Concerns raised about ‘disorganised' withdrawal of SA troops from DRC
It has been reported that SA troops started making their way out of the DRC earlier this week.
The DA has expressed concern about the withdrawal of SANDF troops from the DRC. Picture: Gallo Images/Brenton Geach
The withdrawal of South African troops from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) has been marred by some controversy, with the DA complaining about an alleged lack of planning.
Reports suggest that soldiers from Malawi, South Africa and Tanzania have started moving by road to Tanzania.
The soldiers are part of the SADC mission in the DRC (SAMIDRC).
The DA has been calling for the troops to return home from the DRC since the death of 14 South African soldiers.
ALSO READ: Motshekga gives update on return of SA troops as DRC ceasefire negotiations progress
SANDF's 'disorganised' exit from the DRC
However, Chris Hattingh, the party's spokesperson on defence and military veterans, has described the current withdrawal of the South African National Defence Force (SANDF) as 'disorganised'.
'Poor planning, vague objectives and a disturbing lack of transparency have marred the withdrawal of our troops from eastern DRC.
'What should have been a coordinated and strategic exit has instead become a confused and dangerous process, placing our soldiers at risk and leaving the nation with more questions than answers,' he said.
Hattingh said South African troops have had to negotiate with M23 rebels for safe passage out of Goma.
'Alarming accounts suggest that M23 rebels – widely believed to be backed by Rwanda – are inspecting SANDF military equipment as the convoys pass.
'Members of the elite quick reaction force (QRF) have described this experience as both frustrating and humiliating,' he said.
The Citizen understands that the soldiers will move in groups, with the final meeting point set to be in Tanzania.
Poor communication on troop withdrawal
Meanwhile, Hattingh said SA soldiers continue to report logistical failures, poor communication and uncertainty about the status of military vehicles and heavy weaponry.
'There has been no official communication from the Department of Defence, SANDF or SADC. It has instead emerged that safe passage for our troops had to be negotiated with Rwanda after M23 seized control of vital infrastructure,' he said.
Hattingh said the DA would ask Minister of Defence Angie Motshekga questions about the mission when she appears before the Portfolio Committee on Defence on 9 May.
He called on Motshekga to tell the nation what the terms and scope of the SANDF's deployment were.
He also wants to know the cause of the alleged operational failures that led to the current 'disorganised' withdrawal.
There are also concerns about safety of remaining personnel and equipment in the DRC.
'Fourteen South African soldiers lost their lives in the battle for Goma. The lack of accountability since then is unacceptable,' Hattingh said.
The Citizen contacted the Ministry of Defence and Military Veterans for comment on the matter, which will be added once received.
ALSO READ: The wait for SA troops to return home from the DRC continues
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
2 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
The fatal failure of SA's political opposition
While the creation of our first national coalition government was supposed to be a major change in government, it has also led to major changes in the opposition benches. Despite the fact that the coalition has failed to improve the lives of most South Africans, parties that oppose it have failed to make much headway. South Africa's 2024 elections led to the biggest changes in the opposition benches. The Democratic Alliance (DA), which had become very effective in opposition, was suddenly in government (and taking many of its oppositional habits into the Union Buildings). advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads A party (MK) which had never been represented in Parliament before was suddenly the Official Opposition. And was led by someone who himself had never been an MP. The previous time John Hlophe had been mentioned in the National Assembly was the day he became the first judge to be impeached in the democratic era. The Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), used to being able to make noise as the third-biggest party, found itself in a reduced role, even though its greater parliamentary experience has made it more effective than the uMkhonto Wesizwe (MK) party. And there are several smaller parties who have both tried to be oppositional to the coalition, and flirted with joining it. It is perhaps the greatest indictment of our opposition parties that despite the fact the coalition has delivered GDP growth of just 0.1%, they cannot craft an effective message. A major part of this has been the divided nature of the MK party. Considering President Jacob Zuma's history of a lust for personal power and for wrecking institutions, this was always going to be the case. The revolving door of people in the position of secretary-general has surely created massive instability. It was also entirely predictable that the trio of Zuma, Hlophe and Floyd Shivambu was going to be about as stable as the Trump-Musk relationship. advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads Zuma also had very few people to choose from. The fact he had to appoint someone like Mzwanele Manyi to the position of Chief Whip and then demote him is proof of that. Probably only one other individual has said more and contributed less to our politics than he. Meanwhile, Hlophe has appeared to battle with the transition from being a judge, where your instructions are simply obeyed, to leading a parliamentary caucus, where people must be persuaded. He has also not been able to deliver a single speech in Parliament that has captured the public imagination. For the Leader of the Opposition, a constitutionally mandated position, this is a massive failure. Parliamentary speeches are a massive platform for the opposition and the leader of that party should be able to use it effectively. However, as has been said many times, MK's real problem is that there is no internal democracy and thus no durable legitimate structures. It is unlikely that this will change and thus unlikely that it will become a more effective opposition. The EFF has shown itself to be more effective than MK, partly because its members have more parliamentary experience and partly because its leader, Julius Malema, is prepared to be in Parliament and thus use its platform (unlike Zuma). advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads That said, it still appears as if the EFF has not yet got over the shock of being relegated to the position of fourth-largest political party. Certainly, Malema appears to be unable to grab the political agenda in a way he did, say, five years ago. advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads Even though videos featuring him were shown during President Cyril Ramaphosa's Oval Office meeting with President Donald Trump, he was unable to really insert himself into that story. It may be that Malema's previous focus, on attacking first Zuma and then Ramaphosa so personally, has turned into a strategic weakness. Ramaphosa is not as powerful as he was and, while he may symbolise the coalition government, Malema has been unable to turn him into a hate figure. Crucially, Malema announced at the start of this Parliament that he would no longer disrupt proceedings as he had in the past. So far, he has not been able to come up with a new tactic, or a new line of attack that has really given him traction. One of the more intriguing dynamics of this period has been the role of some of the smaller parties that are not formally in the government coalition. ActionSA has found itself in a position where it can at times support the coalition or the ANC, and then oppose it. In the hours after ActionSA took the decision to vote with the ANC to support the fiscal framework of Budget 2.0, the party's Athol Trollip was incredibly honest when asked if ActionSA would now join the coalition. advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads He summed up the situation for the party when he said: 'If the DA leaves the GNU [Government of National Unity], whether they get kicked out or they decide to leave, the opposition space is going to get crowded and we will have to take a strategic decision. Will we still make an impact in opposition, or must we look at perhaps going into government? But that depends on the GNU, whether they want us there or not. We will wait and see, but we will make a strategic decision where we can make the greatest impact.' advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads This revealed the options the party was dealing with in essence. But it also meant that when the ANC and the DA found each for Budget 3.0, ActionSA had to be content in the opposition benches, despite the fact voters would have known it considered joining the ANC. Build One South Africa, meanwhile, has appeared to struggle to gain traction with a consistent message. Its leader, Mmusi Maimane, has made regular media appearances and often provided principled opposition to government proposals. But it is hard to know if they have been able to really change government policy or win more votes. So far, it seems the coalition government has completely failed to make a difference to the lives of most people. Parties in opposition have failed too; they have not yet provided a credible alternative for voters. DM advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads
Daily Maverick
2 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Helen Zille eyes Joburg mayorship after DA's top picks decline post
Zille told Daily Maverick that she would decide whether to apply to run for Johannesburg mayor by next week, as candidates who want to be considered have an application deadline of 15 June. DA federal chair Helen Zille is seriously considering a dramatic return to frontline politics as Johannesburg mayor. This comes after three high-profile candidates, most from business, turned down the party's approach to throw their hats into the ring to lead the party's Johannesburg campaign. The job was too hard-charging and the pay too low – mayors earn about R1.5-million a year. The local government election will happen in either late 2026 or early 2027. Zille told Daily Maverick that she would decide whether to apply by next week, as candidates who want to be considered have an application deadline of 15 June. 'My whole family is in Cape Town,' she said, adding that her greatest joy now is seeing her grandchildren regularly and that they had a weekly adventure date. 'My husband (retired sociologist Professor Johann Maree) has always been unbelievably supportive. He supports what I decide, but won't come (to Johannesburg).' She said Maree, now 82, was happily settled in their retirement village and that if she decided to run and were successful, they would remain in touch daily. Her sons Paul and Thomas live nearby. 'My family says it's my decision.' A close associate said Zille had been troubled by the state of Johannesburg since about 2019, when she realised that most traffic lights did not work. Since last year's election, she has spent much time in Gauteng planning the party's local government campaign here and had a front-row seat to what distresses the City of Gold and its six million people. Her sister lives in Emmarentia, an old near-northern suburb often with no water or electricity due to the city's regular outages. She said that should she run, she would live with her sister in her cottage. A mayoral candidate must be a resident of the city. Several DA councillors plan to contest the party primary. They must submit a formal application, undergo a screening test and prepare a presentation on their plan for the city. This presentation is made to a group of 15 party leaders, five each from the Johannesburg, provincial, and federal executives. They are also asked unscripted questions. Asked if a race would be moot should she decide to run, Zille said, ' Not at all.' She said formidable candidates were running. A senior official who spoke off the record said Johannesburg is 'so far gone' that the party felt it needed a high-velocity candidate, as the DA has a strong chance of winning the city. An ANC-led coalition holds a slim majority in the city with the EFF, Patriotic Alliance and Action SA. Johannesburg has been under soft intervention by the Presidency since March. Its collapse has become visceral with multiday power and water outages so regular they barely make the news. Thousands of traffic lights are out at any time and potholes are so large they have become dongas and memes. Zille previously told Daily Maverick that it would take about five years to turn the city around, but she says that was an undercount. 'It will take more than five years (now) to stop the rot and turn the tide.' She noted Johannesburg had an infrastructure backlog of R200-billion and an annual budget of R86-billion. She said the city's staff complement had grown by 86% since 2010. Asked what Zille had going for her for the task, the official said she had turned Cape Town around as urban blight slowly settled in around 2006, when she became that city's mayor. Recently, she headed the party's governance unit, which worked with councillors and representatives when they entered government. Mostly, he said, whether they liked her or not, Zille enjoyed trust in her ability to govern. This graphic shows the job description that the DA set for candidates. DM Slice of political life (part satire) The Zillenator – the coalition queen sets her sights on Joburg – here's what to expect By Marianne Thamm (Trigger warning: dead sheep and stunned mice) News that former Cape Town Metro executive mayor, Democratic Alliance leader and the party's current Fedex chair since 2019, Helen Zille, is about to 'throw her hat in the ring' to lead Joburg comes as no surprise. The Afrikaans Sunday platform, Rapport, let the Zille out of the bag at the weekend, breaking the news that the veteran politician had been 'approached to run'. It was Zille in the mid-2000s who held together a fragile and fractious six-party coalition of minor parties as executive mayor of Cape Town while her government faced a hostile ANC which, in opposition, unleashed death by legal challenge. With a background in provincial and national legislatures, Zille also came with made-in-Germany batteries that seemed to be self-charging, as she warded off each challenge, going on to win award after award. Soon she was Queen of the Western Cape, like it or not. Dragging and roasting Anyone who is hoping to run against Zille, in this, the next hill in the comrades marathon that has been her political career, must arm themselves with her tactics and novel approach to bouncing back. This includes the recent Showmax special, Calamitous Caucus of Clowns – The Roast of Helen Zille, during which everyone on stage appeared to be straightjacketed by a script which sucked all spontaneity out of the room. But worth a watch, anyhow. Earlier in the year, Zille made an appearance as Zille Von Teez in full drag on the Tollie en Manila Show, also on Showmax. Zille might and could very well just stay in drag and go out and campaign… she's that good, say those in the know. Zille on the campaign trail, even in her sixties and now at 74, knows exactly what works for which constituency, including which soundtrack to play while choreographing her own dance moves. Zille can probably do a Zulu warrior kick while posting on social media and reach higher than PJ Powers. The three previous occasions that Zille offered to 'throw her hat in the ring', she won. First to lead the Cape Metro (2006-2009) as executive mayor, then the DA itself (2007-2015) while simultaneously being elected as premier of the Western Cape (2009-2019). This is an indication of Zille's unwaning political stamina and clout, whatever your views of her ways und means. They're eating the sheep In 2016, Zille published her autobiography, Not Without A Fight (say it out loud in your head in her voice), weighing in at a hefty 700 or so pages. There she documents her impressive, life-long activism in townships in and around Cape Town, where she has survived being shot at, shouted at, being arrested… the usual. Seen it all. At about this time, Zille writes: 'I should stress that my constituency work involved much more than regular visits to police stations and courts (and dodging the occasional bullet)'. She recalls that 'I was also called on to provide ambulance services from time to time, sometimes in the dead of night. At times, I transported some interesting passengers… 'Every time we had a branch launch, we would buy a live sheep, which I would fetch in my car. 'The animal would sit meekly in the back, looking out of the window as if it was enjoying the view. It gave me an insight into the English idiom that compares a calm, unwitting walk into disaster with 'a lamb being led to the slaughter'.' Zille says that during the drive, she would bond with each sheep and 'felt deeply guilty every time I dropped it off at the party venue'. Say what? You didn't stay for the tjoppies? The mouse and other tails For some time now, I have been wandering on and off stages across the country, in restaurants, bars and festivals with a piece of 'performance journalism' titled, Round of Applause – South Africa Still Standing. I have turned into a bit of roving, three-dimensional, human newspaper, a town crier of sorts, celebrating SA's victory over State Capture and the role of the media, judiciary, whistle-blowers and others while catching up with the latest news. Zille has, since 2023, when I first followed this calling, grown into a fulcrum around which some of the funniest moments of the show revolve. One of the other centrepieces (and this is a retelling audiences have demanded not be shelved, as of yet) is an incident with a mouse that I witnessed with my own Putin-blue eyes while Zille was touring Julius Malema's hood, Seshego, in Limpopo in 2011. I will not let the mouse out of the bellbottom here (so to speak), but let's just say the incident is indicative of the stamina and discipline of Helen Zille when she is on a mission. The Government of National Unity was pulled together during a 10-minute comfort break, requested by Floyd Shivambu (still then dressed in red) while new MPs were being sworn in after the 2024 elections, enabling Zille and the ANC (and others) to sign a Memorandum of Agreement that had been left hanging. And voila, we have our Republiek van Alle Kante with Baie Kante in Die Parliament. Since the rugby incident, I take it no translation is required. Of the future political horizon in Joburg, where Zille has set her sights, all we can say is beware of the politician in drag who comes bearing sheep. DM
Daily Maverick
2 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Tony Leon's new book delivers an insider's account of South African and global politics and personalities
Tony Leon's new book contains fascinating observations about previous foreign and South African leaders and their successes and failures. It also offers insider views on the negotiations to achieve the Government of National Unity. The book reads just like he would sound in a congenial conversation over dinner. We meet over coffee, just before Tony Leon goes to speak at the memorial service for his long-time friend and political colleague Douglas Gibson. At that service, Leon said of Gibson, in speaking of their party, post-1994, that: 'Reduced to just seven MPs and three senators, each of us had to juggle dozens of competing roles. His included chairman of the Federal Council, chief whip, spokesman on Justice and Transport and member of the rules committee. In navigating the revival of our party, Douglas was my essential partner and my closest collaborator, and in the snake pit of politics we forged a durable and deep friendship for which I am so deeply grateful.' His comments regarding his long-time friend's life and works highlight Leon's political trajectory as well. Even if some think Leon was too in-your-face for the politics of the new South Africa, (a political life that, to be fair, is pretty hard-knuckle) he deserves credit for helping set his party on its journey to being South Africa's official opposition, instead of being the marginal political force that it was, back in 1994. The party is now the second largest partner in the Government of National Unity, the second multiparty government since 1994 and in the first days of the country's racially integrated politics. We quickly get on to the business of speaking about his new book, Being There, and his thinking about the current and future challenges of South Africa's political and economic landscape. I remind him that we first met at a mutual friend's home over dinner in the years before the 1994 election. Back then, he was a junior parliamentarian and I was working at the US embassy, trying, like every diplomat assigned to this country, to gauge its rapidly changing political texture and what it would mean for the future. As a backbencher MP, Leon's reputation was as a new, bold — and even arrogant, for some — politician. Back then, it seemed he had crisp, definitive answers for every challenge. If he still has answers for many questions, he has also been tempered by a lifetime in politics. For those who may not remember, Leon was a member of the Progressive Party through its various iterations as it became, successively, the Progressive Federal Party, the Democratic Party and eventually the Democratic Alliance, or DA. Along the way, he may be best remembered as the face of a feisty party that once campaigned on the slogan, 'Fight Back!' For some, while that was read as a pushback against the new, all-race, democratic dispensation in South Africa, Leon would certainly have insisted, au contraire, it was a principled, succinct protest against the growing corruption, the lack of effective government administration and policing, and floundering efforts to build a strong economy and nurture job creation. But that is now old news. We have all moved on. Youngish elder Leaving Parliament, Leon served as South Africa's ambassador to Argentina — on behalf of an ANC government, nogal. More recently, he has moved away from government service and joined the corporate world. But earlier this year, the DA was poised to become a key element of the new Government of National Unity (GNU), as the ANC's faltering lock on national politics and the electorate had made one-party government impossible to maintain. His old party then called on Leon as a youngish elder to be a leading participant in the negotiations over the formation of that GNU. His description of those efforts comprises a significant portion of his new book. Leon believes the DA is becoming increasingly well-placed to position itself, in the future, as the core party of a new political landscape, as the governing party or leader of a coalition of like-minded political groups beyond the current political landscape. The first section of his book delivers insights about the lives and careers of several Middle Eastern leaders, including Yasser Arafat, Ariel Sharon and Shimon Peres (and, by contrast, the actions of the current Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, and the Palestinian Authority leader, Mahmoud Abbas). There is also a more expansive essay on the essential nature and requisites of leadership — or the lack of it, nowadays. As Leon writes towards the end of Being There: 'In many ways, we inhabit — in the true sense — a leaderless world. Mostly, our leaders are either pedestrian placeholders or titanic ego-driven populists who use high office as an engine for self-enrichment or as an instrument of revenge against enemies, real or perceived. The Peronists in Argentina, the Zumas in South Africa, the Trumps in America and the Netanyahus in Israel — all are political grifters who set one section of society against the other. They weaponise differences and grievances, ride roughshod over rules and respect for others, and hijack public institutions for personal ends.' Leon's thoughts about populism ring about right, especially his thoughts over what he terms 'cakeism' — the appeal of would-be populist leaders and their promises that can destroy an economy. (Cue those apocryphal remarks of the queen of France about bread versus cake.) It seems entirely reasonable that such views were strengthened as he observed the glowing embers of Peronism when he was South Africa's ambassador in Argentina. Collectively, thoughts like these can easily be read as a critique of the current leaders in the Middle East. The second part of the book plays off Jesse Unruh's crisp summing up of the inevitable mix of money and politics: 'Money is the mother's milk of politics.' Unruh was a major figure in California state politics for decades, and he is on target, although there are occasionally other nutritional elements in that mix as well. (My favourite novel of politics is Robert Penn Warren's Pulitzer Prize-winning novel All the King's Men. There, Warren added the inevitability of sex as the third leg of the political triangle along with money and the temptations of power, although Leon left that third element out of his equation.) In this section, several chapters recount his fraught fundraising experiences for his party — especially since in the early days of the new dispensation, the Progressive Party/PFP/DP/DA was a minnow in a smallish pond that was also inhabited by a large shark. Another chapter includes a dissection of the public saga of Ronnie Kasrils, an approach that may have been encouraged by Kasrils' cheerleading for the Hamas militants in their 7 October 2023 attack on southern Israel. (Leon's spouse is Israeli-born born and Kasrils' language clearly infuriated Leon.) As Leon tells it, through the years of the South African liberation struggle, in exile, Kasrils had quietly been receiving a retainer from his brother-in-law, a prominent businessman in South Africa. But after Kasrils' comments on the 7 October massacre, that tap closed. Revenge, they say, is a dish best served cold, and so it has been served. Complex negotiations For many readers — those interested in the negotiations for the birthing of the GNU, and even more so, commentators and historians of South Africa's contemporary politics — Leon's detailed description of the complex negotiations between the ANC and the DA, together with some other parties leading to the formation of the GNU will be of genuine interest. Leon kept a diary throughout this entire engagement, and almost 100 pages of his book form a narrative built on those diary entries. In the future, it will be an important source for evaluations of those negotiations. Leon's recollections will be read together with those of all the others who participated in the negotiations, after they write their versions. The remaining pages of Being There include short essays on the successes and failures of FW de Klerk, Mangosuthu Buthelezi and Nelson Mandela. There is also a series of more personal reminiscences, labelled by the author as The Nostos. These include a deconstruction of the false charge that Leon's father had been responsible for sentencing the ANC operative Solomon Mahlangu to death years ago. In particular, Leon's experiences as an ambassador in Argentina during the desperate days in that country's last (so far) Peronista regime are particularly interesting, as Leon positions them as a cautionary tale of what happens when a country augers towards the ground economically and politically. Of special interest to this reader (because of his own experiences) were Leon's non-specialist but trenchant observations on Japan after visiting there. Japan has surmounted its World War 2 experience (and managed to put much of the resulting horrors aside), even as it continues to embrace many ancient traditions together with its contemporary political and economic policies designed for the benefit of a majority of its citizens. Beyond the book, our conversation also covered other topics, key among them being the current difficulties between the US and South Africa. I ask Leon who he thinks should be South Africa's ambassador to the US, or, perhaps, what kind of person should they be? Leon observes that the ambassadorial role has been diminished over the years (the recent presidents' meeting had no ambassadors present from either nation, as would usually have been the case in a meeting between two national presidents). Beyond the traditional diplomatic roles, more and more, Leon says, the job of an ambassador is to be their country's chief salesperson, instead of one of those old-style diplomats. Any new South African ambassador assigned to Washington will have a difficult policy to sell, especially given the two countries' Middle East positions. A key question now is that the Trumpian dog whistle to its Maga constituents is over DEI (diversity, equity and inclusion) and, by extension, over South Africa's Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment policies. Speculating in the immediate wake of the presidential meeting, he notes that the approach of a possible equity equivalent for Starlink operations in South Africa may lead to changing the discussion. (Of course, crime is something that is always in the air in any discussions about South Africa, and it came up in that presidents' meeting as well. It was instructive, per Leon, that rebuttals about crime in that meeting came from a white South African billionaire.) We turn to the often-repeated accusation that the DA has a problem with black leaders. Leon responds that it is unfair to call every black leader's departure from DA leadership roles a failure of black leadership in the party. People leave political bodies for many reasons. However, he adds that the party needs to make it easier and more enticing for expatriated South Africans to return to the country and make real contributions. What of the DA's future? Leon says he is most interested in matters of policy rather than party management, as he is no longer an officer-holder. He believes that by being in the GNU, the DA has improved its legitimacy and prospects with many people. Its participation in the GNU has made it more 'kosher,' so to speak, and it may well gain further traction. He thinks that if the DA can maintain this trend, it will grow even as the ANC continues to make further reversals in support. The key question, of course, is how he views South Africa's future. Leon argues that most countries, except for places like Afghanistan or Sudan, don't explode or disintegrate. He acknowledges that there still is a lot of ruin in South Africa, but citizen action is stepping forward wherever it can. Taken as a whole, Leon seems cautiously optimistic about the country's future prospects, regardless of its current problems and its challenges. DM
