Income tax update due next week after calls to increase Personal Allowance to £20,000
A petition calling on the UK Government to increase the Personal Allowance to £20,000 has attracted more than 248,000 signatures across the UK and is set to be debated in Parliament on Monday, May 12
An online petition urging for the personal tax allowance to be raised from £12,570 to £20,000 in order to assist low-income individuals "get off benefits and allow pensioners a decent income" is set to be debated by MPs in Parliament next week. This comes after the proposal garnered support from over 248,400 people across the UK.
However, a recent update from the UK Government regarding the potential impact of increasing the Personal Allowance to £20,000 seems to quash any hopes of seeing the income threshold freeze lifted before the planned rise with inflation in April 2028, reports the Daily Record.
In a written response to Labour MP Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi, Treasury Minister James Murray stated that the UK Government "has no plans to increase the Personal Allowance to £20,000".
Mr Murray said: "The Government is committed to keeping taxes for working people as low as possible while ensuring fiscal responsibility and so, at our first Budget, we decided not to extend the freeze on personal tax thresholds. The Government has no plans to increase the Personal Allowance to £20,000."
He further explained that raising the Personal Allowance to £20,000 would "come at a significant fiscal cost of many billions of pounds per annum". He added that this would "reduce tax receipts substantially, decreasing funds available for the UK's hospitals, schools, and other essential public services that we all rely on".
The Treasury Minister said, "It would also undermine the work the Chancellor has done to restore fiscal responsibility and economic stability, which are critical to getting our economy growing and keeping taxes, inflation, and mortgages as low as possible. The Government keeps all taxes under review as part of the policy making process. The Chancellor will announce any changes to the tax system at fiscal events in the usual way."
Upcoming debates could signal changes in the wind for taxpayers, as Westminster Hall braces for a fiery session on Monday, May 12. MPs will champion their constituents' calls for a hike to the Personal Allowance, with proceedings drawing to a close with a Treasury Minister making the case for persisting with the current freeze until the conclusion of the 2027/28 financial year.
Alan David Frost, the mind behind the petition, is calling it downright wrong to tax pensioners on their State Pension when it exceeds the personal allowance threshold. He's convinced that bumping up the allowance would pump more money into the economy.
The 'raise the income tax personal allowance from £12570 to £20000' petition clearly outlines the benefactors: "We think this would help low earners to get off benefits and allow pensioners a decent income. We think it is abhorrent to tax pensioners on their State Pension when it is over the personal allowance. We also think raising the personal allowance would lift many low earners out of benefits and inject more cash into the economy creating growth."
The Treasury, responding to a petition's proposals on February 20, echoed Mr Murray's sentiment. It stated: "The Government is committed to keeping taxes for working people as low as possible while ensuring fiscal responsibility and so, at our first Budget, we decided not to extend the freeze on personal tax thresholds."
Furthermore, it was made clear that there are no intentions by the UK Government to raise the Personal Allowance to £20,000. The full response is available to read on the petitions-parliament website.
State Pension payments 2025/26
Weekly State Pension payments increased on April 7, however, people will not see an immediate increase as the contributory benefit is paid in arrears.
Full New State Pension
Weekly payment: £230.25
Four-weekly payment: £921
Annual amount: £11,973
Full Basic State Pension
Weekly payment: £176.45
Four-weekly payment: £705.80
Annual amount: £9,175
To check your own future State Pension payments, use the online forecasting tool on GOV.UK here.
In terms of taxation, individuals receiving the full New State Pension will generally be exempt from income tax. However, older residents garnering additional funds through employment or personal retirement plans may have a tax liability.
Typically, tax for most is deducted automatically via PAYE on employment income or on private pensions. Those not paying tax automatically should expect a tax bill from HMRC the subsequent summer, due for payment by January of the following year.
There's been a fair amount of conjecture about the number of pensioners who will be taxed before the Personal Allowance freeze ends. However, it's worth noting that out of the 13 million State Pensioners in the UK, around 8.51 million (65%) already pay some tax in retirement, so this isn't a new phenomenon.
With auto-enrolment in the workplace now in its 13th year, more individuals are set to benefit from increased income in retirement and will likely pay tax - typically deducted from their private pension.
It's crucial to understand that any tax paid in retirement is based on the amount of income earned above the threshold - not the total additional income. For instance, if someone has a total annual income of £13,000, they will pay tax on £430 - the amount above the £12,570 threshold. Those affected would then have to pay HMRC 19 per cent of their income above the threshold, which is the starter rate of tax in Scotland (20% in England).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business News Wales
21 minutes ago
- Business News Wales
Changing Statutory Sick Pay Rules Is A Positive Step But It's Costly
This March, the UK Government announced changes to the Employment Rights Bill. If the Bill is approved, once it comes into effect employers would have to pay statutory sick pay (SSP) from day one of an employee's illness, rather than day four, as it was previously. As the People and Operations Director here at Mrs Buckét, we've always placed people at the heart of our business, many of whom have traditionally worked in physically demanding roles with lower pay and unsociable hours. The face of cleaning is changing and with it, the way we pay and treat our staff. At Mrs Buckét we have led the way and embraced this shift, something we are very proud of. However, for many businesses, these changes in SSP will be a significant additional cost, on top of recent increases to employer National Insurance contributions and the National Living Wage, which will create further financial strain. Companies aren't reimbursed for sickness costs – they have to swallow them, and for a business like ours, totally dependent on its workforce, that's a difficult balance. The UK Government is also proposing the removal of the Lower Earnings Limit (LEL) meaning employees earning less than £123 per week would now qualify for sick pay – either £116.75 per week or 80% of their weekly salary, whichever is lower. As a company with a large number of part-time workers, this again is going to have a big effect on us. Mrs Buckét is all about our people. They are our ambassadors and our flag bearers around Swansea, where we are based, and around South Wales and beyond where we have many clients. We are committed to looking after them and supporting them. But pressure is being felt across every sector at the moment, every penny is being squeezed out of every bid and every tender we go for, and cost pressures are mounting. We aren't going to change the way we currently treat or pay our staff. But it's important that there is a level of understanding from the Government of the impact on businesses who are having to pay for it all- we are feeling the pressure, and we are trying to navigate these new financial burdens without affecting quality or jobs. Professionalising and championing the cleaning industry is a key part of our ethos and there are positives to these changes – paying SSP from day one will make our workforce feel more valued, it will help with employee retention and I believe it will reduce the number of days people are off sick. It will have a positive impact on cleaning industry standards and practices. Still, we must acknowledge that it will also add to pricing pressure, it will add to our administration costs, it will stress our company's cash flow. Companies should already be looking after, investing and nurturing their staff – they shouldn't be forced into it by a policy change, but because it's the right thing to do. But this commitment also needs to be met with the understanding that small to medium-sized businesses are the lifeblood of the UK economy, and at some point, some may break under the continuing financial pressure of employment.
South Wales Guardian
an hour ago
- South Wales Guardian
United Ireland should be new state that ‘can be better for all of us'- Varadkar
Leo Varadkar also said he hopes the current Irish government takes the decision to establish a forum to lead discussions on unity, and also appeared to dismiss concerns of potential loyalist violence in reaction to a united Ireland. Mr Varadkar, who stood down as taoiseach in April last year, said he believes he will see a united Ireland in his lifetime but warned it is not inevitable. He said that he has had no regrets so far since leaving elected politics, and is enjoying both 'a lot of personal and intellectual freedom to say what I think'. He was speaking at an In Conversation event with Rev Karen Sethuraman at St Mary's University college in west Belfast, hosted by Feile an Phobail and Ireland's Future. Former Sinn Fein president and West Belfast MP Gerry Adams was among those in the audience for the event. Mr Varadkar stressed that a united Ireland 'has to be a new Ireland that is better for everyone'. 'That includes a bill of rights, guarantees civil protections and liberties,' he said. 'Unification, in my view, is not the annexation of six more counties by the Republic of Ireland. It's a new state and one that can be better for all of us, an opportunity that only comes around every 100 years, which is to design your state and design your constitution.' In terms of what the current Irish Government is doing, Mr Varadkar described the Shared Island Unit, which was set up when he was Taoiseach, as really positive. But he said he would like to see the Irish Government lead a forum ahead of unity. 'Just saying it as an aspiration isn't enough anymore, it should be an objective and an objective is something you act on,' he said. 'One of the ideas that I would put forward, which could help to move on this discussion, is the establishment of some sort of forum.' He said there was the New Ireland Forum in the 1980s, and the Forum for Peace and Reconciliation in the 1990s. 'I think there is a strong case now for us to convene the parties that are interested in talking about this, unions, business groups, civil society in a forum to have that discussion, but I don't see how that can happen if that isn't led by the Irish Government, and I hope at some point during the course of this five-year government, a decision will be taken to do that,' he said. Meanwhile, asked how he felt potential violent opposition to a united Ireland could be handled, Mr Varadkar suggested he felt 'only a very small minority may turn to violence'. 'I know there are people south of the border who, when I talk to them about reunification, express to me concerns that there might be a very small minority within unionism who may turn to violence,' he said. 'I don't think we should dismiss that as a possibility. I don't think it will happen, to be honest. 'In two referendums, both north and south, people would be very clearly giving their preference as to what should happen, it would be quite a different situation to when partition happened 100 years ago and it wasn't voted for. 'I don't think that would arise but I think it's a reasonable question.' Meanwhile, deputy First Minister Emma Little-Pengelly suggested Mr Varadkar was 'wrong in terms of the trajectory' towards a united Ireland, insisting the number of people voting for nationalist parties, around 40%, 'hasn't moved since 1998'. Mr Varadkar said he was in politics long enough to not respond to someone else's comments without hearing them in full, but said the case he is making is not just based on the percentage of people who vote for nationalist parties, adding it is clear the percentage voting for unionist parties has fallen. Earlier, Mr Varadkar visited nearby Colaiste Feirste where he heard about the growth in Irish medium education, and plans to build a new Irish Language Heritage and Interpretive Centre, An Spas Din. School principal Micheal Mac Giolla Ghunna said: 'We have grown a vibrant Irish language community from our base in the Gaeltacht Quarter, leading to challenges for us in terms of accommodation and teacher provision. 'But far from limiting our ambitions, we are now using the Sportlann facility and initiatives like our GaelStair heritage project to offer our pupils and the wider community further opportunities.'
South Wales Guardian
an hour ago
- South Wales Guardian
Lammy urges Iran and US to keep talking as Middle East conflict continues
The Foreign Secretary met his Iranian counterpart Abbas Araghchi in Geneva on Friday alongside foreign ministers from France and Germany and the EU's foreign policy chief. Following the meeting, Mr Lammy said the Europeans were 'keen to continue ongoing discussions and negotiations with Iran, and we urge Iran to continue their talks with the United States'. He added: 'We were clear: Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon.' Friday's meeting followed Donald Trump's statement that he would delay a decision on whether the US would join Israeli strikes against Iran for two weeks, raising the prospect of a negotiated solution to the crisis. German foreign minister Johann Wadephul said the group had left the room 'with the impression that the Iranian side is fundamentally ready to continue talking about all important issues'. Speaking to broadcasters after the meeting, Mr Lammy described the situation as 'perilous' and urged Iran to 'take that off ramp' and 'be serious about the diplomacy that is required at this moment'. He added that the US and Europe were pushing for Iran to agree to zero enrichment of uranium as a 'starting point' for negotiations. But Mr Araghchi said Iran would not negotiate with the US as long as Israel continued to carry out airstrikes against the country. Tel Aviv's campaign continued on Friday, with Israel saying its aircraft had hit military targets including missile-manufacturing facilities as it continues to attack locations connected with Iran's nuclear programme. Iran insists its nuclear programme is entirely peaceful. Meanwhile, the UK Government has announced it will use charter flights to evacuate Britons stranded in Israel once the country's airspace reopens. Number 10 said on Friday morning the situation remains 'fast-moving' and it will continue to be monitored closely. A spokesman added: 'We are advising British nationals to continue to register their presence in Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories, to be contactable with further guidance on these flights.' Mr Lammy said work is under way to provide the flights 'based on levels of demand' from UK citizens who want to leave the region. 'The UK will provide charter flights for British nationals from Tel Aviv when airspace reopens,' he said. 'The safety of British nationals remains our top priority.' According to the Israeli government, some 22,000 tourists are seeking to board evacuation flights. It is unclear how many of these may be UK citizens. Government advice for British nationals in the country remains to follow local guidance, as well as to let officials know about their presence within Israel or the Occupied Palestinian Territories. Land routes out of Israel remain open and British staff are on hand to support UK nationals who have crossed the border, he added. The move follows criticism of the Foreign Office's initial response, which saw family members of embassy staff evacuated while UK citizens were not advised to leave and told to follow local guidance. The Government said the move to temporarily withdraw family members had been a 'precautionary measure'. On Friday, the Foreign Office announced that UK staff had also been evacuated from Iran, with the embassy continuing to operate remotely.
