European leaders hope to sway Trump on Ukraine during virtual meeting
Trump and his vice-president, JD Vance, will join a meeting convened by German Chancellor Friedrich Merz in the early afternoon (central European time) that will also include Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, and the leaders of Finland, France, Italy, Poland, the UK, the NATO Secretary-General and the chiefs of the European Commission and Council.
Merz, France's Emmanuel Macron and British premier Keir Starmer will then chair a meeting of the so-called coalition of the willing, scheduled to start at around 16:30 CET, according to media reports.
"We welcome the efforts of President Trump to reach peace for Ukraine, a peace that is just and lasting and respects sovereignty and territorial integrity. And in this sense, we are working with Ukraine to make sure that this is kept in mind in the meeting on Friday," a spokesperson for the European Commission told reporters on Tuesday.
"What we're doing now is reiterating our views on what a just and lasting peace for Ukraine should be and that any decision on Ukraine can be taken with Ukraine at the table," Arianna Podestà added.
Europe seen by Trump and Putin 'as largely irrelevant'
Zelenskyy is not expected to attend the summit to be held in Alaska on 15 August between the US and Russian presidents. Trump told reporters on Monday that "out of respect I'll call him first" after the talks wrap up.
The announcement last week that a summit would be held has led to a flurry of diplomatic contact in Europe over fears Ukraine and the wider continent's interests will be trampled on in a bid for a quick deal.
EU leaders - bar Hungary - reiterated in a joint statement on Tuesday that no deal can be made without Ukraine at the table. They also wrote that "international borders must not be changed by force", thereby rejecting Putin's ceasefire proposal to trade the Ukrainian territories of Donetsk and Luhansk.
"Unable to bring much to the negotiations, European leaders have been relegated to the margins with the EU seen by Trump and Putin as largely irrelevant," Dr Neil Melvin, Director of International Security at the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI), told Euronews.
"European leaders are able to inform Trump of their ideas, and the US will brief them on the summit outcomes, but Europe is in the position that the Ukraine conflict outcomes are being negotiated over its head and the continent's leadership is essentially an observer," he added.
The call with Trump and Vance is a last-ditch attempt before the summit to get that point across before the Arctic meet-up.
Trump treating peace deal like a 'real estate transaction'
One of the central issues for Europeans, Ian Bond told Euronews, is that Trump appears to be treating a possible peace deal in Ukraine "like a real estate transaction".
"He does not understand that some of the territory in the east of Ukraine that Putin covets would be vital to Ukraine's defence when (and it is 'when' not 'if') Russia resumes its aggression and tries to take more Ukrainian territory," the deputy director of the Centre for European Reform (CER) added.
Additionally, recent comments by Trump "showed that he still blames Zelenskyy for the war, even though Russia was the aggressor."
Vance's participation is also "significant", Majda Ruge, a senior policy fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR) told Euronews, "because his position is further away from the one Europeans are hoping to get President Trump to agree to".
The US vice-president told Fox News on Sunday that the US is "done with the funding of the Ukraine war business. We want to bring about a peaceful settlement to this thing".
He also said that any deal was "not going to make anybody super happy" and called on Europe "to step up and take a bigger role in this thing, and if you care so much about this conflict you should be willing to play a more direct and a more substantial way in funding this war yourself".
The EU and its member states are the biggest contributors to Ukraine's defence through their financial, humanitarian and military assistance to the war-torn country since the beginning of Russia's full-scale invasion in late February 2022.
"The US Vice-President is keen to improve US relations with Russia and sees a need for compromise with Russian President Putin. He is therefore more likely to push for a position that involves greater concessions from Ukraine than what President Zelenskyy or the European leaders would like to see," Ruge added.
Can European leaders sway Trump?
The European leaders present in the meeting with Trump will then brief their counterparts involved in the so-called coalition of the willing.
The group, led by France and the UK, was formed back in March following the initial thawing of relations between Washington and Moscow to discuss the security guarantees Europe could offer in the event of a peace deal.
This will be their seventh meeting.
They have so far agreed to the creation of a 'Multinational Force Ukraine' following reconnaissance visits to Ukraine by military chiefs and to "bolster Ukraine's ability to return to peace and stability", and to the establishment of a headquarters in Paris.
"So far, the coalition of the willing has not been particularly willing to act. Its focus has been on preparing to support a peace settlement that was never likely as long as Putin's war aims were unchanged," Bond opined.
"But what Ukraine needs at present is a coalition willing to help it before the cessation of hostilities – to put enough pressure on Russian forces that Putin is incentivised to stop fighting and make concessions. There is no sign of such a coalition at present," he added.
The grouping itself, Dr Melvin said, "is a sign that the main institutions of the Euro-Atlantic community are now unable to deliver the political and security solutions that Europe needs" due to the fact that the EU and NATO run primarily on consensus.
Whether Europe's efforts to rally Trump to their cause are fruitful will likely only be observed in Alaska on Friday.
Their exchange will have been successful if Trump "stands up to Putin in Alaska, strengthens Zelenskyy's position militarily, and joins the Europeans in increasing sanctions pressure on Russia," Bond said, cautioning however that "it seems unlikely that the meeting will achieve any of those outcomes" given recent comments from US officials.
"Maybe the best we can hope for is that Putin over-reaches so that even Trump finds it impossible to accept his proposals," he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
Trump and Putin wrap up Alaska meeting with no mention of ceasefire
As Donald Trump hosted Vladimir Putin for a historic summit in Alaska, Ukraine and Europe held their breath for what the meeting could bring. For the US president, the summit represented an unprecedented opportunity to establish himself as a peacemaker and push Russia to a ceasefire. For Putin, this was a chance to change tack despite his unwillingness to engage in direct negotiations with his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Ukraine's president was invited to the summit at the US military Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage on Friday. Still, Trump hopes he will be present for the next round of talks. Following the Trump-Putin press conference after the meeting, it is increasingly likely that there will be a second meeting after the negotiations in Alaska. Review the latest information and analysis on the Trump-Putin summit in Alaska as Euronews journalists around Europe brought you the latest developments on Friday night in the blog below:
LeMonde
4 hours ago
- LeMonde
Sylvie Kauffmann: 'Putin can pretend to negotiate and engage in endless talks that never lead anywhere'
A bilateral meeting lasting under three hours, followed by a 12-minute joint press conference with no announcements: The Friday, August 15, summit between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin in Alaska left many questions unanswered. By Saturday morning, as European leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky began reacting, Le Monde columnist Sylvie Kauffmann spoke with readers during our live coverage of the war in Ukraine. Pierre: Diplomacy is sometimes a theater, with each side seeking to claim success and assign blame in case of failure. Trump had gotten us used to breaking with tradition. Today, he is acting out a classic scenario. Isn't that already a sign that this summit has failed? Sylvie Kauffmann: Calling the summit a failure depends on what was expected of it. If people were hoping Vladimir Putin would commit to a serious ceasefire, then yes, it was clearly a failure. But I do not think that was a reasonable expectation. At this stage, with no results announced, it is neither a success nor a failure. We will have to judge based on the reactions of Europeans, so far very cautious, and the Trump-Zelensky meeting on Monday. There is, however, a significant risk, well known to Europeans: Putin can buy time by pretending to be ready to negotiate and engage in endless talks that never lead anywhere, while his army continues to gain ground and bomb Ukraine. That was essentially the tactic he used after the annexation of Crimea and the first invasion of Ukraine in 2014, during the Minsk negotiations with France, Germany and Ukraine. Let's discuss: How should we interpret the welcome given to President Putin as he came off his plane – with the red carpet, applause and a show of military strength featuring American jets in the background? S.K.: Trump is fascinated by Putin as a figure – he generally gets along well with "strongmen," but he is particularly interested in the Russian leader. He calls him by his first name, Vladimir, which he never does with Zelensky. All of this staging, on a US military base, was meant both to demonstrate American power to Putin and to treat him as the leader of another major power, worthy of every honor. This treatment is all the more ironic since Putin is not only the aggressor of an independent country, in violation of international law, but also subject to an arrest warrant for war crimes. Dodochampion: On the Russian side, did this summit have any other ambitions beyond relaunching Russia's international trade? S.K.: Putin's goal at this summit was first to gain respectability and second to buy time. On both counts, he succeeded: The welcome by the US president on American soil, with great ceremony, rehabilitated him on the international stage, even if he is a pariah in Europe. Furthermore, by engaging in this form of dialogue with Trump, he managed to get the ultimatums and the threat of further sanctions against Russia lifted – at least for the time being: Trump said on Fox News that the issue of sanctions was off the table for two or three weeks. That matters to Putin because the Russian economy is showing serious signs of weakness. And in the meantime, he can keep bombing Ukraine and continue his offensive in the east of the country. On the other hand, Putin failed to turn this meeting into a major Russo-American summit on economic and trade relations or on strategic dialogue regarding arms control. Nice: The statements from Trump and Putin were devoid of substance, suggesting there was no progress. On the US side, shouldn't this lead to a North Korea scenario – that is, the United States losing interest in the matter (and leaving it to the Europeans)? S.K.: Yes, that's possible. Several American experts have drawn a parallel with the 2018 Trump-Kim Jong-un meeting, in which Trump invested a great deal (with the difference that he also wanted to invite Kim to ride with him in The Beast, the presidential limousine, but at the time his advisers convinced him not to – which was not the case with Putin...). Then he lost interest in the North Korea issue after there was no progress. If Trump decides to lose interest in the Ukrainian issue, it will be up to the Europeans to handle it alone. The question then is what level of American military assistance they can still count on, particularly in intelligence and satellite reconnaissance. But they now know that under Trump, the US will disengage from Europe. Vice President JD Vance stated clearly last week that the US would no longer fund Ukraine's defense. So the dynamic is clear. Patrick: Don't you think Trump's attitude puts the US in a position of weakness? It's obvious Trump is afraid of Putin, which puts the latter in a position of strength, with the likely consequence of destabilizing the West for Russia's benefit. What cards does the West have left to ensure its own survival and that of Ukraine? S.K.: You raise a crucial point, but first, speaking of "the West" raises the question of whether that concept still exists under Trump. Clearly, the fate of Ukraine does not have the same meaning or importance for the current Washington administration as it does for the majority of Europeans. For Europe, Ukraine's survival as a sovereign and independent state is existential; for Trump's America, it is not. Yes, the American president is impressed by Putin, and that may seem like a weakness to us, but he sees Putin as a "strong" leader of another major power that, incidentally, has "a lot of land, a lot of rare earths and oil," and with whom he believes he can do "great things," as he has said. The cards the Europeans can play are unity and firmness, particularly in defense, a field where they have a lot of ground to make up, but which they have started to address. That will require significant political effort.
LeMonde
6 hours ago
- LeMonde
After the Trump-Putin summit, Europe must make a move
Everything unfolded just as the Europeans had expected. The summit on Friday, August 15, between Presidents Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin in Anchorage, Alaska, ended without any concrete prospects for a ceasefire in Ukraine. However, it worked to the advantage of the Russian president, who found himself rehabilitated on the world stage thanks to the event. The aggressor of an independent country, Ukraine, which he claims as his own, and wanted by the International Criminal Court for war crimes, Putin was treated on Friday by the United States with all the honors reserved for a respected leader of a major power. Greeted as he stepped off the plane by President Trump, invited to walk the red carpet with him to the American president's limousine and then invited inside, the Russian president clearly appreciated these gestures. To express his gratitude to Trump, he echoed two grievances dear to the Republican president: that the 2020 presidential election, won by Joe Biden, was fraudulent, and that the war in Ukraine would never have started if Trump had been president. As for the rest, while describing the meeting as very "productive" and on "the path to peace in Ukraine," Putin merely reiterated, during a brief joint appearance before the press, the "underlying causes" of his conflict with Ukraine. The talks lasted just over two and a half hours, whereas the Kremlin had planned for "six to seven hours" of discussions. The scheduled lunch did not take place, journalists were not allowed to ask questions and the exchanges apparently did not touch on commercial or economic matters, nor on arms control – contrary to Moscow's wishes. For his part, Trump showered "Vladimir" with praise, calling him "a strong guy (...) tough as hell." He spoke of a "very productive" meeting where there were "many points that we agreed on," except for one, "probably the most significant," which he did not specify. The American president, who had threatened Russia just a few days earlier with "very severe consequences" if it failed to achieve a ceasefire in Ukraine, stated on Fox News on Friday that the question of new sanctions was not under consideration for the time being, but that he might have to think about it in two or three weeks. In light of this lack of results, the ball is now in the Europeans' court. On Saturday morning, Trump briefed them, as well as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, on his discussions and the points of agreement he mentioned. Even before speaking to them, he offered this advice to Zelensky on Fox News after the summit: "Make a deal!" From the way Putin and Trump presented matters in Anchorage, it can be inferred that the proposed "deal" is not in Kyiv's favor. Echoing Trump, Putin said he hoped the Europeans "won't throw a wrench in the works and not make any attempts to use some backroom dealings to conduct provocations to torpedo the progress." Keen not to miss any chance to end the war, the Ukrainian president nonetheless responded positively to the idea of a three-way meeting with Putin and Trump, and decided to travel to Washington on Monday to discuss it. The scenario Europeans have feared – a settlement hashed out behind their backs by the Russian and American leaders – cannot be ruled out. However, unlike Trump, Putin acknowledged that they, together with Kyiv, have cards to play. The time has come to use them, and to do so with resolve.
