logo
What's in the one-in-one-out migrant deal between the UK and France?

What's in the one-in-one-out migrant deal between the UK and France?

Al Jazeera10-07-2025
The United Kingdom and France are close to a new agreement aimed at preventing tens of thousands of migrants from crossing the English Channel from France in small boats, UK media reported on Thursday.
French President Emmanuel Macron arrived in London on Tuesday for a three-day visit, marking the first state visit by a European leader since Britain's exit from the European Union.
Here is all we know about the 'one-in-one-out' migrant deal being discussed during a bilateral summit between Macron and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer in London.
What's in the deal Macron and Starmer are discussing?
The deal is aimed at deterring migrants from making dangerous trips across the English Channel from France to the UK in small boats. This year so far, more than 20,000 people have undertaken this journey.
At the start of the summit with Macron on Thursday, Starmer said the two must 'apply our collective strength and leadership' to the challenges of undocumented migration.
'We all agree that the situation in the Channel cannot go on as it is so we're bringing new tactics into play and a new intent to tackle illegal migration and break the business model of the criminal gangs.'
Many migrants without visas or permits departing France by sea attempt to cross to the UK in small, inflatable boats. They frequently pay large sums of money to gangs who arrange the boats in northern France. Journeys can be incredibly dangerous and people have died making the crossing.
Under a new agreement, France would agree to take back asylum seekers who have crossed over to the UK and who cannot prove a family connection to the UK. For each migrant France takes back, the UK would grant asylum to one migrant from France who can prove a family connection to the UK.
During the initial stages of the agreement, details of which were reported by French newspaper Le Monde, the UK would initially send about 50 migrants to France per week. Le Monde also reported that the UK would only be able to return 2,600 migrants in a single year.
The UK press quoted a government source on Thursday that plans would be scaled up if the initial scheme is successful.
Who is to blame for the influx of people by boat to the UK?
Both France and the UK have laid the blame on each other.
One of France's main criticisms of the UK is that it attracts migrants without visas because UK laws are too lenient or not adequately enforced. In his speech to Parliament during his state visit on Tuesday, Macron said that one-third of all migrants arriving in France intend to move on to the UK.
During negotiations with the UK 18 months ago when he was interior minister, Gerald Darmanin, France's current justice minister, said: 'Britain must do something to make itself less attractive and change the rules of their labour market because you can work without papers in the UK,' he said.
The UK disputes this, saying people are drawn to it because of family or diaspora ties, as well as many being able to speak English. Instead, some politicians in the UK have blamed France for not policing its northern shores enough. However, Starmer is also expected to unveil new plans to crack down harder on illegal work in the UK.
France, in turn, says it is making huge efforts to deter migrant departures from northern beaches and to take action against people-smuggling gangs.
Why is this agreement being discussed now?
The deal is being discussed because of the rising number of unauthorised migrants arriving from France to the UK, Peter Walsh, a senior researcher at the Migration Observatory at Oxford University, told Al Jazeera.
Just one year since Starmer's Labour party won a landslide election, the prime minister's popularity has tanked in the UK – in large part because of the failure to stop undocumented migration – while support for the far-right, anti-migration Reform UK party has soared.
In particular, Reform's manifesto pledges to clamp down on migrants coming to the UK in small boats. It states: 'Illegal migrants who come to the UK will be detained and deported. And if needed, migrants in small boats will be picked up and taken back to France.'
The Conservative Party, which was in power before Starmer won last year's general election, pledged to impose a binding cap for legal migration and to deport asylum seekers who arrive by irregular means to Rwanda for processing and potential resettlement. Labour scrapped this plan as soon as it came to power.
As of July 7, immigration and asylum stand as the most significant issue in the UK, at 51 percent, according to polling by YouGov.
According to commentary in UK media, Starmer's meeting with Macron also holds symbolic significance, as it allows the British PM to show that he has been able to maintain a good relationship with his main European partners since he negotiated a 'reset' trade deal with the EU in May.
How many people cross the English Channel in small boats each year?
This year, 21,117 people crossed the English Channel from France to the UK in small boats as of July 6, according to UK government data. This was a 56 percent increase in the number of people crossing in small boats during the same period in 2024.
In the whole of 2024, nearly 37,000 people crossed the English Channel in small boats, bringing the weekly average to about 700 arrivals.
In the past year, 73 people have died trying to cross the English Channel, the highest number recorded in one year so far, according to data by the International Organization for Migration (IOM), an intergovernmental organisation within the United Nations.
Small boat arrivals made up one-third of all asylum applications in 2024, according to an analysis by the Migration Observatory based on statistics from the UK Home Office.
Why do so many people make this risky crossing?
Walsh told Al Jazeera that people take the risk to cross the Channel for a wide range of reasons. 'One is the presence of family members, friends, and members of their community already in the UK,' he said.
He explained that because the UK is no longer part of the EU following Brexit, it does not have access to the bloc's asylum fingerprint database any more. Therefore, British authorities cannot know if people who arrive in small boats have already claimed asylum in an EU country.
'If it did, the UK would be able to dismiss the claims,' he said. 'The UK is also no longer a part of the Dublin system that would allow for such asylum claimants to be returned to the EU. Migrants understand this, so view reaching the UK as giving them another chance at securing residence in the UK.'
The Dublin regulation – the framework for the EU's rules on asylum seekers – establishes the criteria that determine which EU member state is responsible for examining asylum applications submitted by someone who is originally from a third country.
Between 2018 and 2024, 68 percent of asylum applications from migrants who arrived in small boats were granted in the UK. This was higher than the grant rate for asylum applications generally, which was 57 percent for the same duration. This may be another reason people are attracted to the UK, experts say.
What steps have France and the UK taken to stop boats crossing the English Channel?
In March 2023, the UK, under former Conservative PM Rishi Sunak, signed a three-year deal with France, under which the UK agreed to pay France 480 million pounds ($650m) to tighten its border patrols and surveillance.
Under this deal, France agreed to deploy 500 officers and provide a new detention centre in France, which would be operational by the end of 2026. France also agreed to increase funding for stricter enforcement, without specifying the amount of money.
Separately, in June this year, France agreed to come up with a plan to intercept small boats heading to the UK, for the first time, expanding its navy with six patrol boats that will rescue migrants but also intercept them from heading to the UK.
Paris has agreed to do this for boats which are within 300 metres (1,000ft) from the French shore, and has asked the UK for extra funding to fund the police and equipment to enforce these interceptions, according to UK media.
French police have recently taken to damaging the small boats, slashing their rubber frames with knives. The French Interior Ministry told The Associated Press that the police had not been ordered to do this, however.
What are the criticisms of the new deal under discussion?
Since an average of 700 migrants enter the UK by small boat each week, if the UK government sends an average of 50 people back to France per week, that would amount to just one in 14 being returned.
Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp of the opposition Conservative Party told The Times newspaper: 'This deal will mean that 94 percent of illegal migrants crossing the Channel will get to stay. That is pathetic and will not deter anyone. By contrast, the Rwanda deterrent would have seen 100 percent of illegal migrants removed and that would have worked to deter people crossing the Channel. Keir Starmer's failure continues.'
The plan could potentially face a legal challenge under the UN Refugee Convention, which mandates asylum seekers' rights to request protection.
French officials are also critical of the deal, cautious it could result in France becoming a 'return hub' for migrants that the UK refuses to accept. 'We are putting ourselves into the hands of the British without minimal reciprocal elements,' an unnamed French official involved in the talks told Le Monde.
The policy could also provide ammunition against Macron for his right-wing political critics, who may question why he has agreed to take back migrants wanting to live in Britain.
The UK is not subject to the EU's Dublin regulations, while France is. This makes the status of migrants returning from Britain to France unclear, causing concern among other European nations, who are upset with France for bilaterally negotiating the deal without consulting the EU.
'Why should other Europeans be obliged to take these returns under EU, Dublin rules when they result from French obligation under a bilateral deal with the UK, a non-EU member, that France negotiated without asking us?' The Times quoted an unnamed EU diplomat as saying on Thursday.
A deal is also opposed by the southern European countries of Cyprus, Greece, Italy, Malta and Spain, who have been receiving unauthorised migrants at an increasing rate, the Financial Times reported. These countries are concerned that if migrants are sent back to France from the UK, they may try to enter southern Europe from France instead.
As the 2000s came to a close, the immigrant population multiplied by more than fivefold in Spain, Italy and Greece, according to a 2016 research article written by scholars from the University of Liege in Belgium.
Reform UK leader Nigel Farage said on Wednesday during Prime Minister's Questions in Parliament that the UK must refuse to accept 'undocumented males' coming in small boats as part of a deal with France. Farage said Starmer should not bow to an 'increasingly arrogant, anti-Brexit French president'. Starmer responded, saying Farage's approach is to 'break everything and claim that's how you fix things'.
Weighing the viability of an agreement between Paris and London, Walsh said: 'A returns deal may have an impact if it affects enough people. We don't know how many people could plausibly be returned to France under this deal, but there's a risk that if an insufficiently low share of individuals are returned, then people wishing to reach the UK by small boat may see the risk of return as another risk worth taking – alongside the much greater risk of getting in a small boat.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UK to airdrop aid in Gaza, evacuate children needing medical care
UK to airdrop aid in Gaza, evacuate children needing medical care

Al Jazeera

time6 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

UK to airdrop aid in Gaza, evacuate children needing medical care

The United Kingdom says it is working with Jordan on 'forward plans' to airdrop aid into besieged Gaza and evacuate children needing medical care as Israel's forced starvation and bombardment of Palestinians fuel global outrage. Two infants on Saturday became the latest Palestinian children to die from malnutrition. The total number of starvation deaths in the territory has risen to more than 120, including more than 80 children. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer confirmed the proposal on Saturday in an emergency call with French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. In a readout of the call, the UK government said the leaders had agreed 'it would be vital to ensure robust plans are in place to turn an urgently needed ceasefire into lasting peace,' according to Britain's Press Association. 'The prime minister set out how the UK will also be taking forward plans to work with partners such as Jordan to airdrop aid and evacuate children requiring medical assistance,' the readout said. Starmer's Labour government has been roundly accused at home of doing too little too late to alleviate the intense suffering of Palestinians in Gaza. Hundreds of thousands of people in the UK have been protesting weekly against Israel's genocidal war since October 2023, making it clear they feel their voices aren't being heard. Public anger has been further stoked as police in the UK arrested more than 100 people at peaceful protests across the country last weekend that called for a ban on the campaign group Palestine Action to be reversed. Demonstrations took place on Saturday in Manchester, Edinburgh, Bristol, Truro and London as part of a campaign coordinated by Defend Our Juries. Starmer is also facing mounting pressure to recognise a Palestinian state as France has said it will do at the United Nations General Assembly meeting in September. More than 200 British parliamentarians urged the prime minister to take this course of action this week. There has been further controversy over accusations the UK government has continued with arms sales to Israel despite stating it had scaled back weapons sales. A report in May found that UK firms have continued to export military items to Israel despite a government suspension in September amid allegations that the UK Parliament has been deliberately 'misled'. The report by the Palestinian Youth Movement, Progressive International and Workers for a Free Palestine revealed that the UK sent '8,630 separate munitions since the suspensions took effect, all in the category 'Bombs, Grenades, Torpedoes, Mines, Missiles And Similar Munitions Of War And Parts Thereof-Other'. 'Waiting for the green light to get into Gaza' In the meantime, Philippe Lazzarini, head of the UN Palestinian refugee agency (UNRWA), said proposed airdrops of aid would be an expensive, inefficient 'distraction' that could kill starving Palestinians. Israel said on Friday that it will allow airdrops of food and supplies from foreign countries into Gaza in the coming days in response to critical food shortages caused by its punishing months-long blockade. But in a social media post, Lazzarini said the airdrops would 'not reverse the deepening starvation' and called instead for Israel to 'lift the siege, open the gates [and] guarantee safe movements [and] dignified access to people in need.' Airdrops, he said, are 'expensive, inefficient [and] can even kill starving civilians'. 'A manmade hunger can only be addressed by political will,' he said, calling on Israel to allow the UN and its partners to operate at scale in Gaza 'without bureaucratic or political hurdles'. He said UNRWA has the equivalent of 6,000 trucks in Jordan and Egypt 'waiting for the green light to get into Gaza'. 'Driving aid through is much easier, more effective, faster, cheaper and safer' than airdrops, he said, adding that it is also more dignified for the people of Gaza. More than 100 aid and human rights groups this week called on governments to take urgent action as a hunger crisis engulfs Gaza, including by demanding an immediate and permanent ceasefire and the lifting of all restrictions on humanitarian aid. In a statement signed and released on Wednesday by 109 organisations, including Mercy Corps, the Norwegian Refugee Council and Doctors Without Borders (also known as MSF), the groups warned that deepening starvation of the population was spreading across the besieged enclave.

Trump in Scotland: How's his trip going and what's on the agenda?
Trump in Scotland: How's his trip going and what's on the agenda?

Al Jazeera

time13 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

Trump in Scotland: How's his trip going and what's on the agenda?

When Donald Trump re-won the United States presidency in last year's election, the Dumfries and Galloway News in Scotland greeted the news with this headline: 'South West Scotland Hotelier Becomes President Of America For Second Time'. That more playful approach – a sign that the locals thought Trump, who owns luxury golf courses in Scotland, an amusement – now seems to have soured. The National, Scotland's pro-independence newspaper, greeted his arrival for a four-day visit this week with the following headline: 'Convicted US Felon To Arrive In Scotland'. So why is Trump visiting Scotland, and what's on the agenda for his trip? How has Trump been received in Scotland? Trump's links to Scotland go back to his mother. While his father, Fred, was the son of German immigrants, Trump's mother, Mary Anne MacLeod, was a Scottish immigrant to the US – born in the village of Tong on the Isle of Lewis. Trump has made much of this connection and his love of Scotland, in general, while also making grand pledges about what his golf courses will do for tourism there. On Friday, he arrived in the small Ayrshire village of Turnberry, where he headed off for some golf, before a meeting with United Kingdom Prime Minister Keir Starmer for talks on trade on Monday. Trump Turnberry has two golf championship courses – the Ailsa (four times host to the Open Championship) and King Robert the Bruce. Turnberry, a tiny place of about 200 people, may have seemed like a good spot to escape wider troubles, as well. Trump still can't shake off speculation, including from many in his MAGA fan base, about his friendship with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Last week, the Wall Street Journal claimed Trump had sent Epstein a birthday note featuring a naked woman and text which read: 'Happy Birthday – and may every day be another wonderful secret.' It reported that a book given to Epstein in 2003 included letters from both Trump and Bill Clinton. On Friday, a Scottish reporter shouted at Trump: 'Are you in Scotland to escape legal problems?' He didn't reply. Some people also turned up to protest against his visit to Scotland on Friday. One protester in Turnberry was holding a sign that read: 'Scotland hated Trump before it was fashionable.' Other protest signs were less polite. Stephen Flynn, a Scottish National Party MP who is notably bald, said he wouldn't meet Trump since he would be busy 'washing his hair'. Dominic Hinde, an author and journalist based in Glasgow, said: 'Scotland doesn't need to kowtow to the White House in the way that the Westminster bubble does. We can afford to be rude in a way that Keir Starmer can't. He played on his Scottish routes and expected to be welcomed like a king every time. His reception has only got worse and worse. We don't want much to do with his kind of politics.' Because of this fuss and an assassination attempt during his election campaign last year, Turnberry became temporary home to 5,000 police officers, army trucks and road checkpoints on Friday. This is the biggest and most expensive security operation since the death of Queen Elizabeth II. Trump also plans to visit his golf course in Balmedie, near Aberdeen, as well as a new course set to open in August, during his four-day trip that is due to end on July 29. Why are some Scots angry with Trump? A dispute between Trump and local people began 14 years ago over a plan to build wind turbines that would be visible from his golf course in Aberdeenshire. He wanted them halted, calling them 'monstrosities' that would only hurt tourism. He failed to stop the wind farms, but he remains against both wind and solar power. During previous talks, Trump has asked Starmer to ditch wind and ramp up oil production. He claims offshore wind turbines are 'driving the whales crazy'. But around half of all Scotland's electricity comes from wind. Trump's golf course in Aberdeenshire has also proved controversial. Conservation groups say the course has destroyed nearby dunes. The course has also struggled to make a profit or employ as many people as had been hoped. The Stop Trump Scotland protest group made its opposition to him clear on Friday. It said: 'The people of Scotland don't want to roll out a welcome mat for Donald Trump, whose government is accelerating the spread of climate breakdown around the world.' What will Trump discuss with the UK's prime minister? Talks with Keir Starmer will centre on refining a US-UK trade deal made in June, which set a 10 percent tariff on British goods going to the US. It also expanded access to US goods in the British market and set tariffs on the first 100,000 UK vehicles exported to the US annually at 10 percent, compared with 25 percent for other countries. In 2024, the UK shipped about 106,000 cars worth 9 billion pounds ($12.1bn) – including luxury brands such as Jaguar, Rolls Royce and Aston Martin, to the US, according to car manufacturers and the UK's Office for National Statistics (ONS). The UK is now hoping to have a 25 percent tariff on UK steel and aluminium lowered, although that already compares favourably with a 50 percent duty for the rest of the world on the same goods. Philip Shaw, an economist at Investec in London, said: 'The UK is in a relatively good position in that Trump has raised most tariffs on UK exports by only 10 percent and that Britain is facing a 10 percent tariff on most of its car exports, and not 25 percent levies, as the majority of other countries are. A good result would be a tariff-free trade deal, but that would be difficult to achieve in normal circumstances, let alone now.' Trump has claimed that the UK gets a better deal than other large economies, saying at the Group of Seven (G7) summit in June: 'The UK is very well protected. You know why? Because I like them. That's their ultimate protection.' On Friday Chancellor Rachel Reeves said: 'It's in Britain's national interest to have strong relations with the US administration and as a result of both that long-term special relationship, but also more importantly, the work that our Prime Minister Keir Starmer has done in building that relationship with President Trump has meant that we were the first country in the world to secure a trade deal.' However, Kathleen Brooks, research director at UK investment group XTB, said: 'While the UK was 'blessed' with an early trade deal, it has not helped the UK's economic predicament, as yet. 'The fact Trump has come to Scotland as the EU continues to wait for confirmation about its tariff rates with the US is interesting. Trump also has golf courses in Ireland, so his choice to visit Scotland could be seen as a rebuttal to the EU. It could also deflect some of the furore over the Epstein scandal.' Some Trump acolytes have been critical of the UK in general, saying it lacks freedom of speech and that London has 'no-go' zones. Starmer is thought unlikely to bring such matters up while he negotiates on trade. What else might come up? Trump is also due to meet Scottish First Minister John Swinney, who has made positive noises, saying: 'Scotland shares a strong friendship with the United States that goes back centuries. The partnership remains steadfast through economic, cultural and ancestral links – including, of course, with the president himself.' He has also pledged to raise issues beyond trade, such as the wars in Gaza and Ukraine. Trump will be back in the UK before too long, following this visit. A state visit with First Lady Melania is planned for September 17, when the president will be expected to meet King Charles and Queen Camilla at Windsor Castle.

UK blasts Hong Kong rewards for help to catch activists overseas
UK blasts Hong Kong rewards for help to catch activists overseas

Al Jazeera

time16 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

UK blasts Hong Kong rewards for help to catch activists overseas

The United Kingdom has condemned Hong Kong authorities for offering payment in exchange for assisting in the arrest of pro-democracy activists living in Britain, even as the British government begins the process of reinstating an extradition deal with the autonomous Chinese city. Foreign Secretary David Lammy and Home Secretary Yvette Cooper issued a joint statement on Friday shortly after Hong Kong announced cash rewards for information leading to the arrest of 19 pro-democracy activists based abroad, including in Britain, who are accused of violating the strict national security law imposed by Beijing in 2020. In their statement, Lammy and Cooper called on China to stop targeting opposition voices in Britain. 'The Hong Kong Police Force's issuing of further arrest warrants and bounties on individuals living in the UK is another example of transnational repression,' their statement read. The bounties range from 200,000 to one million Hong Kong dollars (about $25,000-$125,000), depending on the individual the Hong Kong authorities seek to arrest. This is the fourth time Hong Kong authorities have made reward offers, which have drawn strong criticism from Western countries, to which China, in turn, has denounced as 'interference'. In their statement, the two British ministers said that 'this Government will continue to stand with the people of Hong Kong, including those who have made the [United Kingdom] their home. We take the protection of their rights, freedoms, and safety very seriously'. But a recent proposal by the British government to reform extradition rules has prompted serious concerns, with some fearing it could pave the way for a resumption of extraditions to Hong Kong, which have been suspended since the 2020 national security law was enacted. On Friday, Al Jazeera reported that the UK Home Office applied to Parliament to make changes to the country's legislation regarding extradition on July 17, followed by a letter to Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp the next day. 'It is in our national interest to have effective extradition relationships to prevent criminals from evading justice and the UK becoming a haven for criminals,' the July 18 letter from Security Minister Dan Jarvis said. The Home Office also plans to restore an extradition framework with Chile and Zimbabwe, according to the letter, which was shared on X by Conservative MP Alicia Kearns. Cases for Hong Kong and Zimbabwe would both be considered on a 'case-by-case basis', Jarvis said. About 150,000 Hong Kong nationals migrated to the UK under a special visa scheme introduced in 2021. In 2024, legislators in Hong Kong approved a new national security law ­– referred to as Article 23 – that gave the government new powers to crack down on all forms of dissent on the grounds of alleged treason, espionage, sedition and external interference in Hong Kong's internal affairs. Since then, Hong Kong has been offering bounties for the arrest of activists who have fled the city while facing charges related to the pro-democracy protests. Hong Kong, a former British colony, is a particular sticking point for the UK due to its historical relationship and the sharp decline in political freedoms in Hong Kong since China imposed controversial national security legislation in 2020. The former British colony returned to Chinese rule in 1997 with the guarantee of a high degree of autonomy, including freedom of speech, under a 'one country, two systems' formula.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store