logo
If everyone wants peace why is the war in Ukraine still raging? The answer is very simple

If everyone wants peace why is the war in Ukraine still raging? The answer is very simple

The Sun25-04-2025

EVERYONE says they want peace, so why is the war still raging in Ukraine?
The short answer is simple: Peace means very different things to very different people.
6
6
6
They have different goals and different motives. Vladimir Putin wants total conquest.
And he wants to be remembered as a modern Tsar who restored Russia's imperial greatness.
Ukraine wants to survive, as a sovereign independent nation.
Europe wants a chastened Russia and peace that lasts beyond six months.
Trump just wants a deal — any deal at any price — with minerals thrown in for good measure.
He wants to claim the glory and perhaps a Nobel Peace Prize for sorting out the carnage which he sees as Barack Obama and Joe Biden 's mess.
The American position is clear from the terrible deal they want Kyiv to accept.
Their so-called seven-point peace plan would freeze the war on the current front lines and force Ukraine to surrender almost all of its occupied territories — some 44,000 square miles — with almost nothing in return.
Spouted brazen lies
That is an area the size of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.
It is roughly 20 per cent of Ukraine's sovereign territory. In return, Russia would hand back small pockets of territory, including the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant, and give Ukraine unhindered access to the mouth of the River Dnieper.
Life in Ukraine under Putin-Trump carve-up- Families wrenched apart and threat of execution in echo of post-WW2 Germany
Moscow would also give up its ambitions to capture the parts of Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson provinces that its troops have been unable to take by force.
But crucially, for Ukraine, there are no security guarantees.
That means there is nothing to stop Russia catching its breath, rearming and invading again a few months or years later.
Does that sound unlikely? It is precisely what has happened already.
Moscow seized Crimea and parts of Donbas in 2014.
Peace deals known as Minsk I and Minsk II were signed in 2014 and 2015 respectively. But they both lacked guarantees.
The conflict was frozen at a lower intensity. Both sides accused each other of ceasefire violations, but there was nothing either side could do, save for complain or retaliate.
Then Russia massed the best part of 200,000 troops along Ukraine's northern and eastern borders.
The world watched in horror — and in disbelief — as Moscow spouted brazen lies that they had no plans to invade.
The rest, we could say, is history. More than a million troops have been killed and maimed since Putin ordered his full-scale invasion, as have tens of thousands of civilians.
Some 20,000 Ukrainian children have been forcibly deported to Russia.
And the world has grown tragically weary of Russian war crimes, be it prisoners of war horrifically castrated or the children's hospitals bombed.
Only this week we saw Russia unleash one of the biggest bombardments of the war, with 215 drones and missiles. It left 12 people dead including three children.
That is why Yulia Svyrydenko, Ukraine's no-nonsense economy minister, insisted that Kyiv was 'ready to negotiate but not to surrender'.
She said: 'Our people will not accept a frozen conflict disguised as peace.'
That is not just political rhetoric. It is a deeply held human yearning to live without the fear of slaughter and to sleep without the sound of air raid sirens.
But if the deal was not bad enough already, the crowning insult to Ukraine is that America would legally recognise Russia's ownership of Crimea.
Ukrainians are not stupid. They know that based on the current trajectory, they will have to trade land for peace. And they know that might include Crimea.
But what do they get in return?
6
6
Legally, Crimea is unambiguously Ukrainian. It has been part of Ukraine since 1991 when the country gained its independence from the USSR.
But Russia claims it is theirs since Catherine the Great seized it from the Ottomon Empire in 1783.
Crimea is a jewel in both sides' crowns. Almost every Ukrainian family feels an emotional connection to its seaside holiday resorts.
So do many Russians. But that is not why it matters.
It is a hugely strategic peninsular that gives Russia a warm- water port, submarine berths and easy access to the Mediterranean.
When Ukraine gained independence, Moscow leased back the Crimean port of Sevastopol.
It continued to be the headquarters of Russia's Black Sea Fleet right up to the point that the fleet was forced to retreat by a country without a navy, a country Trump says has no cards.
President Trump ranted at President Zelensky that 'Crimea was lost years ago'.
Trump is right. Crimea was lost in 2014. But he has learnt the wrong lesson from history.
Writing on Truth Social, he said: 'If he [Zelensky] wants Crimea, why didn't they fight for it eleven years ago when it was handed over to Russia without a shot being fired?'
Why? Because America and the West refused to back Ukraine to wage a war against Russia.
Nato was caught spectacularly off guard. They whined, but they did nothing. And that emboldened Putin.
Putin saw the gap between our words and actions. He saw the West was afraid, or at best unwilling, to stand up to Russia. And so he had another go in 2022.
That is why Lithuania, which feels the Russian threat acutely, said the American plan risked 'opening hell'.
If Putin gets away with this, what is next?
Good deals and bad deals
The American plan rewards Russian warmongering. That will not just embolden Putin, it will embolden tyrants everywhere. China is watching. Taiwan, take note.
That is why Britain, Ukraine, France and Germany have put forward an alternative.
The European plan includes 'robust security guarantees' including from America, no restrictions on Ukraine's armed forces and no restrictions on the presence of friendly foreign forces in Ukraine.
But it is only a plan. And disgracefully Donald Trump's envoys Marco Rubio and Steve Witkoff were too busy to come to London this week when it was being discussed. (Witkoff was likely too busy preparing for his fourth face-to-face meeting with Putin.)
Everyone says they want peace but Trump is the leader who has made it a priority.
He said he would end the war in a day, then 100 days. That deadline is on Wednesday.
He deserves to be applauded for trying to end the war. That is a truly noble aim.
But what he needs to realise is that how the war ends matters. Just like with his New York real estate, there are good deals and there are bad deals.
Russia must make concessions. So must Ukraine. The US and Nato allies must guarantee the peace.
Otherwise it is not a peace, it is just a pause. And after the pause, it gets worse.
6

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump responds to wild claims that Elon Musk took drugs at White House
Trump responds to wild claims that Elon Musk took drugs at White House

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Trump responds to wild claims that Elon Musk took drugs at White House

President Donald Trump answered a question about Elon Musk 's drug use while leading DOGE's efforts in Washington with a shrug on Monday. On Monday, Trump was asked about the May 30 The New York Times report that said while campaigning for Trump, Musk had been doing so much ketamine it was affecting his bladder, while also taking Ecstasy and psychadelic mushrooms. During Musk's goodbye fete in the Oval Office, which took place the day the Times' story came out, the billionaire was asked about the claims directly and responded by attacking the newspaper's 'Russiagate' reportage. 'Also, to be clear, I am NOT taking drugs! The New York Times was lying their a** off,' Musk wrote the next day on X. 'I tried *prescription* ketamine a few years ago and said so on X, so this not even news. It helps for getting out of dark mental holes, but haven't taken it since then.' During Monday's event, Trump was asked if Musk had drugs at the White House. 'I really don't know, I don't think so, I hope not,' Trump replied. He then added, 'I wish him well ... I just wish him well, very well, actually.' Trump and Musk had a remarkable falling out on Thursday that got so brutal, the SpaceX and Tesla head pushed that the president of the United States was named in the Jeffrey Epstein files. The president threatened to terminate Musk's government contracts. Musk said he'd support Trump's impeachment - and for him to be replaced by 40-year-old Vice President J.D. Vance. There were reports that said Trump planned to sell off the Tesla he purchased earlier this year to show support for Musk when liberals were boycotting and protesting at his businesses over his work leading DOGE, the Trump-created Department of Government Efficiency. 'I haven't heard that, I mean, I may move the Tesla around a little bit,' Trump told reporters Monday. He also said he'd keep Musk's Starlink system in place. Trump also said he never saw Musk get physical with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, which had also been alleged. 'No I didn't,' the president answered. 'They did have an argument, but I didn't see a lot of physicality there,' Trump said. There was, of course, cocaine found in the White House during the last administration, with the Daily Mail the first to publish pictures of the small bag. The FBI and the Secret Service investigated the discovered cocaine but a culprit was never found. The Biden White House pushed back when asked if it was possible the cocaine could have belonged to first son Hunter Biden, whose struggles with drug addiction were well known. The Biden family was enjoying a retreat at Camp David ahead of the Fourth of July holiday when the drugs were discovered in 2023. Since Trump took over, the FBI reopened a probe into the White House cocaine last month. The cocaine probe was among a number of investigations the FBI decided to reopen, FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino said on X.

Roman Abramovich breaks three-year silence on forced sale of Chelsea: Sanctioned Russian billionaire reveals his future plans in football in rare public statement
Roman Abramovich breaks three-year silence on forced sale of Chelsea: Sanctioned Russian billionaire reveals his future plans in football in rare public statement

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Roman Abramovich breaks three-year silence on forced sale of Chelsea: Sanctioned Russian billionaire reveals his future plans in football in rare public statement

Roman Abramovich has spoken for the first time since Russia's invasion of Ukraine forced him into selling Chelsea three years ago, with the secretive billionaire wanting to attend a game so he can bid a 'proper goodbye' to his beloved Blues. Abramovich announced in March 2022 that he had no choice but to seek a sale amid accusations that he was an ally of Russian president Vladimir Putin – an allegation which led to the UK government sanctioning him later that same month. However, a new book, called Sanctioned: The Inside Story of the Sale of Chelsea FC, paints a picture of Abramovich working secretly and tirelessly in peace talks from the invasion's get-go, including the day after he was poisoned in a Kyiv apartment. Abramovich sold the club to the Todd Boehly-Clearlake Capital consortium in May 2022 with the £2.5billion in proceeds being placed into a frozen UK bank account, supposedly so they could be donated to charities supporting victims of the war in Ukraine. Abramovich agreed to be interviewed for the book, revealing also how he never wants to own another club after losing Chelsea, who he purchased for £140million in 2003 to trigger a trophy-laden era. When asked on Chelsea and the future, Abramovich said: 'Perhaps one day there would be a situation where I could attend a match and say a proper goodbye, but nothing more than that. Abramovich revealed he wants to return to Chelsea at some point to say a 'proper goodbye' 'I don't have any interest in any role in a football club, certainly not a professional role. 'There might be something where I could help with academies and youngsters, giving greater opportunities to people from difficult backgrounds, if there were an initiative that could make a difference. 'But as for ownership or a professional role at a club, I am done with that in this lifetime.' Abramovich also said he would not allow himself to be distracted by the accusations towards him, including from the UK government. 'There is an old Russian saying, 'The dogs bark but the caravan keeps moving,' and that fits here,' he also told the book's author, Nick Purewal. 'Whatever I do, people will always accuse me of some kind of agenda. In the end, I have done what I have done simply to try to help.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store