Fiji among big Pacific losers under Trump tariffs
Fiji - and American lovers of high-end bottled water Fiji Water - stand as the big losers of US President Donald Trump's aggressive tariff play in the Pacific.
In the blue continent, some of the world's poorest economies are reeling after discovering they too will be subject to tariffs from the White House.
The US President unveiled global tariffs on imported goods on Thursday (AEDT), which he labelled "Liberation Day" for the American economy.
https://t.co/4cSd2sXy7C
— The White House (@WhiteHouse) April 2, 2025
Fiji has been levied at 32 per cent, Vanuatu at 23 per cent and Nauru at 30 per cent.
That will mean the favourite bottled water of many Americans - Fiji Water - should get a lot more expensive.
The US is Fiji's biggest goods export market, dominated by the country's eponymous branded water: roughly $A400 million worth of the bottled spring water headed across the Pacific in 2023.
Fiji Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka said the move was akin to a "trade blockade" that Fiji could not win.
"We cannot fight a war, a trade war particularly. We don't have anything to counter with. So we will have to weather the storm and roll the punches," he said, as reported by FBC.
Other Pacific nations - including Papua New Guinea, French Polynesia, Samoa, Tonga, Solomon Islands, Cook Islands, Kiribati and the Federated States of Micronesia - have been given a 10 per cent tariff.
For some countries, this will hurt more than others.
For instance, Tonga counts the US as its second-biggest export market, for Samoa, it is third, and Vanuatu, it is fifth.
However, Solomon Islands exports goods worth just $A1.75 million to the US in 2024, making it the 17th biggest export market and of little significance.
Vanuatu is not as exposed to the US economy as Fiji, but is another nation to be hit with a higher tariff rate, making its products less competitive.
Westpac analyst Justin Smirk said it was important to remember that the region's biggest export was not affected by the dramatic policy.
"Fiji's biggest export market is actually tourism. It's the most important revenue earner and these tariffs do not touch tourism," he told AAP.
We went to Washington DC to get the best possible result for New Zealand in the circumstances, by making strong, genuine, in-person connections with the US Administration. The purpose of our mission has been achieved. Indeed, New Zealand companies, who were fearing much worse,…
— Winston Peters (@NewZealandMFA) April 2, 2025
In New Zealand, Foreign Minister Winston Peters said the Kiwi rate of 10 per cent should be seen as a success from a recent diplomatic mission.
"We went to Washington DC to get the best possible result for New Zealand in the circumstances, by making strong, genuine, in-person connections with the US administration," he wrote on social media.
"The purpose of our mission has been achieved. Indeed, New Zealand companies, who were fearing much worse, are well positioned compared to exporters from other countries."
Prime Minister Chris Luxon said he was less concerned about the impact to Kiwi exporters than where the move may lead.
"Our exporters are deeply deeply competitive. The products and services we sell are in huge demand around the world," he said.
"The bigger worry will be the global impact and the wash-up of the tit-for-tat trade wars that may ensue."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
32 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Fact Check: Are Marines Refusing to Go to Los Angeles?
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Posts on social media suggest Marines are refusing to enter Los Angeles during protests and rioting, but there is no evidence to suggest that is the case. Protests in L.A. against immigration enforcement began on Friday and are continuing, resulting in some isolated incidents of violence and looting. Tensions escalated when, in response, President Donald Trump announced the deployment of 2,000 National Guard troops to restore order, without the consent of California Governor Gavin Newsom. On Monday he said 2,000 more guardsmen would be deployed, as well as active-duty U.S. Marines. L.A. Mayor Karen Bass said the use of troops was unnecessary and counterproductive. Newsom in response filed an emergency motion to block this deployment. A judge rejected this request. A curfew has been imposed in parts of the city. Los Angeles Police Department officers push protesters toward Little Tokyo in downtown LA, Calif., on June 9, 2025. Los Angeles Police Department officers push protesters toward Little Tokyo in downtown LA, Calif., on June 9, 2025. Photo by Caylo Seals/Sipa USA)(Sipa via AP Images The Claim A number of posts on social media suggested that 700 Marines did not go to Los Angeles despite Trump's call. One post, which at the time of writing had been viewed more than 380,000 times, said: "The fact that 700 Marines didn't actually show is a bigger deal than a lot of people are acting, imo [in my opinion.] The same social media user later posted: "It's commanding officers refusing to cooperate with the Secretary of Defense's orders." The Facts However, the social media accusations appear to be based on misunderstanding of a report by Fox News' chief national security correspondent Jennifer Griffin. She posted on X that Marines ordered to help had not yet arrived because they were undergoing training. This is not akin to Marines refusing to cooperate with orders. A CBS News report also said that 700 Marines arrived in the area and were ready to be deployed. Reuters said they were in a staging area in Seal Beach, about 50 km south of L.A. And a New York Times report cited a U.S. Northern Command spokeswoman who reportedly said the Marines will work alongside 2,100 National Guard members who are already in the city and are expected to be deployed on Wednesday. The spokeswoman told the publication the troops would not be involved in making arrests. The Ruling False. While it appears to be true that at the time of posting on social media, Marines had not arrived in L.A, this is because of training schedules and other scheduling choices, and not because they had refused to serve or comply with orders. Newsweek contacted the Pentagon and the White House outside of normal business hours to comment on this story. FACT CHECK BY Newsweek
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Scofflaw Strongman
DONALD TRUMP SAYS HIS LATEST VENTURE into dictatorship—deploying the National Guard and Marines against American citizens, over the opposition of state and local officials—is about safeguarding the rule of law. 'If we see danger to our country and to our citizens, we'll be very, very strong in terms of law and order,' Trump told reporters on Sunday, as protests escalated in Los Angeles against his deportations. 'It's about law and order.' Don't believe it. Trump is using the Guard and the military to enforce his will, not the law. The evidence of his insincerity is what he did four years ago: When rioters were on his side, he didn't call in the Guard. He embraced the criminals, pardoned them, and purged the law enforcement officials who prosecuted them. He's a despot and a scofflaw. In the Los Angeles uprising, Trump—like every authoritarian before him—claims to be saving his country from chaos. 'Violent, insurrectionist mobs are swarming and attacking our Federal Agents,' he declared on Sunday afternoon. 'These lawless riots only strengthen our resolve.' A few hours later, he called for 'bringing in the troops . . . RIGHT NOW!!! Don't let these thugs get away with this.' And on Monday afternoon, he ridiculed any suggestion that the protesters were peaceful. 'Just one look at the pictures and videos of the Violence and Destruction,' he wrote, 'tells you all you have to know.' Insurrectionist mobs. Lawless riots. Videos of violence. We've heard such alarming descriptions before. And on January 6, 2021, we saw how little Trump cared about them. Share AT 1:21 P.M. THAT DAY, AS TRUMP returned to the White House after instructing his supporters to march on the Capitol, he was told twice by a member of his staff, 'They're rioting down at the Capitol.' The exact moment of this encounter was captured in a photograph. Trump replied, 'All right, let's go see.' He went to his dining room and watched on TV as the riot proceeded. For the next hour, TV networks aired videos of the violence and destruction. Like this week's videos from Los Angeles, they told the president all he needed to know. But Trump did nothing. Toward the end of that hour—somewhere between 2:13 and 2:24 pm, according to the final report of the House January 6th Committee—Trump's chief of staff, Mark Meadows, informed White House Counsel Pat Cipollone that Trump 'doesn't want to do anything' about the ongoing assault. A few minutes later, Cipollone was heard to tell Meadows, 'They're literally calling for the Vice President to be F'ing hung.' And Meadows was heard to reply, 'You heard him, Pat. He thinks Mike [Pence] deserves it. He doesn't think they're doing anything wrong.' Meanwhile, in a phone call, House Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy warned Trump that the rioters 'literally just came through my office windows, and my staff are running for cover. I mean, they're running for their lives. You need to call them [the assailants] off.' Trump responded by rebuking McCarthy: 'Well, Kevin, I guess they're just more upset about the election theft than you are.' These conversations took place as Fox News, which Trump was watching, reported that police had been injured and that rioters inside the Capitol were 'feet from the House chamber.' On the screen, according to the House committee report, Fox 'was showing video of the chaos and attack, with tear gas filling the air in the Capitol Rotunda.' Throughout the afternoon, Trump's aides, family, and friends implored him to tell the rioters to go home. He refused. Not until 4:17 p.m., nearly three hours after being informed about the riot, did he comply. Join now TRUMP NOW CLAIMS that he told the rioters to be peaceful and that he offered ten thousand National Guard troops to protect the Capitol. The first claim is misleading. The second is a lie. The House report shows that before and during the assault, Trump resisted entreaties to call for peace. On January 6th, a text message to one of his top aides, Hope Hicks, said Trump 'should tweet something about Being NON-violent.' Hicks wrote back: 'I suggested it several times Monday and Tuesday and he refused.' At one point in his incendiary speech that morning, Trump did ask his followers to march to the Capitol 'peacefully.' But that phrase, according to the House report, was 'scripted for him by his White House speechwriters.' The main theme of the speech was to 'fight like hell.' Another Trump aide, Sarah Matthews, told the committee that once the riot was underway, Trump resisted pleas to call for peace. He did use the term 'peaceful' in a tweet at 2:38 p.m., but only grudgingly. Trump's press secretary, Kayleigh McEnany, told Matthews that Trump 'did not want to include any sort of mention of peace in that tweet.' Trump's other January 6th story, about the National Guard, is also a sham. His acting defense secretary, his Army secretary, and his chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff all testified that he never ordered the Guard to deploy that day. He never even spoke to these officials. Instead, during the riot, he used his phone to press members of Congress to do what the mob wanted: overturn the election. It's true that before the attack, Trump talked about the possibility of needing guardsmen. But it was never about protecting the Capitol. It was, in Meadows's words, to 'protect pro Trump people' from anti-Trump protesters. In short, everything Trump decries in Los Angeles happened on January 6th, and more. A violent, insurrectionist mob swarmed and attacked police. And instead of bringing in the Guard 'RIGHT NOW,' Trump watched the assault, encouraged the mob, and waited to see whether it would keep him in power. In fact, when he returned to office this year, Trump pardoned nearly everyone who had pleaded guilty to or had been convicted of assaulting police on January 6th. He said the insurrectionists were right: 'They were protesting a crooked election.' He purged the prosecutors who had handled those cases. And in a speech at the Department of Justice, he boasted that he had 'removed the senior FBI officials' who, in his words, had persecuted the 'J6 hostages.' Share NOW, AS HE DEPLOYS THE MILITARY against protesters in an American city, Trump invokes 'law and order' as a bogus excuse. And he vows to go further. On Monday, he announced a policy of escalation against protesters. 'If they spit, we will hit,' he wrote on Truth Social. 'This is a statement from the President of the United States. . . . The Insurrectionists have a tendency to spit in the face of the National Guardsmen/women, and others. . . . IF THEY SPIT, WE WILL HIT, and I promise you they will be hit harder than they have ever been hit before.' On Tuesday, speaking to troops at Fort Bragg, Trump said he was seizing control of the National Guard and ending the tradition of consulting governors. 'We will use every asset at our disposal to quell the violence and restore law and order right away,' he declared. 'We're not going to wait . . . for a governor that's never going to call.' And in remarks in the Oval Office, Trump said his policy of escalating state violence would apply to anyone who protests the military parade on June 14, his birthday. 'If there's any protester [who] wants to come out, they will be met with very big force,' he warned. 'For those people that want to protest. . . . They will be met with very heavy force.' This is not a man defending the rule of law. This is a man continuing the project he began in his first term and tried to complete on January 6th: replacing the rule of law with himself. Share The Bulwark
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'They Went Too Far': Elon Musk Just Walked Back Some Of His Explosive Criticism Of Trump
Elon Musk on Wednesday conceded that some of his recent, sharp criticism of Donald Trump 'went too far,' in an apparent effort to mend ties with the president after their nasty public feud. In a post on his social media platform X, formerly Twitter, Musk made his most overt offer yet to bury the hatchet. 'I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week,' Musk wrote. 'They went too far.' Musk didn't clarify which posts he was referring to. About a week after he left his post at the White House, Musk condemned Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' urging Americans to kill the legislation, describing it as a 'disgusting abomination.' In response, Trump threatened to revoke the government contracts Musk's companies have secured, prompting the billionaire to turn his attacks up a notch. 'Time to drop the really big bomb,' Musk wrote Thursday. '[Trump] is in the [Jeffrey] Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public.' The White House had promised to release the full documents related to the disgraced financier's case, but what was ultimately put out was largely already known. Musk also at one point seemed to call for the president's impeachment — another stunning development given his prominent role in Trump's 2024 presidential campaign. Musk appears to have since deleted both posts. Trump over the weekend told NBC's Kristen Welker he has no interest in repairing their relationship. But the president has since appeared more open to rapprochement. Asked if he plans to speak to Musk, Trump told reporters on Monday: 'I would imagine he wants to speak to me, I would think so.' 'If I were him I'd want to speak to me,' he added. Even before Wednesday's explicit acknowledgement of his regret for some of his criticism of Trump, Musk has signaled he was ready for a truce. The Tesla and SpaceX CEO seemed to applaud Trump's response to the protests in Los Angeles, amplifying social media posts by the president and his allies about the immigration protests. The billionaire donated nearly $300 million to Trump's 2024 White House bid and served as a top surrogate on the campaign trail. Elon Just Couldn't Stop Posting About Trump — And Experts Say It's Very Revealing Trump Reveals What's Next For That Tesla He Bought From Elon Musk Jon Stewart Busts Biggest Right-Wing Myth About 'F**king Pussies' Trump And Elon Musk