High blood pressure cases rise – three ways to prevent hypertension at home
A dietician has shared some ways to lower blood pressure at home. High blood pressure – also known as hypertension – affects one in three adults across the UK, significantly increasing the risk of heart attacks, strokes, kidney failure, and even dementia. Often going under the radar without any symptoms, many people often are oblivious to their condition until it causes other health issues.
Despite the NHS rolling out health checks for those over 40 and pharmacies offering blood pressure screenings, the number of hypertension diagnoses continues to rise, especially among younger people. The NHS has previously reported that a lack of exercise, unhealthy eating habits, and excessive alcohol consumption are the biggest risk factors for hypertension, but chronic stress can also be a cause.
Professor Jacob George, chair of cardiovascular medicine at the University of Dundee, expressed his concern to the Daily Mail: "I've been doing this clinic for 20 years. When I started, roughly one in five people with hypertension referred to me were below the age of 30. That's easily doubled.
"Now I'd say one in three referred to me are young, and obesity is the main driver – it really is one of the biggest challenges we face."
Now, dietician Courtney Kassis has shared her top tips that she urges clients to follow in order to naturally bring down their blood pressure or prevent the condition entirely.
"My client just [lowered his blood pressure] in one month after our first appointment," the nutrition specialist said in her video. "Here are three nutrition strategies I recommend to all of my clients with high blood pressure that can improve your numbers within weeks."
Limit processed foods and added sugar
"Number one, limit processed foods and added sugars. Insulin resistance and overall inflammation is very closely tied to elevated blood pressure," she said.
"Limit foods like sugary drinks, refined carbohydrates that cause significant blood sugar spikes. And ultra-processed foods with inflammatory ingredients that can also drive elevated insulin levels and inflammation."
According to the British Heart Foundation, eating too many ultra-processed foods increases the risk of high blood pressure, heart disease, heart attacks and strokes.
More than half of the typical British daily diet is made up of ultra-processed food, including breakfast cereals, ready meals, frozen pizzas, sweets and biscuits.
Eat more whole foods
"Second is eat more whole foods. Incorporating more non-starchy veggies, low-glycaemic fruits, nuts and seeds regularly will deliver essential nutrients like potassium, magnesium, and fibre, crucial for managing blood pressure," Courtney said.
The NHS advises that we should all strive to consume at least five portions of a variety of fruits and vegetables daily, which should constitute about a third of the food we eat each day. This could be fresh, frozen, tinned, dried or juiced. Starchy foods, such as pasta, rice and potatoes, should also account for a third of our daily food intake, serving as a good source of energy.
We should also aim to include some protein in every meal. This could come from dairy, vegetable sources like lentils and beans, or lean cuts of meat and mince. It's also recommended to have at least two portions of fish every week, one of which should be an oily variety like salmon or mackerel.
Swap out table salt
Courtney suggested a swap when it comes to salt: "When it comes to salt, swap your table salt for sea salt which contains essential minerals for blood pressure control. Sea salt in moderation can provide these essential minerals."
Both table salt and sea salt, along with all other types of salt, can contribute to high blood pressure if consumed excessively due to their sodium content, according to the British Heart Foundation.
The NHS reports that adults should not consume more than 6g of salt a day (around one levelled teaspoon). Consuming too much salt can lead to high blood pressure, which increases the risk of heart attacks and strokes.
If you suspect you have high blood pressure or are at risk of developing it, the NHS advises scheduling an appointment with your GP. This is also recommended if you're over 40 years old and haven't had your blood pressure checked in more than five years.
Some pharmacies and workplaces also provide blood pressure tests.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
5 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Boost focus and memory with this best-selling brain supplement users are calling a 'Brain fix! — Now 20% OFF
By Published: Updated: Daily Mail journalists select and curate the products that feature on our site. If you make a purchase via links on this page we will earn commission - learn more Brain fog got ya down? We know life can get messy and, above all, stressful with so many things to do and little time to do them all. With so much on our plates, it can feel overwhelming and thus cause unwanted side effects such as insomnia and anxiety. Luckily, we just found a supplement on Amazon that is changing the game! Nature's Craft Nootropic Brain Supplement (90-day Supply) Do you feel like your brain could use a little boost? This daily supplement helps focus, memory, and so much more with just a small pill! Using a unique formula of nootropics, you can see a difference in everything from studying habits to sleep routines. When you subscribe you can snag a 90-day supply for 10 percent off! $24 Shop Nature's Craft is turning heads with their Nootropic Brain Supplement that uses naturally sourced powerhouses, such as Vitamin A, to support cognitive function. Whether you struggle with brain fog or restlessness, these daily pills may be your new Hail Mary. The bite-sized gel capsules are suited for both men and women and are no larger than a quarter! By taking two a day, you will slowly begin to see changes in your brain health from improved memory retention to better sleep. One user said: ' I have improved focus – I feel more mentally alert and less distracted throughout the day. Better memory retention – I can recall things more easily, which has been helpful for work and daily tasks. Sustained energy without jitters – Unlike coffee or energy drinks, this provides a more natural and steady mental boost without crashes.' Users are seeing real results with incredible stories of success. But like any supplement, the Nature's Craft Brain capsules take time to fully work with most users needing around 90 days to experience the effects. One user said: 'I love this product!!! I swear I have always had a hard time focusing (I truly think I'm undiagnosed ADHD) and this has been a game changer!!' If you have ever found yourself losing sleep, grasping at memories, or unable to finish a task — it is time to give Nature's Craft Brain Supplements a try. Get the five-star rated daily pills now on Amazon and save 10 percent when you subscribe!
Metro
5 hours ago
- Metro
Zombie' squirrels covered in sores spotted after 'Frankenstein rabbits' scare
Yet more cute animals have caused concern in the US over strange growths which really shouldn't be there. It hasn't been long since 'Frankenstein' rabbits with black tendrils covering their faces started hopping around in Colorado. And now squirrels covered in oozing sores have been spotted in gardens across the US and Canada. The first instances of these 'zombie squirrels' date back to 2023, when a homeowner took pictures of several grey squirrels covered in tumours in their yard. The hairless growths have been seen to ooze pus and they can appear on most of the squirrels' body from their head and eyes to their legs and genitals. But the number of sightings has exploded in the past month, Daily Mail reports – but this could be because more squirrels are out and about gathering food for the winter, wildlife experts say. And it's feared leaving bird feeders in the garden for both birds and squirrels to eat from could be helping the illness to spread. While there isn't an official verdict on what the squirrels are suffering from, experts suggest it's likely squirrel fibromatosis, a common virus which causes wart-like growths which usually heal on their own. Shevenell Webb from the Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife said: 'Like a lot of people, I love watching birds. Unfortunately, you can attract multiple [squirrels] to that feeder and risk exposure if one has the virus. 'It's like when you get a large concentration of people. If someone is sick and it's something that spreads easily, others are going to catch it. 'I would not recommend trying to capture a squirrel that has the virus. It is naturally occurring and will run its course in time.' While wildlife experts haven't confirmed whether the new sightings are cases of fibromatosis or the less common squirrel pox (SQPV), it's far less likely that squirrel pox is the culprit. SQPV is a systemic condition that often results in death among red squirrels, who are more vulnerable to the virus. More Trending It's more common in the UK, as there are more red squirrels there compared to the US and Canada. Thankfully, once a squirrel contracts fibromatosis, they tend to recover fully and the condition doesn't tend to come back. It can take up to eight weeks for a squirrel's immune system to rid itself of the virus, but it could take longer for larger or additional infections to heal. This means the very same animals who are suffering with the illness this year will probably be cured by the time summer comes around next year, with no growths in sight. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Wild pigs are turning neon blue in California – here's why MORE: Trump sets up private Putin and Zelensky meeting to thrash out peace deal alone MORE: Two cruise passengers die in separate drownings on same day at Bahamas resort
Spectator
5 hours ago
- Spectator
Kill the single state pension age
When William Beveridge designed the welfare state in the 1940s, the state pension age was 65 for men and 60 for women. Life expectancy for a man was around 66, and around 71 for a woman. The pension was not designed to fund decades of leisure: it was a modest provision for the last couple of years of life, one that not everyone would receive. Today, life expectancy for a man aged 66 (the current state pension age) is around 85, and a woman aged 66 can expect to live until she is 88. The average person now spends close to a fifth of their life in retirement. What was once a short post-script has become a major chapter – and an increasingly expensive one. This is the backdrop for the latest statutory review of the state pension age (SPA), led this year by Dr Suzy Morrissey. Her terms of reference are technical: consider sustainability, intergenerational fairness, life expectancy, international practice. Behind the dry language sits a political question no one rushes to answer: when should people stop working, and who pays for the years they do not? You know the script here. Britain is ageing. The ratio of workers to pensioners is shrinking. Every review concludes that the SPA must rise. Every opposition grumbles about the cruelty of doing so. Every government, when in office, quietly nudges the age upwards. Nothing fundamental changes. What almost never gets challenged is the model itself: a single age at which everyone, regardless of class, health or occupation, is deemed equally ready for retirement. This is tidy for Whitehall. It is also daft. The Office for National Statistics reports that male life expectancy for a retirement age man in Surrey is 86 years; in Blackpool, it is 81. Healthy life expectancy – the years lived without major illness – shows still sharper divides. Yet we persist in pretending that the 66-year-old accountant in Guildford and the 66-year-old ex-dockworker in Hull should both cross the same finish line. That is unjust, and unsustainable. It loads the cost of longer-lived, healthier retirees onto taxpayers who may not live long enough to see much retirement at all. Here I can almost hear some readers reaching for outrage about contributions. Shouldn't a person's pension entitlement reflect their national insurance contributions? So a Surrey stockbroker who pays more NI than a Sunderland scaffolder has earned the right to draw the state pension for longer? This takes me to the biggest and most persistent misunderstanding in British politics: the state pension isn't really a pension. It's a benefit. And it's funded not from some pot of money patiently built up from each recipient's contributions, but from the taxes of today's workers. National Insurance is just a tax, and one that long ago lost any hypothecated link to the pension system. That means pension policy cannot be treated as a personal contract between citizen and state. It is a collective transfer between generations. Pretending otherwise, with talk of 'I've paid in, I deserve it back', hides the real choices – about fairness between regions, between classes, and between young and old. Other countries are at least edging away from the one-size-fits-all fiction. Denmark and the Netherlands now link their pension ages directly to life expectancy. Countries including Norway and Portugal offer some scope to offer earlier pensions to those who have done physically demanding work. None has yet built a fully 'variable' pension age, but the recognition is spreading: a uniform pension age does not match demographic reality. Britain should be bolder. One approach is to tie entitlement not to age but to years of contributions, recognising that someone who started work at 18 has done their share by 65, while the graduate entering at 25 has not. Another is to give more flexibility to those in arduous jobs: that Sunderland scaffolder is likely to be physically knackered in a way that his stockbroking compatriot is not. More radical still is to abandon the cliff-edge retirement model altogether. Instead of full-time one day and nothing the next, policy should support tapering – part-time, flexible work in the sixties and seventies, subsidised and encouraged so people can scale down, not drop out. This would help individuals, who gain income and purpose. It helps employers, who retain skills and experience. It helps the state, which saves on pensions and collects more tax. Above all, it acknowledges reality: ageing is a spectrum, not a binary switch from 'young' to 'old'. This is politically difficult, to put it mildly. I am recommending electoral hemlock, because it entails higher pension ages for some (who will be angry) and different treatment for some (ditto). No sane politician attempts major change to the state pension. The fury of the Waspi women still haunts ministers. Even tinkering with winter fuel allowances causes uproar. You'd be mad to do it, minister. But it must still be done. The fiscal maths is brutal. By 2075, pensioners will make up more than a quarter of the adult population. The cost of the state pension is projected to rise from around 5 per cent of GDP today to nearly 8 per cent. Absent reform, the money has to come from somewhere: higher taxes on a shrinking workforce, or cuts to other services. Intergenerational politics are already sour. Younger voters see themselves funding entitlements for older cohorts who enjoyed cheaper houses and more generous occupational pensions. A rigid single SPA deepens that resentment. That is the real political danger: not the fury of today's pensioners, but the alienation of tomorrow's workers who simply refuse to pay for the pensions of others. Dr Morrissey's review is framed as technical, but it is inescapably political. She has licence to say what ministers will not: that one pension age for all is outdated, unfair and unaffordable. A braver politics would seize that truth, and act on it. None of this is easy. None of it is popular. But it is necessary. The single state pension age should end.
