Michigan football secures 4-star WR Zion Robinson for 2026, revamping offense
But what about the future?
The maize and blue have one wide receiver committed thus far in 2026 Dallas (Tx.) Parish Episcopal three-star Jaylen Pile, but they're still making moves to fill out the rest of the class and the position group. On Wednesday, the Wolverines got a big boost, dipping again into the state of Texas, with Mansfield (Tx.) four-star wideout Zion Robinson committing to Michigan football.
He announced his commitment on Instagram live.
Scouting report
Here's the scouting report on Robinson from 247Sports' Gabe Brooks:
Tall outside target pushing 6-foot-3 with excellent multi-sport athletic context in basketball and track and field. More polished pass catchers are out there, but very few boast this combination of above-the-rim hardwood context, a state championship high jump gold medal, and corresponding high-level athleticism in pads. Frame and explosion foster contested-catch dominance. Displays sneaky run-after-catch effectiveness relative to frame and straight-line top-end gear. Shows adequate acceleration that times requires a build-up runway, but leads to breakaway long speed. Still developing hands consistency and route technique, but showed encouraging signs during junior season and Spring 2025 elite camp evaluation. A particularly high-ceiling outside receiver prospect who could become an impact player in college with long-term pro potential.
At 6-foot-3, 180 pounds, the No. 71 player in the country, according to 247Sports, should give a big boost to the Wolverines' passing attack. He chose the maize and blue over Miami, Texas Tech, Stanford, and Nebraska.
Junior highlights
The current class and who Michigan is still targeting
Michigan football is still working on 2026 Chesapeake (Va.) Oscar Smith four-star wideout Travis Johnson, and appears to have surged in the recruitment of Miami (Fla.) Northwestern five-star Calvin Russell.
Here is what the class now looks like with Robinson in the fold, using the 247Sports Composite rankings:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
29 minutes ago
- USA Today
Alabama football 2025 season preview, predictions: Kadyn Proctor
There are few offensive linemen across college football better at their respective position entering the 2025 season than Alabama Crimson Tide left tackle Kadyn Proctor. Entering year three in Tuscaloosa, Proctor was a day one starter at Alabama who joined the program as a top recruit in the Crimson Tide's 2023 class. However, Proctor's time in Tuscaloosa has not come entirely without bumps in the road, as the former top recruit in fact struggled at times as a true freshman, and even left the program entirely at one point via the transfer portal. One of the most important players on the Crimson Tide's 2025 roster, here is a look at everything you need to know about Alabama offensive tackle Kadyn Proctor entering the 2025 season. Kadyn Proctor player information Kadyn Proctor career stats Over the past two seasons, Proctor has started all 24 games which he has played for the Crimson Tide at left tackle. Proctor was a SEC All-Freshman selection during the 2023 season, and also earned Second Team All-SEC honors a year ago. Kadyn Proctor 2024 stats Proctor was back as Alabama's starting left tackle during the 2024 season, starting all 11 games which he played. A mainstay of Alabama's offensive line when healthy, Proctor earned Second Team All-SEC honors. Kadyn Proctor recruiting ranking One of the highest-rated offensive linemen in program history, Proctor came to Alabama ranked as the nation's No. 10 overall prospect in the 2023 recruiting class, per the 247Sports Composite rankings. A five-star prospect who committed to Alabama in Dec. 2022 after flipping from Iowa, Proctor was also ranked the No. 2 offensive tackle nationally, as well as the top player in the state of Iowa where he attended Southeast Polk High School. Last offseason, Proctor was considered by 247Sports as the No. 2 overall player in the transfer portal, as well as the top offensive lineman. Rated a five-star prospect, Proctor committed to Alabama again in April 2024 after previously transferring to Iowa in Jan. 2024. Kadyn Proctor 2025 season outlook Projected as a top 2026 NFL draft pick, expect Proctor to be one of college football's best overall players this fall. Proctor will start every game for the Crimson Tide at left tackle this season, which will be his third-straight year in Tuscaloosa as the top name at the position. The junior should also be one of the top left tackles, as well as overall offensive lineman, in college football this season, and has already been named to the preseason watch lists for a few honors such as the Outland Trophy. Overall, expect a stellar 2025 season for Proctor as Alabama's starting left tackle, and for the junior to eventually receive a few honors at seasons end on both a conference and national level. Kadyn Proctor 2025 season prediction Contact/Follow us @RollTideWire on X, and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Alabama news, notes and opinion.
USA Today
29 minutes ago
- USA Today
NCAA exonerates Chris Partridge in ‘signgate,' clearing him of major allegations
On the eve of the Michigan football vs. Maryland game in 2023, there was a buzz that something was about to happen to the Wolverines coaching staff, exactly one week after Jim Harbaugh was summarily suspended by the Big Ten according to its sportsmanship policy. The latter came as a result of a campaign by coaches and athletic directors around the conference as the Connor Stalions saga was just starting to infiltrate the college football landscape. And then a bombshell: then-Michigan linebackers coach Chris Partridge had allegedly instructed a student-athlete to lie to NCAA investigators and then destroyed crucial evidence. If that was the case, it was certainly a warranted firing. According to The Michigan Insider's Sam Webb ($), Partridge, 'Advised some of the players on what to say (to investigators) about their interaction with Stallions. One or more of the players told investigators (what Partridge instructed them to do). When Michigan found out, they reacted with immediate termination. So it wasn't involvement in the scheme itself, but it was an attempt to quell suspicion.' Yahoo Sports' Dan Wetzel and Ross Dellenger also reported that, 'Partridge is not alleged at this time of knowing about the advanced scouting by Stalions, but acted after the fact to cover up evidence.' The covering up of evidence, according to Wetzel and Dellenger, involved the, 'Destruction of evidence on a computer after the scandal broke.' But as it turns out, according to the NCAA's findings, that account turned out to be wholly inaccurate, and it found no wrongdoing whatsoever. Finally, on November 14, 2023, Partridge had two exchanges with student-athlete 1. Specifically,student-athlete 1 had an upcoming interview related to the investigation and sought out Partridgefor advice on the interview process. The first exchange occurred prior to practice, when studentathlete 1 announced to Partridge and a group of about five other student-athletes that he was beinginterviewed the following day. Partridge stated that student-athlete 1 then followed Partridge intohis office to ask for advice about the interview. During that exchange, Partridge suggested thatstudent-athlete 1 retain counsel and talk to his father. Partridge said that student-athlete 1 thenasked if they could talk again later. In support of this account, Partridge submitted an affidavitfrom one of the other student-athletes who was present in the room. Following practice, Partridge said he received a text from student-athlete 1 stating that he waswaiting in Partridge's office. Partridge walked by his office and told student-athlete 1 to walk withhim and talk. Student-athlete 1 gave Partridge a summary of the conversation with his father, andPartridge reiterated that he thought student-athlete 1should get a lawyer, then they parted ways. Inaddition to the affidavit, Partridge's account of the interactions is closely supported by camerafootage from around the facility. The NCAA had also alleged that he had improperly contacted recruits, held improper workouts, and also gave out gear improperly. While it did say that he had some improper contact (a Level II violation), the rest of what was alleged did not happen. More via the NCAA report: The NOA alleged additional violations for Partridge, including: (1) arranging and conductingimpermissible tryouts with prospects; (2) providing an impermissible inducement to a prospect;and (3) failing to cooperate during and after his employment at Michigan. The recruitingallegations were presented as Level II. The failure to cooperate allegations were presented asLevel I. Partridge disputed each of the allegations. The panel concludes that the case record doesnot demonstrate that these violations occurred. Impermissible TryoutsThe enforcement staff alleged that Partridge conducted impermissible tryouts with prospects onfour occasions during the spring and summer of 2023. Three of those alleged tryouts consisted ofindividual workouts with prospect 1 at Michigan's practice facilities. The other alleged tryout wasa group workout on Michigan's practice field. Across his interviews with the enforcement staff, prospect 1 stated that he engaged in multipleindividual workouts with Partridge. However, some of prospect 1's statements were unclear, andhe seemed to have trouble recalling the total number of workouts that may have occurred. Partridge consistently denied conducting any individual workouts and suggested that prospect 1could have been referring to other, permissible interactions. Specifically, Partridge gave prospect1's stepfather 'film drills' to run and worked on technique with prospect 1 while watching film inPartridge's office. Moreover, at the hearing, Partridge recalled that prospect 1 attended camps atMichigan in May and/or June, during which he and Partridge would have interacted. Notably, the panel considered several text exchanges between Partridge and prospect 1 referencingworking out. During those conversations, Partridge made statements about needing 'to do that inthe summer' because there were '[t]oo many people around now.' He also encouraged prospect1 to visit in May and June 2023 so they could 'do some more ball' and 'talk [football] and train.'At the hearing, Partridge explained that, although several of the text exchanges indicatedPartridge's interest in working out with prospect 1, his messages were crafted in an attempt to pushoff the workouts until football camps started at Michigan in May and June. In that way, Partridgewas attempting to be responsive to prospect 1, while still complying with tryout legislation. Thepanel is persuaded by Partridge's account of these events. The panel is also persuaded by Partridge's explanation of Michigan's BBQ at the Big House three prospects were registered camp attendees, and the timing of the workout appeared toalign with a scheduled camp activity.34 In light of Partridge's arguments, the panel does notconclude that any individual or group workouts constituted violations. Impermissible Recruiting InducementsThe enforcement staff alleged that, on one occasion, Partridge walked prospect 1 to the equipmentroom to receive gear. As addressed previously, Michigan disputed that prospect 1 received anygear from football staff members. Partridge also denied that he provided any gear to prospect 1,other than a camp T-shirt given to all attendees of the BBQ at the Big House Camp. In prospect 1's interview with the enforcement staff, he did not initially mention that Partridgeprovided him gear. After being asked multiple times, prospect 1 stated that Partridge, as well asClinkscale, each walked him to the equipment room on one occasion. The record contains a photoof Partridge and prospect 1, with prospect 1 holding the camp T-shirt. Although the panel concludes that the other inducements are sufficiently supported by informationin the record, the panel does not believe that there is sufficient information to conclude thatPartridge directly provided or assisted in providing prospect 1 with an impermissible inducementin the form of gear. There are certainly some questions that should be raised. First, who was the player who alleged that Partridge instructed him to lie to the NCAA when it turned out that that wasn't the case? Also, what did Michigan know (or in this case, how was the athletic department deceived) through the process that resulted in Partridge's dismissal? Also, why did the program note in Partridge's firing that he's not eligible for rehire when the facts had yet to be determined? Back on November 7, 2023, Partridge released a statement denying wrongdoing, indicating he was being railroaded -- which now looks prescient given the NCAA's findings: Unfortunately, the manner in which the termination of my employment and my role as a Coach at Michigan has been reported is inaccurate and has resulted in people speculating and making assumptions about my knowledge of, and connection to, the sign-stealing allegations within the football program. I want to be clear: I had no knowledge whatsoever of any in-person or illegal scouting, or illegal sign stealing. Additionally, at no point did I destroy any evidence related to an ongoing investigation. Partridge has been a coach with the Seattle Seahawks the past two years and doesn't appear to have interest, as of current, of returning to the college game. What's more, the once-favored son in Ann Arbor who had helped Jim Harbaugh from his first year until 2023 -- minus a couple of years at Ole Miss -- was railroaded for what ended up being no reason. It will be interesting to see if we ever learn who was behind the purported lie that lost him his job in Ann Arbor.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
What is a show-cause order? Explaining NCAA's Michigan penalties
The NCAA announced Friday it was handing out four different show-cause orders to the four people most involved in the University of Michigan football team's sign-stealing scandal in 2023. But what is a show-cause order? And who is it affecting? The NCAA's announcement on Aug. 15 of sanctions against the Michigan program included penalties for four people associated with the scandal: Connor Stalions, the former Michigan defensive analyst who orchestrated much of the illicit "off-campus, in-person scouting scheme;" Jim Harbaugh, former Michigan head coach and current Los Angeles Chargers head coach; Denard Robinson, former assistant director of player personnel for Michigan; and Sherrone Moore, Michigan's active head coach. Here's what to know about the show-cause orders imposed on each of them: NCAA PUNISHMENT: Explaining former Michigan coach Jim Harbaugh's sanctions Who was penalized by the NCAA for Michigan's sign-stealing scandal? The NCAA announced its sanctions for Michigan's illicit activities in the 2023 season on Friday. Here are the four active or former personnel members of the Michigan football program hit with sanctions for their involvement in the Wolverines' sign-stealing scandal and what their penalties are, per the NCAA: Former defensive analyst Connor Stalions: Eight-year show-cause order Former head coach Jim Harbaugh: 10-year show-cause order, which begins Aug. 7, 2028 after the conclusion of a current, four-year show-cause order from a previous rules violation. Former assistant director of player personnel Denard Robinson: Three-year show-cause order Current head coach Sherrone Moore: Two-year show-cause order, plus a three-game ban. Michigan self-imposed a two-game ban for Moore during the 2025 season, which he will serve in Weeks 3 and 4 (vs. Central Michigan, at Nebraska) this year. The NCAA also imposed its own one-game ban for the Wolverines' first game in the 2026 season (vs. Western Michigan in Germany). MICHIGAN SIGN-STEALING PUNISHMENT: NCAA suspends Sherrone Moore, show-cause for Connor Stalions All three former members of Michigan's football program are not currently employed by a college football program and are restricted "from all athletically related activities during the show-cause period." Moore, who is Michigan's active head coach, did not receive the same prohibitions. The football program as a whole also received its own list of penalties. They include four years' probation, a "multimillion-dollar fine" and certain prohibitions on recruitment: "a 25% reduction in football official visits during the 2025-26 season" and "a 14-week prohibition on recruiting communications in the football program during the probation period." SHERRONE MOORE SUSPENSION: Is Michigan head coach suspended for Week 1? What is a show-cause order? A show-cause order is essentially a college football-wide ban on hiring a person to join their coaching staff. If Michigan or any other college football program wanted to hire Stalions, Harbaugh, Robinson or Moore (or any other person with an active show-cause), it would have to appear before the NCAA's committee on infractions and make a strong case for why it specifically wants to hire one of them. The name "show cause" comes from the case that the prospective employer must make to the NCAA, showing cause for why previous infractions will not happen again if a previous offender is hired at a new program. Show-cause orders are a somewhat common penalty imposed on coaches or other personnel found to have violated major rules. DAN WOLKEN: Divided opinions on Michigan sign-stealing scandal just part of college football tribalism Other recent/active show-cause orders in college athletics Here are a few other examples of recent or active show-cause orders in college sports: Kelvin Sampson, 2008: The former Indiana head basketball coach and current Houston head coach received a five-year show-cause for NCAA violations during his time at Indiana, including impermissible calls to recruits. Bruce Pearl, 2011: The former Tennessee head basketball coach and current head coach at Auburn received a three-year show-cause for lying to the NCAA about hosting a recruit during a cookout at his home. Jim Tressel, 2011: The former Ohio State head coach received a five-year show-cause for failing to report NCAA violations involving his team's players. Jeremy Pruitt, 2023: The former Tennessee head football coach received a six-year show-cause for providing impermissible benefits to recruits during his time coaching the Volunteers. Pruitt's show-cause is still active and runs through July 13, 2029. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Show-cause order, explained: What Michigan's NCAA penalties mean
