logo
Harvey Weinstein found guilty of sexual assault in New York retrial, acquitted on another charge

Harvey Weinstein found guilty of sexual assault in New York retrial, acquitted on another charge

Yahooa day ago

Harvey Weinstein, the fallen Hollywood executive whose decades-long history of alleged sexual assault sparked the #MeToo movement and calls against workplace harassment across entertainment and beyond, was found guilty of one 2006 sexual assault but acquitted on another from the same year in the high-profile retrial of his sex crimes case in New York.
The majority-female jury handed down its split verdict after a week of deliberation. Weinstein was convicted in February 2020 of rape and a felony sex crime connected to individual allegations from accusers Jessica Mann and Mimi Haley, respectively. He was acquitted at the time on two charges of predatory sexual assault. A month later, he was sentenced to 23 years in prison.
A New York appeals court overturned Weinstein's rape conviction in April 2024.
On Wednesday, he was convicted of forcing oral sex on Haley and acquitted of the same regarding former model Kaja Sokola. The jury was hung on a third charge of raping Mann in 2013, the Associated Press reported.
Read more: Commentary: With his 'casting couch' defense, Weinstein continues to damage the culture he once ruled
In closing arguments, which concluded June 4, Weinstein's defense attorney Arthur L. Aidala downplayed his client's alleged assaults as part of a "courting game" and said they were "transactional" exchanges of favors. According to Aidala, prosecutors were "trying to police the bedroom." Weinstein had become "the poster boy, the original sinner, for the #MeToo movement," he added.
Prosecutor Nicole Blumberg took a different tone, throwing Aidala's phrases back at the defense: 'This was not a 'courting game,' as Mr. Aidala wants you to believe. This was not a 'transaction." 'This was never about 'fooling around.' It was about rape," she said.
Read more: Harvey Weinstein indicted on additional sex crimes charges ahead of New York retrial
Weinstein's retrial began April 23 and featured emotional testimony from former Weinstein Co. production assistant Haley and once-aspiring actor Mann, who returned to the stand, plus Sokola, who did not testify against the mogul in the 2020 trial. Judge Curtis Farber oversaw the proceedings. The disgraced Hollywood boss, 73, was tried on the allegations that led to his original rape and felony sex act conviction, plus a new sexual assault charge stemming from Sokola's allegation that he forced oral sex on her in 2006 when she was 19. Weinstein pleaded not guilty and his defense maintained the alleged sexual encounters were consensual.
Before the jury reached its partial verdict, the jury foreperson expressed dismay to Farber about deliberation proceedings. Farber also heard from Weinstein, who urged him to halt the trial. The producer declared before the verdict, "it's just not fair."
"My life is on the line, and you know what? It's not fair,' he said, after making an unusual request to address the court. 'It's time, it's time, it's time, it's time to say this trial is over.'
Weinstein's reputation as a Hollywood star-maker was central to the prosecutors' opening statements. The Miramax co-founder "knew how tempting the promises of success were," prosecutor Shannon Lucey said during the first week of the trial. "He produced, he choreographed, he therefore directed, their ultimate silence."
Weinstein attorney Aidala offered another take in his opening statements. He asserted that his client engaged in a Hollywood quid pro quo with the accusers, telling jurors, "the casting couch is not a crime scene."
In their respective testimonies, the three women painted a picture of Weinstein as a Hollywood gatekeeper who leveraged his status to force himself upon women seeking professional opportunities.
Haley, a former production assistant who worked on "Project Runway," was the first woman to testify against Weinstein in the second week of the trial. She alleged that he forcibly performed oral sex on her in 2006 at his New York apartment. Similar to her testimony in 2020, Haley, 48, detailed meeting the mogul at the Cannes Film Festival months before he allegedly sexually assaulted her. She said during the trial that she was only looking to further her professional career in Hollywood and not seeking sex or romance with the Oscar-winning "Shakespeare in Love" producer.
'It was just kind of like a sinking feeling that he wasn't taking me seriously at all," Haley said as she recalled Weinstein's alleged comments about her legs and suggestion that they give each other massages. During her testimony, which built on her previous account from the 2020 trial, Haley said she remained in contact with Weinstein for professional matters. In a February 2007 letter that wasn't seen at the first trial, she told Weinstein she would 'love [him] forever… and ever…' if he invested in her idea for an online series.
Haley also claimed that after a separate encounter with Weinstein, she told the former Hollywood executive, "You know you can't keep doing this."
Polish-born psychotherapist Sokola, 39, was the second accuser to testify against Weinstein. Though she sued Weinstein in 2019 for sexual assault and alleged emotional abuse, Sokola took the stand against him for the first time during the third week of the trial.
Sokola broke into the modeling scene in her teens and met Weinstein at a nightclub during a 2002 modeling trip to New York, prosecutors said. The former Hollywood executive offered to help make her acting ambitions a reality, she testified, but then made unwanted physical advances, beginning when she was 16. The criminal charges against Weinstein stem from her allegation that he forcibly performed oral sex on her in a Manhattan hotel in 2006, just before her 20th birthday. She said the incident was the most "horrifying thing" she had ever experienced up to that point.
Like Weinstein's other accusers, Sokola said she kept in touch with him after the assault but never had any romantic or sexual interest in him.
During the fifth week of the trial, the third and final accuser, Mann, returned to a familiar scene: She took the stand in front of a New York jury once again and described her complicated relationship with Weinstein. She accused the producer of raping her in a New York hotel room in 2013.
Mann, 39, said she met the Hollywood mogul in the 2010s after a move to Los Angeles to pursue acting and recalled that their subsequent meetings would devolve from professional to personal. Weinstein invited her into his glitzy world of entertainment, Mann said, but she was not attracted to him and refused his initial sexual advances.
She testified she eventually succumbed to him performing oral sex on her because Weinstein allegedly threatened not to let her leave until she let him 'do something.' That encounter left her feeling "defiled," she told the jury, but she ultimately agreed to consensual encounters with Weinstein, who was married at the time.
Wiping tears from her eyes, Mann recalled confronting Weinstein in 2013 after he booked a room at the New York hotel where she and a friend were staying. She joined Weinstein in his room to avoid a public argument and told him, 'I don't want to do this.' He shoved the door shut as she tried to leave, demanded she undress and grabbed her arms, she alleged. She said she "just gave up" and Weinstein raped her after injecting himself with a performance-enhancing drug.
She said she kept the rape a secret and over the ensuing months nudged Weinstein about a movie part and remained cordial. 'I compartmentalized the part of Harvey that was hurting me,' she said. Mann detailed her attempts to keep a subtle distance, including declining invitations, meetings and a package from his office that she claimed contained cash.
Throughout the trial, tensions ran high as Weinstein's defense team challenged the credibility and accuracy of the accusers' allegations and probed the nature of their respective relationships with the mogul. The "Gangs of New York" producer's legal team underscored that each of the women maintained contact with Weinstein after their alleged assaults. Defense attorneys also scrutinized each woman's motivations for pursuing legal action against Weinstein.
Attorney Jennifer Bonjean declared in her cross-examination that it was "for the jury to decide" whether Weinstein sexually assaulted Haley, to which the accuser responded, "It's my experience" and "He did that to me" as she used expletives and cried. Bonjean also accused Haley of telling the news media "only part of the story" when she went public with her allegations in 2017. Haley denied the attorney's suggestion that she spoke out against Weinstein with hopes to sue, though she later filed a federal lawsuit against the producer in 2020 and received a roughly $475,000 settlement.
In his cross-examination of Sokola, Weinstein attorney Michael V. Cibella pressed about the money the model had won in other civil proceedings against Weinstein. "It changed the course of your life in that you got $3.5 million from false accusations?" Cibella asked.
"No. That's very unfair," Sokola replied. "That's not true."
Cibella suggested it was Sokola who was taking advantage of Weinstein and claimed the former model's involvement in the retrial abetted her pursuit of various legal pathways to stay in the United States long-term.
Additionally, Cibella pressed Sokola about a private journal she kept for an alcohol-abuse program in Poland. In the decades-old writing, Sokola wrote about people who had sexually abused her — notably omitting Weinstein. Sokola did write about a "Harvey W" who was "promising to help" her but nothing came from it. She left out Weinstein's alleged sexual abuse because she had not processed it at the time, she said during questioning.
The defense examination of her diary — kept as part of her treatment for substance abuse — was "very inappropriate" and violating, she told Cibella.
Read more: Contributor: One lesson from the Weinstein case is that men like me must speak out about abuse
Mann also had her share of courtroom tensions with Weinstein and his legal counsel. During her second day of testimony, after detailing an alleged rape in a Beverly Hills hotel room in 2004, Mann turned to the producer and aimed a finger at her eyes and then at him as she exited the courtroom. In response, Weinstein's defense attorney Aidala requested a mistrial because of Mann's gesture. He also took issue with her displays of emotion while talking about the alleged 2014 rape. Farber denied the request.
After Mann returned to the stand, Aidala's line of questioning took an odd turn. The attorney asked how she faked an orgasm during her first sexual encounter with Weinstein so he would allow her to leave. Mann referenced a memorable scene in "When Harry Met Sally..." when Meg Ryan moans in a restaurant. Mann said she had been 'making noises' and Aidala began asking her to elaborate. Prosecutors jumped in to object. After the jury and Mann left for the day, prosecutor Matthew Colangelo criticized Aidala's line of questioning, saying it went "beyond the pale."
During the trial jurors also heard from a physician-pharmacist, a former executive assistant for the producer, friends of Weinstein's accusers and employees from the hotels where he allegedly assaulted the women. Notably, jurors did not hear testimony from Weinstein himself. The producer, whose health has declined since his original New York conviction, had at one point considered testifying.
'He thinks that the evidence in this trial has been challenged very forcefully and that many of the complainants' stories have been torn apart,' Aidala said in the penultimate week of the trial.
Read more: Harvey Weinstein is in recovery following emergency heart surgery
Ultimately, Weinstein did not take the stand. He also did not testify during the 2020 trial in New York or a separate 2022 rape trial in Los Angeles. He was convicted of rape in Los Angeles in December 2022; his appeal in California hasn't been decided yet.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Get notified when the biggest stories in Hollywood, culture and entertainment go live. Sign up for L.A. Times entertainment alerts.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Weinstein case judge declares mistrial on remaining rape charge as jury foreperson won't deliberate
Weinstein case judge declares mistrial on remaining rape charge as jury foreperson won't deliberate

Associated Press

time29 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

Weinstein case judge declares mistrial on remaining rape charge as jury foreperson won't deliberate

NEW YORK (AP) — Harvey Weinstein 's sex crimes retrial came to a disjointed end Thursday as the jury foreperson declined to deliberate and the judge declared a mistrial on a remaining rape charge, a day after a split verdict on other charges in the landmark #MeToo-era case. The outcome positions the ex-studio boss for a third New York trial — prosecutors said they're ready to retry the rape count — even as he faces a new sentencing on his sexual assault conviction. Weinstein, 73, denies all the charges. The Oscar-winning movie producer had a blank, drained expression as court officers escorted him out Thursday in his wheelchair. His lawyer said he plans to appeal. 'What happened in that jury room was absolutely improper,' attorney Arthur Aidala said outside court. Weinstein is due back in court July 2 for discussion of retrial and sentencing dates. His first-degree criminal sex act conviction carries the potential for up to 25 years in prison, while the unresolved third-degree rape charge is punishable by up to four years — less than he already has served. He's been behind bars since his initial conviction in 2020, and he later also was sentenced to prison in a separate California case, which he's appealing. In Wednesday's partial verdict, Weinstein was convicted of one criminal sex act charge but acquitted of another. Both concerned accusations of forcing oral sex on women in 2006. Those verdicts still stand. While the jury of seven women and five men was unanimous on those decisions, it got stuck on the rape charge involving another woman, Jessica Mann. The hairstylist and actor testified at length — as she did in 2020 — that Weinstein raped her amid a years-long consensual relationship. 'I will never give up on myself and making sure my voice – and the truth – is heard,' Mann said in a statement Thursday, confirming she's ready to testify yet again. Jury-room strains started leaking into public view Friday, when a juror asked to be excused because he felt another was being treated unfairly. Then Monday, the foreperson complained that other jurors were pushing people to change their minds and talking about information beyond the charges. The man raised concerns again Wednesday, telling the judge he felt afraid in the jury room because another juror was yelling at him for sticking to his opinion and suggested the foreperson would 'see me outside.' When Judge Curtis Farber asked the foreperson Thursday whether he was willing to return to deliberations, the man said said no. And with that, Farber declared a mistrial on the rape count. Two jurors disputed the foreperson's account as they left court. One, Chantan Holmes, said that no one mistreated the man and that she believed he was just tired of deliberating. 'We all felt bad. Because we really wanted to do this. We put our hearts and souls in here,' she said. Another jury member, who identified himself only by his juror number, said the deliberations were contentious, but respectful. Weinstein's 2020 conviction seemed to cement the downfall of one of Hollywood's most powerful men in a pivotal moment for the # MeToo movement. The anti-sexual-misconduct campaign was fueled by allegations against him. But that conviction was overturned last year, and the case was sent back for retrial in the same Manhattan courthouse. Weinstein's accusers said he exploited his Tinseltown influence to dangle career help, get them alone and then trap and force them into sexual encounters. 'These hopeful young women were trying to follow their dreams in a world that he controlled,' Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, a Democrat, said at a news conference Thursday. Weinstein's defense portrayed his accusers as Hollywood wannabes and hangers-on who willingly hooked up with him to court opportunity, then later said they were victimized to collect settlement funds and #MeToo approbation. Miriam Haley, the producer and production assistant whom Weinstein was convicted — twice, now — of sexually assaulting, said outside court Wednesday that the new verdict 'gives me hope.' Accuser Kaja Sokola also called it 'a big win for everyone,' even though Weinstein was acquitted of forcibly performing oral sex on her when she was a 19-year-old fashion model. Her allegation was added to the case after the retrial was ordered. Holmes, the juror who spoke outside court, said the panel all felt Sokola 'wasn't credible.' The Associated Press generally does not name people who say they have been sexually assaulted, unless they agree to be identified. Haley, Mann and Sokola did so. ___ Associated Press journalists Joseph B. Frederick and Ted Shaffrey contributed.

Harvey Weinstein's New York Case Isn't Over Yet
Harvey Weinstein's New York Case Isn't Over Yet

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Harvey Weinstein's New York Case Isn't Over Yet

There's one conviction in Harvey Weinstein's New York criminal case, but the saga continues. A jury of 12 had found Weinstein guilty Wednesday of one count of a criminal sexual act against former Project Runway assistant Miriam Haley, but not guilty of the other count of a criminal sexual act against former model Kaja Sokola. More from The Hollywood Reporter Harvey Weinstein Gets Mistrial on Rape Charge After Threats to Jury Foreperson Harvey Weinstein Trial Witnesses React to Mixed Verdict, See Win for #MeToo Movement Harvey Weinstein Receives Mixed Partial Verdict as Deliberations Heat Up in Criminal Case The jurors were sent home Wednesday afternoon, amid inflamed tensions and one juror saying he was being threatened by others, with plans to resume deliberating the next day on the remaining charge of rape in the third degree. However, on Thursday, the juror refused to return to the deliberation room and a mistrial was called on that charge. Prosecutors said they plan to retry Weinstein on the rape charge. The criminal sexual act conviction is a higher felony charge than rape in the third degree and carries a maximum prison sentence of 25 years. Asked why the Manhattan District Attorney's office was still pursuing the retrial charge – which will be Weinstein's third trial on that charge – DA Alvin Bragg said it was on behalf of Jessica Mann, who was the complaining witness on that charge. 'It's about the survivors and, yes, Harvey Weinstein is going to be held accountable for his conduct as to Ms. Haley, and he's facing a very significant term of imprisonment for that, but the jury was not able to reach a conclusion as to Ms. Mann, and she deserves that,' Bragg said. 'I will never give up on myself and making sure my voice – and the truth – is heard. I have told the District Attorney I am ready, willing and able to endure this as many times as it takes for justice and accountability to be served. Today is not the end of my fight,' Mann said in a statement. Mann also testified in Weinstein's 2020 trial, making this upcoming trial her third time on the stand. The verdict in Weinstein's 2020 rape and criminal sexual assault conviction was overturned in April 2024 after the court of appeals found the trial prejudiced Weinstein with improper rulings, including allowing women to testify about allegations that were not part of the case. Conversely, Weinstein's attorney, Arthur Aidala, said his team is continuing to look into juror misconduct and file motions with Judge Curtis Farber to bring the jurors back in and try to find out what happened in the jury room. (He pushed for this many times over the past few days, but was denied by Farber.) 'None of us have ever heard of that, where a jury is so intimidating, a grown man who was in good physical shape in his late 30s, [says], 'I'm afraid to go back into the deliberating room'. If that doesn't cast doubt on the verdicts here, I don't know what would, so this is not over,' Aidala told press outside the courthouse. The goal is to get the conviction thrown out. However, the jury had reached unanimous verdicts on the other two counts, and the foreperson had said in court that he was not coerced into those decisions. If that doesn't happen, Aidala plans to appeal Weinstein's conviction on the one felony charge. He added that he did not know whether Weinstein will remain at Bellevue Hospital, where he's been throughout the trial, or return to Rikers. Aidala's team has repeatedly pointed to their client's poor health over the past months, and he said that would also be something they bring up during sentencing. Weinstein also still faces a 16-year prison sentence in California, after being convicted in 2022 of rape and other sex crimes. Aidala's team has also appealed that conviction. 'Mr. Weinstein started off with a 23-year prison term when we left here on March 11 of [2020]. Those numbers are now out the window,' Aidala said. 'Of course, Mr. Weinstein is disappointed. He has maintained his innocence from the day I met him in 2019. In 2020, when I sat next to when the verdict came in guilty on [Miriam Haley] he said to me, 'How could this happen? I'm innocent. I'm innocent.' He basically said the same thing yesterday to Mr. Cibella who sat next to him.' Best of The Hollywood Reporter Most Anticipated Concert Tours of 2025: Beyoncé, Billie Eilish, Kendrick Lamar & SZA, Sabrina Carpenter and More Hollywood's Most Notable Deaths of 2025 Hollywood's Highest-Profile Harris Endorsements: Taylor Swift, George Clooney, Bruce Springsteen and More

Harvey Weinstein Gets Mistrial on Rape Charge After Threats to Jury Foreperson
Harvey Weinstein Gets Mistrial on Rape Charge After Threats to Jury Foreperson

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Harvey Weinstein Gets Mistrial on Rape Charge After Threats to Jury Foreperson

Harvey Weinstein's rape charge ended in mistrial after the jury foreperson refused to return to the jury room Thursday after saying he faced threats from other jurors. The 12-person jury in Weinstein's trial had found him guilty Wednesday of one count of a criminal sexual act against former Project Runway assistant Miriam Haley, but not guilty of the other count of a criminal sexual act against former model Kaja Sokola. More from The Hollywood Reporter Harvey Weinstein Trial Witnesses React to Mixed Verdict, See Win for #MeToo Movement Harvey Weinstein Receives Mixed Partial Verdict as Deliberations Heat Up in Criminal Case Jurors Raise Concerns About Harvey Weinstein Deliberations After the mistrial was declared, prosecutors said Thursday that they plan to retry Weinstein on the rape charge, related to aspiring actress Jessica Mann, and that 'she is ready and willing and wants to retry this count.' A July 2 hearing has been set on that charge. Weinstein faced one charge of rape in the third degree and two charges of criminal sexual act in the first degree, which is the higher felony charge and carries a maximum prison sentence of 25 years. The rape charge carries a sentence of up to four years. On Wednesday, the jury had yet to reach a verdict on rape in the third degree, but jurors were sent home midday amid concerns about fighting and tensions in the jury room. They had been in the midst of their fifth day of deliberations. The jury foreperson had sent a note Wednesday afternoon asking to speak to the judge and then told the attorneys and Judge Curtis Farber: 'I feel afraid inside there. I can't be inside there.' He added that other jurors had been trying to get him to change his decision, and, when he had refused, had said 'Oh we will see you outside,' and that he was concerned for his own safety. When the foreperson was asked Thursday if he would return to the jury room, he told the court, 'No, I'm sorry.' However, Farber spoke with the others jurors after the mistrial was declared Thursday and said 'they were extremely disappointed' that deliberations had not continued and that 'They don't understand why the foreperson bowed out.' Jury tensions had reached such a fever pitch Wednesday that Weinstein himself addressed the court, urging the judge for a mistrial. His request was denied at the time. 'This is not right for me, the person who is on trial here,' Weinstein said Wednesday. 'This is my life that's on the line, and you know what? It's not fair. It's simple. It's just not fair.' The foreperson, who is charged with speaking on behalf of the jury, then returned to court after the jury had been dismissed Wednesday and implied that he did not want to go back into the deliberation room Thursday. He returned to court, but was being kept separately from the other jurors Thursday morning. On Monday morning, the foreperson had also asked to speak to the judge and said that jurors were considering elements from Weinstein's past that weren't being used as evidence in the trial and weren't part of the charged crimes. Another juror, who was juror No. 7 on this case and the youngest on the jury, had asked to address the court twice Friday, first saying he had heard jurors discussing another juror in the courtroom elevators, and then asking to be excused from the jury as he did not feel the process was 'fair,' while staring at the defense table. 'If you're a deliberating juror you have to be punched in the face in order for it to rise to the level of a real threat,' Weinstein's attorney, Arthur Aidala said Thursday, while urging the judge to call for mistrial before the juror entered. 'It's insane in the membrane, insane on the brain.' All of this comes after Weinstein's 2020 rape and criminal sexual assault conviction was overturned in April 2024 after the court of appeals found the trial prejudiced Weinstein with improper rulings, including allowing women to testify about allegations that were not part of the case. In the 2020 trial, Weinstein received a mixed verdict with the jury finding Weinstein guilty of the crimes against Haley and Mann, but also acquitting Weinstein of first-degree rape and predatory sexual assault related to other women. Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg pursued the retrial of Weinstein shortly after his conviction was overturned. In this trial, Mann had testified that she had first met Weinstein around 2013 at a party in Hollywood. After later attending his Oscars party, Mann said she was invited by Weinstein up to his hotel room, where he said he wanted to give Mann and her friend a script for Vampire Academy. There, Weinstein performed unwanted oral sex on her. After that incident, Mann said she decided to embark on a relationship with him. 'I just thought it would take the pain away,' Mann said on the stand. The charge relates to an alleged incident with Weinstein in a Manhattan hotel in March 2013. At the time, Mann was visiting New York City with friends and said she had arranged to meet Weinstein for breakfast, along with her friends, but found that he had arrived early at her hotel and was in the process of booking a hotel room. Despite her protests, Weinstein booked the room and she followed him upstairs. Once there, she claims he repeatedly held the door shut as she tried to leave and said she didn't want to do this, while he grabbed her arms and told her to undress. She did so, and said Weinstein then went to the bathroom and injected himself with a substance which she later found was to treat erectile dysfunction, and then performed unwanted penetrative sex on her. More to come. Best of The Hollywood Reporter Most Anticipated Concert Tours of 2025: Beyoncé, Billie Eilish, Kendrick Lamar & SZA, Sabrina Carpenter and More Hollywood's Most Notable Deaths of 2025 Hollywood's Highest-Profile Harris Endorsements: Taylor Swift, George Clooney, Bruce Springsteen and More

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store