Prashant Kishor slams Modi govt's ‘ceasefire' with Pakistan: 'Can't achieve anything by distributing sindoor boxes'
Jan Suraaj founder Prashant Kishor has questioned Prime Minister Narendra Modi-led Union government's decision to agree to a cessation of hostilities with Pakistan after four days of military action post Operation Sindoor last month. The political consultant-turned-politician suggested by halting action India may have been a missed opportunity for the Indian Army to push its advantage further.
Kishor said, going by External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar's statement, Pakistan wanted the the cessation, indicating that neighboring country was under pressure and fearful of defeat.
"I'm thinking, if Pakistan wanted a ceasefire, as our Foreign Minister is saying, that means our army was doing a good job, we were defeating Pakistan. It must have been out of fear that Pakistan wanted a ceasefire. So if Pakistan wanted a ceasefire, why did we agree to it? The Army should have let it go on for two more days," Kishor said during a press conference in East Champaran on Saturday.
Kishor priased Jaishankar calling him 'very educated and sensible.' "Regarding the issue of the ceasefire, our country's EAM Jaishankar is a very educated and sensible person. I have great respect for him. I read his statement where he said the ceasefire was done at Pakistan's initiative," he added.
India carried out precision strikes under Operation Sindoor on nine terror infrastructures in Pakistan and Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir, on 7 May in response to the22 April Pahalgam terror attackthat killed 26 people, mostly tourists in Jammu and Kashmir.
Following the Indian action, Pakistan attempted to attackIndian military baseson 8, 9 and 10 May. The Pakistani attempts were strongly responded to by the Indian side by inflicting heavy damages to a number of key Pakistani military installations including air bases, air defence systems, command and control centres and radar sites.
The two nations, however, agreed on an understanding to halt military action on 10 May.
Kishor said the situation on the ground suggested that India's military was in control.
"That's exactly what our army personnel are saying, what the citizens of this country are saying, that during the fight, we had them on the back foot, sirens were going off, people were hiding, Pakistan was on the defensive, begging for a ceasefire."
Kishor was referring to External Affairs Minister, S Jaishankar's comments in which he had said that it was the militaries of the two nations that negotiated directly and resolved the conflict through agreement and understanding for a cessation of fire and military action.
'Then why did you halt the action? It should have continued for a few more days. And if you did go for a ceasefire, why mislead the public? It's clear that what he's saying is wrong… You can't achieve anything by simply distributing boxes of sindoor (vermillion),' he said
Kishor also challenged claims made by foreign leaders about who led peace efforts.
"Although, Trump said something else, that he did it and that he deserve da Nobel Peace Prize, from brekenring peace. But why should we believe what Trump said? We will believe our own Foreign Minister," Kishor said
On May 23, days after United States President Donald trump claimed that he played a role in settling the escalating tensions between India and Pakistan, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar reiterated that it was the militaries of the two nations that negotiated directly.
You can't achieve anything by simply distributing boxes of sindoor.
Kishor's statement comes ahead of the Bihar Assembly election to be held in October-November this year wherein the NDA, which consists of the BJP, JD(U), and LJP, will be once again looking forward to returning to power. In contrast, the INDIA Bloc will be giving competition to the incumbent Nitish Kumar government. Kishor's party Jan Suraaj is contesting first Bihar assembly election this year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
34 minutes ago
- Mint
Indian billionaire Gautam Adani comes under new scrutiny from US prosecutors
Gautam Adani, Asia's second-richest man, is trying to get the Trump administration to drop foreign bribery charges against him. Instead, he is facing a new front in his fight with prosecutors: a probe into whether his companies are buying Iranian petrochemical products. U.S. prosecutors are investigating whether Adani's companies imported Iranian liquefied petroleum gas, or LPG, into India through the company's Mundra port. A Wall Street Journal investigation into tankers that regularly traveled between Mundra and the Persian Gulf found their behavior often exhibited traits seen by ships seeking to evade sanctions. 'Adani categorically denies any deliberate engagement in sanctions evasion or trade involving Iranian-origin LPG," a company spokesman said in a statement. 'Further, we are not aware of any investigation by U.S. authorities on this subject." The expanding scrutiny by the U.S. Attorney's Office in Brooklyn could prove problematic for Adani's rehabilitation effort. President Trump is rolling back enforcement of longstanding laws punishing overseas bribery, but has also taken aim at purchasers of Iranian oil and gas products. 'Any Country or person who buys ANY AMOUNT of OIL or PETROCHEMICALS from Iran will be subject to, immediately, Secondary Sanctions," Trump wrote on social-media platform Truth Social last month. 'They will not be allowed to do business with the United States of America in any way, shape, or form." Adani is a close ally of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and sits atop a group of infrastructure companies bearing his name that has been integral to India's recent economic growth. The public companies have a valuation around $150 billion, yielding Adani and his family one of the world's largest fortunes. In January 2023, short-selling firm Hindenburg Research published a 33,000-word report alleging the Adani Group had violated Indian securities laws by having Adani family members secretly control swaths of shares through offshore vehicles. The companies' stocks plunged but have recovered some of their losses. In November, the group faced a new headwind when U.S. prosecutors charged Adani with fraud, alleging he orchestrated roughly $250 million in bribes to Indian officials to secure lucrative solar-power supply contracts in India. Adani Group called the short seller's report 'nothing but a lie," and the government allegations against it 'baseless." Adani has hired high-powered legal firms Kirkland & Ellis and Quinn Emanuel, according to lobbying disclosures. Adani's lawyers also met with prosecutors in March in hopes of having the case dropped, according to people familiar with the matter. Six Republican members of Congress have publicly argued Adani's indictment is at odds with Trump's foreign-policy priorities, including a strong trading relationship with India. Trump also issued an executive order 'pausing" prosecutions under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. While the case grew out of an FCPA investigation, Adani was charged with conspiracy and securities fraud over alleged bribes, not with violating the act itself. Prosecutors are reviewing the activities of several LPG tankers used to ship cargoes to Adani Enterprises, the people said. The Adani spokesman said that importing LPG has been a small but growing part of the company's business, contributing 1.46% of its $11.7 billion in revenue last fiscal year. A Journal investigation into a group of LPG tankers making journeys between the Adani-run Mundra port and the Persian Gulf since early 2024 found they showcase signs that ship trackers say are typically evidence of ships attempting to obscure their activities. A common tactic includes manipulating the ship's automatic identification system, or AIS, which shares a ship's position, according to Tomer Raanan, a maritime risk analyst at Lloyd's List Intelligence who tracks LPG tankers. One journey in April of last year undertaken by a ship that carried an LPG cargo for Adani, the Panamanian-flagged SMS Bros, demonstrates some of the patterns. The ship was docked at Khor al Zubair in southern Iraq on April 3, 2024, according to its AIS, which the Journal analyzed using Lloyd's List's Seasearcher platform. Satellite images from April 3 don't show the SMS Bros at its reported berth in Iraq. But a satellite did capture images of a ship matching the SMS Bros's characteristics and length docked roughly 315 miles to the southeast at an LPG terminal in Tonbuk, Iran. The ship docked in Tonbuk was the SMS Bros, according to Samir Madani, whose service has indexed more than 9,000 ships from satellite imagery. By April 7, the SMS Bros's AIS data showed it off the coast of the United Arab Emirates. Its data was adjusted at that time to show it riding lower in the water, which would indicate it had taken on cargo. Its AIS data shows that it departed the night of April 8, heading south, and by the following day anchored offshore near Sohar, Oman. On April 10, documents purport that Adani Global PTE contracted the ship to load roughly 11,250 metric tons of LPG at Sohar and ship it to Mundra in India. The ship never appears to have docked in Sohar's port, according to the Journal's analysis of AIS data. From there, the SMS Bros sailed to Mundra, where customs records reviewed by the Journal show that on April 17, Adani Enterprises imported a load matching the cargo described in the shipping documents with a declared value just over $7 million. Purchasers of Iranian oil and gas products often use forged documents from Oman and Iraq, according to several people familiar with the trade. The Adani spokesman said the SMS Bros shipment was handled through a third-party logistics company and documentation identifies the shipment as originating from Sohar. Adani companies check the vessels they contract for red flags but don't own, operate or track vessels and can't comment on the activity of vessels they don't control, he added. 'Whatever the duties of and responsibilities of a bona fide importer are, we have fulfilled those," the spokesman said. The SMS Bros, which changed its name to the Neel last year, has shown other discrepancies. A Bangladeshi port record from last June shows the SMS Bros as importing a load of LPG originating in Iran for an unknown importer, yet its AIS data reports making the same journey to Iraq that it did in April. At several other points over the past year, satellite images don't show the SMS Bros at its reported AIS position, according to Bjorn Bergman, a data analyst who tracks AIS spoofing at the nonprofits Global Fishing Watch and SkyTruth. Three other LPG tankers show some elements of obfuscation while making runs between Adani's Mundra port and the Persian Gulf, according to the Journal's review of their data. One tanker operated by the same company that managed the SMS Bros showed similar signs of spoofing its AIS. That ship was also named on a list of tankers suspected of shipping Iranian oil and gas by a bipartisan group of U.S. senators. The company operating the ships, as well as the captain of the SMS Bros on its April 2024 journey, didn't respond to requests for comment. A third ship appears to have used similar tactics around its trips to Mundra, broadcasting via AIS a stop in Khor al Zubair that can't be seen on simultaneous satellite images of the port. A fourth tanker in the group often making deliveries to Mundra was listed in a 2024 report by the U.S. Energy Department as being involved in the export of Iranian petroleum products. In May, the Journal found that ship was reporting its position on the railroad tracks of the port in Khor al Zubair. Write to Ben Foldy at and Dave Michaels at
NDTV
35 minutes ago
- NDTV
"So Difficult To Be Patriotic?" Salman Khurshid's Stinger Dig At Opposition
Quick Read Summary is AI generated, newsroom reviewed. Congress leader Salman Khurshid defended opposition MPs joining anti-terrorism missions despite internal party criticism. He emphasized patriotism over political allegiance, highlighting India's global role and the need for unity against terrorism. New Delhi: Congress leader Salman Khurshid - a member of a cross-party delegation travelling to partner nations as part of an outreach after the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor - has slammed critics, including those from his party, questioning opposition MPs' participation in these missions. "When on a mission against terrorism, to carry India's message to the world, it is distressing that people at home are calculating political allegiances... is it so difficult to be patriotic?" he asked on X. The sharp remark follows praise days earlier for the BJP-led federal government's August 2019 decision to scrap Article 370 in Jammu and Kashmir. Mr Khurshid told Indonesia think tanks abrogation of a law that "gave the impression Kashmir was separate" from India resulted in prosperity for J&K. Mr Khurshid is part of a delegation led by Janata Dal (United) MP Sanjay Kumar Jha that has visited South Korea, Singapore, Japan, and Indonesia, and is presently in Malaysia. When on mission against terrorism, to carry India's message to the world, it's distressing that people at home are calculating political allegiances. Is it so difficult to be patriotic? — Salman Khurshid (@salman7khurshid) June 2, 2025 Speaking to reporters in Kuala Lumpur, he explained his X post was meant to call out people who "are not very encouraging when you want to do something for the nation". "People keep saying, 'what are you doing in a delegation where there are people from the BJP'. What we are doing is what is needed for the country. No matter which party you are from, today what is needed is a single voice to speak for the nation... the question is to be asked of those saying these things I believe are not very encouraging when you want to do something for the nation." "People are also saying 'he (referring to himself) is supporting so-and-so and is not supporting so-and-so'. But if I wanted to oppose the government I would stay at home. I have come to speak for India... whoever speaks for India, and in whichever way they speak, we are here to support them." #WATCH | Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Member of all-party delegation led by JD(U) MP Sanjay Kumar Jha, Congress leader Salman Khurshid says, "...People are saying, he (Salman Khurshid) is supporting so and so and he is not supporting so and so; they are supporting Government etc. Have… — ANI (@ANI) June 2, 2025 "... we are here for India first... India and only India," Mr Khurshid told news agency ANI. Although the Congress has publicly said it will back the government in any attempts to combat the spectre of terrorism, home and abroad, the party is believed to be unhappy over its key figures - five, including Mr Khurshid, Shashi Tharoor, and Anand Sharma - becoming de facto BJP spokespersons. A former External Affairs Minister, he said in Malaysia that India had a key global role today and that it is not 'greedy' for Pakistan territory, which was a clear swipe over Pak's illegal occupation of Kashmir. READ | "Not Greedy For Pakistan, Their Region": Salman Khurshid On Op Sindoor Salman Khurshid's responses on 'political allegiances' comes amid criticism of opposition MPs on these anti-terrorism delegations, particularly the Congress' Shashi Tharoor, who faces rumours about his party future. Mr Tharoor is leading a team to the United States, Brazil, and other nations. Those jabbing Mr Tharoor include senior Congress leaders, including party comms boss Jairam Ramesh and spokesperson Pawan Khera, who have called out what they think is the former diplomat's unnecessary praise for the ruling BJP and Prime Minister Narendra Modi. READ | Asked about those jabs, Mr Tharoor too said he is more focused on conveying India's message on terrorism, and said he would only speak to his colleagues once he returns. The seven anti-terrorism delegations are meant to carry India's revised doctrine on terrorism after Pahalgam - an attack in which a Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba killed 26 people. India responded to that attack with precision military strikes targeting only terror camps - four in Pak and five in Pak-occupied Kashmir - but Islamabad (and Rawalpindi, the Pak Army HQ) retaliated by launching drones and missiles at military and civilian centres in western India. The missiles and drones were neutralised or shot down by India's air defences and, after 100 hours of military conflict, Pak sought a ceasefire. India accepted the ceasefire request but warned Pak against resuming hostilities, and said it would no longer tolerate cross-border attacks. Pak was also told to desist from funding terrorist strikes, and dismantle terrorist infrastructure in that country, and also vacate illegally occupied regions in Kashmir.
Indian Express
36 minutes ago
- Indian Express
In 50 years of statehood, Sikkim has emerged from being a small Himalayan outpost to a sustainable development leader
Written by Vimal Khawas and Rakhee Bhattacharya Fifty years ago, on May 16, 1975, Sikkim began its journey as the 22nd state of the Indian federation. Its merger with India was rooted in a complex interplay of internal dissent and India's larger geostrategic interests. Sikkim, with a population of just 0.7 million, accounts for a mere 0.05 per cent of India's population. Despite its small size, this Himalayan state has emerged as a model for sustainable development over the past 50 years, achieving remarkable economic prosperity, socio-political harmony, and environmental stewardship. With a per capita income of Rs 5.88 lakh in 2024, Sikkim ranks among India's top-performing states. From a modest agrarian economy in 1975, with a GSDP of Rs 50-100 crore, it has grown at a CAGR exceeding 13 per cent, driven by eco-friendly policies and consistent governance. Sikkim's focus on sustainable development has set it apart. By leveraging its indigenous and agrarian strengths, the state achieved economic self-sufficiency, boasting the highest per capita developmental expenditure in India. In 2016, Sikkim became the world's first 100 per cent organic state, a transformative initiative launched in 2003 to protect its fragile environment and promote healthy living. This milestone earned global recognition, including the UN Sustainable Development Leadership Award in 2016 and the UN FAO's Future Policy Gold Award in 2018. In 2024, Sikkim's eco-friendly programme, Mero Rukh, Mero Santati (My Tree, My Legacy), received the SKOCH Silver Award at COP 28, reinforcing its status as a global leader in sustainability. The state has invested in social infrastructure and its literacy rate has risen from 17 per cent in 1971 to over 90 per cent in 2025, supported by a free education policy up to the college level with a student-teacher ratio of less than 8:1, the best among Indian states. The healthcare system has likewise progressed significantly. With one doctor per 595 people in 2019, it is far higher than the national average. The Infant Mortality Rate in the state, at five deaths per 1,000 live births, is one of the lowest in the country and the Total Fertility Rate, at 1.1 children per woman, is also very low as compared to the national average, as of 2019-21. Sikkim has shown notable improvement in the 'quality of life' indicators over time. Household access to electricity (99.3 per cent) and sanitation facilities (85.3 per cent) is much better than the national average, but access to drinking water (94 per cent) is slightly below the national benchmark, as of 2021. The state continues to focus on social infrastructure and has the highest per capita social expenditure of Rs 35,673 among Indian states. The transformative Dhara Vikas Abhiyan, launched in 2008, exemplifies an innovative approach to sustainable life in the hilly terrain of Sikkim. This initiative combats water scarcity in drought-prone south and west Sikkim by reviving drying springs using hydrogeological techniques like contour trenches and percolation pits. Sikkim has significantly improved road connectivity, increasing road density from 12 km per 100 sq km in 1975 to 148 km in 2020, despite its challenging hilly terrain. Income poverty dropped from 30.9 per cent in 2004-05 to 2.6 per cent in 2023-24, driven by inclusive policies. Consequently, Sikkim's HDI rose from 0.55 in 1990 to 0.83 in 2024, ranking it second in India after Goa (0.85). Social empowerment has been systematically backed by political rights at the grassroots level. Sikkim has bagged six National Panchayat Awards in 2024 and the Sarojini Naidu Women Achievers' Award in 2023 for 14 women, highlighting its social progress. Sikkim was granted special status under Article 371F of the Indian Constitution during its merger with India in 1975, providing safeguards to preserve its unique traditional land, culture, and laws, including restrictions on property ownership by non-Sikkimese residents. It has helped the state not only preserve its traditions but also create a shared space among the communities, which consists of Nepalis, Bhutias, and Lepchas with a harmonious blend of cultures. Both Hinduism and Buddhism have shaped their vibrant culture and created social cohesion as a strong pillar for Sikkim's progressive journey, while maintaining its distinct identity. It is noteworthy that Sikkim is the only state that has never confronted any major community conflict or internal security threat. Fifty years of such progressive policies have made this small Himalayan state a bright spot in India. It is arguably the most progressive state in Northeast India. A pristine Himalayan state with rich biodiversity and cultural heritage, Sikkim has become a global and national tourism destination. From just 5,000 tourists in 1975, Sikkim welcomed 13.2 lakh visitors in 2024, a 260-fold increase. Contributing 8-10 per cent to the GSDP, tourism has increasingly become the most important parameter of Sikkim's economy. Being a fully organic state, Sikkim attracts environment and health-conscious travellers. Despite its achievements, Sikkim faces significant challenges. Natural disasters and climate change threaten the state, while its hilly terrain limits infrastructure and industrial growth. Social issues, such as increasing suicide rates and crimes against children, demand urgent attention. With 70 per cent of its revenue reliant on central funds, Sikkim must strengthen its financial independence. Prioritising equitable development over GDP is crucial to ensure inclusive progress in the state's development journey. The writers are professors, Special Centre for the Study of North East India, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi
