enrich uranium. Iran also says it will not abandon its nuclear programme, which Araghchi has called a source of 'national pride'.