logo
Vatican Alters Birth Records for Two African Cardinals Ahead of Conclave

Vatican Alters Birth Records for Two African Cardinals Ahead of Conclave

Newsweek06-05-2025
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The Vatican has updated the ages of two African cardinals—John Njue of Kenya and Philippe Ouédraogo of Burkina Faso—effectively making both eligible to vote in the upcoming papal conclave despite previously being considered too old.
The change appeared in the 2025 edition of the Vatican's Annuario Pontificio, the authoritative yearbook of the Holy See.
Why It Matters
Following the death of Pope Francis on April 21, preparations for the conclave are well underway. The rare adjustment has expanded the number of voting cardinals to 135, amplifying African representation in the selection of the next leader of the Roman Catholic Church—a shift that could better reflect the Church's growing base in the Global South.
The Vatican updated the ages of John Njue of Kenya and Philippe Ouédraogo of Burkina Faso—effectively making both eligible to vote in the upcoming papal conclave despite previously being considered too old.
The Vatican updated the ages of John Njue of Kenya and Philippe Ouédraogo of Burkina Faso—effectively making both eligible to vote in the upcoming papal conclave despite previously being considered too old.
Getty Images
Since the reforms of Pope Paul VI in 1970, the rule disqualifying cardinals over 80 from voting in papal elections has shaped the balance of power inside the conclave. The sudden revision of birthdates shortly before a conclave alters that balance—especially by adding two senior prelates from Africa, a region that has seen exponential Catholic growth but limited influence in papal elections.
What to Know
The corrections alter previously accepted records that listed both Njue and Ouédraogo as born before 1945, which would have made them too old to vote under Church law. Their newly listed birth years—1946 and 1947, respectively—bring them under the canonical age limit of 80 for papal electors.
Concerns have been raised within Catholic and media circles about whether retroactive alterations—particularly for electors from regions with less formal civil documentation systems—might be seen as political manipulation.
"Not all countries enjoy the same quality of registry offices," explained Holy See Press Office director Matteo Bruni to reporters on Tuesday, and the initial statements on the date of birth "have been changed to a valid document."
However, despite the change, only Ouédraogo will participate in the voting. Njue, 79, will miss the conclave due to ill health, according to a statement from Kenya's Archdiocese of Nairobi. Earlier confusion had suggested he had not been invited, but officials have since clarified that he was invited but had to decline due to medical reasons.
"Although [the cardinal] is eligible to participate and was officially invited... owing to his current health condition [he] will be unable to travel to Rome," a statement signed by Archbishop Philip Anyolo said.
Njue, who retired in 2021, is now one of only two eligible cardinals not participating in the conclave—the other being Cardinal Antonio Cañizares of Spain—bringing the total number of votes to 133, most of them reportedly handpicked by Francis, according to Vatican insiders.
Cardinal Pierbattista Pizzaballa arrives in the New Hall of the Synod at the Vatican, Tuesday, May 6, 2025, the last time before the start of the conclave starting in the afternoon of Wenesday, May 7,...
Cardinal Pierbattista Pizzaballa arrives in the New Hall of the Synod at the Vatican, Tuesday, May 6, 2025, the last time before the start of the conclave starting in the afternoon of Wenesday, May 7, when they will elect the successor of Pope Francis. More
AP
The next pope will face a Church shaped by Francis's appointments and reforms. His tenure saw major structural changes, including the decentralization of the Vatican's power and the appointment of more non-European cardinals than any of his predecessors.
How the Next Pope Is Chosen
The election of a pope follows centuries-old Vatican traditions. The College of Cardinals will vote in secret ballots inside the Sistine Chapel. A two-thirds majority is required to elect a new pope. If no consensus is reached, additional rounds of voting will continue until a candidate emerges with the necessary support.
When a round of voting does not reach consensus, ballots are burned and the black smoke that appears from the Sistine Chapel chimney signals to those watching on television and in St. Peter's Square that the conclave continues.
When white smoke appears, a new pope has been chosen.
What People Are Saying
Ulrich Lehner, professor of theology at the University of Notre Dame, told Newsweek: "Pope Francis selected the majority of the cardinals who possess the right to vote. However, his approach to governance, characterized by unilateral decisions made without consultation with the College of Cardinals, has made it impossible to form interpersonal relationships among them."
Archbishop Philip Anyolo said in a statement: "Let us also continue to pray for the good health of His Eminence John Cardinal Njue."
What Happens Next
As the conclave to elect the next pope begins Wednesday at the Vatican, four candidates have emerged as clear favorites—Cardinals Pietro Parolin, Luis Antonio Tagle, Matteo Zuppi, and Pierbattista Pizzaballa.
They all have more than a 10 percent probability of being selected to replace Pope Francis as the head of the Catholic Church, according to the betting site Polymarket.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Carney voices support for Trump's peace efforts — and encourages US security guarantees
Carney voices support for Trump's peace efforts — and encourages US security guarantees

Politico

time5 minutes ago

  • Politico

Carney voices support for Trump's peace efforts — and encourages US security guarantees

The Canadian leader's message comes after several U.S. partners in Europe showed support for Trump's trilateral proposal on Friday. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney signaled support on Saturday for President Donald Trump's efforts to end the war in Ukraine. | Mandel Ngan/AFP via Getty Images By Giselle Ruhiyyih Ewing 08/16/2025 06:21 PM EDT Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney on Saturday joined other Western leaders in support of President Donald Trump's work to end the war in Ukraine and lauded what he described as the 'openness of the United States to providing security guarantees' for Ukraine after peace is reached. 'The leadership of President Trump and the United States is creating the opportunity to end Russia's illegal war in Ukraine. Robust and credible security guarantees are essential to any just and lasting peace,' Carney wrote in a statement. 'I welcome the openness of the United States to providing security guarantees as part of the Coalition of the Willing's efforts.' The 'coalition of the willing' refers to a group of nations, including Canada, convened to provide military support for Ukraine after the war. A virtual meeting of the loose coalition is set to take place on Sunday, spearheaded by French President Emmanuel Macron and U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer.

Canadian government ends Air Canada strike, imposes binding arbitration
Canadian government ends Air Canada strike, imposes binding arbitration

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

Canadian government ends Air Canada strike, imposes binding arbitration

The Canadian government brought the Air Canada strike to a screeching halt Saturday by imposing binding arbitration on the airline and its flight attendants. The move came less than 12 hours after Air Canada's 10,000 flight attendants walked off the job, at 1 a.m. Saturday, after months of stalled negotiations over a new contract. Canada's labor policy minister, Patty Hajdu, said she met with both sides Friday night and determined there was a low likelihood of a near-term deal. 'They are so far apart on a number of issues that they are going to need some help,' she told the Wall Street Journal. 3 The Canadian government imposed binding arbitration Saturday to bring a strike by the country's largest airline carrier to a screeching halt. AFP via Getty Images 'This is not a decision that I've taken lightly, but the potential for immediate negative impact on Canadians and our economy is simply too great,' she said. The most contentious issue in the contract talks has been the Canadian Union of Public Employees' demand for compensation for time spent on the ground between flights and when helping passengers board. Flight crews are currently only compensated when their airplane is moving. 3 Striking Air Canada workers walk the picket line at Pearson International Airport in Toronto. AFP via Getty Images Montreal-based Air Canada formally requested this week the government impose binding arbitration, arguing talks were at an impasse. 3 Air Canada said it was premature to discuss when flights would resume as the arbitration order was just unveiled. AP The union in a statement said the government gave Air Canada what it wanted. The union, known as CUPE, made 'reasonable proposals for a fair cost-of-living wage increase,' it said. 'Air Canada responded by sandbagging the talks.' Air Canada said it was premature to discuss when flights would resume as the arbitration order was just unveiled. Air Canada transports about 130,000 passengers daily, operates nearly 200 flights daily to the U.S., and flies to nearly 60 countries.

Why Putin Must Be Thrilled With the Result of the Alaska Summit
Why Putin Must Be Thrilled With the Result of the Alaska Summit

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Why Putin Must Be Thrilled With the Result of the Alaska Summit

Russian President Putin speeches during their joint press conference with U.S. Persident Donald Trump after their meeing on war in Ukraine at U.S. Air Base In Alaska on August 15, 2025, in Anchorage, Alaska, United States. Credit - Contributor—Getty Images Vladimir Putin wanted a lot of things from his visit to Alaska. A ceasefire in Ukraine was not one of them. Throughout the summer, his troops have been grinding out advances along the frontline, and they achieved a sudden breakthrough in the days before the Alaska summit. Putin's main objective was to buy time for his troops to continue those advances, all while avoiding the 'very severe consequences' that President Donald Trump promised to impose on the Russians if they refused to call a ceasefire. It appears Putin succeeded on both counts. In his public statements on Friday night, Trump made clear he no longer plans to impose any economic pain on Russia. 'Because of what happened today, I think I don't have to think about that,' he told Fox News after the summit. 'I may have to think about it in two weeks or three weeks or something, but we don't have to think about that right now.' In Trump's understanding, two or three weeks is a malleable term, as the New York Times recently noted, 'not a measurement of time so much as a placeholder.' Read more: From the Sidelines, Ukraine Prepares to Watch as U.S., Russia Discuss Its Fate On the battlefield, however, it could mean the difference between holding off the Russians and allowing them to seize another region of Ukraine. The epicenter of the fighting in recent weeks has been the region of Donetsk, where Ukrainian troops were able to stop the latest Russian breakthrough. The latest maps of the fighting indicate that the Kremlin remains determined to seize that region. Another few weeks of Russian infantry assaults could achieve that goal, allowing Putin to negotiate with the U.S. and Ukraine from a position of greater advantage. 'Things at the front are going well for them,' a senior Ukrainian military officer tells TIME. 'Slow but steady.' These gains helped Putin negotiate in Alaska from a position of strength. Ahead of their talks, Trump indicated that he wants the warring sides to 'swap' territories, with Ukraine giving away its own land in exchange for areas Russia has occupied. 'They've occupied some very prime territory,' Trump said a few days before his summit with Putin. 'We're going to try and get some of that territory back for Ukraine.' Trump failed to achieve that in Alaska, and his chances of getting what he calls a 'fair deal' for Ukraine diminish as Russian forces continue to gain ground. For reasons that remain unclear, Trump said he believes that Putin wants to stop the fighting. 'I believe he wants to get it over,' Trump said. 'Now, I've said that a few times, and I've been disappointed.' Alaska marks the latest of these disappointments, but Trump has shown no inclination to change his strategy. He did not even secure some of the easier concessions from Putin that might have given the Americans something to show for the Alaskan spectacle. One of Russia's leading dissidents, Yulia Navalnaya, had urged Trump to secure the release of Russian political prisoners jailed for their opposition to the war. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, for his part, has urged the U.S. to demand the release of thousands of Ukrainian children that Russian forces have abducted from the war zone. Neither of these issues came up in the official statements in Alaska. Appearing side by side on Friday, Trump gave his guest the floor, allowing Putin to deliver another one of his rambling history lessons, a maneuver that has been likened to diplomatic 'filibustering.' When Trump's turn came to speak, he admitted that the talks had not resulted in a deal. The next step toward peace, he suggested, would be to arrange a meeting between Putin and Zelensky. But the Russian side has given no indication that it would be open to such an arrangement. Instead, at the end of their press conference in Alaska, Putin suggested in English that he and Trump would meet 'next time in Moscow,' an idea that seemed to catch Trump off guard. 'Oh, that's an interesting one,' he replied. 'I'll get a little heat on that one.' This final exchange pointed again to the paltry outcomes of the summit. The two sides had not even agreed on a location or a format for the next stage of the peace process, while Putin came away confident enough to suggest that his capital would be a fitting venue. It was hard to blame him. Given the red-carpet treatment he received in Alaska, Putin had every reason to feel like a winner coming out of those talks. He had, after all, achieved his main objective, and given nothing away. Contact us at letters@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store