Trump says Israel will have to decide on next steps in Gaza, pledges more aid
Trump underscored the importance of securing the release of hostages held by Hamas in Gaza, saying they had suddenly "hardened" up on the issue, and said the U.S. would provide more aid to the war-torn Palestinian enclave.
"They don't want to give them back, and so Israel is going to have to make a decision," Trump told reporters at the start of a meeting with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen at his golf property in Turnberry, Scotland.
"I know what I'd do, but I don't think it's appropriate that I say it. But Israel is going to have to make a decision," he said, while also claiming, without evidence, that Hamas members were stealing food coming into Gaza and selling it.
Dozens of Gazans have died of malnutrition in recent weeks, according to the Gaza Health Ministry in the Hamas-run enclave. The ministry reported six new deaths over the past 24 hours due to malnutrition, bringing the total deaths from malnutrition and hunger to 133 including 87 children.
Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu both appeared on Friday to abandon Gaza ceasefire negotiations with Hamas, saying it had become clear that the Palestinian group did not want a deal.
Netanyahu said Israel was now mulling "alternative" options to achieve its goals of bringing its hostages home from Gaza and ending Hamas rule in the enclave, where starvation is spreading and most of the population is homeless amid widespread ruin.
Trump said he believed Hamas leaders would now be "hunted down", telling reporters: "Hamas really didn't want to make a deal. I think they want to die. And it's very bad. And it got to be to a point where you're going to have to finish the job."
Trump on Sunday said the U.S. would provide more humanitarian aid to Gaza, where concerns are mounting about the worsening hunger, but wanted other countries to participate as well. He said he would discuss the issue with von der Leyen.
"We're giving a lot of money, a lot of food, a lot of everything," he said. "If we weren't there, I think people would have starved, frankly. They would have starved, and it's not like they're eating well."
He said he had spoken with Netanyahu and discussed a number of issues, including Iran. He said and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer would also discuss Israel when they meet at Trump's golf property in Turnberry on Monday.
Trump also noted said the United States was not acknowledged for earlier food aid for Gaza.
"No other country gave anything," he said, calling out European countries in particular. "It makes you feel a little bad when you do that and, you know, you have other countries not giving anything... Nobody gave but us. And nobody said, Gee, thank you very much. And it would be nice to have at least a thank you."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
College endowment tax is leading to hiring freezes and could mean cuts in financial aid
A big increase in the tax on university endowments is adding to financial uncertainty for the wealthiest colleges in the U.S., leading several already to lay off staff or implement hiring freezes. Spending more endowment money on taxes could also lead colleges to reduce financial aid, cutting off access to elite institutions for lower-income students, colleges and industry experts have warned. President Donald Trump signed the tax increase into law last month as part of his signature spending bill. The new tax rates take effect in 2026, but colleges such as Harvard, Yale and Stanford already are citing the tax as one of many reasons for making cuts across their universities. Each will be on the hook to pay hundreds of millions more in taxes, while also navigating reductions in research grants and other threats to funding by the Trump administration. A tax on college endowments was introduced during Trump's first administration, collecting 1.4% of wealthy universities' investment earnings. The law signed by Trump last month creates a new tiered system that taxes the richest schools at the highest rates. The new tax will charge an 8% rate at schools with $2 million or more in assets for each enrolled student. Schools with $750,000 to $2 million will be charged 4%, and schools with $500,000 to $750,000 will continue to be charged the 1.4% rate. The tax applies only to private colleges and universities with at least 3,000 students, up from the previous cutoff of 500 students. 'The tax now will really solely apply to private research universities,' said Steven Bloom, assistant vice president of government relations for the American Council on Education. 'It's going to mean that these schools are going to have to spend more money under the tax, taking it away from what they primarily use their endowment assets for — financial aid.' This small group of wealthy colleges faces a tax increase The law will increase the endowment tax for about a dozen universities, according to an Associated Press analysis of data from the National Association of College and University Business Officers. Harvard, Yale, Stanford, Princeton and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology are expected to pay the 8% rate next year. The schools facing the 4% rate include Notre Dame, Dartmouth College, Rice University, University of Pennsylvania, Washington University in St. Louis and Vanderbilt University. Some universities are on the edge of the law's parameters. Both Duke and Emory, for instance, were shy of the $750,000-per-student endowment threshold based on last fiscal year. Endowments are made up of donations to the college, which are invested to maintain the money over time. Colleges often spend about 5% of their investment earnings every year to put toward their budgets. Much of it goes toward scholarships for students, along with costs such as research or endowed faculty positions. Despite the colleges' wealth, the tax will drastically impact their budgets, said Phillip Levine, an economist and professor at Wellesley College. 'They're looking for savings wherever possible,' Levine said, which could impact financial aid. ' One of the most important things they do with their endowment is lower the cost of education for lower- and middle-income students. The institutions paying the highest tax are also the ones charging these students the least amount of money to attend.' For example, at Rice University in Houston, officials anticipate the college will need to pay $6.4 million more in taxes. That equates to more than 100 student financial aid packages, the university said, but Rice officials will explore all other options to avoid cutting that support. How colleges are adjusting to financial pressures In the meantime, some universities are going forward with staff cuts. Yale University says it will have to pay an estimated $280 million in total endowment taxes, citing the tax in a campus message implementing a hiring freeze. Stanford University announced plans to reduce its operating budget by $140 million this upcoming school year, which included 363 layoffs and an ongoing hiring freeze. The university spent months trying to determine where to reduce its budget, but said it would continue to support undergraduate financial aid and funding for Ph.D. students. Research universities are under increasing financial pressure from reductions in funding from the National Institutes of Health, the National Science Foundation and other federal agencies. No university knows this pressure better than Harvard, the country's wealthiest college. Its $53 billion endowment puts it at the top of the list for the new tax, but it's also seeing massive portions of research funding under threat in its ongoing battle with the White House. The federal government has frozen $2.6 billion in Harvard's research grants in connection with civil rights investigations focused on antisemitism and Harvard's efforts to promote diversity on campus. But the impact of other administration policies on the university could approach $1 billion annually, Harvard said in a statement. 'It's not like Harvard is going to go from one of the best institutions in the world to just a mediocre institution. That's probably not going to happen," Levine said. 'But that doesn't mean it's not going to be a bad thing — that there won't be pain and that students won't suffer.' ___ Mumphrey reported from Phoenix. Associated Press writer Sharon Lurye in Philadelphia contributed to this report. ___ The Associated Press' education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at
The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
The Latest: Israel plans to take control of Gaza City, drawing international condemnation
Israel said early Friday that it plans to take over Gaza City, drawing rejection from the Palestinians and international condemnation. The decision, agreed in a late-night meeting of its security Cabinet, marks a further escalation of Israel's 22-month war with Hamas. It also provoked worries in Israel over the fate of hostages still held by Hamas. Another major ground operation would almost certainly exacerbate the humanitarian catastrophe, in which Israel's air and ground war has pushed the territory toward famine. Hamas said people in Gaza would 'remain defiant against occupation.' Here's the Latest: UK, Spain, Turkey and Australia criticize Israel's Gaza City plan Israel's plan to escalate military operations in Gaza drew international condemnation Friday. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer urged Israel to reconsider, saying the expanded offensive would do nothing to end the conflict or secure the release of the remaining hostages. 'Our message is clear: a diplomatic solution is possible, but both parties must step away from the path of destruction,' Starmer said. Spain's Foreign Minister José Albares said Israel's plan would 'only lead to more destruction and suffering.' Turkey's Foreign Ministry said the escalation marked a new phase of Israel's 'expansionist' policies in the region. 'Israel must immediately halt its war plans, accept a ceasefire in Gaza, and begin negotiations toward a two-state solution,' it said in a statement on Friday. Australia also condemned a further occupation of Gaza. Foreign Minister Penny Wong said a two-state solution is the only pathway to secure an enduring peace: a Palestinian state and the State of Israel, living side-by-side in peace and security within internationally recognized borders.
Telegraph
24 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Labour's decimation of the North Sea is an act of economic vandalism
What a week for Labour in Scotland. First the Prime Minister was summoned to Turnberry, where Donald Trump gave him a quick lesson on how to keep Nigel Farage out of No 10: slash taxes, get tough on crime and stop the 'bad people' coming to Britain on boats – that was about the long and short of it. Sadly, the US president stopped short of a recommendation to fire Sir Sadiq Khan out of a cannon over the Thames. As if Starmer's humiliation wasn't sufficiently excruciating, just days later the Chancellor was doing her very best to ensure she was never invited back north of the border after a risible attempt to defend a North Sea windfall tax that is wreaking havoc in the region. North Sea oil and gas has 'an important role to play for many decades to come', she declared during a brief trip to Lossiemouth. Yet in the same breath, Rachel Reeves pledged to stick with the energy profits levy, which the industry says is massively accelerating its demise. No doubt Labour will see such warnings as scaremongering, but she cannot hide from the fact that the major producers are pulling back in the face of a tax raid that will eventually render the North Sea unproductive. That's if it hasn't already, of course. The fate of Harbour Energy alone should be sufficient for Reeves to row back on the tax but this is a Government that is so ideologically stubborn that about-turns only occur when it has exhausted all other options. Harbour may not be a familiar name to many, perhaps because it was only created four years ago out of the merger of two rival oil and gas companies, Chrysaor and Premier, which were hardly household names themselves. Yet it is both a bona fide member of the FTSE 100 and the largest operator in the North Sea. What's more, it is going great guns, on the face of it: production has tripled over the last six months to 488,000 barrels of oil equivalent a day; free cash flow is on course to hit $1bn (£745m) by the end of 2025; and another $100m of share buybacks takes investor payouts for the year to $555m. It is the sort of company that any rational government would be looking to nurture, yet Labour, with its chronic shortsightedness, has conspired to chase it away. There may be much to cheer in Harbour's headline figures, but its tax bill has become crippling. It posted pre-tax profit of $1.6bn but faced with a tax burden that had rocketed from $335m last time around to $1.8bn on this occasion, the company racked up losses of $174m. It is now grappling with an effective tax rate of 111pc, Harbour said. Incredibly Reeves claims the windfall tax 'remains fair' and that it strikes the 'right balance' on the basis that 'the energy companies did make huge profits in the aftermath of Russia's invasion'. However, as Ryan Crighton at the Aberdeen & Grampian Chamber of Commerce was quick to point out: 'oil prices are down 50pc since the invasion of Ukraine in 2022 and gas prices are down 80pc from their post-invasion peak.' Therefore, the Government is taxing windfalls that exist only in the heads of ministers. Perhaps Labour will be more inclined to listen to BP, which frankly could do with all the help it can get right now after the company got lost in a green fog of renewable energy initiatives. With BP rediscovering its affection for fossil fuels, the North Sea, where it has been a pioneer for 60 years, should be central to the organisation's future. As Gordon Birrell, the head of production and operations, reminded people earlier this week, BP's North Sea had delivered a 'tremendous' performance so far this year, cementing the company's view that it has 'the best portfolio up there'. Yet with so much uncertainty surrounding 'the fiscal situation', those assets will be included in a sweeping review of its operations triggered by the imminent arrival of new chairman Albert Manifold. Harbour meanwhile has gone much further, shifting its focus almost entirely from the North Sea to other parts of the world after the windfall tax was introduced under the Conservatives. Last autumn, the company pulled off an $11bn transformational takeover of oil and gas assets in Norway, Germany, Denmark, Argentina, Mexico and North Africa – a deal that reduced its dependence on the UK from roughly 90pc to a third. Moreover, 250 jobs have been culled in Britain too.
