French NGOs slam 'lack of ambition' after Macron's bottom trawling announcement
In a statement released Sunday, environmental protection group Bloom said that Macron had "confirmed that the imposture of France's maritime protection policy would continue, namely that there would never be a binding framework to truly protect so-called protected marine areas."
In an interview with the regional press on the eve of the Nice Oceans Summit (Unoc-3), Macron announced a restriction on bottom trawling in certain areas of French marine protected areas (MPAs).
He admitted that this fishing technique, which scrapes the seabed, "disrupts biodiversity and ecosystems that we must learn to protect."
Bottom trawling will be just one of many items on the agenda at a week-long conference - hosted by France and Costa Rica - to confront what the United Nations calls a global "emergency" in the oceans.
Ocean's survival hinges on finding the billions needed to save it
However, "we get the impression he's announcing that he's not going to announce anything," he added, deploring the "lack of ambition" in the president's statements.
Read more on RFI EnglishRead also:France defends tuna policy as critics warn of overfishing in the Indian OceanEU and six member states ratify UN treaty on high seas ahead of Nice summitEU and UK clash in first post-Brexit legal battle over North Sea fishing ban
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Bernard Arnault Defends U.S.-EU Trade Deal as ‘Necessary' Agreement
PARIS — French luxury magnate Bernard Arnault has defended the trade deal reached between the U.S. and the European Union against accusations that it is lopsided and will impact European growth in the medium-term. In an opinion column published on Wednesday in French financial daily Les Echos, the chairman and chief executive officer of LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton described the agreement as a necessary compromise and argued that it averted an outright trade war. More from WWD Footwear Firms Will Benefit if Trump Moves Forward With Another Pause on China Tariffs Italy's Wood Supply Chain Urges Swift Trade Deal With South American Trade Bloc Cambodia Is a Growing Footwear Production Hub - A Trade Deal Could Be on the Way 'The trade agreement recently reached between the European Union and the United States has drawn criticism. It has been labeled asymmetric, defensive — even inadequate. I understand those concerns,' the businessman acknowledged. 'But as the head of a European global business, I believe it was important to avert a breakdown. This deal is an act of responsibility. In the current geopolitical and economic context, it is a good agreement,' he added. LVMH owns Les Echos. Arnault, who attended U.S. President Donald Trump's second inauguration in January and visited the White House in May, acted as an unofficial broker in the trade talks, holding meetings with senior European officials including German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, in addition to speaking with Trump and senior U.S. officials. In the wake of the deal, Merz struck a resigned note, saying that 'more simply wasn't achievable.' But French Prime Minister François Bayrou was more openly critical, calling it a 'dark day' in a post on X. Meanwhile, economists have warned about the agreement's implications. Olivier Blanchard, Robert M. Solow professor emeritus of economics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, called it a 'defeat' for the European trade bloc. 'When the law of the jungle prevails, the weak have little choice than to accept their fate. But Europe could potentially have been strong, either alone or in a coalition with others. It would have had to be ready for stormy waters. But it would have gotten a better deal in the end and sent a strong message to the world,' he wrote on X. Jack Allen-Reynolds, deputy chief euro-zone economist at macroeconomic research firm Capital Economics, predicted the tariffs would reduce the EU's gross domestic product by around 0.5 percent, adding this was 'worse than we had previously assumed.' Arnault said critics needed to accept that the normal rules no longer apply, a seeming reference to Trump's fast and loose approach to diplomacy that saw him brandishing threats of unilateral tariffs of 30 percent on EU goods. 'Let's be clear: Europe did not seek this deal. Europe did not ask to rewrite international trade rules to fit short-term interests. But when confronted with a partner willing to abandon existing norms, Europe had to stand firm — without provoking a break,' Arnault said. 'The Commission did not secure a perfect agreement, but it achieved a necessary one. It protects essential interests, avoids a full-blown confrontation, and maintains a baseline of stability,' he added. 'I know President Trump. He would not have backed down from a prolonged standoff.' Arnault's tone contrasted with his comments in January, when he forecast a 'booming' U.S. market would help his luxury empire recover this year. 'I felt the wind of optimism that is blowing there. When you return to France after spending a few days in the U.S., it's a bit of a cold shower, I must say. In the U.S., you get the feeling that you're welcomed with open arms,' he said at a press conference. While Arnault has tempered his enthusiasm in the wake of Trump's 'Liberation Day' announcement in April, which sent global markets into a tailspin, he's maintaining a pragmatic approach to dealing with the U.S. administration, announcing last week that LVMH plans to open a second factory in Texas by early 2027. Arnault, who has known Trump since his days as a real estate developer in the 1980s, invited the president to inaugurate a first Louis Vuitton factory in Texas in 2019. He already has his sights set on his next battle: securing more favorable terms for wines and spirits, which were excluded from the trade agreement, a decision Arnault called 'damaging.' 'I hope ongoing discussions will provide some clarity. The mutual recognition of our protected designations of origin and fair treatment for exports are not just economic matters — they are questions of cultural sovereignty,' he said. Best of WWD Pandemic Has Stoked Appetite for French Luxury, Survey Finds U.S. Sets Strategic Vision for China Trade Policy Furmark's Farm-to-Shopfloor Tracing Tags Set for International Debut
Wall Street Journal
2 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
Recognizing a Palestinian State Is a Rebuke to Hamas
The decision by France, the U.K., Canada and Australia to recognize a Palestinian state in September is morally right and reflects a global consensus. More than 140 countries agree that the Palestinian people are entitled to self-determination alongside a secure Israel. Yet with the Gaza crisis still unfolding, this focus on recognition seems totally beside the more pressing realities. Amid the suffering of Palestinian civilians and Israeli hostages—and Israel's announced plan to occupy all or part of the enclave—averting famine, recovering the hostages and ending the conflict in Gaza are the priorities. Talk of two states can wait.
Fast Company
6 hours ago
- Fast Company
Court blocks Trump's order to allow commercial fishing in a protected area of the Pacific Ocean
Commercial fishing that recently resumed in a vast protected area of the Pacific Ocean must halt once again, after a judge in Hawaii sided this week with environmentalists challenging a Trump administration rollback of federal ocean protections. The remote Pacific Islands Heritage Marine National Monument is home to turtles, marine mammals and seabirds, which environmental groups say will get snagged by longline fishing, an industrial method involving baited hooks from lines 60 miles (about 100 kilometers) or longer. President Donald Trump's executive order to allow this and other types of commercial fishing in part of the monument changed regulations without providing a process for public comment and rulemaking and stripped core protections from the monument, the groups argued in a lawsuit. U.S. District Judge Micah W. J. Smith granted a motion by the environmentalists on Friday. The ruling means boats catching fish for sale will need to immediately cease fishing in waters between 50 and 200 nautical miles (93 kilometers to 370 kilometers) around Johnston Atoll, Jarvis Island and Wake Island, said Earthjustice, an environmental law organization representing the plaintiffs. U.S. Justice Department attorneys representing the government did not immediately return an email message seeking comment on Saturday. Trump has said the U.S. should be 'the world's dominant seafood leader,' and on the same day of his April executive order, he issued another one seeking to boost commercial fishing by peeling back regulations and opening up harvesting in previously protected areas. President George W. Bush created the marine monument in 2009. It consists of about 500,000 square miles (1.3 million square kilometers) in the remote central Pacific Ocean southwest of Hawaii. President Barack Obama expanded it in 2014. Soon after Trump's executive order, the National Marine Fisheries Service sent a letter to fishing permit holders giving them the green light to fish commercially in the monument's boundaries, Earthjustice's lawsuit says. Fishing resumed within days, the group said. Government attorneys say the fisheries service's letter merely notified commercial fishers of a change that had already taken place through Trump's authority to remove the prohibition on commercial fishing in certain areas. Earthjustice challenged that letter, and by granting the motion in their favor, the federal judge found the government had chosen not to defend its letter on the merits and forfeited that argument. Smith also ruled against the government's other defenses, that the plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge the letter and that the court lacked jurisdiction over the matter. David Henkin, an Earthjustice attorney, said Smith's ruling requires the government to go through a process to determine what kind of fishing, and under what conditions, can happen in monument waters in a way that wouldn't destroy the area. Members of Hawaii's longline fishing industry say they have made numerous gear adjustments and changes over the years, such as circle hooks, to avoid that. The lawsuit says allowing commercial fishing in the monument expansion would also harm the 'cultural, spiritual, religious, subsistence, educational, recreational, and aesthetic interests' of a group of Native Hawaiian plaintiffs who are connected genealogically to the Indigenous peoples of the Pacific.
