Tributes paid to Green Party pioneer John Marjoram after his death aged 86
Mr Marjoram, from Stroud in Gloucestershire, died on Saturday after a long illness. He held the record as the longest continuously serving Green Party councillor.
John Marjoram, who has died aged 86, with Cate James-Hodges who is the newest-elected councillor on Stroud District Council (Stroud District Green Party/PA)
An environmentalist, Quaker and pacifist, Mr Marjoram was a co-founder of the Stroud Green Party in 1985 and was elected to the district council the following year.
As well as district councillor, Mr Marjoram was elected to the town council when it was formed in 1990, before becoming the UK's first Green Party mayor.
He grew up in rural Essex and developed an early interest in politics during dinner table debates with his staunch Labour father and Conservative-voting mother.
When he was called up for national service he cited his pacifist beliefs, and remained in an administrative role while others in his intake went to Malaysia to fight the Communists.
In 1968 he moved to Stroud with his young family, drawn there by his affiliation with the Quakers, who had a strong presence in the town.
Life-long pacifist Mr Marjoram seen addressing a Stop the War rally (Stroud District Green Party/PA)
Catherine Braun, Green Party councillor and leader of Stroud District Council, said: 'It was John who persuaded me to stand as a paper candidate, before I was eventually elected to Stroud District Council.
'He was such an influential and inspirational activist, not just to us here in Stroud district but across the whole Green movement. He will be much missed.'
Martin Baxendale, a district councillor in Stroud, said: 'John's first election leaflet for Stroud District Council in the 1980s inspired me.
'I read it, phoned him, and within half an hour he was on my doorstep talking me into joining the Green Party and standing for election to work alongside him.'
As a young boy Mr Marjoram developed a love of politics from debating his parents at the dinner table (Stroud District Green Party/PA)
Jonathan Edmunds added: 'John was an amazing man who inspired so many people into the Green Party and peace movement.
'A real maverick, they certainly don't make them like John any more.
'He was so passionate about politics but also cared deeply for all people and the planet.
'Stroud will be a lot quieter without him but he has certainly left a great legacy and it is for all of us to continue his work.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
MP removed from New Zealand parliament in heated debate over Palestinian recognition
New Zealand parliamentarian Chlöe Swarbrick was ordered to leave parliament on Tuesday during a heated debate over the government's response to the conflict in Gaza. An urgent debate was called after the centre-right government said on Monday it was weighing up its position on whether to recognise a Palestinian state. Close ally Australia on Monday joined Canada, the UK and France in announcing it would recognise a Palestinian state at a UN conference in September. Swarbrick, who is co-leader of the Green party, said New Zealand was a 'laggard' and an 'outlier' and the lack of decision was appalling, before calling on some government members to support a bill to 'sanction Israel for its war crimes'. The bill was proposed by her party in March and is supported by all opposition parties. 'If we find six of 68 government MPs with a spine, we can stand on the right side of history,' said Swarbrick. Speaker Gerry Brownlee said that statement was 'completely unacceptable' and that she had to withdraw it and apologise. When she refused, Swarbrick was ordered to leave parliament. Brownlee later clarified Swarbrick could return on Wednesday but if she still refused to apologise she would again be removed from parliament. New Zealand has said it will make a decision in September about whether it would recognise Palestine as a state. Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been strongly critical of growing international moves to recognise a Palestinian state. 'To have European countries and Australia march into that rabbit hole, just like that, fall right into it,' he said earlier this week. 'This canard is disappointing, and I think it's actually shameful. But it's not going to change our position.' Netanyahu went on to claim Israel was 'actually applying force judiciously, and they know it'. Foreign minister Winston Peters told parliament that over the next month the government would gather information and talk to partners, which would inform cabinet's decision. 'We'll be weighing this decision carefully rather than rushing to judgment,' Peters said. Along with the Green party, opposition parties Labour and Te Pati Maori support recognition of a Palestinian state. Labour parliamentarian Peeni Henare said New Zealand had a history of standing strong on its principles and values and in this case 'was being left behind'.
Daily Mirror
5 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
JD Vance strikes up unlikely friendship with The Apprentice star Thomas Skinner
JD Vance was told he was "not welcome" in the Cotswolds by a group of protesters who had gathered to wave signs, banners and placards in anger at the US politician's visit US Vice-President JD Vance was lauded as "a proper gent" - by The Apprentice star Thomas Skinner after the pair had a barbecue last night during his UK visit. The amicable scenes contrasted hugely to the protests earlier in the week in the Cotswolds near the politician's holiday residence. Locals there blasted Mr Vance's heavy security - seemingly a mix of police and US Secret Service agents - as "a bit over the top" and vented their anger at the visit altogether. But last night, Mr Vance, 41, continued his unlikely friendship with Mr Skinner, a charismatic Essex trader who has become a social media star since appearing on The Apprentice in 2019. Mr Vance invited the 34-year-old TV personality to a barbecue at the Cotswolds holiday residence, along with Cambridge Academic James Orr and Conservative MP Danny Kruger. The encounter came after lawmakers both here and in the US expressed concern for Donald Trump's mental state. Writing on social media, dad-of-three Mr Skinner said: "Here is a pic of Me and Vice President JD Vance towards the end of the night after a few beers. I'm overdressed in my suit, but when the VP invites you to a BBQ, you don't risk turning up in shorts an flip-flops. Cracking night in the beautiful English countryside with JD, his friends and family. Once in a lifetime. Bosh." In another reply, he added: "When the Vice President of the USA invites ya for a BBQ an beers, you say yes. Unreal night with JD and his friends n family. He was a proper gent. Lots of laughs and some fantastic food. A brilliant night, one to tell the grand kids about mate. Bosh." Mr Skinner shared photographs of him posing alongside Mr Vance, who had visited Chevening House in Kent where he and his family stayed with Foreign Secretary David Lammy for two days last week. He today will meet Nigel Farage - although the Reform UK leader did not meet with President Trump when he visited the UK last month. It is unclear if Mr Skinner, a pillow salesperson, and Mr Vance had ever met before but their friendship has blossomed through social media. The Apprentice star suggested he was delighted to accept the invite to the barbecue in Dean, Oxfordshire, a picturesque hamlet flooded with police and security this week. Among those who gathered in and around Dean to protest recently was Sue Moon, a 54-yearold therapist who said she didn't recognise the purpose of Mr Vance's trip. She added: "The Cotswolds is the home of ordinary people who are not comfortable with JD Vance coming here. What is happening in America regarding reproductive rights is appalling. "It's also very hard to welcome somebody who said that Britain is a random country. I am not sure what is the purpose of his visit and on a local level it has caused a lot of disruption and roads on our area have been closed."
Daily Mail
9 hours ago
- Daily Mail
EUAN MCCOLM: Shouldn't we worry about the youth we're creating for the future?
It was once a crucible of intellectual inquiry, a revered institution where some of the greatest minds in politics were sharpened. The late Labour leader John Smith, the much-mourned Liberal Democrat MP Charles Kennedy and Scotland's inaugural First Minister, Donald Dewar, were all schooled in the great art of debate at Glasgow University Union. In the chamber of the GUU in Glasgow's West End, they – and others, including broadcaster and journalist Andrew Neil and banker Angus Grossart – learned the skills that would take them to the top of their professions. And they did so while – often ferociously – disagreeing with their fellow students. On Saturday, a women's rights group was thrown out of the GUU after staff complained that banners bearing feminist slogans made them feel unsafe. Words such as 'Women's rights are not a hate crime ' and 'I'm not a vet – but I know what a dog is' were considered so dangerous by management at the union that members of Let Women Speak – whose booking to meet there had previously been accepted – were refused service and kicked out. Earlier, those feminists had gathered outside the nearby Kelvingrove Museum to demand – months after the Supreme Court ruled that sex is a matter of biology rather than feelings – recognition of women's legal rights. Inevitably, a counter protest of angry misogynists disguised as progressives turned up to try to drown out the words of the participants. Those shouting down feminists outside the museum had the law on their side. Quite correctly, their right to free speech allowed their protest to go ahead. However, management at the GUU are not on such solid ground. Let Women Speak – headed by activist Kellie-Jay Keen – had paid in advance for use of a space within the union for their post-rally gathering. Ms Keen has already announced plans to launch legal action against the union, which – in common with other organisations captured by crank ideologues – is now on course to learn a costly lesson in the law. Discrimination against anyone on the basis of their entirely legal beliefs is no trifling matter. Shortly after the group was evicted from the GUU premises, Ms Keen said the male manager told them he was closing the bar because the women's beliefs and opinions could constitute harassment towards their staff and make them feel unsafe. How much more of this nonsense are we expected to tolerate? There is a tendency for us, when we age, to romanticise the past and our place in it. Times were tougher, people worked harder, bullets were faster… the list of ways in which we ancients dismiss the challenges facing the young people of the day is long and varied. Pub bores sneer at their every choice; from their politics (always wrong) to their preferred breakfast (the idea of eating avocado on toast really upsets some people), there is no end of critical commentary about their fecklessness. I've always tried not to be that man. It's not always easy. Frequently, during political debate, we hear talk of the future we are creating for our young people. Environmental activists argue – with science on their side – that more must be done to halt the devastation caused by climate change while others focus on the ongoing housing crisis, demanding more affordable properties and arguing for rent restrictions. The increased use of short-term contracts and the continuing transformation of traditional industries add to the feelings of uncertainty with which young people must wrestle. If those of us longer in the tooth are honest, we must admit that – in so many ways – we had things easier. If you left school in, for example, the 1980s, there were college places, better quality apprenticeships and plentiful white-collar traineeships in banks and insurance companies. Yes, fewer young Scots went to university but those who did were more likely to find good jobs upon graduation than students today. And, once in work, the purchase of a house was a reasonably straightforward process rather than a pipe dream for all but the most fortunate. At some stage in life, usually in childhood, we all learn that the world does not care about our problems. There are some good, compassionate people who do, and great campaigning organisations that give focus to their concerns. But reality does not give a hoot about our battles or our feelings. The world keeps spinning while we struggle by. Difficult though the realisation that the world cannot be shaped to accommodate our needs – or whims – may be, it is a useful developmental stage. Exposure to reality – messy and unfair – breeds resilience. To employ the old cliché, what does not kill us, makes us stronger. How disturbing, then, that the GUU's position is that feminist slogans should be considered a threat to safety. Members of Let Women Speak and other campaigning groups argue that, when it comes to the debate over gender, those who pose a real danger are the activists who continue to campaign for the prescription of powerful puberty-blocking drugs to emotionally confused children and the placing of trans-identifying men in women's prisons. What happened at the GUU last Saturday is in keeping with the aggressive way trans activists have reacted to feminists at higher education establishments across the UK and beyond. The Aberdeen-born philosopher and writer Kathleen Stock was hounded out of her lecturing job at the University of Sussex by students and – for shame – staff for refusing to adhere to the belief that a man can become a woman because he says so. The academic was terrorised by anonymous activists to the point at which she needed personal security to go about her everyday life. Eventually, Professor Stock received compensation from the University of Sussex, which was also fined £585,000 by the Government's Office for Students for its failure to uphold freedom of speech and academic freedom. In January last year, an employment tribunal found that the Open University (OU) had discriminated against Jo Phoenix, a professor of criminology. The tribunal agreed bosses had failed in their duty to protect Professor Phoenix from harassment by colleagues and management. Like Kathleen Stock, Professor Phoenix's crime was to believe in the immutability of sex and the importance of women's rights. In common with the University of Sussex and the OU, the GUU is failing all who attend by censoring and excluding feminists with perfectly mainstream views. What terrible damage trans extremists have wrought across the higher education sector. Theirs is a culture in which intellectualism withers and dies. It remains legitimate to worry about the future we're creating for young people but there are also concerns about the young people we're creating for the future.
