
Maine's public defense agency files a plan to solve constitutional crisis
Apr. 3—Maine's public defense agency says it will redirect several employees at its central office who oversee billing and training to instead work on finding lawyers for criminal defendants who have spent weeks or months waiting for an attorney.
Superior Court Justice Michaela Murphy had given the Maine Commission on Public Defense Services one month to share how they can increase representation after finding the state agency was violating Mainers' Sixth Amendment rights to representation as part of a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union of Maine. (The ACLU said it's still waiting to see if Murphy will find the entire state liable.)
Murphy suggested last month that the state's new public defenders, particularly those who are more experienced, should take on more cases. She also criticized the commission for relying on a messy spreadsheet compiled by court clerks, instead of tracking criminal defendants themselves.
As of Monday, there were approximately 400 pre-trial criminal defendants who needed an attorney, according to a list maintained by the courts. Roughly 140 had been on the list for more than two months. And at least 70 were in jail, with about 25 having been in custody for more than two weeks.
The commission agreed Thursday to reassign some administrative staff to focus on tracking and finding counsel for the state's unrepresented cases. As a result, some training will be placed on hold and staff will "adjust the level of scrutiny given to vouchers" submitted by attorneys seeking reimbursement for public defense work.
The new plan also suggested offering new incentives for private attorneys to join the commission's rosters, and emergency discussions on altering "perceived barriers" to the application process. (Some observers, including Gov. Janet Mills, have criticized the commission's caseload limits and eligibility requirements. The commission has previously disputed these are to blame.)
Much of the plan included only short-term commitments as the commission hopes to get more funding so it can increase its public defense presence throughout Maine, a state that relied exclusively on private, court-appointed lawyers until 2022.
Today, four of the state's five criminal public defense offices are less than a year old and still ramping up. Several counties in the Midcoast and southern Maine still don't have public defenders.
RELEASE, DIMISSAL DEADLINES
The commission wrote in court records that the number of defendants who need attorneys continues to drop, demonstrating their attention to the crisis.
On March 7, when Murphy issued her last order, there were 85 defendants who were in jail and needed lawyers. A month later, only six of those defendants are still in jail without an attorney, the commission stated. The reduction "resulted from the continuing efforts" of their staff and public defenders to representing their clients, the commission wrote.
The filing also contains several exhibits, including letters to prosecutors requesting they reevaluate some of the cases that have been languishing the longest and the commission's budget requests.
The plan submitted Thursday was part of a larger order issued by Murphy last month. It includes an April 7 hearing, for the judge to lay out her process for releasing anyone from jail who has been unrepresented for at least 14 days, unless the state can find them an attorney within the following week. She said she would drop charges against anyone who has waited more than 60 days for a lawyer (charges could be re-filed when an attorney is available.)
The potential release of those defendants has frightened victims' rights advocates, lawmakers and the governor.
Civil rights advocates who have been following Maine's crisis from other states say Murphy's deadlines aren't unusual, and similar timelines have been ordered in Oregon and Missouri.
"It's not just about funding lawyers to help guilty people get free — it's about funding our system so that the system works in as fair and accurate a way as possible. And that benefits all of us," said Daniel Medwed, a former public defender and professor at Northeastern University's School of Law.
EMERGENCY LEGISLATION
Meanwhile, lawmakers agreed Thursday afternoon to advance emergency legislation attempting to address the crisis.
LD 1101 would allow judges to appoint and pay an attorney who hasn't been approved by the commission — but only if no approved lawyers are available.
Lawmakers made several changes to the bill Thursday to address concerns the commission's director raised last month, questioning how these lawyers could be held accountable or paid accurately. The commission's Director Jim Billings said it would be premature for him to comment on the bill before the rest of the Legislature votes on it.
The bill now comes with a Feb. 1, 2026, sunset, and also clarifies that these non-rostered lawyers still have to have three years of related experience. Judges also can't appoint and pay anyone who has previously been disqualified by the commission and these attorneys have to use the same reimbursement voucher process as everyone else doing public defense.
The same bill includes more than $3 million for the commission to hire five new public defenders and additional support staff.
Despite the bill's bipartisan support — it was introduced by Democrats and endorsed by Senate Republican Leader Trey Stewart — the governor has not weighed in on the latest version and has previously opposed the commission's requests for more funding until the organization rolls back its eligibility requirements and caseload limits.
The governor's office didn't not respond to an email, seeking her reaction to the amended version of the bill.
Copy the Story Link
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Bill limiting protests at public universities awaits Gov. Abbott's approval
The Brief A new bill, SB 2972, limiting protests on Texas public university campuses has passed both the Senate and House. The bill prohibits activities like using amplified sound during class, protesting in the last two weeks of the semester, and wearing masks to conceal identity. Critics, including the ACLU of Texas, argue the bill violates First Amendment rights. AUSTIN - A bill that passed through the Texas legislature last weekend would prohibit certain times and locations of protests on public university campuses. Critics worry the bill is in direct violation of the First Amendment, as well as the Texas Constitution. Senate Bill 2972 defines "expressive activities" in the same manner as the First Amendment and the Texas Constitution, directly citing those documents to include assemblies, protests, speeches, the distribution of written materials, the carrying of signs, and the circulation of petitions. Under the new bill, the following would be prohibited at Texas universities: Using devices to amplify sound during class hours while engaging in expressive activities. Engaging in expressive activities during the last two weeks of the semester. Camping or setting up tents on campus. Wearing a mask or other disguise while engaging in expressive activities. Lowering the U.S. flag with the intent to raise another flag. Engaging in expressive activities between 10 p.m. and 8 a.m. Note that these are limited and expanded upon individually within the bill's text. The Senate passed the bill 21-10 on May 14. The House passed it 97-39 on May 28. What they're saying The bill's text says it may not be construed to limit freedom of speech or expression as protected by the First Amendment or Texas Constitution. Critics wonder how this is possible, saying the bill in its entirety is an imposition of prohibitions on rights defined in those texts. Caro Achar, the engagement coordinator for free speech at the ACLU of Texas, released the following statement to that point. "S.B. 2972 threatens the free expression of all Texans, regardless of political beliefs. This bill imposes broad restrictions that allow school officials to restrict how, when, and where Texans can speak on campus — undermining the First Amendment rights of students, faculty, staff, and the general public." Dig deeper The new bill comes on the heels of recent major protests on Texas university campuses, largely related to the conflict between Israel and Palestine, as well as developments with mass deportations. At one UT Austin protest in April 2024, 79 pro-Palestine protesters were taken into custody. The university was later found to have violated several institutional rules when handling the incident. Feds to screen social media of migrants, foreign students for antisemitic activity Columbia must notify students before handing records to Congress amid antisemitism probe ICE detains U of M student at Twin Cities campus, officials say What's next SB 2972 now awaits Gov. Greg Abbott's signature. According to the ACLU, he is expected to sign it into law. If he neither signs nor vetoes the bill, it will become law without his action. The Source Information in this article comes from Texas Legislature Online, the ACLU of Texas and previous coverage by FOX 7.
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Protests erupt over immigration raids in Los Angeles
Protests erupted in Los Angeles over ongoing Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids in the city. Federal agents have raided multiple workplaces in the fashion district, a Home Depot and other local areas, according to the American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California. Hundreds of people, including children, were detained by ICE agents on Friday at the Edward Roybal Federal Building in downtown Los Angeles, the ACLU said. ICE Acting Director Todd Lyons said in a statement Saturday, "The brave men and women of ICE were in Los Angeles arresting criminal illegal aliens including gang members, drug traffickers and those with a history of assault, cruelty to children, domestic violence, robbery, and smuggling." Large crowds began gathering near the federal detention center in downtown Los Angeles Friday protesting the immigration raids and leading to some reported clashes with authorities. Lyons said that the "violent rioters will be held accountable" and vowed that ICE will continue to make arrests. "What took place in Los Angeles yesterday was appalling. As rioters attacked federal ICE and law enforcement officers on the LA streets, Mayor Bass took the side of chaos and lawlessness over law enforcement," Lyons said Saturday. Mayor Karen Bass, meanwhile, condemned the ICE raids in a statement. "As Mayor of a proud city of immigrants, who contribute to our city in so many ways, I am deeply angered by what has taken place. These tactics sow terror in our communities and disrupt basic principles of safety in our city. My Office is in close coordination with immigrant rights community organizations. We will not stand for this," Bass said. Bass told KABC that neither she nor the Los Angeles Police Department were aware that the ICE raids were going to happen. Some protesters could be seen throwing objects at vehicles and others tried to block vans from leaving on Friday, KABC reported. Shortly after 7 p.m. the Los Angeles Police Department declared an unlawful assembly, warning protesters they risked being arrested if they remained in the area. LAPD officers were seen lining the streets near the federal building, KABC reported. The LAPD said in a social media post late Friday that officers had reported a "small group of violent individuals" were throwing large pieces of concrete. "Once again, an UNLAWFUL ASSEMBLY has been declared. You must leave the area. The use of less lethal munitions has been authorized by the Incident Commander," the LAPD said in the post. The Department of Homeland Security said the targeting of law enforcement in Los Angeles is "despicable." "Mayor Bass, ICE is not responsible for "sowing a sense of terror" the protestors YOU enabled are," DHS said. FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino said the FBI has already made arrests for "obstructing our operations." Federal law enforcement operations will proceed as planned this weekend in Los Angeles County, U.S. attorney Bill Essayli added. -ABC News' Luke Barr and Vanessa Navarrete contributed to this report.
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
Tacoma man held in East Africa part of latest Trump fight over deportations
A Tacoma man is among a group of men convicted of serious crimes that President Donald Trump's administration is trying to send to South Sudan as part of Trump's ongoing effort to deport undocumented immigrants. Lawyers for 43-year-old Tuan Phan learned this week that he and eight other men are being held in a converted shipping container in leg shackles at a United States Naval base in Djibouti in East Africa. The men were routed there following a May 20 deportation flight from Texas after a federal judge in Boston intervened. Judge Brian Murphy found that the Department of Homeland Security had violated a court order by failing to provide the men a meaningful opportunity to assert any fears they had about being deported to a country not listed on their removal orders. Murphy said the U.S. Department of State has a 'do not travel' advisory for South Sudan due to crime, kidnapping and armed conflict. Conditions at the U.S. military base in Djibouti are also dangerous. In a sworn declaration filed Thursday, a DHS official said Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers were warned when they arrived of the imminent danger of rocket attacks from terrorist groups in Yemen. Officers and detainees have felt ill, the official said, noting that smog clouds from nearby burn pits disposing of trash and human waste made it difficult to breathe. In news releases about the deportations, DHS said the flights to South Sudan were to remove some of the 'most barbaric, violent individuals illegally in the United States.' DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said Murphy's ruling that halted their removal was 'deranged.' Unlike the deportations of more than a hundred Venezuelans to El Salvador earlier this year, who according to the New York Times, mostly had no criminal records, each of the eight men in this case have been convicted of violent crimes. An attorney for Phan with the Northwest Immigrant Rights Project, Glenda Aldana Madrid, said Phan and his wife, Ngoc, had been preparing for his deportation, but they had been planning for him to be removed to Vietnam, where he emigrated from as a child in 1991. The two met in Tacoma as neighbors. Phan had legal permanent status, but his legal status was revoked after he was convicted of first-degree murder and second-degree assault in 2001. According to Pierce County court records, Phan, then 18, fatally shot 19-year-old Michael Holtmeyer and wounded his friend near Les Davis Pier on Ruston Way. Holtmeyer was an innocent passerby, and prosecutors said Phan shot into a crowd because he was angry that rival gang members were harassing his friends. Phan pleaded guilty and was sentenced to 22 years in prison. According to the DHS, he was issued a final order of removal in 2009. Some countries don't accept deportation flights. Vietnam has previously accepted deportations for immigrants who entered the United States before 1995, according to the Asian Law Caucus. Ngoc Phan was able to talk with her husband for a few minutes Wednesday after not hearing from him for two weeks. 'It was a relief to know that he is safe and alive, but it was extremely upsetting to know that he's chained by the feet like an animal, living in a shipping container, and without proper medication,' Ngoc Phan said in a written statement. The U.S. government has the authority to deport people to a third country — one other than the country designated by an immigration judge — according to Trina Realmuto, executive director of the National Immigration Litigation Alliance. But Realmuto said the court's order was that if that's going to happen, attorneys have to be given sufficient time to investigate whether their clients have a fear of being deported there. In this case, Realmuto told The News Tribune on Friday, there was less than 16 hours notice before the men were brought to an airport facility in Texas and put on a plane. Realmuto's organization is part of the ongoing lawsuit over the men's deportations. She said she thinks the effort to send them to South Sudan is 'fear mongering.' 'The effort is punitive, but it is meant to incite fear in the United States,' Realmuto said. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, also Trump's chief foreign affairs advisor, wrote in a declaration in the case that Murphy's court order had interfered with quiet efforts to rebuild a working relationship with the government in South Sudan's capital, Juda. 'Before the court's intervention, the government in South Sudan, which previously refused to accept the return of one of its own nationals, had taken steps to work more cooperatively with the U.S. government,' Rubio said. Rubio added that cooperation between South Sudan and the U.S. was critical both in terms of removals and to advance the U.S. government's humanitarian efforts in the country.