
What It Takes to Build an FDA-Approved Oncology Plant in India
India's pharmaceutical industry has earned its place as the world's largest supplier of generic medicines, with over 650 manufacturing facilities approved by the US FDA. This number positions India as the global custodian in generics. While this statistic is often cited to highlight scale, a more telling sign of maturity is the rising number of oncology plants built in India, not just to serve domestic markets but to meet the stringent regulatory standards of the US and EU. Among all drug categories, oncology manufacturing demands the most rigorous quality controls, cleanroom architecture, and data integrity systems. Building such a facility isn't a matter of scaling up what already exists. It's a fundamental shift in how a company thinks, plans, executes, and sustains compliance.
The difference begins with the product itself. Oncology drugs, especially those based on highly potent APIs, cytotoxics, or monoclonal antibodies, require full containment, sophisticated air-handling systems, and precise zone separation. Even minor lapses in cross-contamination or validation can result in patient harm. Unlike standard oral generics, oncology formulations often involve sterile injectables, lyophilised powders, or targeted biologics. Each step in the process, from material handling to packaging, must be validated against international GMP standards. They must undergo installation qualification (IQ), operational qualification (OQ), and performance qualification (PQ) validation and continuous environmental monitoring. These aren't mere upgrades to existing facilities. They are entirely new ecosystems built from the ground up.
The journey of getting FDA Approval begins long before a brick is laid. The process begins with site selection. This plays a critical role, especially when waste handling and zoning compliance for hazardous materials are involved. Pharma hubs in Gujarat, Baddi, Telangana, and Maharashtra offer infrastructural advantages, but even here, environmental clearance, utility design, and HVAC zoning take months to finalise.
The regulatory approvals run in parallel. Companies need to secure a state manufacturing license, followed by CDSCO approval and eventually, US FDA registration. In parallel, the design and construction teams work closely with quality and validation teams to establish protocols for cleanroom classification, air change rates, and water-for-injection (WFI) systems. Once construction is complete, validation begins with processes like IQ, OQ and PQ being run across all systems from HVAC to filling lines, and every deviation is documented and closed. This phase alone can stretch over six to nine months. In total, it can take two to three years from planning to inspection.
This integrated effort demands not just technical competence but cultural alignment. Companies that invest early in staff training, data integrity systems, and audit simulations are typically better prepared for FDA scrutiny. Those that delay often face the issuance of Form 483, an inspectional observation report listing any conditions that may violate the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. These findings range from incomplete batch records to deficiencies in aseptic processing and signal gaps in quality systems. As global inspections ramped up in recent times, foreign FDA drug inspections more than doubled from 130 in FY2021 to 262 in FY2022, where OAI outcomes have steadily declined, reflecting better inspection readiness and improved documentation culture.
The returns, however, justify the effort. Once approved, the facility gives huge access to the US and European markets, where oncology drugs represent one of the fastest-growing therapeutic segments. Mr. Vishwa Savla, the Managing Director and CEO of Pinnacle Life Science, which got US FDA Approval last year, said in this context, 'We knew from the beginning that if we got this right, it would change the trajectory of our company. Of course, it's a high-stakes investment, but the payoff is clear. My team was sure that this would take time, but we knew that we were building our capability for a lifetime once the facility was operational. And it's needless to emphasise that if you're serious about oncology, you have to build to FDA standards. There's no shortcut to that. The oncology pipeline demands long-term thinking, and FDA approval gave us a foothold in markets where both quality and trust are non-negotiable."
Ultimately, building an FDA‑licensed oncology plant in India demands capital, time, technical rigour, and cultural commitment. But with global oncology spending expected to exceed USD 375 billion by 2027, Indian companies that invest in compliance today are positioning themselves for long-term value not just commercially, but in terms of credibility and global impact.
(Disclaimer: The above press release comes to you under an arrangement with NRDPL and PTI takes no editorial responsibility for the same.). PTI
(This story has not been edited by News18 staff and is published from a syndicated news agency feed - PTI) view comments
First Published:
August 12, 2025, 12:00 IST
News agency-feeds What It Takes to Build an FDA-Approved Oncology Plant in India
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Doctor reveals how excessive liver problems can affect the brain
Image credits: Getty Images The liver is one of the largest and most important organs in the body. From filtering out toxins to transmitting nutrients and vitamins to the rest of the body, the organ is vital for the healthy maintenance of humans. However, when the liver is unable to filter out toxins from the blood or when the blood flow through the organ is blocked, the toxins build up in the body and can get into the brain. Now, in a video going viral on the internet, a doctor has revealed how this can be highly harmful to the body. The video has received over 1,007 likes. How do liver diseases affect brain health ? Image credits: Getty Images In the caption of the viral video, Dr Joseph Salhab, who goes by the name "thestomachdoc" and is a gastroenterologist, as per his Instagram bio explained how the process works. "Many people don't realize that cirrhosis, a severe form of chronic liver disease, can progress to a condition that can impact brain function: overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE)," said the caption. Overt hepatic encephalopathy can cause symptoms such as confusion, tremors, personality changes and other symptoms that might not seem connected to liver function. The caption also added that Xifaxan is the first and only FDA approved medicine that reduces the risk of OHE recurrence in adults. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Beyond Text Generation: An AI Tool That Helps You Write Better Grammarly Install Now Undo "Today I want to educate you about a condition called overt hepatic hepatic encephalopathy also known as OHE," began the doctor. "OHE is a complication of cirrhosis and occurs when the liver sustains damage and loses its ability to remove toxins from the bloodstream, effectively causing toxins to accumulate and lead to impaired brain function" "This leads to a range of mental and physical symptoms that can significantly impact a person's well being. Symptoms associated with an episode of OHE can include confusion, disorientation, severe personality changes, changes in sleep patterns, tremors and more which on the surface level may not seem connected to a decline in liver function but that's why I always advice speaking to a doctor about all of your symptoms," explained the doc. Treating the disease requires a diagnosis of the underlying health condition and the most common medications prescribed by healthcare providers Rifaximin and lactulose.


Business Standard
13 hours ago
- Business Standard
Alembic Pharma secures USFDA nod for generic acne cream
Alembic Pharmaceuticals said on Friday it has received final approval from the US Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) for its Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) Tretinoin Cream USP, 0.025%. The product is therapeutically equivalent to Bausch Health's Retin-A Cream, 0.025%, and is indicated for the topical treatment of acne vulgaris. The cream has an estimated market size of $94 million for the 12 months ended June 2025, according to IQVIA. With this nod, Alembics cumulative ANDA approvals now stand at 224, including 202 final and 22 tentative approvals. Alembic Pharmaceuticals is a vertically integrated research-driven company that manufactures and markets generic medicines globally. The company's consolidated net profit jumped 14.18% to Rs 156.63 crore while revenue from operations grew 9.54% to Rs 1,710.72 crore in Q1 June 2025 over Q1 June 2024.


New Indian Express
2 days ago
- New Indian Express
Odisha HC bins plea against OSMCL tender for NAT Testing units in 45 blood centres
However, the petitioner again raised objections, stating that no BIS certification currently exists for the product in question, thereby causing further prejudice to domestic bidders. Following additional representations, the tendering authority clarified that any one of the certifications - USFDA, European CE, or BIS - would be considered valid, and the bid would not be rejected solely for the lack of a specific certification. The deadline for bid submission was also extended to accommodate these changes. However, on August 11, the division bench of Chief Justice and Justice M S Raman declined to interfere, emphasising that the matter involves technical and public health considerations. The tender pertains to equipment used for detecting life-threatening diseases like HIV, HBV, and HCV in blood plasma, and ensuring precision and accuracy is of paramount importance, the bench noted in the order uploaded on Wednesday. Stressing judicial restraint in matters involving technical expertise, especially in the healthcare sector, the bench stated that its role is limited to examining whether the actions of the authorities align with constitutional and statutory provisions, and do not result in discrimination. Since no decision had yet been taken on bid acceptance or rejection, and the deadline for submission was still open, the court observed that the petition was based merely on presumption and apprehension.