Israel approves plan to take control of Gaza City
"The IDF will prepare to take control of Gaza City while providing humanitarian aid to the civilian population outside the combat zones," Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office said in a statement, referring to the Israeli Defense Forces.
While Netanyahu said on Thursday Israel intended to take military control of the entire Gaza Strip, the plan approved on Friday focused specifically on Gaza City, the largest city in the enclave, located in its north.
Axios reporter Barak Ravid, citing an Israeli official, said on X that the plan involved evacuating Palestinian civilians from Gaza City and launching a ground offensive there.
Asked if Israel would take over the entire coastal territory, Netanyahu told Fox News Channel's Bill Hemmer in an interview on Thursday: "We intend to."
But he said Israel wanted to hand over the territory to Arab forces that would govern it. He did not elaborate on the governance arrangements or which Arab countries could be involved.
"We don't want to keep it. We want to have a security perimeter. We don't want to govern it. We don't want to be there as a governing body," he said.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaks during an event in Jerusalem last month |
AFP-Jiji
Israeli officials described a previous meeting this week with the head of the military as tense, saying military chief Eyal Zamir had pushed back on expanding Israel's campaign.
Among the scenarios being considered ahead of the security meeting was a phased takeover of areas in Gaza not yet under military control, one government source said, speaking on condition of anonymity.
Evacuation warnings could be issued to Palestinians in specific areas of Gaza, potentially giving them several weeks before the military moves in, the person added.
In its Friday statement, Netanyahu's office said the vast majority of the political-security Cabinet members believed that "the alternative plan presented in the cabinet would not achieve the defeat of Hamas nor the return of the hostages."
Two government sources said any resolution by the security cabinet would need to be approved by the full cabinet, which may not meet until Sunday.
Total control of the territory would reverse a 2005 decision by Israel by which it withdrew Israeli citizens and soldiers from Gaza, while retaining control over its borders, airspace and utilities.
An Israeli military vehicle moves along Israel's southern border with the Gaza Strip on Tuesday. |
AFP-Jiji
Right-wing parties blame that withdrawal decision for the militant Palestinian group Hamas gaining power there in a 2006 election.
It was unclear whether Netanyahu was foreseeing a prolonged takeover or a short-term operation. Israel has repeatedly said it aims to dismantle Hamas and free Israeli hostages.
Hamas in a statement called Netanyahu's comments "a blatant coup" against the negotiation process.
"Netanyahu's plans to expand the aggression confirm beyond any doubt that he seeks to get rid of his captives and sacrifice them," the statement said.
Arab countries would "only support what Palestinians agree and decide on," a Jordanian official source said, adding that security in Gaza should be handled through "legitimate Palestinian institutions."
Hamas official Osama Hamdan told Al Jazeera the group would treat any force formed to govern Gaza as an "occupying" force linked to Israel.
Earlier this year, Israel and the United States rejected an Egyptian proposal, backed by Arab leaders, that envisaged the creation of an administrative committee of independent, professional Palestinian technocrats entrusted with the governance of Gaza after the war.
Protestors stand outside Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office to demand a ceasefire and the immediate release of the hostages kidnapped by Hamas, in Jerusalem, on Thursday. |
REUTERS
Opinion polls show most Israelis want the war to end in a deal that would see the release of the remaining hostages.
The White House had no immediate comment. U.S. President Donald Trump has declined to say whether he supported or opposed a potential full military takeover of Gaza by Israel.
Netanyahu's government has insisted on total victory over Hamas, which ignited the war when it staged a deadly October 2023 attack on Israel from Gaza.
The U.N. has called reports about a possible expansion of Israel's military operations in Gaza "deeply alarming" if true.
The idea, pushed especially by far-right ministers in Netanyahu's coalition, of Israeli forces moving into areas they do not already hold in the enclave has also generated alarm in Israel.
There are 50 hostages still held in Gaza, of whom Israeli officials believe 20 are alive. Most of those freed so far emerged as a result of diplomatic negotiations. Talks toward a ceasefire that could have seen more hostages released collapsed in July.
A senior Palestinian official said Hamas had told Arab mediators an increase in humanitarian aid entering Gaza would lead to a resumption in ceasefire negotiations.
Israeli officials accuse Hamas of seizing aid to hand to its fighters and to sell to finance its operations, accusations the militant group denies.
Videos released last week of two living hostages showed them emaciated and frail, stirring international condemnation.
Recent images of starving children from Gaza have also shocked the world and fueled international criticism of Israel over the sharply worsening conditions in the enclave.
Hamas, which has ruled Gaza for nearly two decades but now controls only fragmented parts, insists any deal must lead to a permanent end to the war. Israel says the group has no intention of going through with promises to give up power afterward.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Today
6 hours ago
- Japan Today
Israel in talks to resettle Gaza Palestinians in South Sudan, sources say
FILE PHOTO: Palestinians carry aid supplies they collected from trucks that entered Gaza through Israel, in Beit Lahia, in the northern Gaza Strip August 10, 2025. REUTERS/Dawoud Abu Alkas/File Photo South Sudan and Israel are discussing a deal to resettle Palestinians from war-torn Gaza in the troubled African nation, three sources told Reuters - a plan quickly dismissed as unacceptable by Palestinian leaders. The sources, who have knowledge of the matter but spoke on condition of anonymity, said no agreement had been reached but talks between South Sudan and Israel were ongoing. The plan, if carried further, would envisage people moving from an enclave shattered by almost two years of war with Israel to a nation in the heart of Africa riven by years of political and ethnically-driven violence. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office and Israel's foreign ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the information from the three sources. A spokesperson for the U.S. State Department said, "we do not speak to private diplomatic conversations," when asked about the plan and if the United States supported the idea. Netanyahu said this month he intends to extend military control in Gaza, and this week repeated suggestions that Palestinians should leave the territory voluntarily. Arab and world leaders have rejected the idea of moving Gaza's population to any country. Palestinians say that would be like another "Nakba" (catastrophe) when hundreds of thousands fled or were forced out during the Arab-Israeli war of 1948. The three sources said the prospect of resettling Palestinians in South Sudan was raised during meetings between Israeli officials and South Sudanese Foreign Minister Monday Semaya Kumba when he visited the country last month. Their account appeared to contradict South Sudan's foreign ministry which on Wednesday dismissed earlier reports on the plan as "baseless". The ministry was not immediately available to respond to the sources' assertions on Friday. News of the discussions was first reported by the Associated Press on Tuesday, citing six people with knowledge of the matter. Wasel Abu Youssef, a member of the Executive Committee of the Palestine Liberation Organization, said the Palestinian leadership and people "reject any plan or idea to displace any of our people to South Sudan or to any other place". His statement echoed a statement from the office of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas on Thursday. Hamas, which is fighting Israel in Gaza, did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Israeli Deputy Foreign Minister Sharren Haskel, who visited the South Sudanese capital Juba this week, told reporters that those discussions had not focussed on relocation. "This is not what the discussions were about," she said when asked if any such plan had been discussed. "The discussions were about foreign policy, about multilateral organizations, about the humanitarian crisis, the real humanitarian crisis happening in South Sudan, and about the war," she said, referring to her talks with Juba officials. Netanyahu, who met Kumba last month, has said Israel is in touch with a few countries to find a destination for Palestinians who want to leave Gaza. He has consistently declined to provide further details. © Thomson Reuters 2025.
NHK
21 hours ago
- NHK
Israeli media: Mossad head in Qatar for talks on Gaza ceasefire, hostages
Israeli media outlets say the head of Israel's intelligence agency Mossad has visited Qatar for talks on a ceasefire and hostage release in the Gaza Strip. The reports say David Barnea was in Doha on Thursday and met Qatar's prime minister. Qatar is acting as a mediator between Israel and the Islamic group Hamas. Ceasefire negotiations have been stalled since an Israeli delegation left Qatar at the end of last month. Hamas announced on Tuesday that its delegation had visited Egypt, another mediator, to hold talks with senior government officials there. The focus now is whether ceasefire talks will resume. Israel continues attacks on Gaza while stepping up pressure on Hamas. The country announced a plan to extend its military operation in the territory. Health authorities in Gaza said on Thursday that 54 people had died during the previous 24 hours, bringing the total death toll in the enclave to 61,776 since the current conflict began in October 2023.
Asahi Shimbun
a day ago
- Asahi Shimbun
EDITORIAL: Japan's role as a protector of peace now called into question
Eighty years ago following the end of World War II, the victors, mindful of the dreadful loss of life, sought to create a rule-based system rather than rely on the strength of nations to maintain international order. But that principle has grown weaker and domination by force has again reared its ugly head. The International Criminal Court (ICC) in the Netherlands was established in 2002 to prosecute those responsible for the gravest crimes against humanity from an independent perspective rather than having victors in war make those judgments. But the ICC now faces relentless pressure from both the United States and Russia, two permanent members of the U.N. Security Council. SUPERPOWERS NOT FULFILLING THEIR ROLES Last year, the ICC issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and a former defense minister, together with a former Hamas commander, citing war crimes committed in Gaza. U.S. President Donald Trump retaliated in June by implementing economic sanctions that froze the assets of four ICC judges. An emergency meeting of ICC judges was convened at which one of those targeted by the sanctions said tearfully: 'I have undertaken my work to bring about justice for crime victims. But I have been placed on a sanctions list next to terrorists for an extremely irrational reason given unilaterally by the United States, which is not even a member. Is there anything that is more humiliating than this?' Other ICC judges, including President Tomoko Akane, were reportedly moved by the appeal. Akane has been placed on Russia's most wanted list after the ICC issued an arrest warrant for President Vladimir Putin over reported mass abductions of Ukrainian children by Russian forces. This is the situation that prevails 80 years after the end of World War II. By invading Ukraine, Russia ignored the provisions of international law which state that a nation's territory is inviolable. For his part, Trump has called for annexing the territory of other nations, Canada, for example. The United States also turned a blind eye to the international order by bombing nuclear facilities in Iran. China is also applying greater military and economic pressure on other nations. The U.N. Charter calls on its members to maintain international peace and security by upholding international law. Based on the lesson that the cooperation of major powers was needed to maintain order, five nations were named as permanent members of the U.N. Security Council and given veto power. But the United States and Russia, which created the United Nations and the Security Council, have flouted international laws, threatened to use nuclear weapons and repeatedly vetoed resolutions not to their liking. THE COURSE AHEAD FOR JAPAN Japan has prospered due to the benefits arising from the rule of law. With scarce food and other resources and limits to strengthening its defense because of a tight fiscal situation, Japan's lifeline for prosperity and national security is free trade and international law. If its key ally the United States acts in a way that undermines the existing international order, it could lead to a reassessment of Japan's reliance on Washington, which could have been excessive in the past. Japan took the initiative for the Trans-Pacific Partnership and must continue to shoulder the role of promoting free trade. Given the current security environment, defense capability based on the alliance with the United States is necessary, but diplomacy plays a much greater role than military force. There will be a need to deepen cooperation with nations that share the belief in the rule of law, such as South Korea, Australia and those in Europe, as well as occasionally take a stance critical of Washington. In explaining how she, as a Japanese, became the ICC president, Akane said, 'It reflects the fact Japan has maintained a pacifist stance throughout the postwar era as well as transmitted to the world the importance of rule of law.' Eighty years after the end of World War II, Japan's role as a protector of that rule of law is being called into question. --The Asahi Shimbun, Aug. 15
