Ukraine, Russia hold second round of direct talks in Istanbul
Delegates from Russia and Ukraine have gathered in Turkey for their second round of direct peace talks.
The meeting began shortly before 3 p.m. on Monday at a palace in Istanbul. The previous round took place on May 16, and was the first face-to-face meeting between the two countries in more than three years.
Once again, the Russian delegation is being led by Vladimir Medinsky, a senior aide to President Vladimir Putin, while Ukrainian Defence Minister Rustem Umerov is representing Kyiv. Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan is attending as a mediator.
They are believed to be discussing each other's memorandum on a potential peace treaty.
The Russian side is expected to call for the withdrawal of Ukrainian troops from the four regions in the country's east and south, which Russia says it annexed.
Ukraine will likely seek a full and unconditional ceasefire, as well as summit-level talks toward realizing a lasting peace. The negotiations are expected to be difficult as the two sides remain far apart on their conditions for peace.
Intense fighting has continued up to the meeting. Russian forces stepped up their offensive in eastern Ukraine, resulting in casualties.
Meanwhile, Ukrainian media reported on Sunday that the country's security agency launched drone strikes on airfields in Russia and struck 41 aircraft, including strategic bombers.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NHK
3 hours ago
- NHK
Russian rocket attack on Ukraine's Sumy causing casualties, people to flee
Russian forces are intensifying their offensive in the northeastern Ukrainian region bordering Russia, with reports of civilian casualties and residents forced to flee. The Russian defense ministry said on Tuesday that its troops took control of another settlement about 20 kilometers north of the city of Sumy. The city's urban areas came under rocket attack on Tuesday. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said four people were killed and about 30 others wounded. Authorities said they were evacuating residents in more than 200 settlements in the region, but that more than 35,000 people remain in high risk areas. The authorities condemned the Russian offensive, saying consecutive days of shelling were putting an increasing number of civilians in danger. The Russian military is aiming to expand areas under its control to create what it calls a "buffer security zone" along the border with Ukraine. The head of Ukraine's presidential office, Andriy Yermak, said he recently met separately with US special envoy to Ukraine, Keith Kellogg, and Steve Witkoff, US special envoy to the Middle East, in the United States. Yermak said they discussed direct talks between Ukraine and Russia, and that he made it clear "Moscow does not want a ceasefire." His call for stronger sanctions against Russia is seen as an attempt to maintain the involvement of the Trump administration.
NHK
5 hours ago
- NHK
Report: Russia's security chief Shoigu in North Korea for talks with Kim Jong Un
Russia's state-run TASS news agency has reported that Russian Security Council Secretary Sergei Shoigu is in Pyongyang to meet with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un. The report on Wednesday said Shoigu made the trip at the instruction of President Vladimir Putin. TASS said Shoigu and Kim are expected to discuss the comprehensive strategic partnership treaty between the two countries. The news agency also said the two are likely to exchange views on a plan to honor North Korean soldiers dispatched to Russia to assist in the fighting against Ukraine. Diplomatic sources say the talks will focus on further strengthening bilateral ties ahead of the one-year anniversary of their treaty on June 19. Putin invited Kim to Russia when the two leaders met in the North Korean capital in June last year. Observers are watching to see whether Shoigu and Kim will talk about the timetable for a visit and other details.
Japan Times
7 hours ago
- Japan Times
The Europeans are facing an existential choice
For years, I have taken every opportunity to urge the European Union and its member states to invest more in defense. When Russian President Vladimir Putin launched his full-scale invasion of Ukraine, I repeatedly asked (as a member of the European Parliament) what further proof we would need to recognize the threats facing all of Europe. What would we — as Europeans — do if our security was threatened while our closest ally, the United States, was otherwise engaged? Today, we confront that very situation. U.S. officials are openly stating that they do not intend to devote most of their time or resources to dealing with what they deem European issues. According to Secretary of State Marco Rubio, the U.S. has 'other priorities to focus on.' I agree. The global superpower has global responsibilities and the number of flash points that might demand the U.S. government's attention seems only to be growing. In addition to challenges in the Western hemisphere, instability in the Middle East and severe tensions between two nuclear powers — India and Pakistan — there is also the paramount goal of redefining relations with China. Moreover, according to the official U.S. Defense Department planning doctrine, the U.S. can no longer fight more than one major war at a time. The new U.S. administration has been communicating its position plainly. 'We're here today to directly and unambiguously express that stark strategic realities prevent the United States of America from being primarily focused on the security of Europe,' Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced in Brussels this February. And U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance was even more direct, stating that 'Europe's entire security infrastructure ... has been subsidized by the United States of America,' even though it is neither in Europe's nor America's interest 'for Europe to be a permanent security vassal of the United States.' President Donald Trump himself has repeatedly accused Europe of 'freeloading' and 'taking advantage' of the U.S.. Europeans may not like what we hear, but we cannot pretend not to hear it. We must be prepared for the U.S. to wash its hands not only of Ukraine, but even of Europe. Le Monde's Sylvie Kauffmann recently argued, 'Preparing for the worst is a safer bet than hoping for the best.' We can and should do both — hope and prepare. Trust but verify. Ever since Trump announced his presidential candidacy back in 2015, there have been two schools of thought on interpreting his words. Some argue that we should take him seriously but not literally, whereas others urge us to do the opposite: treat him literally but not always seriously. I believe that the most reasonable and respectable approach is to treat whatever the U.S. president says both literally and seriously. Given the current state of the world, this implies that Europe faces an existential choice. We can enter the global game united as a heavyweight competitor or we can condemn ourselves to marginalization. Much has been done already to become a heavyweight contender. Since 2016 — just before Trump's first term — NATO members, excluding the U.S., have increased their annual defense spending by 98%, from $255 billion to $506 billion. Moreover, after three years of Putin waging war on Ukraine, the EU and its member states have proven willing to spend even more and to embrace a more cooperative, rational and effective approach to defense planning and procurement. The new joint defense agreement between the EU and the United Kingdom is another step demonstrating this new strategic solidarity. Deterring Russia is not beyond our means. We don't need to match U.S. military capabilities; rather, we just need enough to force Putin to reconsider his chances of winning in a confrontation with a united European community of democratic nation-states. The people of Europe are clearly demanding that we develop a revitalized European defense posture. According to the European Commission, 71% of EU citizens believe that the bloc must strengthen its ability to produce military equipment, while 77% support a common defense and security policy. This gives European leaders a mandate to think and act boldly. But how long will it take to restore peace to Ukraine and stability to Europe? I believe we must act on the basis of three assumptions. First, we should view this as a war of a former imperial metropole against what it regards as a mutinous colony. History suggests that colonial wars usually take about a decade to end. Anything less than that should be considered a bonus. Second, we should accept that for the invading country to start negotiating in good faith, it must conclude that the invasion was a mistake. It must acknowledge that the costs of war and of keeping the former colony subjugated are greater than whatever benefits the colony can possibly yield. Third, given the above, we should remember that colonial wars are usually finished by a different group of leaders than those who started the fighting. Yes, boosting European defense capabilities while supporting Ukraine will cost money. Since the start of Russia's war of aggression, the EU and its member states have provided more than $165 billion in support for Ukraine and its people. That is a significant amount, but it is still less than 1% of the combined gross domestic product of the EU's member countries (some $19 trillion). We can certainly do more. And as we reinvigorate Europe's defenses, we must not lose sight of why we are doing it: we are acting for our own safety, not to undermine transatlantic relations but to improve them. To avoid a strategic dilemma, we Europeans must be able to help the U.S. defend its allies by taking on our fair share of the security burden. Radosław Sikorski is foreign minister of Poland. © Project Syndicate, 2025
